₦airaland Forum

LordMecuzy:
I'm igbo and I don't hate Buhari, But I hate all our corrupt leaders/Politicians...

When they want to steal our wealth they all come together peacefully and share our National cake among themselves with no tribal sentiments..

But throw tribalism down to the gullible Nigerians to feed on. If only all tribes can come together and push away our common enemy which is corruption..(PDP,APC,APGA,Labour Party) are just names of political parties..

off to my work jare

Buhari is also very corrupt

Also
The various tribes have the group they belong in
And each of these groups cannot come together they all not the same people
They have different idiology (some feudilism, some republicanism), beliefs (religion etc), aspirations (some progress, some backwardness) as well as value system
So trying to bring these groups together will only result in chaos and conflict as is what's obtainable presently

Smilelo:
I don't blame the writer of this post,

If you want One Nigeria, come out and protest for one Nigeria.
I bet you, una no go reach 10.

Mumu people.

Lol

CACAWA:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19OQPmVui0Y

Cc. Lalasticlala

Gowon can explain himself all he wants
Deep down he knows
BIafra is about to be restored soon

kosovo:
Firstly, let me point out that I am not Ibo, neither do I have a bias towards the people.

101-years down the road, since the demonic Lord Lugard almagamented the Northern and Southern protectorate, Nigeria, 55-years after Independence, it's future is still in shambles.

No doubt, only in Nigeria uncertainty winds precipitates the entire masses conditionally in this twenty-first century of human existence. Criminals are promoted from the valley of the downtrodden to the helms of affair. While evil masterminders receive the highest ovation when flaunting their magical over night wealth, the frustrated masses sing praises as solidarity agreement for people that mortgaged their future and that of their upcoming generation.

Instead of northern leadership to strategize on how to sensitize their people for basic education, they converge to discuss office of the presidency which is now a mirage. Opportunity that does not repeat itself is the type the North had for 38 years and failed to maximize it. Any attempt to impose such criminality once again will amount to infringing on the rights of other people. Such people may not fold their hands and watch vampires champion their destiny under “Born to Rule”mantra.

What is going on in Nigeria today is for the best interest of those with eyes but cannot see. Those with mouth but cannot speak.Those with ears but cannot hear. Those with legs but cannot walk into their freedom. Those with nose but cannot smell the pollution in the air.Those with hands but cannot write. God gave these natural senses to men so that they will use it to improve and maximize the earth to their betterment. In other parts of the world, these senses helped them to build a better nation on earth while in Nigeria, what is paramount is the visibility of a failed state-the consequences of the British colonies not asking enough questions before amalgamating people of different religion, culture, language and vision together as one people.

The only way Nigeria can survive is to re-visit the Aburi Accord. Ojukwu saw 48-years ago, what scholars and national shakers and movers are seeing in 2015.

Yakubu Gowon, before he goes back to his ancestors, must swallow his pride, apologize to Nigerians for taking advise from his Emirs and Sultan to kill the Aburi Accord.

Confederation is the only solution to "one" Nigeria. Britain does it, China does it. Even in the U.S we have semi-independent states like Texas. In 2014, Texas threatened to break-off from the U.S.

I have no clue why some parts of Nigeria are scared to the bones when they hear Biafra, yet they don't want to do the right thing. You can't force a tribe into a union and enslave them, even after killing 5-million of their people. Life doesn't work that way. There is a limit one can be pushed, and he will retaliate in a deadly fashion.

Nigeria was dead on arrival, we can either amend it by going to the Aburi Accord or watch it disintegrate before our eyes.

The aburi accord was not the solution
Disbandment of the slave camp aka Nigeria was and still is the only solution

As for gowon
The blood of his people will be the only apology
So no need for him to apologise
This is natures way of balancing things

carnegiefan:
Biafra will be totally different from Nigeria. I read today that the IMF is pressing Nigeria to devalue the Naira. The main reason IMF gave is that 90% of Nigeria's foreign exchange comes from oil exports. While watching a show concerning South Korea, one Korean said that Korea is constantly working and producing products because his country has no natural resource. For a country without natural resource to have 3 times Nigeria's GDP with only about a third of Nigeria's population speaks volumes about how flat footed Nigeria is.
Biafra, the only hope for African humanity.

