₦airaland Forum

popizaino:
Your mind is in my hands.

No, you are a pathological cheap liar who is a hypocrite too.

I can dig up where you hold entirely different opinions about Pochettino. Should I show you?

popizaino:
Where is Renard here?

Look at Renard here...

airmark:
Non fan that wrongly believed once Rohr gets sacked, the team would move forward. Now the reverse is the case.

Safe to say, you goofed and accept your L.

You are clearly biased. And your mission of mocking me failed the instant I showed you I actually made a recommendation on Rohr's replacement.

I made two opinions known: Sack Rohr, appoint Renard.

In your biased mind, you intentionally left the second part of my opinion, trying to make only the first stick.

It's DoA. As long as I am here. NFF didn't appoint Renard, so how will they move forward?

Let them appoint Renard and still be in shambles, even I will join you to troll me.

popizaino:
The ones i have been posting since na wetin?

For almost one week now, you have never linked my name with Peseiro where I supported his appointment. All you have been spamming here is where I want Rohr sacked.

Have some shame.

[quote author=popizaino post=127100467][/quote]You must be out of your mind.

airmark:


You no dey shame.

Na you no get shame at all.

Which reaction you expect from a non fan who just made his opinion known? You go just dey ask shameless question upandan.

airmark:
What was your reaction when they didn't hire Renard, but announced Peseiro?

What was your reaction when they appointed Eguavoen to replace Rohr?

Ibime:
Timbros rejecting the L by any means necessary

Which L?

popizaino:
They sacked him so that the team would move forward just like suggested.

And they never employed Renard.

popizaino:
Someone who specifically said the SE will move forward if Rohr is sacked should not talk about recommendation. Your recommendation was all in the screenshot below.

And specifically asked NFF to hire Renard for Super Eagles to move forward.

popizaino:
Don't you get it,you do not have any moral right to ask me questions till own your L like a man.

You, a cheap liar, is the last person to talk about morals here.

Where are the yapa evidences?

popizaino:
It was not donstan18 that said this below. They have sacked him but SE has moved forward based on your recommendation.

Did they appoint Renard?

popizaino:
Sack Rohr and the team moves forward is enough for the judge to ask you not to speak again.

I recommended two things.... Sack Rohr. Appoint Renard.

Did NFF do both?

popizaino:
Yes Rohr has been sacked but has the team moved forward like you advice?

Did they hire Renard that I recommended?

popizaino:
Who does this screenshot expose?

It's high time I stop replying you about Rohr sack.

Let's talk about the replacement.

Who recommended this?

popizaino:
Before saying you wanted Renard to take the job what did you say concerning the person who replaces Rohr?

Have you ever held one wild opinion on something in the heat of the moment and later calmed down and specifically adjusted your view?

And let me warn you again, be very careful while answering this question because I have evidences. Not your kind of evidence though...

popizaino:
If you support the sacking of Rohr and you don't care who replaces him what does that say about the current coach?

This doesn't look like who don't care about the replacement

MorataFC:
Lol, that is an invitation to all, even including Moratafc.

And this is an invitation to who?

Griffon:
E reach to even go dey check the definition of “replace” in thesaurus?

Such an epic display of overt deviance. Woah!

Is this definition wrong?

airmark:
In my language, " I don't care about anyone that replaces Rohr", means I am not against anyone (including Peseiro), that replaces Rohr.

So, you are hereby sentenced to 100 lashes of koboko on Xmas day somewhere in Rumuokoro.

Really? I thought it means appointing Peseiro

airmark:


Timbros na my guy still, flog him with koboko only.

Is "sack Rohr" also "appoint Peseiro" in your language?

popizaino:
Cheap liar is the one who can't own up to his own words.

For the umpteen time, I own up to being #RohrOut.

How old are you please? I have treated this your screenshot over and over again. I WANT ROHR SACKED. I never denied it.

However, who should replace him? Check below...

popizaino:
You are certainly the clown 🤡 here,before the efik man wanted to know your most preferred coach what did you say about Rohr and is he still the coach?

Was I the one that coin the phrase "obey the last order"?

Clown has shifted the post to "before".. Before asking me this before question, did you not ask who wanted my opinion? If you want to go the "before" route, I'm very ready.

popizaino:
No i will present them with this,which will send you a life time in prison.

The speed the judge will chase you out of the courtroom, you will think you stole his wife!

Since "sack Rohr" has become "appoint Peseiro" in your language.

popizaino:
How do you interpret the below?

The interpretation is very simple... Sack Rohr.

Now, how do you interpret the below?

popizaino:
I'm very sorry to say this at this point,if lies hits you in the face you wouldn't recognise them.

Did you say you don't care about who replaces Rohr or not which denotes that just anybody can be the next SE coach but Rohr? Isn't that what i pointed out? How is that a lie against you?

Yes anybody can be the coach but Rohr. And Eguavoen became the coach! And that is against my recommendation of Renard.

You see this screenshot? It will continue to haunt you for the rest of this expose

popizaino:
Did you say you don't care who replaces him or not?

Did i not call you out when Eguavoen for still coaching and did you not start being defensive right from then? I guess there wasn't the clutch of Peseiro to grasp at.

Did I not say I want Renard to take up the job?

Thank you @ the bolded

So why did you call me out when Eguavoen was coach if he did not replace Rohr?

You are a clown.

popizaino:
There are evidences of you supporting the sack of Rohr and he has been sacked. Own up to your words and stop this show of shame.

I was never denying the sack of Rohr.

Did Airmark ask you if I supported the sack of Rohr? Was that the question you answered "yes o. Evidence yapa"?

popizaino:
Call your fellow port-Harcourt man to order. He is doing one dragging this conversion with his strawman argument.

The Port Harcourt man refused to be falsely accused. Next time, look face well before you start to lie against somebody.

And, trust me, I am ready to do this with you all week.

Cheap liar.

popizaino:
Who wanted to know about your opinion on Rohr when you asked for his sack?


The same way nothing concern you when Kano pillar decides to hire another coach who isn't your recommendation should have been the same way it shouldn't concern you if the super Eagles coach is performing or not. At least you can see how your concern in giving advice as turned out?

Are you okay? Did you even read the screenshot below? Or you choose to become a clown?

Diss.troy clearly wanted to know my opinion and I gave him.

What are you yapping about?

popizaino:
Is the screenshot below what you said with airmark's mouth or your second mouth?

What is the meaning of "i don't care"...?

Did I mention Peseiro?

So if you were to appear in court, this is the best you can present to prove that Timbros supported the appointment of Peseiro?

How about where I mentioned Renard?

popizaino:
Stop misusing words if you don't know the meaning. Where is the lie? Have i said anything you've not said?

By the way, tell you the were agenda you were after when you said you don't care who replaces Rohr?

Read the question and answer below carefully...

airmark:
So, Timbros preferred the RCC worker as Eagles coach?

popizaino:
Yes ooo evidence yapa.

Did I misuse any word here? Did you or did you not accuse me of supporting Peseiro?