₦airaland Forum

CoolUsername:
First off, he actually watches the shows that he critiques.

Secondly, WWE had been doing solid ratings and making solid profits at least before the buyout (you can't really lie about profits as a pubicly traded company).

1. I don't need to watch the show to talk about things I talk about. Things I talk about aren't intricacies, but public knowledge you can get from a post or headline on Facebook. Example, knowing all belts aren't defended at Night Of Champions this year as opposed to the rule of the PPV.

2. We all know WWE is standing on the weight of it's already built reputation. 50 years + of great programming is what's still keeping them standing, and not what they are currently doing now. And you can easily tell by mentioning any worthy star they've created currently that can match previous guys. They still bring back legends for big matches.
Another reason is marketing. WWE is heavy on that, it's why they brought in Nick Khan. Less value, more marketing. That's their mantra, but it's only going to take a while, before it gradually crumbles if they don't act fast. Bring in Bad Bunny, bring Logan Paul, bring this one, bring that one, make this stage, use this arena...it's all marketing. Why do you think they are so high on merch?

CoolUsername:
The point of the tournament is to give the other competitors a shot because the Bloodline is currently holding the other world title hostage.

In kayfabe, Roman Reigns has a ton of leverage as the company's top guy due to his long championship reign. Just like Mbappe and Ronaldo in their clubs or Dwayne Johnson during his stint in the DCEU, they get to dictate their terms to a greater extent than others. Right now, he is using said leverage to limit his title defences to only A-tier PLEs and to negotiate title matches for himself and his boys.

In reality, WWE is just trying to protect Roman Reigns from injury and overexposure. Furthermore, at this point, we know he isn't dropping the belt until at least SummerSlam. What's the point of feeding him talent when we all know they aren't going over? He needs a challenger that feels legitimately positioned to win it for us to be really invested. Lastly, WWE knows that he is a megastar and a huge draw so they still want him to be involved in Night of Champions in some capacity.

the point of the tournament is to create another world title. If they claim is cos Roman is holding the belt hostage, then all of them in that company don't know what they are doing. Nobody holds a belt hostage. You either do your job or you leave.

So a big payday in Saudi isn't "top-tier"? Come on.
And no matter how influential he is, he can still be let go. Man U let go of CR7, WB fired Dwayne and now he's looking for space in F & F. No one is indispensable and everyone obeys the rules. CR7 and Mbappe aren't more powerful than the ref in a match.

Now you mentioned injury, but I'm wondering if he didn't know what he signed up for in the first place and can't he also get injured in a tag match? That excuse no follow.
Over-exposure? And yet he's still wrestling. So which exposure again. This one is also shallow.

And you talked about feeding him people till SummerSlam, and how is that my fault? Did I send WWE to make their programs very predictable. As far as I'm concerned it's a 'them' problem. They've lost the magic touch and can't seem to do anything right. People have been complaining about the programming since WrestleMania ended, so it's nothing new.

They still want him to be involved? But they don't want him to be involved fully. They are confused then.

The point is this, they should be consistent in their programming and not insult our intelligence. If all belts are defended at NOC, then all belts should be defended at NOC, don't give them an excuse.

pu7pl3:
It's not it
You're stressing your self trying to know what's happening behind the scenes when there is Cinematic hold happening right in front of you.

You come everyday with review. You critique too, telling us what you liked and what you didn't, while backing it up with logic - that's exactly what I'm doing. We know this, all belts are defended on the said PPV, but today there's an exception with no tangible reason whatsoever. The main company belt isn't defended on the night when all belts are supposed to be defended? And what's the world champ's excuse? Going after a smaller belt he has absolutely no business with and no current expertise on. And all what this company has to say to explain all these is that "strings were pulled"? Haba. No wonder they aren't gaining new fans. Them go just confuse them on their first viewing. And don't worry, AEW isn't exempted from this problem.

jaephoenix:
There are many of them gods? Be specific bro

the creator of the universe.

pu7pl3:
Make dem try am now na
You think Khan wont be licking his lips at a fired Roman...dey play.

