₦airaland Forum

nateevs:
Me I just dey hear about Pedro Neto news.

I couldn't be more pleased about news. Not particularly about who was purchased in the end, but in the fact that this is evidence that Maresca is a problem solver.

After the last game, I was highlighting vehemently critical issues that could derail Maresca's season even before it starts - LW/RW issues.

This signing shows that the problem was glaring as well and needed an immediate fix, and they went out to the market for a plug.

According to Airmark, CF or nothing. To him, CF is the only attacker in the team. Buy a shiny new toy. Problem fixed.

airmark:
Is defence Arsenal's most important problem?

Who is discussing Arsenal with you? Is Arsenal my problem?

Chelsea made a defender their first signing this season after the flopping of last season.
New coach came in and told you that one of the first meetings he held with players concern the number of goals the defence conceded last season.

Any right thinking person don't need to be told what Chelsea's major problem is.

You are here asking me irrelevant nonsense question.

airmark:
You want him to throw Sterling, Mudryk and Jackson under the bus and point to Neto, Omorodion, Dewsbury and Guiu that have gulped over 120m already with Osimhen still on our radar, before you know where our major problem lies?

You are 'ridiculously terrible'.

You tackle your most important problem first

Read the text on the image again. What you can't see for more than one year, a coach identified in few days.

airmark:
Tosin, Fofana, Colwill, Disasi are above Badiashile on the pecking order of CBs for any Chelsea fan, not named Timbros.

So, you will say Arsenal's major problem is defence because they signed Calafiori first, right?

I will say Chelsea's major problem is defence because the head coach thinks so.

Abi you sabi football pass Enzo?

airmark:
I have stated it here severally why attack is the major issue and I have suggested what I believe will improve our attack and defence to challenge City and Arsenal.

If you don't have retentive memory, that shouldn't be my problem.

Enzo Maresca thinks otherwise.

We know whose opinion hold water more.

UncleHaba22:
Check his chance miss for a defensive alaves that rarely creat chances

Scoring 9 goals for a team that, according to you, rarely create chances, do you think he missed a lot of chances?

airmark:
To you with next to nothing football knowledge, coaches are Gods and can't make mistakes in their decisions.

So you are saying that Maresca made a mistake of tackling the subject of goals conceded last season in one of his first meetings with the players?

Your case keeps getting worst by the day.

airmark:
As usual, you didn't even watch any of our Preseason matches.

If Badashile won't start for any sensible coach, will Fofana?

Every sensible coach tackles the major problem first. Enzo have told you the major problem, and that's the first thing he tackled. Maybe you know more than him.

airmark:
Honest advice - Go back to Primary school.

Did Chelsea attack improve last season compared to season before or not? Did Chelsea defence improve in the same time frame?

Which is Chelsea's major problem?

Professor.

Kimbeast:
Thats not his name. His name is Omorodion which means Children above all. Its an Edo name.

I know his real name is Omorodion. I'm just curious to know the meaning of his banter name.

And, it's nothing serious. Na just banter

Leyqute:
Have a guess.

Jeez!

Leyqute:
This guy’s parents no try. Call the kid “Sam” and save him years of embarrassment. Being called “Omoriodo” is punishment enough for anyone.

What does that word mean?

Whizlight:
I'm not saying anything but this man has eyes at least

Airmark will turn a blind eye to this quote.

He knows more than the coach.

airmark:
Badiashile will not start any match when we have better defenders in the team.

If the season starts and he starts Badiashile, then Maresca loves mediocrity like you do.

You keep shouting Badashile will not start, but when I asked you if Fofana will start after that disasterclass, you keep avoiding that one

Are these not the injured defenders you are saying will come back and stabilise our defence?

airmark:
You wouldn't tell us the addition and influence of Palmer but would be doing illogical comparisons.

Palmer was the difference last season and if we continue giving him wastepipes upfront to serve, he will be frustrated and leave us when we need him most. He won't want to continuously shoulder the burden of wasteful strikers, while the likes of Foden, celebrate silverwares and gets him benched in the national team.

I don't understand... Is Palmer not part of the Chelsea attack you have beenncastigating all this time?

So if Osimhen joins now and start performing, you will now say apart from Palmer and Osimhen, our attack is trash? Or if your Dovbyk still join you will say apart from Palmer and Osimhen and Dovbyk, our attack is trash...

Is Palmer different from Chelsea attack?

rooftops:
Who be the full squad again? No be only palmer remain?
Man this is our reality.
How can you spend so much and you are still lacking in all parts of the field. Keeper? We haven't sorted it, defense? Looking like it might be worse than last season, midfield? Still incomplete and attack? Na confusion full there.

I think the worst of them all is that defence. How can you have five defenders and not one make sense.

Don't allow airmark see this.

airmark:
Attack is our major problem.

An attack that doubled their goal tally of previous season is the major problem.

But a horrendous defence that double their goal conceded from previous season is a minor problem.

Clown.

airmark:
Maresca starting 2 Left-footed players as CBs against Madrid is suicidal.

Maresca is looking like a mistake of a coach already.

