Try69's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Try69's Profile › Try69's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 20 pages)
Kumuyi and russell wouldn't have been a team if not for a causeTo spite the truth/church ![]() |
mavister: Since they are afraid to talk. It means they have nothing to say. (prooven fact).. Let me enlighten these cat-holics a bit.How many times have you told the same person "I love you" mamavister? |
mavister: amazing. Wish someone could clarify me on those questions rather than drifting away from them. Uh!Una dey look for fight... Catholic doctrines are everywhere on the internet..type catholic doctrine on google and read and decipher yourself mamavister abi wetin dem call u... If I ask you your churches's teaching on birth control, can you answer on your own or source for it on the net or you'd ask me to wait so that you go ask your GO. Abeg make una go sleep |
They should go and preach in the places where the good news has not been heard, it's good for christianity. What more do they want to tell me that I don't know OK, this is what I knowa: Jehovah's Witnesses. |
If you didn't know what her reply would be to such after dating her for so long, then there is a problem. One girl I met some time back told me she has not taken and will not take any drug when she falls sick, according to her, she speaks to her sicknesses and they leave. My point is "don't just date, communicate". |
Mrlouis: blah blah blah... Stories by the moon tale... All dis are stories.. Any one could have woken up to say all this... From dis post.. I personally dont get anything reasonable... I wonder if the others do.. No bible quotation with reference to what you are saying. We call this cock and bull story bro..Bla bla bla...and you don't think anyone could have woken up to write the bible? Smh.. Read more of history hear? |
jp philips: which one is the church of christ? im kinda lostThe church of christ is the Body He gave at the last supper that he also asked to be done in his commemoration |
A Born Again = A person baptised in christ = christian |
ukotmi: Please take time and read my background in other threads. I have never condemned the Catholic Church. I got born again in the Charismatic Renewal in 1988. baptized in the Spirit with evidence of speaking in other tongues in 1989. So seeing the light to me means getting answers to questions the Catholic Faith could not answer adequately.I can understand Wouldn't change my stand on ur case though I know a lot of people like this, they can't even see the whole truth elsewhere.. Most start up their own ministry Your case is still a case of "I too know" Can you beat what the church teaches on MORALITY which for me is utmost in this complex world we live in |
ukotmi: GOMBs, Bidam,some of us were serious catholics well schooled in the doctrines of the church before seeing the light. Some catholics are only catholic in name and don't know the doctrines. Some are not serious participants in activities at their home (home town) parishes. They stay in Lagos and Abuja etc and claim catholics.From what I can deduce up, there is no light in the catholic church? Ok! Can you kindly let us know where this light led you to? I'm interested.. Do not be ashamed to proclaim and stand for your faith.. You people can be very funny, you have seen light ![]() One thing I know about the catholic church is she has her stand on issues ranging from morals to theology and are easily sourced from libraries and the internet. Some of those praising you for seeing light are the same people their G.O told to self service freely.What is important here is the church's stand on tithes and that has been shown to you..and I don't believe any reverend father preaches malachi even if he names his collection "tithe". It is not enough to say I confirmed in 1845, you were practising what I call "show christianity".. That's what happens in these places of light you may have found yourself because it is suitable for you.. I remember attending a service in one of these bussiness centers and the female minister who presided (because her husband who is senior pastor was away) even if they were other male pastors said, she used to follow her parents to church and hymns are sang and that those hymns do not move her spirit..smh.. She even sang "stand up, stand up for Jesus" to burtress her point... It is actually some 1990's american pop styled xtian songs she prefers where jazz drums and other types of loud instruments are used that suits her..I personally don't av a problem with that but why condemn hymns for pete's sakes? PROTESTIANISM is actually a case of "I know more than my father".. That's why after luther left, his children children children are still leaving their fathers and what do you get? More churches that claim to have the brighter light It's easily inferred |
