I detest APC for lying to Nigerians and for subjecting everyone to hardship.

Please, i beg everyone reading this message to vote for PDP and Atiku Abubakar for President.

Congratulations to our incoming president, Atiku Abubakar.

Nigerians please vote for PDP so we can recover this country and fix our economy.

This is laudable. We have a country to recover and I use this opportunity to tell all Nigerians to vote for PDP.

PDP is a safe choice. We have done it before and we will do it again

Introduction
Proving that the 2019 Presidential election was substantially non-compliance will be very difficult for Atiku & the PDP.

Based on this awareness, the legal counsel of the respondents came to the Tribunal with a lazy strategy. Their plans were to avoid cross examination, to explore technicalities, to prevent server inspection and to discredit petitioners’ evidences.

As you read through this thought-provoking thread, you will discover how the legal counsels of the petitioners were able to spring a surprise and weather the storm through the following strategies:

1. The various issues for determination were reordered.
2. Some issues for determination were merged.
3. Submission of new academic qualifications for Buhari was rejected.
4. Arguments that Buhari’s qualification issue was a pre-election matter were rejected.
5. Summary of wrong computation of votes in 11 focal states was tendered.
6. False information in Buhari affidavit were re-emphasized
7. The inec server result.
8. The inec server distraction.
9. Plan B (Inconclusive Elections).
10. Conclusion

1. Reordering the issues for determination
One of the things that delighted my heart was the way the petitioners’ legal counsel reordered the issues for determination starting with the most brutal ones. Take for example the issue of Buhari’s non-qualification was presented as the first issue for determination followed by the submission of false information to inec. This was a brilliant move by the legal counsel of Atiku & the PDP.

2. Some issues for determination were merged.
In order to reinforce the strength of the petitioner’s final written address, some issues were merged together. The issues of non-qualification and false information were argued together so as to weaken the defence counsel of the respondents. Also the issues of electoral corruption plus non-compliance were merged as well. Thus, the respondents made the mistake of addressing one of the merged issues and abandoning the other, which is equally as important.

3. Submission of new academic qualifications for Buhari were rejected
The 2nd respondent tried to bring in more credentials that were not listed in Buhari’s resume and in his form CF001 but their efforts were checkmated. Atiku’s legal counsel posited that any fresh qualifications that were not contained in exhibit P1 (Form CF001) is unnecessary to the questioned election and can not be allowed in determining Buhari’s qualification as at the time of the election. See page 7, paragraph 3.15 of petitioner’s final address to Buhari.

4. Arguments that buhari’s qualification issue was a pre-election matter were rejected
While the respondents argued that Buhari’s qualification issue was a pre-election matter thus statute barred, petitioners’ counsel rejected this position.

Atitu’s lawyers argued that failure to fulfil the conditions relating to qualification as stipulated in section 131(d) of the constitution is a valid ground for questioning an election. The case of Dingyadi & Anor versus Inec (2010) was cited where the Supreme Court held that non-qualification is a ground for questioning an election in an election petition. See page 6, paragraph 3.10 of petitioner’s final address.

5. False information in Buhari affidavit were re-emphasized
The respondents tried to be crafty by arguing that the petitioners failed to prove that Buhari submitted false information in his affidavit. Consequently, Atiku’s legal counsel reminded them that Buhari’s witness had already reinforced the petitioner’s evidence and that the respondent did not even contest the adduced evidence.

Sadly for Apc, inec & Buhari, they did not call a single witness or provide any evidence to prove that the information in his affidavit is true, which means that they have agreed that the information is false as alleged.

6. Cambridge versus WAEC result
The discrepancies between the Cambridge result and the waec result were also highlighted. One result showed 6 subjects while another showed 8 subjects. The petitions’ counsel went on to conclude that both results are not reliable. Besides, both results bear a strange name (Mohamed Buhari). Sadly, the respondents did not explain the discrepancies and one of their witnesses also confess that the Cambridge document is not a certificate during cross examination.

7. Wrong computation of votes in 11 focal states
The votes of APC were inflated by 5.98 million at the various stages of collation. Also the votes of the PDP were inflated as well by APC riggers just to cause confusion and give an impression that both parties rigged the election. The petitioners consequently argued that a readjustment of the result will show that PDP won the election with a margin of over 200,000 votes.

Atiku’s legal counsel cleverly brought in this conclusion @ the eleventh hour through a statistician who analysed all the result sheets and compared them with what INEC announced. The respondents did not respond to this allegation because it was an ambush and they were helpless.

8. INEC server result
All the 3 respondents did not lead any evidence to disproof the server result adduced by the petitioners’ counsel. This is a big plus for Atiku and the PDP because were a party fails to lead evidence in his pleading, the pleading is deemed to be abandoned. Also, the respondent assertion that e-collation & transmission were prohibited by the electoral act was rebuffed by the petitioners. The respondents were reminded that section 52(2) of the 2015 electoral act as amended had removed the restriction on electronic voting.

9. INEC server distraction
The noise and controversy generated by the server also created sufficient distraction to the respondents’ team, especially INEC. While the Atiku Team were busy proving other grounds of their petition, the respondents were struggling on how to deny the existence of the server.

As part of their lazy strategy, rather than disprove the contents of the server, they took the bait of denying the existence of a server, only for them to admit it later at the close of the case. This threw their credibility into the gutter.

