₦airaland Forum

popizaino:
I guess it was Gabonese you told the screenshots below to?

Evidently you have searched and searched and searched but you couldn't link my name with Peseiro.

That's a big shame on you.

Everything you posted is me promoting the sack of Rohr. That has never been an issue because, yes, I campaigned for Rohr's sack.

After sacking Rohr, what next? I recommended Renard.

Why are you lieing against me?

popizaino:
Did you support the sacking Rohr or not?

Is Rohr still the NT coach ?

If your answer is accordingly then why are you not accepting your L? He no dey kee now.

Yes, I support the sack of Rohr. Does that translate to supporting the appointment of Peseiro?

Can you at least differentiate scak this man and appoint that other man?

I supported the sack of Rohr 100% and recommended the replacement. Why are you lieing against me?

popizaino:
I don't think you have the moral right to tell anyone to shut up Limbros.


Is it until the proofs hit you on the face before you recognise it?

Again, shut up!

You are the last person to talk of moral right here. You are a cheap liar who have zero morals.

Where are the evidences where I support the appointment of Peseiro?

Jodera:
Lol... Shocking ke??

Make I hear say Tim.bros no know say Interim no mean replacement.

Him don already vow say Airm.ark and Popi no go carry am trabaye for this argument so even if it means him to re-write English textbook to die on that hill, he will.

I don leave am for that matter

Was I the one who wrote the below?

izzou:
[color=royalblue]Just because of L, Timbros ready to rewrite Oxford Dictionary from scratch.

Make him drop Zoom link abeg.

We need the classes. [/color]

I was not the one who defined replace below.

Eguavoen was put in place to do Rohr's job. He did that till Peseiro came along.

Griffon:
How do you read and comprehend bro?

Interim isn’t replacement, interim is a short lived term until a replacement for a vacant position is established.

Interim: (Provisional, temporary, interval, meantime, acting, gap, meanwhile, interlude, makeshift)

Replacement: (Surrogate, successor, exchange, fill-in, relief, alternate, substitute)

Eguavon was simply the provisional gaffer until Rohr’s successor, Peseiro, was appointed. The former was NEVER the replacement.

How you fail to understand this is quite shocking.

For the period Eguavoen is in that dugout, he is Rohr's replacement.

airmark:
Did Eguavoen finally replace Rohr?

Before you say yes, read below o.

Did I support Peseiro appointment? Before you say yes, read below...

airmark:
Plus you don't care who replaces him?

Most important, I can mention who is the best to replace him.

airmark:
For this international break, na Timbros be the scapegoat. Next one fit be Lordfalcao.

Scapegoat kee you there!

This agenda no enter, at all.

You should know how e dey be for you nah. I go prove you wrong till the next 10 years.

airmark:
Only Peseiro finally replaced Rohr.

You have so many ropes around your neck.

Eguavoen was appointed to replace Rohr until a set time. As long as he was the coach, he was Rohr's replacement.

airmark:
Was Peseiro not among those you didn't care replace Rohr? Timbros, your statement covered even Raumdeuter as Rohr's replacement. Rest.

Was my later comment on Renard more direct and specific, thereby nullifying the initial broad comment? Diss.troy knew my "I don't care" comment isn't beneficial to the topic that's why he wanted me to specify and I did. Why are you clinging on to that initial comment when you see clearly that I have specified who I want to replace Rohr?

You yourself know that this agenda is DoA.

Jodera:
Timbros, This, especially the bolded.

Well, them say you no fit wake person wey dey pretend to sleep

Tell me this definition is wrong...

In which place was Unai Emery? Arsenal dugout.
What job was he doing there? Coaching.
Who was then put in that place? Ljunberg
To do what job? Coach.

What other thing are you twisting?

airmark:
Timbros wan hide under Eguavoen's umbrella.

Na una dey hide u "I don't care" talk. You see me clearly mention who I feel is good for the job yet you are clutching at straws.

airmark:

So if Nigeria had announced Dayo Raumdeuter as Rohr's replacement, you wouldn't have criticized it ?