fr3do: didn't Peter,the man you refer to as the first Pope perform miracles in The Name of JesusDo you just hate the mother of Jesus because catholics honour her OR you hate her because the bible told you to? For behold, from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed - Mary Son, behold your mother - Jesus to john the beloved |
loveroftruth: Abeg shift ! Make you no rob me shite.I expected this.. ![]() |
To understand the bible in "context" and not just literally, one needs to study a little bit of history (languages, cultures, norms) of the times before, during and after christ. Scripture which my dear friend claimed JW's understanding and interpretation of is not inspired, makes me wonder and I asked a question he has refused to answer- how do JW's believe the interpretation of scripture is achieved? This forms a great debate between early theologians of the catholic and orthodox churches till date..(I can only deduce mathematics from the failed russell and co end time prophecy) JW end time prediction could have failed from the fact that the use of timing in the bible could peharps be figurative. When you create doctrines out of parts of scriptures, you should first of ask yourself if it does not disaffirm the fundamentals of the christian faith. Literal interpretation and disaffirmation in interpretation of the fundamentals of christ-likeness in scriptural understanding is the sole reason why history(culture, norms, traditions, languages e.t.c) can never be exempted from context in scriptural discernment. Literal interpretation examples are so numerous, from pluck out your eye if it cause you to sin to it's easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle.. are clear cases to suggest the depth unto which some other parts of scripture should be acclaimed "figurative". Now how do you disaffirm the fundamentals of christ-likeness (christianity i.e like christ)? Remember the story of the adoultrous woman? He who is without sin should cast the first stone? Or the parable of the lost sheep? The parable of the prodigal son? All these center on how christ would treat a sinner, and now if I say i want to be christ-like, do I cross to the other side of the road when i see the brother I have judged(even if judgement is for God) a sinner? Or speak not to him even while I accept him in my midst(like the pharisees)? Did christ eat with the tax collectors(sinners) or not? I once read a story by a man God delivered from the organization called Jw and almost cried. How he was not allowed to speak to his own daughter because she fornicated.. Thank God he is delivered of the bondage called JW. When I said bla bla bla..it was actually meant to avoid such epistles because the false prophecies of your founding fathers are proof that they would have come up with fascinating and conflicting doctrines which of course is of a confusing spirit. Have you asked yourself why the whole of christianity is not with the JWs? Your guess is as good as mine. |
loveroftruth: You are just a hypocrite !When you hear things, ask questions to garner in-depth knowledge. I talked about catastrophic doctrines, right? I talked about back and forth doctrines, right? Maybe you have not gotten the context. You can go back and re-read if you wish, this time carefully. First of, hope you can differentiate between and know the meaning of these words "DOCTRINES" $ "OBLIGATIONS". ? If yes, then see the catholic stand on tithes; Although the Church teaches that offering some form of material support to the Church is obligatory for all Catholic adults who are able to do so, it doesn't specify what percent of one's income should be given. Remember, tithing was an Old Testament obligation that was incumbent on the Jews under the Law of Moses. Christians are dispensed from the obligation of tithing ten percent of their incomes, but not from the obligation to help the Church. The key to understanding how God wants us to give to the Church is found in 1 Corinthians 16:2, "On the first day of the week [Sunday] each of you should set aside whatever he can afford," and in 2 Corinthians 9:5-8, So I thought it necessary to encourage the brothers to go on ahead to you and arrange in advance for your promised gift [donation], so that in this way it might be ready as a bountiful gift and not as an exaction. Consider this: Whoever sows sparingly will also reap sparingly, and whoever sows bountifully will also reap bountifully. Each must do as already determined without sadness or compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver. Moreover, God is able to make every grace abundant for you, so that in all things, always having all you need, you may have an abundance for every good work. To paraphrase: God doesn't demand a fixed amount of money from us; he wants us to give from the heart. If people are forced by their church to give a certain percent of their income, that's extortion. If they give freely and cheerfully the amount they are