10. Plan B (Inconclusive Elections)
Another brilliant move by the petitioners was to throw in an alternative prayer to declare the elections as inconclusive and order a rerun. They established that the actual total number of void/rejected votes was higher than the difference between Atiku and Buhari, thus, INEC ought to have declared the elections as inconclusive. The respondents had no answer to this. This was like a Plan B, so that even if the respondents’ team found any technicality to rely on, the case would be salvaged.

11. Conclusion
From all indications, the petitioner’s counsels have done very well and the 2019 election is very likely to be the first Presidential election that will be reversed by our Judiciary.

Many will argue from a lazy perspective that it has never happened before and so the electoral fraud of Buhari will survive judicial scrutiny. Well, that it has never happened before does not mean it will not happen one day.

Yaradua almost lost at the Supreme Court in 2008 due to a minor issue (non-serialized ballot papers). However, the issues with the 2019 Presidential election are multi-dimensional and the evidences are stronger.

In conclusion, the failure of the 2 of the respondents to call any witness is a big plus for the petitioners and these are the reasons why many learned people can easily conclude that #atikuiscoming to #sackbuhari


By: Dokun Ojomo @DokunOjomo & David Ashaolu @AshaKonko

10 REASONS WHY ATIKU IS NOT COMING

A point by point rebuttal to the above subject matter

—Abstract (executive summary)
—Definition of terms
—A rebuttal to the subject matter (why Atiku is not coming)
—Conclusion

Abstract (executive summary)
Two years ago, INEC announced their plan to deploy electronic transmission & collation of polling unit results to enhance the credibility of the 2019 election. The technology was consequently used and the outcome revealed that Buhari lost.

Ironically, Inec tried in vain to dump the result but it was too late, a brave anonymous staff of inec downloaded the result and forwarded it to Atiku for a looming post-election litigation.

The possibility that Atiku will win is very high given the avalanche of evidence he has to proof his appeal.

Definition of terms
—Soft copy of the presidential result
The aggregated result of all the polling units across Nigeria sent via a smart card reader (SCR) to a backend belonging to inec for automated processing.

—Backend
Backend is a computer system which consists of a server, a database and an application.

—Front end
Frontend is that part of a computer system or application with which enables user-friendly interaction with a computer system.

—Digital evidence
Digital evidence is defined as information and data of value to an investigation that is stored on, received or transmitted by an electronic device

—Whistle blower
A whistle blower is a person, who could be an employee of a company, or a government agency, disclosing information to the public or some higher authority about any wrongdoing, which could be in the form of fraud, corruption, etc.

A point by point rebuttal to the subject matter (why Atiku is not coming)

1. Atiku’s Server Argument is a SCAM
Note that Atiku is not in court to argue about the meaning of a server but he is in court to proof that he won majority votes that were cast in the just concluded 2019 election. To prove his point, Atiku has presented digital evidences to the tribunal which comprises of the following:

A. Soft copy of the presidential result obtained from the backend server of INEC.
B. Total number of accredited voters via the smart card reader (SCR).

The above evidences were obtained from a whistle blower who is a staff member of inec but wishes to remain anonymous. The soft copy result of the presidential election serves as a powerful evidence which shows that Atiku got 18.35 million votes while Buhari and the other contestants got 16.7 million votes and 1.3 million votes (others) respectively but excluding Rivers State data.

Note that digital evidences are very difficult to falsify or destroy because it will leave a trail / footprint unlike paper evidence which could be altered / falsified.

The total number of accredited voters is another strong evidence Atiku has presented in his petition to reinforce his appeal that he won the election. INEC said only 29.3 million Nigerians did accreditation but data obtained from the backend server belonging to INEC shows that more that 37.6 million people did accreditation.

This means that over 8 million votes were depleted and this further gives credence to Atiku’s appeal that his votes were reduced from 18.35 million to 11.26 million (-7.09 million). Also note that Buahari’s votes were reduced from 16.7 million to 15.19 million (-1.51 million). This was deliberately by APC & INEC just to confuse investigation.

2. it does not matter whether INEC has a Server since the law does not recognize it
From a direct point of view, the electoral law does not recognise the server & the smart card reader but from an indirect point of view, the law does not prohibit INEC from modernising, upgrading, automating and determining how to conduct the election (Section 52(2) of the electoral act 2010). However, what is most important regarding the Atiku’s petition is that he has evidence to show that he won. It is only mischief makers that are twisting the narrative.

3. The Law recognises Form EC8A, signed by agents, collation officers.
Yes and nobody is contesting that fact.

4. Due to network connectivity issues, INEC could not have transmitted results
This is not true. Virtually every part of Nigeria has been covered by GSM infrastructure. Secondly, it was INEC that instructed their officials to transmit polling unit result to the backend server.


5. No lawyer, arguing an election petition case will make an argument based on Servers

Atiku’s petition is built on 5 pillars:
—That buhari did not score majority of the vote cast.
—That buhari’s election is invalid by reason of corruption, before & during the election.
—That buhari does not possess the required minimum qualification.
—That Buhari lied under oath about his credentials thus committing as offence know as perjury.
—That the 2019 election did not fully comply with the 2010 electoral act.

Like I said earlier, Atiku is not in court to base his argument about the meaning of a server but he is in court to proof that he won majority of votes cast in the just concluded 2019 election. The most potent evidence remains the information in the backend server belong to INEC.