Did you criticize Eguavoen's choice as a placeholder by the way?

No i won't, because I'm not a Super Eagles fan anyway. Ask Popizaino to show you the post where I said that. He is good at digging.

That's also why I didn't go out to criticise Eguavoen as Rohr's replacement.

Diss.troy wanted to know who my replacement would be and I specifically told him.

I am not a fan of Kano Pillars but I can throw my opinion in if I want. I can ask the to fire their underperforming coach if they want to move forward. I can recommend a replacement.... But if they choose to hire another replacement, wetin concern me? Must I come out to criticise them vehemently?

airmark:
What is your definition of 'finally replace'?

What is your definition of Renard is a tested and trusted name in African football?

izzou:
[color=royalblue]I really don't know why you want to keep dragging something this is very clear.

You didn't care who replaced Rohr, and Eguavoen DID NOT replace Rohr.

I am surprised you are beginning to inteprete INTERIM. Where in this universe is an Interim tagged as a Replacement?

The reason i asked for rest, is because you have refused to take your L. So no need to bore people with back and forths

Eguavoen did not replace Rohr. NFF affirms Jose as his replacement. You know that, but because of L, you dey interprete English

I really hope you rest this matter. It is tiring[/color]

Eguavoen replaced Rohr. No two ways about it.

And you see where I SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED WHO I WANT FOR THE JOB. Why are you avoiding this post below?

airmark:
Can you please answer the question I asked first?

Who said 'i don't care who replaces Rohr, he must go to move forward'?

Why will I answer your question when you have refused to answer mine for almost 4 days now? Where is the post where I endorsed Peseiro by name?

Instead of clinging to a line that have braod meaning, why not look at the specific post which I mentioned specific name?

You guys accuse me of supporting Peseiro and I have been asking for evidence for almost four days now and you are telling me to answer your question first?

Which is more direct, "I don't care..." or "hire Renard"?

Are you talking to a 4 year old?

Ibime:
Eguavoen wey fúck up 2010 world cup qualifiers and led our most embarrassing loss against Ghana 4-1 in 2007. Eguavoen wey be corrupt padi man whose only usefulness is saying yes to every NFF demand on placing wack players in the team. Eguavoen that lost to Tunisia in the same AFCON and went out to a very poor Ghana team in qualifiers. Eguavoen is the most useless manager ever in SE history. Even as a player, he was over useless, giving Italy free penalty to defeat us in 1994 with 10 men. Even both our goals conceded against Argentina in 1994 WC were caused by Eguavoen stupidity. Eguavoen the dunce who took his shirt off to celebrate Amokachis winning goal during qualifiers for World Cup 1998 and got a red card, putting out qualification in jeopardy. Eguavoen is as stupid as he looks and corrupt to the core.

Gernot Rohr never failed to qualify Naija comfortably for World Cups, never failed to reach semi-final of AFCON, always integrated new and young players na whom you want comot for a corrupt stupid fool like Eguavoen

It's obvious you don't know Super Eagles history, and you should rest from commenting on it.

Were we comparing Eguavoen to Rohr or Peseiro?

izzou:
[color=royalblue]*unfollows thread*[/color]

Better for you.

Continue supporting agenda until the table turn one day.

All of us will be here the day the narrative will change and you guys will want to prove to us that Eguavoen once replaced Rohr as Super Eagles coach. We go dey here that day.

Or when all caoch na coach. Interim or not.

No be this thread again?

DissTroy:
In Timbros' defense, I just wanted to know what alternative he had to Rohr; better alternative. The flow of the back-and-forth showed I wasn't pushing any agenda beyond wanting to know who he thinks is a better alternative.
---

Wait... Why am I defending a Chelsea fan on a footballing issue?

Thank you.

Agenda pushers will come for you soon.

Ibime:
Eguavoen is even worse than Peseiro

He looked worst because of the magnitude of the loss against Ghana, our eternal rivals.