Absolutely true

gab264:
BIAFRA SET TO BECOME THE NEWEST NATION ON EARTH.Since 1990, 34 new countries have been created. The dissolution of the USSR and Yugoslavia in the early 1990’s caused the creation of most of the newly independent states.
1. Armenia
2. Azerbaijan
3. Belarus
4. Estonia
5. Georgia
6.Kazakhstan
7. Kyrgyzstan
8. Latvia
9.Lithuania
10. Moldova
11. Russia
12. Tajikistan
13. Turkmenistan
14. Ukraine
15. UzbekistanFormer YugoslaviaYugoslavia dissolved in the early 1990’s into five independent countries.
16/17.). Bosnia and Herzegovina, February 29, 1992
18.) Croatia, June 25, 1991
19.) Macedonia (officially The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) declared independence on September 8, 1991 but wasn’t recognized by the United Nations until 1993 and the United States and Russia in February of 1994
20.) Serbia and Montenegro, (also known as the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia), April 17, 1992 (see below for separate Serbia and Montenegro entries)
21.) Slovenia, June 25, 1991Other New CountriesThirteen other countries became independent through a variety of causes.
22.) •March 21, 1990 – Namibia became independent of South Africa.
23.) •May 22, 1990 – North and South Yemen merged to form a unified Yemen.
24.) •October 3, 1990 – East Germany and West Germany merged to form a unified Germany after the fall of the Iron Curtain.
25.) •September 17, 1991 – The Marshall Islands was part of the Trust Territory of Pacific Islands (administered by the United States) and gained independence as a former colony.
26.) •September 17, 1991 – Micronesia, previously known as the Caroline Islands, became independent from the United States.
27.)•January 1, 1993 – The Czech Republic and Slovakia became independent nations when Czechoslovakia dissolved.
28.) •May 25, 1993 – Eritrea was a part of Ethiopia but seceded and gained independence.
29.) •October 1, 1994 – Palau was part of the Trust Territory of Pacific Islands (administered by the United States) and gained independence as a former colony.
30.) •May 20, 2002 – East Timor (Timor-Leste) declared independence fromPortugal in 1975 but did not became independent from Indonesia until 2002.
31.) •June 3, 2006 – Montenegro was part of Serbia and Montenegro (also known as Yugoslavia) but gained independence after a referendum.
32.) •June 5, 2006 – Serbia became its own entity after Montenegro split.
33.) •February 17, 2008 – Kosovo unilaterally declared independence from Serbia.
34.) •July 9, 2011 – South Sudan peacefully seceded from Sudan following a January 2011 referendum. Sudan itself was the first to recognize South Sudan and did so one day early, on July 8, 2011.Nigeria embraces more than 40 ethnic groups and languages lumped crudely together by colonial mapmakers. There is nothing wrong with demanding for a secession in a peaceful manner. In a sane country, most secession and agitation for autonomy does not have to result in bloodshed… so enough of the constant ranting about Biafra in relation to war.Ethiopia allowed Eritrea to peacefully secede in 1991, though they later started having a boundary dispute.A peaceful secession, like when Czechoslovakia broke up, or when Montenegro left its federation with Serbia to become independent for the first time since 1918…and many others.

‪#‎BiafraOrDeath
‬‪#‎FreeNnamdiKanu

Biafra is not a new nation
It is actually one of the oldest nations ever to exist

Remii:
watch this bro before fanning ember of war.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGSRa6KE_rg

No need trying to blackmail people
Biafra will be restored
War or not

Bishopmayowa:
Do this people really think of happenings around them? Is secedding the best option?

Yes
Not just for Biafra
But also for the other groups of people that were enslaved

