₦airaland Forum

lorddeni: Seems you just want to find a way to muddle things up. My point in the last post was once again, you are judging atheists based on your own theistic understanding by claiming most atheists here save for your precious Kay 17 use the same strategies for getting their point across as you theistic folks. This statement itself betrays your insistence on judging atheists from your own point of view-whether accurate or not.

I bet you if we take a poll of the atheists who have commented here, not one will agree with your point of imitating you theists in getting their points across- not even Kay 17 will agree with you here my dear.

Emmyk: Cant sleep. A mosquito wanna feast on me!

I'll see its end before I sleep! *cocks gun*

lorddeni: @texanomaly,

Just like the average theist, your post only further underlines the point I was making. Stop judging atheists based on your own narrow confines. An atheist becomes an atheist because he/she feels having done some honest deep thinking of all the facts available to the human race, the most intellectually honest thing for him/her to do is to be an atheist/agnostic.

Because the underlying basis for coming to such a conclusion is knowledge, it only presupposes that if you theists can find a way to resolve your myriad of contradictions and proffer an intellectually honest & convincing knowledge-based logic to theism, we would be willing to consider your points on their merits.

Atheists don't feel a need to defend their space because basically it's a free space but when quasi-intellectuals like the OP create a thread to 'lecture atheists', you guys can not run away from the challenge of beating us on a purely logical basis rather than leaning on the disprovable basis of your atheism and simply expecting us to eat what you are dishing because ultimately to you, your faith says so

Emmyk: My heading is swearing go. And vixen is not here to help deflate. Lawd have mercy

Emmyk: So, what's up?

Logicboy03: Huh? Did the fruit kill them? Did the bible actually say that Adam and Eve were immortal?

Jbluv55: Hello Texan , anomaly , aly . Tis bin a while, hope my boots are still intact . I made a couple of Shout Outs and forgot to mention you (apologies) but will definitely make you numba one in the next .

elrony: And an awesome new year ahead for u dearie

elrony:

MERRY XMAS FAM!!!!!


[size=5pt]hope u guys are giving Santa a run for his money? [/size]

Emmyk: Something like that.

Happy Sunday, buddy.

Logicboy03: See the lies?
So, clearly he has indicted himself. This is why he didnt want to explain his faulty reasons for banning me

Logicboy03: He explained nothing....see how he has exposed himself

Logicboy03: Even worse, back up your claim where I duplicated stuff...you are now even trying to lie that I was spamming.....haba....I don suffer

Logicboy03: So you now ban on what you are not sure of? You "think"? How about doing things based on what you "know" rather than "think"?
You misinterpreted my comment and how I used the word animal
If calling someone "animal" is enough for banishment
What about
"mumu"?
"Intellectually weak"?
These are clear cut insults that I showed you after I got banned.......did you ban the people who used those two insults?

Logicboy03: See the lies? Urban dictionary? Really?
http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/45649/what-does-it-mean-to-call-someone-a-tool
Tool also means "pompous" or "douche"

Logicboy03: Biased mod
What about the other insult? Bias?

Logicboy03: Can everyone see how Mynd_44 consistently misinterprets my comments?
Is it clear now?

Logicboy03: Too late bro....too freaking late.....
Your modding sucks

Logicboy03: Thank you.
It is as clear as daylight. Mynd_44 had a vendetta against me. Closely monitoring and misinterpreting my comments

Logicboy03: Is this false accusation funny to you?
Please, someone should caution this joke of a mod

Logicboy03: See how Mods just talk carelessly without checking facts? I am rationalmind?
Seun needs to have a re-education camp for some mods

Logicboy03: Pride wont let him
At least, everyone can see that he was wrong.

Logicboy03: [size=18pt]Facts proven so far[/size]
1) Mynd_44 is too heavy-handed
2) Mynd_44 misinterpreted my comments
3) Mynd_44 is not yet adapted to the religion section
We need new mods, Seun. Also, my ban should be lifted

Logicboy03: There are times that you are cute
There are times that you are ridiculous

@ bold
That was not cute. You might want to revisit the last time that you were banned

Please, shift.

Logicboy03: Really? Because mine is also an american definition.

Logicboy03: Please, anyone with a dictionary, does "tool" mean "fool"?

Logicboy03: See the lies?


-"tool" does not mean "fool"
-You were not a mod when at least 25 of the last of my comments were hidden. Those 25 were mostly from discussing in the complaints section not insults.
-You read my mind to know what I implied by "animal" abi? Just as how you misread the meaning of "tool"
-Ajibam was derailing my thread and I told him to use his brain



So, clearly he has indicted himself. This is why he didnt want to explain his faulty reasons for banning me

Logicboy03: Like I said in the op....if we elect mods by ourselves out of the regulars, we can't complain. Plus I think that you, texanomaly and pagan would make great mods

Alfa Seltzer: I asked this question before but religious people ran away. DESCRIBE YOUR CREATOR!

Logicboy03: This thread should be closed.

Not one atom of sense in the op

"evolution of kinds"
"forensic science refutes atheism"


This thread contains false information

1) Atheism is not evolution
2) Science can not and does not refute atheism.

aManFromMars: Is Logicboy banned?

plaetton: I rest my case.

Kay 17: Now we both agree about mutation.

*edited

nnofaith: yes it was a "collabo" thing 2 "Gees" laying down the tracks.

gangster style.

rationalmind: Good work my brothers in the "lord". The wilfully ignorant poster has been debunked and his arguments shred into pieces.

Better luck next time op. Think properly before you post trash next time.

rationalmind: If you even read texs argument properly, all she did was to use the "you too" fallacy. Someone accused the OP of confirmation bias and all tex had to say is, "Atheists do the same too."

Even if we agree atheists do the same which isnt even true, does that justify the op's use of confirmation bias?

Like I said initially, christians and muslims can hardly debate without resorting to the "you too" fallacy. Thats the same tactic they tend to employ when debating atheists

maclatunji: I am not your pastor obviously.

aManFromMars: Is Logicboy banned?

GeneralShepherd: Even you Tex, I find it dubious how christians become so agreeable with muslims when debating the existence of God!

Is Allah the same with Yahweh?
Do you believe the world was created by Allah? Or did they work together?

lorddeni: @maclatunji

You know the problem with you quasi-intellectual theologians, you always start all your arguments from a non-scientific viewpoint of finding means to justify an already pre-determined end, you then adopt any pseudo-knowledge to help, you root your argument in bases totally unagreeable to atheists/agnostics & when we see little or no point debating you in an arena you've built to your utmost convenience, you lay claim to the supremacy of your fallacies. What you should be more worried about should be how without mosques or churches or dedicated promoters, atheism/agnosticism keep gaining ground.

Logicboy03: What the fuq?

Logicboy03: The serpent wanted them to gain knowledge. He even told them the truth that-
1) they wont die
2) they will gain knowledge
The serpent was a good guy!!

Logicboy03: This thread should be closed.

Not one atom of sense in the op

"evolution of kinds"
"forensic science refutes atheism"


This thread contains false information

1) Atheism is not evolution
2) Science can not and does not refute atheism.

Alfa Seltzer: yes.

ajibam banned me and I lit a candle on his name. you know the rest.

Alfa Seltzer: what do you means long time? we chatted yesterday.

Alfa Seltzer: I am.