Thesolutions's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Thesolutions's Profile › Thesolutions's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 (of 100 pages)
Kobojunkie:Your focus on equal right makes it look like partnership in marriage is a form of competition. A partnership in marriage involve two partners agreeing to be joined in marriage. It could be traditional, religious or social contract. Before marriage, both parties must have had an understanding. Some go to an extent of having prenuptial agreement in written form. Once there is an agreement, it is partnership marriage. Equality doesn't have to be redefined because everyone is already equal in marriage only separated by gender and roles. Calling this roles that was traditionally assigned to women as slavery makes you definition of equality suspicious. |
Kobojunkie:Who ever trained that AI is dumb. There is always roles and there is no equality in roles assigned biologically or traditionally. There is no third party in marriage partnership that will give ruling on opposing equal voices as your AI tried to explain. So everything has to be based on understanding which must have been reached before marriage. If this discussion comes up after marriage, the man over rules. There is no equality in roles or even in voice between a man and a woman in marriage if those were not agreed prenuptial. |
Kobojunkie:Partnership doesn't mean equal rights. There is percentage distribution of responsibility and resources. In typical traditional settings, the man owns the farm land. But in contemporary economy, men finds it difficult to earn a living more than the woman. Does this affect the distribution of resources and roles? Yes. But the man is still responsible for provision in his role as husband because the traditional roles was not repealed. So, if any woman was given an opportunity to earn because the contemporary economy created that environment, she can either have an understanding with the man before marriage. Any of such understanding after marriage will be oppression on the man. In essence, if a woman is given opportunity to earn because the economy favours her to do that, she is obligated to remit her earnings to her man and not to drag equality with him. Anything other than that is oppression against the man We can not take it. |
Kobojunkie:That is a fantasy distorted definition inserted into AI used to manipulate people. Marriage approved by any law defined it to be between husband and wife. This is role based. It is partnership. But the woke community has been working hard to distort this reality by forcing an illegal definition of marriage partnership that is not recognized by law or by religion or tradition but still try to arm twist these Bodies to join them so as to be recognized as couples. These are predators and pretenders. This is where gay marriage hinge on. They can not sponsor a system recognized by law to join them as couples but they want the same traditional and religious institution that recognized marriage as role based between a male husband and female wife to join them as couples. |
Nearly ripped, I will go four at a go. For unripened plantain, two is too much. I find it difficult to chew and swallow |
thisisit:If Ribadu made that statement, he must be regretting it by now. He wanted to be president after tinubu. Why make use of group that are already linked to criminal and terrorist activity. He could have recruited a strike squad from the DSS or a combination of the military. But going along with criminals he knew was ill advised. |
Solution to sound health is working like a slave and eating like a king. Every other thing besides this is I'll health. |
Is it only OPA. NEXT will be NDDA, ISOB, ACA. NDDA Nigeria Delta Defense Agency ISOB Indigenous State of Biafra ACA Arewa Community Association. |
Jman06:Well scholars have facts and figures to back up their claim which will relegate your opinion as assumption. If a younger woman agrees to marry a man without being programmed to do so, she probably has her reason. Immediately that reason is no longer there, she has higher chances of not enduring the aftermath of having no reason to be in the marriage than the older women. This doesn't mean that it is easier to marry older women. But most older women with children will endure anything to make sure that they do not raise their kids alone. The younger woman ends up turning their kids to mini version of themselves if they have kids without regards to the child being male or female. So it is easier for the younger woman to leave the marriage. |
Marriage is an agreement. You can either program someone to agree with you or negotiate agreement with someone. It could be with the older ones or the younger ones. The older ones mostly seem to be ready to agree with anyone because of time factor. The younger ones can be programmed to agree if they are kept within a consistent environment. The ones in-between has known life in diverse ways and are more rational. They agree and disagree with anyone as long as dynamic situations hovers around the relationship. No one truly agrees. They choose to endure. The older ones appears to be enduring more because of societal factor and that is what made scholars assume marriage with older women is easier to maintain. |
fredie107:What separate android TV from smart TV. |
His allies should be on the wanted list too. His foreign partners if they exist should be exposed. Too many unproductive millionaires down east with illegal and questionable wealth. |
Mariangeles:Something like it. |
I've tasted all the flavours. |
The caliphate is in trouble. |
Quest7777:It's not about government inability to enforce ban. It is inability of government to command and control the law enforcement agency to enforce the ban. The law enforcement agency are headed by members of the same sect you want them to tame. They may apprehend the culprit for media photo ops but the the next day, same people are on the street committing same crime. They pressed the president to withdraw police officers from VIP even when war on terrorism is not police jurisdiction. The VIP are now begging government to restore their security details in exchange to keeping quiet over insecurity challenges in the country. Your government is owned and controlled. It will take a special kind of bad man to dismantle the military cocus. |