6. No party agent authenticated any results on a Server post-voting and the counting of votes
Blame INEC for not allowing collation agents of the various political parties to view details of the election results, transmitted from the polling units to the backend server of INEC.

The original plan was to allow political party agents have viewing access to the frontend of INEC computer application at the various state collation centres but after Buhari lost, INEC did a detour by dumping the earlier plan. Their servers were deliberately short-down, thus preventing collation agents of political parties from viewing, authenticating and re-confirming the soft copy result with the hard copy result.

7. Illegal & unauthorised access to a Server is a crime under the Cybercrime Act?
In the context of the 2019 election, nobody (PDP & Atiku) had committed any Cyber-crime. It was a whistle blower who blew the whistle and gave Atiku the required evidence. Again, it is the inec chairman who has committed a crime by conveying false election information to all Nigerians.

8. The server result presented by Atiku is extremely ridiculous.
Statistical research methods such as correlation analysis will show you that the results obtained from inec backend server is more statistically logical than the one which was announced by Professor Yakubu Mahood. How can peaceful regions like the s/west, s/east and the s/south have a low turnout ratio than the n/east?

The turnout ratio in the n/east was about 44% while the INEC result gave the s/west, s/east & s/south an average turnout ratio of 29%. Borno State for example has more voters that Anambra.

9. Atiku’s 400 witnesses are far too few to prove or disprove anything
It is not the quantity of witnesses but the quality that matters. Kindly note that 4 international observer group from America and EU had already said the election was badly conducted.

With just 200 witnesses + video evidences + international observer statements and publications + newspaper publications + statistical evidences among others, I am optimistic that Atiku and his team of lawyers will proof that Atiku is the true winner.

10. The Borno election results
The Borno election result need to be further investigated. So far, about 3,500 exhibits have been submitted at the tribunal regarding that state. This goes to show how bad the 2019 election was.

To me, I will classify Borno, Yobe, Kano & Zamfara as the Head Quarters of Election corruption Centres in Nigeria. Zamfara and Kano states both have 11,000 exhibits against them at the tribunal pertaining to electoral malpractices.

Conclusion
The inability of inec to justify Buhari’s victory so far gives credence to Atiku’s appeal that he is the true winner. The server evidence remains a nemesis to APC / INEC / Buhari.

Every right thinking person with good education knows that the result which inec announced on 27 Feb are not genuine.

I am very confident that the judiciary will give justice to the true winner.

10 REASONS WHY ATIKU IS NOT COMING

A point by point rebuttal to the above subject matter

—Abstract (executive summary)
—Definition of terms
—A rebuttal to the subject matter (why Atiku is not coming)
—Conclusion

Abstract (executive summary)
Two years ago, INEC announced their plan to deploy electronic transmission & collation of polling unit results to enhance the credibility of the 2019 election. The technology was consequently used and the outcome revealed that Buhari lost.

Ironically, Inec tried in vain to dump the result but it was too late, a brave anonymous staff of inec downloaded the result and forwarded it to Atiku for a looming post-election litigation.

The possibility that Atiku will win is very high given the avalanche of evidence he has to proof his appeal.

Definition of terms
—Soft copy of the presidential result
The aggregated result of all the polling units across Nigeria sent via a smart card reader (SCR) to a backend belonging to inec for automated processing.

—Backend
Backend is a computer system which consists of a server, a database and an application.

—Front end
Frontend is that part of a computer system or application with which enables user-friendly interaction with a computer system.

—Digital evidence
Digital evidence is defined as information and data of value to an investigation that is stored on, received or transmitted by an electronic device

—Whistle blower
A whistle blower is a person, who could be an employee of a company, or a government agency, disclosing information to the public or some higher authority about any wrongdoing, which could be in the form of fraud, corruption, etc.

A point by point rebuttal to the subject matter (why Atiku is not coming)

1. Atiku’s Server Argument is a SCAM
Note that Atiku is not in court to argue about the meaning of a server but he is in court to proof that he won majority votes that were cast in the just concluded 2019 election. To prove his point, Atiku has presented digital evidences to the tribunal which comprises of the following:

A. Soft copy of the presidential result obtained from the backend server of INEC.
B. Total number of accredited voters via the smart card reader (SCR).

The above evidences were obtained from a whistle blower who is a staff member of inec but wishes to remain anonymous. The soft copy result of the presidential election serves as a powerful evidence which shows that Atiku got 18.35 million votes while Buhari and the other contestants got 16.7 million votes and 1.3 million votes (others) respectively but excluding Rivers State data.

Note that digital evidences are very difficult to falsify or destroy because it will leave a trail / footprint unlike paper evidence which could be altered / falsified.

The total number of accredited voters is another strong evidence Atiku has presented in his petition to reinforce his appeal that he won the election. INEC said only 29.3 million Nigerians did accreditation but data obtained from the backend server belonging to INEC shows that more that 37.6 million people did accreditation.

This means that over 8 million votes were depleted and this further gives credence to Atiku’s appeal that his votes were reduced from 18.35 million to 11.26 million (-7.09 million). Also note that Buahari’s votes were reduced from 16.7 million to 15.19 million (-1.51 million). This was deliberately by APC & INEC just to confuse investigation.