able, that's a gift. http://www.catholic.com/quickquestions/what-is-the-churchs-position-on-tithing And peharps you want to know how tithes was introduced into the church as she was expanding NOT as a doctrine but as an OBLIGATION OF CONSCIENCE for church expansion. Oya begin read http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14741b.htm Do you see similarities with what my points up there are? Did you notice any back and forth movement even if you want to claim it was doctrinal?Even if some catholics pay tithes once, no catastrophic (malachi) doctrine was attached to it. It was for those who could afford it. Talking about catastrophic teaching , maybe na because you no dey alive when russell and co predict the end of the world, you for vex pass me. ![]() B/w before you call me hypocrite, first call JMAN05 twice, catholics never attack people's belief system..JMAN05 was busy attacking catholic belief before the OP decided to open this thread so he too can defend their doctrines.. Did you notice his moniker on the topic? |
JMAN05: And I have stated that some mistakes could be out of human error. when u keep repeating what has been attended to, u dont sound serious. I keep saying that we are fallible, but we shouldnt dismiss the fact that truth comes gradually.*I teach something(A) today After a while, *i found A to be misleading, wrong (you say mistake) and change my stance to B After a while yet again *i go back to A(I earlier adjudged mistake) citing B to be a mistake Round-robin ![]() When the same mistakes are repeated, it's called confusion. Which kind clearer light light doesn't get clear by the day, light shines every other day ![]() |
JMAN05: We are not inspired. and you dont sound serious.I don't sound serious I'd leave that for readers to judge because twice I have proved you wrongI talked about back and forth teachings and you pointed out modified or once-changed teaching, how do those correlate? |
jp philips: I took time to study most of the offshoots in Christianity and i found the roman catholic most interesting in terms of how their doctrines are close to what Jesus taught while still on earth, i cant categorically say that my research was elaborate or sacrosanct however, i find some part of their doctrines very insulting not because it is not biblical but the explanations given there in eludes common sense.The things you find interesting and in line with what jesus taught are labelled demonic by protestants..what does that suggest to you? Confusion? pull-down-attempts at the church of christ as predicted by christ? For the ones you still term "insults", continue your quests in prayer and open mindedness to how they are taught. The church of christ does not err in what she teaches..God bless you |
JMAN05: Current understanding bro. light gets brighter each day.NO!!! I'd rather by reason say lights goes back and forth(flip flop) and that's not of God broFlip flops would either be "ON" or "OFF" If I use the flip flop logic, I can conclude thus; Resurrection of the Men of Sodom 1879 - ON 1952 - OFF 1965 - ON 1988 - OFF The 'Lord' in Romans 10:12-16 1903 - OFF 1940 - ON 1978 - OFF 1980 - ON 'Higher Powers' of Romans 13:1 1916 - OFF 1943 - ON 1964 - OFF Do you now see my emphasis? Do you notice that these dates span? By the ways, what are the newer explanations of these? Do you notice confusion? If you don't claim inspiration, then how do you draw your conclusion on scriptures? literal? Reason? Logic? Science? Divine inspiration? Just what? JMAN05: Maybe your not responding to this is a nod of approval. I repeat:Your reason here is flawed; My reasons(again I'd use the flip flop logic); * This is no flip flop (back and forth), I'd rather call it a complement. i.e (water : water and the spirit) * This is not catastrophic like predicting the end more than ones (back and forth) without any luck *Jesus didn't void john's baptism and then come back to validate it.(No back and forth movements) Are we clear now? JMAN05: They are not leaders of JWs, but fellow workers who work much harder. Christ is the leader and head.Bla bla bla. and Deuteronomy 18:21-22 means nothing inspired would come from a lineage of lies and frequent fallibility.. Bla bla bla also mean I don't want to delve just yet. I'm not responding to your points; Reason can be seen in deut 18:21-22 Or peharps till you tell us where you get your inspiration from. |
italo: Should they say instead, ![]() |
JMAN05: We do not claim inspirationI don't know what you want me to say about this.. This is quite laughable.. You do not claim inspiration HABA!!!Ok please dear one, explain further..truth comes gradually (after series of lies) to the church by Please enlighten me |