Roman Reigns is the real boss in WWE

the stats still remain there. Nick Khan is the real MVP of the company right now. Roman na just poster boy.

pu7pl3:
You too dey stress yourself my guy

na the 'tribal chief' comments I dey talk be this. Nothing really substantial.

pu7pl3:
Dey play
You don't know how much Pull Roman has behind the scenes.
The fact that he didn't drop the belt for Cody should tell you he is not just an employee.

which pull? Didn't Vince fire Hogan, Punk, Hart and other names more valuable than precious Roman? He even let guys like Rock and Brock and Austin leave without flinching.

pu7pl3:
Board Member
Talent relations
Logistics and special counsel to the tribal chief

okay. So as Talents Relations in real life, he doesn't work for Roman. He works for HHH and Vince. So WWE always coming out and saying "pulled some strings" as a way of promoting non-logical decisions doesn't make any sense. Management should make decisions that are best for business and don't insult our intelligence while in-character manager Adam Pearce makes those same decisions and everyone - including the world champ - follows it. Is that too much to ask? Now there's a NOC PPV that doesn't follow it's rule and defend all championships. Very soon we'll have a Royal Rumble PPV with no Royal Rumble match involved because some one 'pulled some strings', I'm sure you'd love that.

Kai!

pu7pl3:
Heyman "pulled all the Bloodline power strings" via the tribal chief's orders... thats good enough for me 🤭

and what office is Heyman holding in character and in reality?

pu7pl3:
Heyman "pulled all the Bloodline power strings" via the tribal chief's orders... thats good enough for me 🤭

come on P we can do better than that. He works for the guy that actually runs the show. Your tribal chief is just an employee.

LordReed:
Yes since there may be some discrepancy in what humans are calling a god, I'd like to hear from the horse's mouth.

you see, that's the problem. You can't believe what you don't know, so how do you ascertain he isn't a scammer. You claim you can't be scammed, but even the best of us can be. We only trust because we have to, not because we are a 100 % sure. This is where faith in God comes in; the Bible says he that comes to God must believe he exists and is a rewarder of those who deligently seek him. Bro, to KNOW God, you must first BELIEVE.

LordReed:
What is the point of these line of questions?

.
1. To prove to you that you can actually believe in something you don't know.
2. Emotion and intellect is one of the ways of convincing an atheist that another civilization exists outside the physical. This is because the soul (mind) is a connection between the physical and spiritual realms. So if I ask you a question concerning emotions and thoughts and you can't explain them, it will serve as a semi-proof that the spirit world actually exists. You get what I'm saying? You see images in your head everyday, from what you've seen and what you haven't seen, how can you explain that? The spirit realm has something to do with it. You feel things, joy, fear, sadness; there are so strong and yet are not physical, cannot be seen. Can you explain that? The spirit realm has something to do with them.

CoolUsername:
Rules are for peasants. The Tribal Chief only acknowledges his own rules on the Island of Relevancy.

😂 Really? Then what's he doing in a venture governed by rules.
You know what, answer this - what's the use of a draft if Smackdown guys can just compete for a RAW belt immediately a draft is completed, huh?
As you're finishing with that, answer how and why Roman is getting a tag title shot. How did he earn it and who did it beat in a tag match? If you're going to give me 'tribal chief answers', might as well just ignore the questions.

LordReed:
She will first tell me what she means by that and then she will show that she fulfills the criteria of what she is saying.

what would you expect her to say? I mean she says she loves you. Isn't that enough? How would she show this criteria? Give me an example.

LordReed:
So how would I know the experience is spiritual when I don't know what spiritual is?

First he would have to tell me what a god is and how he fulfills the criteria before showing me evidence that matches the criteria.

does he really need to? I mean it's there in your dictionary.
So, evidence? What kind?

LordReed:
So how would I know the experience is spiritual when I don't know what spiritual is?

First he would have to tell me what a god is and how he fulfills the criteria before showing me evidence that matches the criteria.

you'd know it is spiritual cos it will be real but cannot be understood by your natural mind.

LordReed:
Check to see the legs are complete, straight, with no cracks and flat on the ground. Shake the chair to establish it is sturdy. Next put a hand on the seat and press down to ascertain it can support weight. Then finally tentatively sit down without putting all my weight on it in case it fails.

"tentatively sit down without putting all my weight on it IN CASE IT FAILS". Truth is we use blind faith daily without even knowing. But I get your point.

CoolUsername:
He wants to go for the tag team titles.

so what happens to the Night Of Champion rules?

CoolUsername:
I thought you said you don't watch the show

I don't. This I got from a headline.