I don't know what the future would have looked like if Eguavoen was given more time but I don't think Peseiro would have been better than him.

Jodera:
Actually, the answer is a resounding Nooo @bolded!!

Ljunberg was just meant to fill in while we went about looking for someone to actually do the job Emery was expected to do(since arsenal can't be a club who would be without a coach).

While I get your point on "replacement" but we're dealing with English here and English is mostly about context. Ljunberg as an interim never had the full responsibility, accountability nor authority Emery had, so how do you expect him to be expected to do Emery's Job?
Everyone knows that, as an interim, your responsibility is "loose"

There's a reason everybody knows that Arteta took over/replaced Emery and never Ljunberg.(including you). All newsite, blogs and all says Arteta replaced Emery. If Ljunberg replaced Emery, why haven't any site said that Arteta replaced Ljunberg?

....Like a servant waiting for his master's son to take over his Master's properties. Everyone knows it'll be wrong to call the servant "master" just because he's overseeing the preparation of the master's son's coming.

To fill in what vacancy? Is there no one there before?

What other context are you talking about when the definition of replace is as clear below as anything?

airmark:
Who said 'i don't care who replaced Rohr, he must go to move forward'?

Who said hire Renard?

airmark:
You are the one not ok, and everybody have told you.

NFF announced Peseiro as Rohr's permanent replacement. You should have objected if not ok with him. But because your solution was Rohr must go and anyone could replace him, you didn't object.

You need to stop embarrassing yourself.

You must be lieing to yourself and your conscience if you refuse to acknowledge that I recommended Renard for the job.

Stop embarrassing yourself. It's so shameful.

So Chelsea sack Scolari and replace him with Hiddink, I will now go and start criticising Ancelotti who has nothing to do with Chelsea job yet.

Does it make sense to you Airmark? Sometimes make you stand one side as observer and read some of your comments. You will bury your head in shame, I assure you.

airmark:
When Peseiro was appointed, did you object to it? That now confirms your view that you don't care about anyone that replaced Rohr.

Now you need to be flogged with koboko at the back of your neck.

Why will I object someone somewhere in Germany when the replacement for the job is Eguavoen? Are you okay like this?

airmark:
You said you didn't care who replaced Rohr and when Peseiro was signed, you didn't object.

This L you are trying to shy away from, will eventually choke you.

Why will I object when it was Eguavoen that replaced Rohr? Wetin concern me with Peseiro?

Did I mention names that I want for the job? Was Peseiro name there? What did you ask Popizaino?

You see this screenshot below? It will forever choke you and your goons... It is there in black and white. All your agenda is DoA...

Una weight no reach.

izzou:
[color=royalblue]No, i don't.

[/color]

Well if you insist, then it's now clear to everyone that you intentionally wanted to push and agenda, and I have clearly proved all of you wrong.

Jodera:
He was not replacing anybody. He was just a stop gap.

There's a reason he's called "interim".

I no go school o, but is this not the definition of replace?

If you replace one thing or person with another, you put something or someone else in their place to do their job

Was Ljunberg not put in Emery's position, to do his job? Isn't that replacement?

Na wao.... You are not even arguing that Ljunberg replace Emery for the mean time, till a permanent replacement is found. That would be another thing entirely. Telling me that Ljunberg did not replace anybody is you being economical with the truth.

popizaino:
I'm still coming to that but i want him to accept what he said with his own mouths before we proceed.

Look at what I said with my own mouth.

Where are the evidences wey yapa you told Airmark of?

popizaino:
The only thing everyone sees is that you said you don't care about who replaces Rohr.

Another lie.

This is what everyone see.

Disstroy genuinely wanted to know my view. He was not after any agenda that's why he specifically asked me who I think should replace Rohr, and I made myself very clear.

You know the truth, but agenda and pride will not allow you accept your goof.

popizaino:
Strawman.


Why did you tell Nigerians you don't care about who replaces Rohr?

This is what I told Nigerians below...