Episteme2:
Critics and notable columnists who scoff at the March 28
dethronement of ex-President Goodluck Jonathan have
continued to belittle the coronation of President
Muhaammadu Buhari. Before the presidential election, they
had argued that while Dr Jonathan was not perfect, and
could in fact be trusted to improve considerably in his
second term should he get it, President Buhari’s democratic,
suprapersonal and secularist credentials would remain
fettered by his background and limited exposure. Recent
political developments, especially the bitter and frenetic
jostling for presidency positions and key federal
appointments, have given more ammunition to the critics. It
is, however, now no longer clear where genuine criticism
begins and where rabid partisanship stops. More baffling,
the said critics and columnists have turned round to accuse
critics and columnists who denounced Dr Jonathan in favour
of then candidate Buhari of embracing mindless
propaganda and heedless partisanship.
Some of these notable columnists like Femi Aribisala and
Yinka Odumakin of course have the right to pursue and
prosecute private and public agenda. There is indeed no
constitutional impediment to the bitter manifestation of
their detestations, no hindrance at all to their sometimes
bewildering characterisation of the political objects of their
pet revulsion. As the columnists and critics indulge their
craft and acidic views, it is, however, also urgent to explode
some of the myths that underscore their opinions and
conclusions. It will be helpful if they present their
detestations in civil, logical and persuasive language.
President Buhari, they have concluded, cannot change. Fine.
All Progressives Congress (APC) leaders from the Southwest
may have been mistaken in their support for the ossified
president. Again, fine. But both viewpoints can in fact be
rendered in persuasive arguments and reasoning without
wrapping and encumbering them with private and bitter
loathing.
But the first obstacle the critics will encounter is attempting
to demolish President Buhari in terms of comparatively
elevating Dr Jonathan. The two, even by the most liberal and
empathetic arguments, are incomparable. In the March 2015
polls, Nigeria was presented with two difficult choices:
candidate Buhari who, to the South, was insular,
ethnocentric, intemperate, inflexible, and mildly Jihadist;
and candidate Jonathan who, to the North, was inept,
ethnocentric, unfeeling, distracted, facetiously evangelical,
and irredeemable. It was not quite Hobson’s choice; but
whatever choice was made had its manifold drawbacks.
Almost like Kogi State, where a lethargic incumbent will be
facing an abrasive builder-challenger in next month’s
governorship poll, Nigeria had to choose last March
between Dr Jonathan who was bringing the country to a
frenzied ruin, and a disciplined leader of admittedly
doubtful depth and suspect democratic credentials. Except
in the opinion of the pro-Jonathan critics and columnists,
there was absolutely no contest.
President Buhari doubtless has his weaknesses, some of
them provocative. His appointments to presidency positions
have remained skewed and indefensible, and his cabinet
list, though technocratic and scholarly, is largely apolitical
and mystifying in a country so compulsively political and
querulously nitpicky. His appreciation of complex and
modern issues, especially economic, is deeply unnerving.
His conception of society has not gone beyond the strange
dualism of his younger days as a military officer and
northerner in which he sees society as we against them, and
good against evil. Nor does he seem capable of the rapid
and comprehensive regeneration the decaying Nigerian
society urgently needs. Yes, he has all these unenviable
weaknesses. But he has his strengths, largely his disciplined
outlook, frugality and ethical soundness far beyond cavil.
Dr Jonathan brought little or nothing to the table before and
during the 2015 polls. He was the simplistic product, if not
culmination, of the crazy meddlesomeness and insufferable
arrogance of past Nigerian presidents and military heads of
state. Like most of his predecessors, he was neither
equipped for the job of leadership nor capable of the
grandness and nobility which the job calls for and the office
yields to. He professed Christian ethics and baited
southerners with ethnic crumbs, but on a grand scale he
showed no discipline in managing the affairs of the country
or its economy. On his watch, helped by government
officials who had stolen the country blind, he was bringing
the country to ruination and raising the prospect of a
revolution. Until he lost the election and some of his
ministers triggered the unpalatable disclosures of the past
few months, few believed he was capable of superintending
such appalling breakdown of law, order and common sense.
In a long line of unsuitable Nigerian leaders, Dr Jonathan sat
on the acme. Ibrahim Babangida, army general and former
head of state, began the craze. The heavens gifted him a
great political transition programme, but he spurned it in
favour of his own misconceived contraption, enthroning
Ernest Shonekan by a strange and unearthly steeplechase
succession, and undergirding it with a rapacious and power-
hungry Sani Abacha, a general and late head of state.
Abdulsalami Abubakar, another general and former head of
state, followed hard on their heels and relinquished power
after he and other generals similarly played God and in their
supposed wisdom installed ex-President Olusegun
Obasanjo. Abjuring the democratic practice of letting the
people choose their own leaders, which he gleefully
propounded in 1978 and 1979, Chief Obasanjo unilaterally
and contemptuously foisted the late Umaru Yar’Adua on the
country. The latter’s dramatic death in turn foisted Dr
Jonathan on Nigeria, unprepared mentally and ideologically.
It is shocking that in their frustrations, the pro-Jonathan
critics and columnists ignore the value of pluralism and
continue to assail the political contributions of those who
championed the amalgamation of APC and President
Buhari’s victory. Defending Dr Jonathan and denouncing
President Buhari is an irrational exercise. The president has
his weaknesses, and is still committing many faux pas and
egregious policy and appointment blunders. But rather than
pine over Dr Jonathan’s loss, and assail those who triggered
the country’s political rebirth through the peaceful change of
power from one party to another, President Buhari should
be criticised for his shortcomings. It is time to quit mourning
APC’s victory, notwithstanding the party’s clumsiness in
managing the legislature, the executive and the economy. So
far, an awkward Buhari has proved far better than a
sprightly Jonathan. Indeed, President Buhari is probably the
single most important factor in arresting the country’s drift
towards the precipice.
It is also time for critics, analysts and columnists to avoid
the bitter and vexatious essays of the pre-election period
and begin to focus on more germane national issues.
President Buhari, his cabinet and his policies are the issues.
These should be addressed. If, as seems apparent, the
president is unable to impress the Southwest or the
Southeast or even the South-South before the next elections,
then these will become something to talk about,
notwithstanding how well he pleases the North. The
president announced with flourish at his inauguration that
he belonged to everybody and to nobody. The next polls will
determine whether that delicate phrase is worth its weight in
gold. In a matter of months, the Buhari government will
clock one year, even as the president has proceeded very
slowly and very gingerly. If he does not gather speed, if he
continues along the sanctimonious line and idealism of
being his own man, and if he fails to recognise the political
environment in which he operates, he will discover only too
late that elections and the electorate can be very cruel
indeed.
President Buhari will need to pay close attention to the
alliances he built before the election if he is not to come to
grief. And going by the crippling poverty assailing the
country, and beyond the anti-corruption campaign and
some desultory recovery of stolen public funds, it is even
more urgent for him to quickly articulate and adopt a
multidimensional approach to the country’s multifarious
problems. The problems are huge and have developed into
an octopus, and are determined to resist his panaceas.
President Buhari may be regarded as part of the country’s
problems on account of his inability to quickly and efficiently
respond to the exigent issues of the day, however, Dr
Jonathan was never an option. It is time to move on and
focus on President Buhari. For, as it now seems, the
country’s fate is intertwined with his.