insidelife22:Unknown gunmen. Do you know the origin of that title? |
zeuss:That is why we can not call them mercenaries. The boys wouldn't know what 100 million or 500 million looks like so how can they demand that amount. No news about them fighting over sharing formula. The boys are owned and the owners are the ones protecting them trying to spin different stories around. The owners keep mentioning that the boys have their own territories. That makes it clear that the financiers have understanding between themselves not to trespass. They are all over the news granting interviews. The government knows them. |
Salt06:So did he mention any other ministry whose school collect less fees and feed the poor too? If it was only his, you should not be defending him. I have nothing against what he said. It is his truth. But it is not Jesus. |
helinues:So sit at home has stopped. It was not the Nnamdi Kanu that instituted it but south east politicians. So why is Nnamdi Kanu incarcerated. |
helinues:NEDC is not Amnesty. NEDC is not tantita that receive pay to protect national infrastructure. Listen to Gumi and you will know where everything is going. |
helinues:Oh you mean that. But was that all you saw in the input? |
zeuss:They are not. You know that. They are acting on instructions. They receive peanuts from the ransom paid by the government or the people. Do you not read that Gumi is the one delivering ransom to them, some women contributed money about 800k only for Gumi to tell them that that is transport money. The game plan is to ask for amnesty while also requesting for the terrorist to be given contract to protect the farmers. No plans to disarm or withdraw from this act. Have you not heard about personnels being court martialed for firing at the terrorist and disobeying unnecessary controlled tactical withdrawal by his superiors who saw that the terrorist are disadvantaged. The air force can not provide air support because of imaginary Forrest. Imagine that. You guys with your taqqiya of wickedness will continue to raise irrelevant questions of wickedness to divert attention from the real issues. |
helinues:Again, asking this proves that you are aware of what is going on regarding the terrorist bandits. The government saw what Oil spill caused in the region. The people can no longer farm on the land or fish in the water. These were genuine concerns that both the government and multi national companies saw and created an enquiry that brought the NDDC idea. What is the agitation of Gumis Bandits that was caused by government. The North will always claim to be the poorest so as to channel all intervention to the north. Buhari specifically instructed foreign aids to be channeled to the north. But no deliberate act to control poverty in the north. They only enhanced it using religion. Good luck was building Almajiri schools to support them in their chosen educational systems but the same people taunted good luck for being voted out by the same Almajiri. Everything is deliberate by these monsters. It is a pity that exposed people like yourself would be this unreasonable. How do we expected the unexposed to act. |
helinues:Knowing and asking is just pure wickedness. Amnesty was given to Niger Delta militants. Tompolo, an ex Niger Delta militant was given contract to protect the pipeline. The north in alliance with Gumi formed and named their group Bandits. Armed them to cause havock while protecting them. Now ask for amnesty for the bandits and for them to be given contracts to protect the farm and farmers. Games. But the Bandits serves multiple purpose. Religious, political and economic. |
Everyone knows this. The only problem is still religion. Some of those people chanting amnesty for bandits terrorists were once victims or had families that were victims. You can not solve this problem until you solve the religious problem. |
The appointment was done before the test. It is possible the candidate that scored 54 points was given the question before the test. |
mrvitalis:Oduduwa was accepted by the Yoruba as their founder. It therefore is tied to their identity. Arewa is hausa name for North. Arewa is not an identity. But they Arewa consultative forum was formed to unite the northern states. It should be around 1999 or 2000. The northern states and north central became members by default. The Niger Delta is a general term used to refer to the Niger Delta region. It is part of their identity. Biafra was not and is not part of our identity. |
Ekele22:Change your location please. It will solve a lot of this misconception. |
mrvitalis:They have chosen to be identified as that. The Igbos did not choose Biafra. No reasonable Igbo person will suggest that name in any meeting for referendum seeing that it is associated with terrorism in recent times. If the Igbos want a uniform identity, they will call on OHAN'EZE and they will deliberate on it and give the people feedback. Biafra is Pain, Biafra is suffering, Biafra is death. But we were never Biafrans until 1967. So we need to go back to anything before 1967 and find out our identity, pick it, dust it and run with it while taking cognisant of current civilization. |
mrvitalis:The Igbos will first chose to be identified as Biafrans for that to happen because there is no ethnic group known as Biafrans anywhere in the world. Not a single one. There was never an amalgamation that brought any of the other groups together to choose the name Biafra as identity. Biafra was a declaration of a military warlord that was curtailed in 1970. It is a pity people still dwell in this imaginary identity to make themselves inferior under the Nigerian state. |
Johnson Suleiman was using reverse psychology to take a swipe at winners and other bigger churches that placed high fees for schools under their ministry. He never meant what he said. He saw an opportunity and he used it for the benefit of his ministry. Now people know his ministry has schools that runs at cheaper fees, and conduct intermittent feeding of people using revenue from the church. This is religious politics. He is guilty as others he is accusing. |