JMAN05: You have the opportunity now to prove it wrong.I just did; and with sound reason except you fail to see because you are told not to oppose fallible teaching ![]() And guess you are not aware of JW's flip flop teachings over the years. Ok I get it; Today the holy spirit says "A" and then comes back tommorow and says "sorry oga, what I called A yesterday is actually B"? In 1975 the WTB&TS taught that the man who sows the seed in the parable of the mustard seed (Matthew 13) is Satan. Later that same year the WT Society taught that this sower was Jesus. A similar incident occurred in 1978, when the WTB&TS identified the "Alpha and Omega" of Revelation 22:12-13 as Jehovah (that is, God the Father), and then five weeks later taught these verses referred to Jesus. Resurrection of the Men of Sodom 1879 - They will be resurrected. 1952 - They will not be resurrected. 1965 - They will be resurrected. 1988 - They will not be resurrected. The 'Lord' in Romans 10:12-16 1903 - 'Lord' refers to Jesus. 1940 - 'Lord' refers to Jehovah. 1978 - 'Lord' refers to Jesus. 1980 - 'Lord' refers to Jehovah. 'Higher Powers' of Romans 13:1 1916 - 'Higher powers' refers to governments. 1943 - 'Higher powers' refers to Jehovah God & Jesus Christ. 1964 - 'Higher powers' refers to governments. JMAN05: We do not claim inspiration, but we believe that truth comes gradually as the light gets brighter. That doesnt mean a bad spirit took over, no. Just like a bad spirit didnt institute the law and later removed it.Perhaps the lie russell told you that only jW members would survive your armageddon would be revealed when each of you is called by God in death? Your group has repeatedly changed their doctrines and contradicted previously held beliefs, all while claiming that it alone has the truth. Is this consistent with God's perfection and holiness? Perhaps you don't think predicting the end of the world and it not coming to pass not just once is catastrophic and anti-prophesy(in the name of God). Maybe you need science to teach you some fundamentals.. Google real time systems ![]() Or probably God has been lying to all your fallible leaders? Russell, rutherford and co.? JAMAN05: He is. Prove it wrong. Changes doesnt mean that all our believes will continue to change. no, rather those changes keep leading us to greater bible understanding that leads to sacred secrets of God. It even make us gather more spiritual truths unmatched by another religion. Jehovah keep leading His people. This type of humility is never seen anywhere in any religion. If you have allowed the Lord to lead you, you wouldnt have been haboring a doctrine that the truth clearly shows to be wrong. Jah has always led humble people who accepts correction. If Peter had claimed infallibility, he wouldnt have baptised Cornelius. But he was humble to change.Bla bla bla bla... Deuteronomy 18:21-22 "And if thou say in thine heart, How shall we know the word which the LORD hath not spoken? When a prophet speaketh in the name of the LORD, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the LORD hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him."(KJV) You JW's are just afraid of russell's armageddon.. You want to survive..lol..that's why even those you adjudge sinners and refute to speak to still wants to come amidst you in what? Fellowship ![]() Bros abeg after quoting me, define fellowship before anything ![]() |
JMAN05: we are not infallible like the fallible Popes. But Which one in particular is false as we currently believe? Can you prove them false biblically?People who believed the false prophesies of 1914 would have stuck out their necks to defend it. How then are you sure the same teachings of this day from the same source/lineage are not wrong teachings? Do you agree a spirit different from the holy spirit would have given your pioneers the doctrines of 1914? Peharps this same confusing spirit would have told them to teach you that jesus is angel micheal ![]() This same spirit would have told you to segregate from people you adjudge "sinners", when even christ said he had not come for the righteous but for sinners, that they would be joy in heaven over one repentant sinner? This same spirit would have taught them to conclude that the world is satan's? That the UN is controlled by satan when their written agenda and works says differently? That you should refuse blood transfusion to save your life? I can go on.. You now even denied russell the founder of JW after his molestation issue was uncovered Many will arise in my name - Jesus |
JMAN05: My religion is not watchtower. I am a JW. And christianity wasnt founded by Russell but Jesus. He is not the founder of JWs, but they (not only Russell) sought to find the truth as apposed to pagan type of believe at the time. they werent establishing a new religion different from what Christ has established. He wasnt even alive when we began to answer JWs.Go to the thread italo opened and answer his quests about your false prophesies over the year Many will arise with false prophesies and mislead others - jesus Google charles taze russell bro, he founded JW, when he died rutherford took over, stop lying here to cover up. Russell's wife while seeking for divorce, told the court hidden truths about russell and ROSE BALL.. Normally I would not attack personal morality but doctrine but to think that the founder of JW actually did these things are more proof that it was a certain spirit and not the holy spirit that directed his path. And oh you also said the UN is satanic, has that teaching changed ![]() Infact go to the other thread |