SOURCE/SAUCE: thenationonlineng.net/jonathan-was-never-an-option/

Focus on dismembering the slave camp aka Nigeria
That should be the goal of every right thinking person

kingsolex:
the freedom of speech,association or movement is not absolute it comes with a responsibility, he Nnamundi kunu is using the media for treasonable acts and at such it contradicts his freedom of speech which is punishable under the same 1999 constitution as amended. so Igbo world order should be well learned and stop trying to use the constitution to their favour.

There is no trasonable offence here
The slave camp expired 2014
It should be disbanded
And fast
Or else it will blowup in every ones faces
The earlier the better

laudate:
ROFLMAO!! He was not travelling with a Nigerian passport. He was travelling with a British passport, issued by Lord Frederick Lugard's people (or descendants) in the UK.

The same Lugard that Kanu's supporters keep cursing and vilifying for setting up Nigeria!

Did frederick lugard and his fellow demonic british slave master use any passport to come to africa and enslave various indeginous groups

When Biafra is restored Biafrans will definately stop using all foriegn passports
Till then
Nnamdi Kanu, Ipob as well as other Biafrans can use any passort they like to get into the british slave camp so as to carry out their mission of it's disbandment and the restoration of their true nation

bigbonecrush:
If you call 'treasonable felony' as no law but 'self-determination' then you are not worthy of my time or response to your backward argument!

You have to understand that the document signed for the almagamation of the slave camp called Nigeria expired 2014
It was also written clearly in the document that any group that wishes to leave the slave union can do so pending the expiration day of the document which was in 2014
Coupled with this is the UN law that advocates self determination of indigenous people
Not forgetting also the Universal demorcratic law on freedom of speech and freedom of association
So you and everyone can see that there is no case here
If the Nigerian government feels they have a case they should take him to court
But they know they cannot do that because they have no case here
Going to court will even help facilitate the destruction of the slave camp
So weither I am worth your time or not it doesn't change the fact that biafra will soon be restored
There is nothing any one can do about it

bigbonecrush:
I told you I won't give free lessons! It suffices to say that you know there is a law on treasonable felony!
If you don't, I suggest you go and see a lawyer or take a crash course in 'adult education'.

You obvious don't know the law you are talking about
If you did
You will quote it
Ipob and their leadership are upholding the united nations (of which the so called nigeria is part of) law of self determination
So they are not the ones at fault here

goldiehoney:
A Great Nigerian hero has had his say and I hope those few elements among the ibos won't bite more than they can chew like Ojukwu realised to his eternal regret!