Blame ANYTHING than defence.

Maresca instructed Badashile to jog while his keeper is being rounded.

airmark:
Comprehension, zero.

Everyone knows that you admire goal-shy and wasteful strikers.

So I am now officially the board that is in charge of getting a striker for Chelsea. The same board in charge that impressively don't think like me

Comprehension 100. 🤡🤡

airmark:
I doubted the loan and not the interest in Osimhen.

That we are linked to additional two strikers, shows those in charge impressively don't think like you do.

airmark:
It's official, Tim.bros is in charge of getting strikers for Chelsea.

Airmark the oche barber🤡🤡

airmark:
When you have a prolific striker that knows how, where and when to open up for passes perfectly and superb in front of goal, even the keeper will trust and set him up on goal. But when you have Jackson, a wastepipe in front of goal, even the most cheerful giver in the team will think twice before releasing him.

Are we saying we should pay above the roof and get a Nico that won't join a conference league team, because we want to keep a wasteful striker in the team?

I remember this is how you wanted us to keep wasteful Morata, and we fell off waiting for his stone to produce water. He was later bundled out, justifying my argument against his purchase.

Later in the day I will dig deep into how having a wasteful striker but good support cast can be neutralized when playing numerous teams with low block in Epl. They will just double mark each winger on the ball and leave the wasteful striker to remain useless.

Like I said, all thanks to Jackson for all the missed chances in preseason.

airmark:
The usual ugly head.

Thanks to Jackson

Ibime:
Just remember to captain Haaland on match day 1 in FPL

Neglect the Egyptian king at your own peril.

airmark:
It's just like saying because you said Fraudiola was economical with the truth, so you didn't call him a liar. You are ridiculous.

You still haven't shown me where I said our injured defenders will not rescue us this season.

Does "Dr Fofana" translates "Fofana will not rescue us next season"?

airmark:
You know what you typed and posted. Don't be a coward.

Meanwhile, attached is the initial post that prompted my referring to past squads in which we had like 4 strikers.

I wanted Jackson loaned out and 2 new strikers signed. I have been consistent with that unlike you 'changing mouth' at every opportunity.

Where exactly did I say our injured defenders will not rescue us this season?

airmark:
All those injured players I told you would return and improve our defence but you mocked with sarcasm and called Dr Reece James, Dr Fofana, are back and you will be served your impending L at the appropriate time.

Where in that post did I say they will not rescue us this season as you accused me?

airmark:
I am not like you.

Check your past posts you are a timewaster. When we sign another striker I will come back to you. You enemy of Chelsea's progress.

Everybody can now see how you lie cheaply just to make a nonexistent point.

Show everyone here the post where I said our injured defenders will not rescue us this season. How is it hard for you to quote where I posted such?

airmark:
I have addressed that, and can't be repeating it.

Addressed what? You cheap liar.

Quote where I said our injured players won't rescue us this season.

airmark:
I have backed loaning out Jackson several times here. You even quoted one of the posts.

Tell me where I asked for 4 strikers with Jackson loaned out? Below is your lie.




Where did I state that we need 4 strikers if all you quoted are references?

Dirty liar, I only referred to past squads when you and some people were against loaning out Jackson and getting 2 new strikers.

This has always been my stand and I remember Unlimited tackled me on the LB.

Why were you referring to past squads?

airmark:
Have you agreed that I never wanted us to sign 4 strikers?

Who said you wanted us to sign 4 strikers?

Maybe you don't know who you are conversing with.... Where did I say you wanted us to sign 4 strikers?

airmark:
Have you agreed that I never wanted us to sign 4 strikers?

Have you agreed that you lied here?

airmark:
You referred to injured players as doctors with no hope of rescuing us next season. While I wanted bulk of our transfer funds to go to upgrade our attack, you were against it.

I hope you have been educated and finally delivered from the spirit of arguing blindly.

airmark:
So, we can all agree that Tim.bros is a liar, that I never asked Chelsea to sign 4 strikers.

Where is the lie here?

airmark:
So we should buy a new LB that will bench an English Vice captain of the team, right?

If Chilwell is not leaving, then no need buying another LB that will struggle to bench our English Vice captain, especially when Cucurella is looking manageable.

Chelsea's 2009/2010 Epl winning squad had Drogba, Shevy, Anelka and Sturrudge as our CFs.

Chelsea's 2016/2017 Epl winning squad had Diego Costa, Loic Remy, Batshuayi and Solanke as CFs.

The standard has really dropped for you to be thinking having 2 solid CFs, is too much of a call.

It's high time you stopped seeing Chelsea as Aston Villa. In fact Jackson is not even near Watkins in finishing.

airmark:
Chai, you are beyond repair.

Because of your busybody, you didn't understand the point I was driving at, before jumping into what didn't concern you.

Chelsea of those years, prepared 4 CFs for the season, so they wouldn't get caught napping with injuries during the season. Why can't we do such when Man City, have 2 solid CFs and over the years they have been the team to beat?.

Must one spoon-feed you before you could understand simple stuff?