I don't like such topics moved to front page to avoid too much posts without credence but if after a while JMAN05 cannot answer these, it wouldn't be a bad idea @MODS |
six one: Well unless the fella mentioned kumuyi and is a Member of deeper life, I don't see why you are bringing kumuyi into this. The topic is rather geared towards catholic and Protestants but the basis still remain PURGATORYYes he's deeper life and you are what again? Jehovas witness? Well different spirits taught both kumuyi and charles taze rusell On the topi, you were asked questions you all could not give same answer for and I guess it's the same holy spirit that's interpreting for all of you.. |
adsonstone: No, He is not.Stop beating about.. Give me names..you are even afraid to mention your kumuyi and I'd tell you the reason; one day just one day, he would wake up and teach something different from what you assume and, guess what? You would move on and start yours or follow another..ever heard the word "church ashewo"? Lol. That's what's been up about protestants since martin luther and you thinks that's the work of the holy spirit? The Holy spirit is never the author of confusion.. Haaaaaa God have mercy |
And to all of you stating that there is no purgatory, do you answer amen when someone say or do you say " may the soul of (dead person's name) rest in peace? |
adsonstone: Well, the truth is Christ found the Christian Church.Why are you evading my question now.. I'd repeat again; Which christian church of the many groups because the holy spirit cannot inteprete differently to different groups. Please answer me I beg of you and don't repeat the ortodox church thing.. Just tell me the group with the truth.. I want to know |
HolyHolla: No! I do not believe that we should all run away from the Catholic church, neither do I believe that we should run from any church, IF we have the opportunity to make a change or differential impact. Unfortunately, I personally don't know of "great" protestants who returned to the Catholic church after reading the Bible.I knew you were never a serious catholic... You didn't read while you were in the church and you claim to know all.. JOHN HENRY NEWMAN... Does that ring a bell or you didn't know him? I'd go for the later and that's a clear confirmation that you were never a catholic that knew well about the church and protestianism. |
Mrlouis: hahahahaOk, we have heard how you saw light..now tell us where the light lead you to. I bet when you finally get the courage to say it, others quoting you and mocking the holy church will in their mind rebuke you( they won't speak out because you all have a collective aim - spite the catholic church).. Tell us where the light lead you to..don't be ashamed to declare and defend your faith...I say this because I know you would want to dodge this. Please tell us, I'm interested in that light |
adsonstone: if you ask me the of the Church Christ found, I'll rightly tell you its The Christian Church....but I know you'll disagree because you believe its the Roman catholic church just like other othodox churches to believe they are the church.And the holy spirit is responsible for the different teachings of the different christian groups? If no Then, which is the group with the right teachings from the holy spirit and how do u judge so? I'm curious |
adsonstone: you make a big mistake by putting everyone outside the catholic church under the umbrella tagged 'protestant'......in that wise, someone can put all churches claiming they are the one true apostolic church Christ found that have the true(original apostolic) traditions ie (roman catholisism, anglicans, assyrian churches and all orthodox churches) under a general umbrella....each one also have her bible canons.And if I ask you the true church, you would tell me it's deeper life founded in 1973 by a former anglican? Christ waited till 1973 to found his church that the gates of hell will never prevail against? ![]() You must be joking! See, kumuyi's only contribution to protestianism is more division. |
if not for a cause
OK, this is what I know
. Father, Son and Holy Spirit are identified as distinct Persons within the one Triune Godhead (Matt.3:16-17; 2 Cor.13:14). Throughout the New Testament the Son and the Holy Spirit, as well as the Father are separately identified as God. Each has divine attributes and acts as God (Son: Mark 2:5-12; John 20:28; Heb. l :8; Holy Spirit: Acts 5:3-4; 2 Cor. 3:17-18).