₦airaland Forum

popizaino:
Because it is futile doing so after you have already conceded that you don't care about who replaces Rohr.

Have you ever clarified an opinion you hold before?

popizaino:
At least it can be seen you quoted Diss.troy there who did you quote in the screenshot below?

You are completely confused. Nothing else can explain this gibberish above.

Where is the evidences you promised Airmark? Remember you said they yapa... Lets see them.

popizaino:
Who asked you before making your frustration known about Rohr?

Don't you know how to dig again? Can't you trace the genesis of that conversation?

Even if you trace it, you will still look for a way to turn amala... So I'm not surprised.

BTW why haven't you bring out a particular post where I support the appointment of Peseiro?

popizaino:
Let me go with the one you said willingly and not the you were coerced to say.

First pressed, now coerced.

English professors like Izzou and Griffon will not come out and talk to Popizaino. It's when "replace" is the topic, all of una go jump out...

Who coerced me here?

popizaino:
Did anyone asked for your opinion when you were all over the pages of nairaland asking Rohr to be sacked? Why should you wait for destroy to ask for your opinion before making your recommendations?

So asking a question is now pressing? Did diss.troy asked me repeatedly and I evade the question before finally answering it? What do you mean by press?

popizaino:
This your attempt at been trying to be clever by half can only work when you are in Rumuokoro and not on the pages of nairaland.

Do you need to have a chat with me before i know that you were not enjoying the SE and that led you to consistently asked for the coach to be sacked?

Does the person who wrote the screenshot below sound like one who was enjoying the game under Rohr?

Then why bring that up when you know we never had such chat before?

Have you ever held an opinion and changed it later? Why are you avoiding this question? Is it because you know it will come back and bite you in your backside?

Below is my opinion on Super Eagles moving forward. Why you keep going backwards I don't know..

popizaino:
You were not pressed when you asked for Rohr's sack.why should wait till you were pressed before making recommendations?

Well I don't even want you to answer. Because there is already evidence that you don't care about who replaces Rohr.

What do you mean by press? Choose your words wisely man.

So Diss.troy asking my opinion is now press?

popizaino:
Before now,his defence was that he never had any chat with me about Rohr or not when i called him out,today he has seen a perfect straw of did he recommend Jose. .

Such a shameless man .

Classic case of clutching at straws.

That post was made March. Like the comment imply, Show me anywhere you and I had a chat about Super Eagles, if I enjoy them with or without Rohr. I'm waiting.

Why haven't you posted one single post I made supporting Peseiro. All your post is me talking about Rohr. Don't you have an atom of shame?

popizaino:
I know you are found of looking out for nuance in statement for your next clutch but sorry to disappoint you it won't work.


Tell us what the screenshot meant .

I have answered you this question before. Or should I repeat myself for the 1,001 time?

You have not told us what this screenshot mean...

airmark:
Let's even assume it wasn't after you were pressed to mention your favorite coach for the job, that you mentioned Renard. When your preferred coach wasn't signed, what was your reaction?

When VVD wasn't signed by Chelsea, it's on record that I scolded the decision here vehemently. When Renard wasn't signed, one would expect you to have criticized the decision, if truely your "I don't care who replaces Rohr" stand, was just a joke.

You don't need to shy away from the fact that you were all about "Rohr must go", to move forward. Now that no progress after he was sacked, accept you goofed and move on. It doesn't make you an eternal failure.

If you engage in a football discussion about a team not doing well that you DO NOT support, can't you as a football fan point out what is wrong with that team and make recommendations? Now, if those you recommendations are not follow, will you come out and vehemently criticise them? Or will you be indifferent on what is happening there?

You scolded VVD decision because it had to do with a club you support, Chelsea.

Why must you expect me to vehemently criticise the decision of a team I do not support just because I discussed that team with fellow football fans?

popizaino:
See I don't care here.

See Rohr leaving and the team automatically moves forward.

Show me where I said the team "automatically" moves forward. I recommended a replacement that will move the team forward.

popizaino:
You know the reason why? ........it is simply because you don't care about who replaces Rohr.

I do care about who replace Rohr. And I have evidence to that.

You shamelessly accused me and you are finding it hard to bring evidence of your accusation for a week now.

popizaino:
Your mind is in my hands.

No, you are a pathological cheap liar who is a hypocrite too.

I can dig up where you hold entirely different opinions about Pochettino. Should I show you?

popizaino:
Where is Renard here?

Look at Renard here...

airmark:
Non fan that wrongly believed once Rohr gets sacked, the team would move forward. Now the reverse is the case.

Safe to say, you goofed and accept your L.

You are clearly biased. And your mission of mocking me failed the instant I showed you I actually made a recommendation on Rohr's replacement.

I made two opinions known: Sack Rohr, appoint Renard.

In your biased mind, you intentionally left the second part of my opinion, trying to make only the first stick.

It's DoA. As long as I am here. NFF didn't appoint Renard, so how will they move forward?

Let them appoint Renard and still be in shambles, even I will join you to troll me.

popizaino:
The ones i have been posting since na wetin?

For almost one week now, you have never linked my name with Peseiro where I supported his appointment. All you have been spamming here is where I want Rohr sacked.

Have some shame.

[quote author=popizaino post=127100467][/quote]You must be out of your mind.

airmark:


You no dey shame.

Na you no get shame at all.

Which reaction you expect from a non fan who just made his opinion known? You go just dey ask shameless question upandan.

airmark:
What was your reaction when they didn't hire Renard, but announced Peseiro?

What was your reaction when they appointed Eguavoen to replace Rohr?

Ibime:
Timbros rejecting the L by any means necessary

Which L?

popizaino:
They sacked him so that the team would move forward just like suggested.

And they never employed Renard.

popizaino:
Someone who specifically said the SE will move forward if Rohr is sacked should not talk about recommendation. Your recommendation was all in the screenshot below.

And specifically asked NFF to hire Renard for Super Eagles to move forward.

popizaino:
Don't you get it,you do not have any moral right to ask me questions till own your L like a man.

You, a cheap liar, is the last person to talk about morals here.

Where are the yapa evidences?

popizaino:
It was not donstan18 that said this below. They have sacked him but SE has moved forward based on your recommendation.

Did they appoint Renard?

popizaino:
Sack Rohr and the team moves forward is enough for the judge to ask you not to speak again.

I recommended two things.... Sack Rohr. Appoint Renard.

Did NFF do both?

popizaino:
Yes Rohr has been sacked but has the team moved forward like you advice?

Did they hire Renard that I recommended?

popizaino:
Who does this screenshot expose?

It's high time I stop replying you about Rohr sack.

Let's talk about the replacement.

Who recommended this?

popizaino:
Before saying you wanted Renard to take the job what did you say concerning the person who replaces Rohr?

Have you ever held one wild opinion on something in the heat of the moment and later calmed down and specifically adjusted your view?

And let me warn you again, be very careful while answering this question because I have evidences. Not your kind of evidence though...

popizaino:
If you support the sacking of Rohr and you don't care who replaces him what does that say about the current coach?

This doesn't look like who don't care about the replacement

MorataFC:
Lol, that is an invitation to all, even including Moratafc.

And this is an invitation to who?

Griffon:
E reach to even go dey check the definition of “replace” in thesaurus?

Such an epic display of overt deviance. Woah!

Is this definition wrong?

airmark:
In my language, " I don't care about anyone that replaces Rohr", means I am not against anyone (including Peseiro), that replaces Rohr.

So, you are hereby sentenced to 100 lashes of koboko on Xmas day somewhere in Rumuokoro.

Really? I thought it means appointing Peseiro