2. it does not matter whether INEC has a Server since the law does not recognize it
From a direct point of view, the electoral law does not recognise the server & the smart card reader but from an indirect point of view, the law does not prohibit INEC from modernising, upgrading, automating and determining how to conduct the election (Section 52(2) of the electoral act 2010). However, what is most important regarding the Atiku’s petition is that he has evidence to show that he won. It is only mischief makers that are twisting the narrative.

3. The Law recognises Form EC8A, signed by agents, collation officers.
Yes and nobody is contesting that fact.

4. Due to network connectivity issues, INEC could not have transmitted results
This is not true. Virtually every part of Nigeria has been covered by GSM infrastructure. Secondly, it was INEC that instructed their officials to transmit polling unit result to the backend server.


5. No lawyer, arguing an election petition case will make an argument based on Servers

Atiku’s petition is built on 5 pillars:
—That buhari did not score majority of the vote cast.
—That buhari’s election is invalid by reason of corruption, before & during the election.
—That buhari does not possess the required minimum qualification.
—That Buhari lied under oath about his credentials thus committing as offence know as perjury.
—That the 2019 election did not fully comply with the 2010 electoral act.

Like I said earlier, Atiku is not in court to base his argument about the meaning of a server but he is in court to proof that he won majority of votes cast in the just concluded 2019 election. The most potent evidence remains the information in the backend server belong to INEC.

6. No party agent authenticated any results on a Server post-voting and the counting of votes
Blame INEC for not allowing collation agents of the various political parties to view details of the election results, transmitted from the polling units to the backend server of INEC.

The original plan was to allow political party agents have viewing access to the frontend of INEC computer application at the various state collation centres but after Buhari lost, INEC did a detour by dumping the earlier plan. Their servers were deliberately short-down, thus preventing collation agents of political parties from viewing, authenticating and re-confirming the soft copy result with the hard copy result.

7. Illegal & unauthorised access to a Server is a crime under the Cybercrime Act?
In the context of the 2019 election, nobody (PDP & Atiku) had committed any Cyber-crime. It was a whistle blower who blew the whistle and gave Atiku the required evidence. Again, it is the inec chairman who has committed a crime by conveying false election information to all Nigerians.

8. The server result presented by Atiku is extremely ridiculous.
Statistical research methods such as correlation analysis will show you that the results obtained from inec backend server is more statistically logical than the one which was announced by Professor Yakubu Mahood. How can peaceful regions like the s/west, s/east and the s/south have a low turnout ratio than the n/east?

The turnout ratio in the n/east was about 44% while the INEC result gave the s/west, s/east & s/south an average turnout ratio of 29%. Borno State for example has more voters that Anambra.

9. Atiku’s 400 witnesses are far too few to prove or disprove anything
It is not the quantity of witnesses but the quality that matters. Kindly note that 4 international observer group from America and EU had already said the election was badly conducted.

With just 200 witnesses + video evidences + international observer statements and publications + newspaper publications + statistical evidences among others, I am optimistic that Atiku and his team of lawyers will proof that Atiku is the true winner.

10. The Borno election results
The Borno election result need to be further investigated. So far, about 3,500 exhibits have been submitted at the tribunal regarding that state. This goes to show how bad the 2019 election was.

To me, I will classify Borno, Yobe, Kano & Zamfara as the Head Quarters of Election corruption Centres in Nigeria. Zamfara and Kano states both have 11,000 exhibits against them at the tribunal pertaining to electoral malpractices.

Conclusion
The inability of inec to justify Buhari’s victory so far gives credence to Atiku’s appeal that he is the true winner. The server evidence remains a nemesis to APC / INEC / Buhari.

Every right thinking person with good education knows that the result which inec announced on 27 Feb are not genuine.

I am very confident that the judiciary will give justice to the true winner.

Slayer1914:
10 REASONS WHY ATIKU IS NOT COMING

1. Atiku’s Server Argument is a SCAM. An Expensive one. The Electoral Act as it exists in Nigeria today does not recognize the transmission of results to any Server or Servers anywhere.

2. So, it does not matter whether INEC has a Server or does not have one, or whether there is any information or data on the INEC Servers or not; the law does not recognize it, simple. This means that regardless of what party clowns and petty criminals like Reno Omokri are saying on social media, claiming they have ‘incontrovertible’ proof that INEC has a Server, all of this means nothing before the Law. Whether or not INEC has a Server, whether or not it transmitted any results to this Server, is immaterial before the current Electoral Laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Even a 100L Law Student understands this, how come Atiku’s SANs don’t?

3. What Nigerian electoral law as it currently exists recognises is the Form EC8 Series, especially Form EC8A, signed by agents, collation officers, etc, at the Polling Units. The only way to prove election results in Nigeria today is by the approved forms: the EC8 series. Not by any Server or Servers.

4. INEC could not have transmitted any results to any Server (even if the Server existed) because of network connectivity issues around the country. Several parts of Nigeria are not covered by mobile network which is necessary to guarantee successful transmission. Even INEC has explained that this was one of the reasons why it jettisoned the idea of electronic transmission, in addition to the fact that it is not currently supported by law. INEC has repeatedly explained that it used manual collation for the 2019 elections, as stipulated by the existing Electoral Laws of Nigeria.

5. No lawyer worth his salt, arguing an election petition case in Nigeria in 2019, will make an argument based on Servers, phantom or real. This suggests that Atiku’s lawyers are either clowns, or greedy, or both. This is all about milking him as much as possible. After the campaign-milking comes the election-petition-milking. After the election-petition-milking, probably the spiritual-assistance-milking will be the next level.