Gowon is not a hero
Rather he is a murderous slave who together with other murderous slaves helped their evil an demonic slave masters to kill some group of people who tried to set themselves free from the slave contrapment they found themselves

His murderous act has hereby placed his people in line of fire of nature's most effective vengance mechanism KARMA

His people and future generations of his people will have to bear the brunt of his heinous act of which they have started already

bigbonecrush:
Inasmuch as I dislike to teach you law, his offences were based on Nigerian Constitution and Penal Code for acts inimical to state security!

Can you quote the particular law and what it says

Rayhut:
Nigeria as a country need restructuring, even the British, US knew that Nigeria will break up one day. UK has 4 countries in it, eg Wales, England, Scotland and Northern Island, then ask yourself why they cannot be one country like Nigeria, USA has all it states operating as a semi independent country, immigration law in Texas is not the same with California, China has Taiwan, Hong Kong, Tibet and Macau as part of China which are all semi independent, without confederation in Nigeria there will be no peace, Nigeria need to go back to Aburi peace accord, Nigeria will never be a progressive country because Nigeria is made up of irreconcilable entities that cannot align, Nigeria is supposed to be made up of 5 countries eg Arewa, Biafra, Midland, Oduduwa and Niger Delta Republic, under confederation just like UK, China, Netherlands etc, Nigeria need this structure for peace to reign.

There is nothing like Niger delta republic
There is only Biafra
Biafra ie: Igbanke, Igala, Igede, idoma, itshekiri, isoko, Isobo (aka. Urobo), Izon (ijaw), Ibibio (efik/ibibio) and Igbo

Also
Nigeria needs disbandment not restructing

dre11:
http://sunnewsonline.com/new/police-brutality-my-brothers-started-talking-sister/

Anger or not
It takes a certain degree of wickedness for anyone to to do such an act

midolian:
http://www.thisdaylive.com/articles/presidential-aide-buhari-is-shy-around-the-opposite-sex/223525/

Is he also shy around young girls of 9-12yrs old
Cause he doesn't seem to be

coolitempa:
....... ....joker.....

Sorry
Don't seem to get who the joker is
And what a joker has to do with the question that I asked

coolitempa:
Stop telling lies.....and then deleting the propaganda you posted up there.... ...that will be a good start...

Can you point the lies in that post

PenSniper:
The Op is quite on point. It's either Nnamdi Kanu is not as popular as they make believe or they just treacherously decided to leave him in the lurch. Either way, it is disappointing and attests to the truism that they are nothing but waiters and empty chest-beaters.

The Biafran struggle is not about negotiating with terrorist
The Nigeerian government is a terrorist government and no ransome will be paid to terrorists

Yunus2012:
If succession cures all, South Sudan won't be in the problem they are in today. Two years now they have the indepence they were fighting for and they are now in more serious crisis than when they were with Sudan. Lest I forget they were a homogenous tribe with oil and all that.

Where has that lead them.

And Sudan itself has not seize to exist!!!

Just like the clamour for more states, this too is by those who feel they will be among the leaders of Biafra if it succeds. Of course along with those who had been made to belief its the best next thing since slice breed.

Stop blackmailing people who want their freedom
They want their freedom so let them be

hummerwise:
my prayer is, those claiming to be biafrans who have already commented on this thread and those who will still comment will join in the war including there families and relatives...

if you are a BIAFRAN, you shud say Amen to this

AMEN

perculiarperson:
From the look of things and his response to prompting questions asked, and in comparison to the grilling questions given to Fashola, Ibe Kachikwu and Kemi Adeosun and their educative and informative answers, Amaechi has no business being on that list.

This was a great opportunity for Amaechi to sell himself by showing his intellectual prowess, strong capabilities and reasons to be confirmed. Instead he went there to sell radicalism, multiple personality and mental imbalance on views and perspectives, double-mindedness and eye service. From his overall wealth of experience (former SA, PA, State Speaker, Governor etc.) he could not articulate a couple of words as advice to younger generation of politicians or political class.

His desperation is so glaring and obvious as he spoke with two sides of his mouth today. The same issue (resource control) he fought the past government for is what he has embraced fully in this new administration all because of his GREED and selfish interest!!!

He has even given a pointer with regards to his final political destination and where he would love to retire which is as a senator of the Federal Republic of Nigeria!!! This is sooooooo pathetic and heart wrenching.
Nmdeed entered ONE CHANCE!!!

There is no point pointing fingers at Mr amaechi
The president himself is not qualified to be president (he has no 0 level certificate)
It does not make sense to point fingers at anyone when most of the appointed and elected leaders are in the same boat
If you want to scrutinize
Scrutinize each and everyone of them