6. Please help ask: Which of the party agents – of any of the Parties – authenticated any results on a Server post-voting and the counting of votes? If there’s any agent who authenticated any results please let him or her come forward. Truth is that it didn’t happen! The only results party agents authenticated are the ones on Form EC8A, and this is the only evidence that will stand up in court.

7. Atiku and PDP say they got access to INEC Servers from where they retrieved the results they’re bandying about. Let’s even assume that those so-called Servers exist and that there are any results on them (there aren’t!) – do Atiku and PDP realise that illegal and unauthorised access to a Server is a crime under the Cybercrime Act? If you had (illegal) access as you claim to the Server, how do we know you did not manipulate whatever was present on that server, by adding or subtracting numbers, or smuggling extraneous data in? What Atiku and the PDP do not realise is that admitting in a Court of Law that they hacked into the database of a Government agency is itself proof of malicious and criminal conduct. Talk about self-incrimination. Atiku will not only lose the Election Petition case, he will go down in history as a Cyber Hacker and Manipulator.

8.

a. Take a look at the results presented by Atiku and the PDP, as their own genuine version of the results obtained from the INEC Server. It is extremely ridiculous, and can only support the theory that Atiku’s lawyers are both clownish and greedy.

b. See Lagos State, where 580,825 people validly voted for Buhari versus 448,015 for Atiku, making a total of 1,028,840. On the other hand, however, Atiku’s fabricated Server results allege that 1,103,297 people voted for him versus 1,422,906 for Buhari, making a total of 2,526,203. In other words, PDP and Atiku are alleging that 1.5 million votes somehow vanished into thin air in the cosmopolitan metropolis that is Lagos State.

c. Meanwhile, two weeks later, in the Governorship election, the total valid votes cast came to about 945,000, which is in consonance with the number that voted in the Presidential election, but nowhere near Atiku’s fabricated claims. How will Atiku explain this 1.5m difference between his fabricated Server result and the INEC Presidential result on the one hand, and his fabricated Server result and the INEC Governorship result on the other hand?

d. This is the pattern in all of Atiku’s fabricated Server results – his figures make no sense whatsoever. They didn’t employ common sense in their fabrications. According to Premium Times, “Mr Abubakar’s purported result implies that no invalid votes were recorded in the 33 states, and none of the 71 other presidential candidates obtained any score. In three states; Abia, Bauchi and Cross River, the documents show that the two candidates collectively got votes higher than the number of accredited voters.” Ridiculous!

9. Atiku’s so-called 400 witnesses which he is presenting in court are far too few to prove or disprove anything, especially in a Presidential Election. His lawyers know this, why are they not telling him the truth? The law says you have to prove your election petition case PU by PU. In the 2014 Osun Election Petition Tribunal alone, PDP originally sought to present 1,000 witnesses. 1,000. Just for Osun State alone. In Ekiti in 2014 APC sought to present 1,009 witnesses in the Governorship Election Petition. Now PDP wants to argue a PRESIDENTIAL election petition – with nationwide coverage – with only 400 witnesses. Joke!

10. Atiku and PDP question the INEC declared result in Borno State claiming that turnout could not have been that high because of the insurgency (Buhari 836,496 vs Atiku 71,788, making a total of 908,284). Guess what Atiku’s fabricated Server results claim: Buhari 849,599 vs Atiku 281,897, making a total of 1,131,496 – more than 200,000 votes higher than the declared INEC results. How does this make sense? How can you question the turnout in Borno on the basis of insurgency, and then go ahead to fabricate numbers that are even higher than what you’re querying?

ATIKU IS NOT COMING!

Atiku is just too much

1. They used a company in Israel to spoil Atiku's image.

2. They used a political party, PCP, to steal 110,196 votes from PDP.

3. They used trade moni, the police, inec, thugs, violence & voters intimidation to cheat Atiku.

Yet he won

#atikuIsComing

Profile of Nigeria’s best 11 from the South East & Presidential hopeful

1. Peter Obi
B.sc Philosophy
Business & Banking

2. Mustapha Chike Obi
B.sc Maths (1st class)
Business & Banking

3. Prof Charles Soludo
Ph.D. Economics
Professor of Economics

4. Osita Chidoka
M.Sc. Transport
Minister of Aviation

5. Prof Kingsley Moghalu
Ph.D. International relations & other degrees
Worked with the United Nation & CBN

6. Prof Bath Nnaji
Professor of Mechanical Engineering
Ex-Minister of Power

7. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala
Ph.D in Regional Economics & Development
Formerly @ World bank & Ministry of Finance

8. Chukwuemeka Chikelu
LLB Law from the University of Buckingham
A lawyer

9. Andy Uba
B.Sc. Geology
A Senator

10. Frank Nweke Jr
M.Sc. Public Admin
Former Minister & A Consultant

11. Ben Akabueze
B.sc Accounting
DG Budget office.

d Result inec is hiding

SW
Buhari - 53%
Atiku - 47%

SE
Buhari - 33%
Atiku - 67%

SS
Buhari - 28%
Atiku - 72%

NC
Buhari - 44%
Atiku - 56%

NE
Buhari - 51%
Atiku - 49%

NW
Buhari -61%
Atiku -39%

Total

Atiku - 48.8%

Buhari - 44.4%

voided - 3.3%

others - 3.5%

#AtikuIsComing

Historically, Buhari was never a popular aspirant until Bola Ahmed cleaned him up, funded is campaign and then used the media to re-brand his image.

After the election, a lot of people became wiser. Buhari's incompetence became apparent and he lost many followers.

In the South South and South East, Buhari's tactless approach to the issues of Niger-delta development, ethnic marginalization and the agitation for Biafra did him more harm than good.

In the South west, Buhari's open declaration that he does not support restructuring also decimated his popularity.

In the North central, Buhari's inability to curb the herdsmen/farmers clash also made him to loose followers.

In the North, Atiku had quality politicians who assisted him in winning decent votes across the North west and the North east. The names of these politicians include: Kwankwaso, Sule Lamido, Ahmed Markafi, Nnamadi Sambo, Aliyu Babangida, Tabunwal and many more.

So based on the above, every right thinking person will tell you that buhari lost. Please find below, details of how Nigerians voted.

SW
3.310 - Buhari (53%)
3.012 - Atiku (47%)
Winning margin 298,000 (Buhari)

SE
1.515 - Buhari (33%)
3.237 - Atiku (67%)
Winning margin 1.722 million (Atiku)

SS
1.22 - Buhari (29%)
2.94 - Atiku (71%)
Winning margin 1.72 million (Atiku)
The winning margin would have been more if votes from Rivers state were available.

NC
2.34 Buhari (44%)
2.99 Atiku (56%)
Winning margin 0.65 million (Atiku)

NE
2.62 - Buhari (51%)
2.55 - Atiku (49%)
Winning margin 70,000 (Buhari)

NW
5.72 - Buhari (61%)
3.69 - Atiku (39%)
Winning margin 2.03 million (Buhari)

Total no of voters per region

NW 9.41 m
NE 5.17 m
NC 5.33 m
SW 6.32 m
SE 4.74 m
SS 4.16 m

South – 15.22 m
North – 19.91 m

South – 9.2m (Atiku), 6m (Buhari)
Atiku won in the south with a margin of 3.2 million. The winning margin would have been more if votes from Rivers state were available.

North – 9.23 m (Atiku), 10.68 (buhari)
Buhari won in the North with a margin of 1.45 million


Total accreditation = 37.6 million

Total voided votes = 1.23 million

Total votes cast = 36.4 million

Winner / Atiku = 18.35 million

2nd place. Buhari = 16.7 million

Other candidates = 1.3 million votes


If you are not convince about all that i have said, please let me have your research in details just as i have done.

Best Regards

Adedokun

Lagos Nigeria.

asanwafo:
What u said is born out no research. U say what u think and u attribute it to research

@ Asanwafo,

Historically, Buhari was never a popular aspirant until Bola Ahmed cleaned him up, funded is campaign and then used the media to re-brand his image.

After the election, a lot of people became wiser. Buhari's incompetence became apparent and he lost many followers.

In the South South and South East, Buhari's tactless approach to the issues of Nige-delta development, ethnic marginalization and the agitation for Biafra did him more harm than good.

In the South west, Buhari's open declaration that he does not support restructuring also decimated his popularity.

In the North central, Buhari's inability to curb the herdsmen/farmers clash also made him to loose followers.

In the North, Atiku had quality politicians who assisted him in winning decent votes across the North west and the North east. The names of these politicians include: Kwankwaso, Sule Lamido, Ahmed Markafi, Nnamadi Sambo, Aliyu Babangida, Tabunwal and many more.

So based on the above, every right thinking person will tell you that buhari lost. Please find below, details of how Nigerians voted.

SW
3.310 - Buhari (53%)
3.012 - Atiku (47%)
Winning margin 298,000 (Buhari)

SE
1.515 - Buhari (33%)
3.237 - Atiku (67%)
Winning margin 1.722 million (Atiku)

SS
1.22 - Buhari (29%)
2.94 - Atiku (71%)
Winning margin 1.72 million (Atiku)
The winning margin would have been more if votes from Rivers state were available.

NC
2.34 Buhari (44%)
2.99 Atiku (56%)
Winning margin 0.65 million (Atiku)

NE
2.62 - Buhari (51%)
2.55 - Atiku (49%)
Winning margin 70,000 (Buhari)

NW
5.72 - Buhari (61%)
3.69 - Atiku (39%)
Winning margin 2.03 million (Buhari)

Total no of voters per region

NW 9.41 m
NE 5.17 m
NC 5.33 m
SW 6.32 m
SE 4.74 m
SS 4.16 m

South – 15.22 m
North – 19.91 m

South – 9.2m (Atiku), 6m (Buhari)
Atiku won in the south with a margin of 3.2 million. The winning margin would have been more if votes from Rivers state were available.

North – 9.23 m (Atiku), 10.68 (buhari)
Buhari won in the North with a margin of 1.45 million


Total accreditation = 37.6 million

Total voided votes = 1.23 million

Total votes cast = 36.4 million

Winner / Atiku = 18.35 million

2nd place. Buhari = 16.7 million

Other candidates = 1.3 million votes


If you are not convince about all that i have said, please let me have your research in details just as i have done.

Best Regards

Adedokun

Lagos Nigeria.

Why Buhari is afraid of Onnoghen

Justice Onnoghen was one of the 3 Justices who called for the cancellation of the 2007 election and asked INEC to conduct a new election within 90 days due to non-compliance with the 2006 electoral act and other irregularities.

Buhari knows that Justice Onnoghen is not corrupt and he might give a fair judgement.

Atiku was too sure that buhari will rig hence extra efforts were deployed towards the gathering of evidences for post election litigation.

While INEC spent almost 3 days doing their collation, Atiku also quickly did his own collation as well.

Buhari ought to have known better that it's impossible to rig without being caught because we are in a digital age.

As I speak to you, atiku has a compilation of how the election was rigged state by state and local government by local government.

These compilations were done by auditors, mathematicians, statisticians and other forensic experts.

Buhari and others rigged the election in several twists and turns so as to confuse investigation but the server result has uncovered how they rigged.

Buhari's votes were inflated by 260,000 in the north west, 619,000 in the north east and 112,000 in the north central.

However, kindly note that buhari's votes were reduced in the south by 2.59 million. This was deliberately done to confuse investigation.

On the other hand, Atiku's votes were reduced by 3.3 million in the north and 3.79 million in the south.

While Atiku's aggregate votes were reduced by 7.09 million, Buhari's aggregate votes were reduced by a net sum of 1.59 million (2.59m - 0.991m = 1.599 million).

Conclusion

Atiku's evidences are so powerful to the extent that the INEC chairman is even hiding vital electoral result sheet despite court orders which permits Atiku to inspect those results.

So just be rest assured that Atiku will reclaim his mandate within 12 months.

As you can see, but Buhari and Osinbajo can not celebrate because it is a temporary victory.

Thanks for reading.

Please note that the writer of this piece does not do propaganda. This write-up is a compilation of several investigations and research i did about how the 2019 election was rigged.

Dokun from Lagos.
Bsc. Economics, Diploma transport & logistics.

South-West Region of Nigeria.

id911:



Don't lose hope Sir. The Supreme Court is an institution that respect and interpret the constitution in accordance with their conscience and most times they are impartial. They will look at the evidence presented before them without fear or favor and would do justice to the case. We pray our stolen mandate is retrieve

@Id 911

Well said sir,

You spoke very well.

Atiku was too sure that buhari will rig hence extra efforts was deployed towards the gathering of evidences for post election litigation. .

While inec spent almost 3 days doing their collation, Atiku also quickly did his own collation as well.

Buhari ought to have known better that it's impossible to rig without being caught because we are in a digital age.

As I speak to you, atiku has a compilation of how the election was rigged state by state and local government by local government.

These compilations were done by auditors, mathematicians, statisticians and other forensic experts.

Buhari and others rigged the election in several twists and turns so as to confuse investigation but the server result has uncovered how they rigged.

Buhari's votes were inflated by 260,000 in the north west, 619,000 in the north east and 112,000 in the north central.

On the other hand, atiku's votes were reduced by 3.3 million in the north and 3.79 million in the south.

Atiku's evidences are so powerful to the extent that the inec chairman is even hiding vital electoral result sheet despite court others which permits atiku to inspect those results.

So just be rest assured that Atiku will reclaim his mandate within 12 months.

As you can see, but buhari and osinbajo can not celebrate because it is a temporary victory.

Dokun from Lagos.

asanwafo:
He did not loose. Any time people are alleging rigging in an election, attention is always directed to the north. Is high time we began to focuse on the southeast and south south during election. What happens in these two geo political zones is terrible ranging from flagrant allocation of votes, intimidation of opposition party supporters to massive vote buying.

Please do your research very well.

Buhari lost the election and his popularity was overated.

Before the election, Atiku already had the south east, south south, middle belt, 50% of the south west and 50% of the north east in his pocket, hence there was no way buhari could win.

PrecisionFx:


Pls bring the akwaibom video.

There was absolutely no need for PDP to start rigging their stronghold

Before the election, atiku already had the south east, the south south, the north central and half of South West and north east in his pocket.

Rabiu kwankwaso, markafi, sule lamido, sambo, tabuwal and others delivered 33% of north west to atiku.

Hence atiku was sure to win.

PrecisionFx:




Giving out money to people to vote for u is quite different from changing election results completely, sending thugs n police + soldiers to disrupt, kill n burn election materials in a certain parties stronghold...giving out money as bribe isn't same with the massive thumb printing exercise that INEC organized in Borno n Yobe states.

Atiku knew buhari will rig hence, Atiku used his initiative, human resources & technology to man the election nationwide.

With the help of forensic experts, auditors & statisticians, Atiku was able to produced a state by state analysis of how the election was rigged.

Simply read the petition Atiku submitted to the tribunal.

Yusman316:
Defenders of absurdity will start making all sorts of permutations. Results from each state were declared on national TV without objections, after which the figures were summed up and announced. Now someone is claiming there is a different figure somewhere, and funny enough some fellas will believe the narrative. What a pity

Atiku knew buhari will rig hence, Atiku used his initiative, human resources & technology to man the election nationwide.

With the help of forensic experts, auditors & statisticians, Atiku was able to produced a state by state analysis of how the election was rigged.

Simply read the petition Atiku submitted to the tribunal.

krendo:
The election is a sum total of all the votes cast at each poll across the Nation

It is not impossible to know the sum before INEC announced it

INEC needs to stop behaving as if this is 1920s

INEC falsified the results and should own up and redeem this country from downward slide

All the party agents have copies of the results from all polling units so it is not impossible to know the results

Atiku knew buhari will rig hence, Atiku used his initiative, human resources & technology to man the election nationwide.

With the help of forensic experts, auditors & statisticians, Atiku was able to produced a state by state analysis of how the election was rigged.

Simply read the petition Atiku submitted to the tribunal.

eodavids:


Be reasonable and make a reasonable comment.

Whatever Nigeria, Nigerians and INEC does in this 2019 elections becomes a precedent that will be followed in the future.

WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND. A BETTER NIGERIA THAT WE ALL WANT DOES NOT REQUIRE THIS FORM OF CORRUPTION.

Atiku knew buhari will rig hence, Atiku used his initiative, human resources & technology to man the election nationwide.

With the help of forensic experts, auditors & statisticians, Atiku was able to produced a state by state analysis of how the election was rigged.

Simply read the petition Atiku submitted to the tribunal.

nwanyionitsha:
Smh for great ignorance. Fyi, inec has a server, inec server has the original results and there are people who have access to inec's server. You go soon know. Smh.
I also hope you know that the card readers are connected to a server?

Atiku knew buhari will rig hence, Atiku used his initiative, human resources & technology to man the election nationwide.

With the help of forensic experts, auditors & statisticians, Atiku was able to produced a state by state analysis of how the election was rigged.

Simply read the petition Atiku submitted to the tribunal.

sharena:
QUESTION I AM STILL ASKING IS THIS, IS THERE AN ELECTION THAT HAS NEVER BEEN RIGGED IN NIGERIA BEFORE? WHY IS THIS APC AND PDP OWN A DIFFERENT CASE?

Atiku knew buhari will rig hence, Atiku used his initiative, human resources & technology to man the election nationwide.

With the help of forensic experts, auditors & statisticians, Atiku was able to produced a state by state analysis of how the election was rigged.

Simply read the petition Atiku submitted to the tribunal.

Purej:
Most votes in the North were manually done, no card reader and accreditation of voters, hence card reader which was designed to automatically transmit result to INEC server , could not capture manual voting.

Any vote without card reader is null and void

Going by INEC server , ATIKU won the election. This is a serious case for Mahmoud, Buhari and APC.

Even Buhari and APC lawyers will find it very difficult to defend this case.

Atiku knew buhari will rig hence, Atiku used his initiative, human resources & technology to man the election nationwide.

With the help of forensic experts, auditors & statisticians, Atiku was able to produced a state by state analysis of how the election was rigged.

Simply read the petition Atiku submitted to the tribunal.

unite4real:
Our electoral law does not recognize result from server especially after it must have been bugged. The court will throw those figures out like a piece of rubbish in an old dark store. Super Ted

Atiku knew buhari will rig hence, Atiku used his initiative, human resources & technology to man the election nationwide.

With the help of forensic experts, auditors & statisticians, Atiku was able to produced a state by state analysis of how the election was rigged.

Simply read the petition Atiku submitted to the tribunal.

ollah2:


It's only a mad man that will ciam APC rigged and PDP didnt hence whining, crying and ranting.

Atiku knew buhari will rig hence, Atiku used his initiative, human resources & technology to man the election nationwide.

With the help of forensic experts, auditors & statisticians, Atiku was able to produced a state by state analysis of how the election was rigged.

Simply read the petition Atiku submitted to the tribunal.

iskay1971:
It will be a monumental proof of progress in our democracy if the election tribunal can alter the status quo.

Atiku knew buhari will rig hence, Atiku used his initiative, human resources & technology to man the election nationwide.

With the help of forensic experts, auditors & statisticians, Atiku was able to produced a state by state analysis of how the election was rigged.

Simply read the petition Atiku submitted to the tribunal.

frowland:


You need about 300k witnesses to validate your claim that there where nationwide irregularities. How long will you take to get this number of witnesses? Including feeding, accommodation, and logistics. They need to review the law on presidential election petitions. Thanks.

Atiku knew buhari will rig hence, Atiku used his initiative, human resources & technology to man the election nationwide.

With the help of forensic experts, auditors & statisticians, Atiku was able to produced a state by state analysis of how the election was rigged.

Simply read the petition Atiku submitted to the tribunal.

pastorcyrus:

It is quite obvious that Mr integrity lost the election,my happiness is that, his conscience will always tell him that he stole the people,s mandate anytime he calls himself Mr integrity.
God over all

Buhari has lost his integrity. he never had one.

Atiku knew buhari will rig hence, Atiku used his initiative, human resources & technology to man the election nationwide.

With the help of forensic experts, auditors & statisticians, Atiku was able to produced a state by state analysis of how the election was rigged.

Simply read the petition Atiku submitted to the tribunal.

ChristianNorth:

Years back it wasn't possible to sack a sitting governor but Peter Obi did and everyone is enjoying that precedent.

I pity the INEC chairman. He would likely end in prison.

From a legal perspective, inec is not suppose to conceal any evidence, provide cover up for APC, obstruct justice or alter any evidence. This is why i said the inec chairman might go to jail if he is not careful.

Wiseandtrue:

To be honest the bulk of the work lies with the Judiciary

They can either make history or let their names go with the wind! Forgotten!!!

Whatever judgement they arrive at, one thing has been established Buhari does not have integrity as he proclaimed neither is he Democratic!

Well said sir.