When will this storyline finish so we can return to proper wrestling?
You know what, someone tell me why Roman isn't defending his titles at Night Of Champions (the night where every championship is defended)?

Maynman:
You are little, all your rebuttals are dumb.
You are like a scammer asking us to “believe” you and send our bank details and when we refuse you start bringing examples of “do you know if there are 8 planets”? DUMB

Only if you have knowledge on your religion and your Israelite deity you won’t open this thread.
But still, Yahweh worshipper you will learn

no. I don't want to learn from you. You are rude, disrespectful and other things I won't bother to mention and I don't want to continue this convo cos it's really leading no where. You have a good day.

Maynman:
What’s the definition of God and god?

one is a name/title, the other is just a noun. One is a proper noun and the other is a common one. Satisfied?

Maynman:
when you go to market to buy foodstuffs, how do you examine it before paying?

This is dumb

you want to carry another man's cross? Focus on our discussion.

Maynman:
Arguing with you about what exactly?That different deities are called “God”?

Are you also arguing with Wikipedia, your israelite deity yahweh is one of the gods.

I'll answer you. But first I need you to agree that "God" and "god" isn't the same, just as "Bishop" and "bishop" aren't. Go.

LordReed:
I have been scammed before and it was because I believed the scammer instead of checking. The times I do check a scammer's claims I didn't fall for the scam.

If I was going to sit on a chair I have never sat on before of course I am going to check it can carry my weight or that it is stable enough to sit on.

how would you examine the chair?

LordReed:
You think checking the specs of the phone and the Samsung phone health app is blind belief? You have a strange definition of blind belief.

People fall into scams and other stuff they should have checked well because they want to believe. I don't see that as a good recommendation for living by beliefs. Why should I live by beliefs when I can live by knowing and investigating?

so if a lady told you she loved you, how would you know she was telling the truth?

LordReed:
No. The god still needs to show evidence that he is who he says.

Cameras can't catch what I am seeing with my eyes? Why?

yes, because that experience is spiritual.
What evidence will he have to show you to convince you that he was God (the creator of the universe), if you're actually being sincere?

Maynman:
Please mention proper noun, and can multiple people bear it. Apart from your friend called Bishop, no other person goes by the name?

Just as yahweh is a “God”, allah too is a “God”, so as Zeus and Odin etc.

So which “God” are using to beg me?

I showed you the difference, from Wikipedia! Are you arguing with me now or are you arguing with Wikipedia?

Maynman:
There are many “Bishops”” coming.
There are many “Gods” coming.

Yahweh worshipper, just as we have millions of Bishops, is the same way we have millions of Gods, and your isrealite deity yahweh is just one of them( capital G dey there, cause it seems you are obsessed with capital letters)

Have you researched Yahweh yet?

"God" and "god" isn't the same thing. One is a proper noun (God) while the other is a common noun (god). I beg you in the name of God let this matter die and let's move on to important discussions.

Maynman:
There are many “Bishops”” coming.
There are many “Gods” coming.

Yahweh worshipper, just as we have millions of Bishops, is the same way we have millions of Gods, and your isrealite deity yahweh is just one of them( capital G dey there, cause it seems you are obsessed with capital letters)

Have you researched Yahweh yet?

A proper noun is a noun that identifies a single entity and is used to refer to that entity (Africa, Jupiter, Sarah, Microsoft) as distinguished from a common noun, which is a noun that refers to a class of entities (continent, planet, person, corporation) and may be used when referring to instances of a specific class (a continent, another planet, these persons, our corporation).[1][2][3][4] Some proper nouns occur in plural form (optionally or exclusively), and then they refer to groups of entities considered as unique (the Hendersons, the Everglades, the Azores, the Pleiades). Proper nouns can also occur in secondary applications, for example modifying nouns (the Mozart experience; his Azores adventure), or in the role of common nouns (he's no Pavarotti; a few would-be Napoleons). The detailed definition of the term is problematic and, to an extent, governed by convention.[5][6]

A distinction is normally made in current linguistics between proper nouns and proper names. By this strict distinction, because the term noun is used for a class of single words (tree, beauty), only single-word proper names are proper nouns: Peter and Africa are both proper names and proper nouns; but Peter the Great and South Africa, while they are proper names, are not proper nouns (though they could be said to function as proper noun phrases). The term common name is not much used to contrast with proper name, but some linguists have used the term for that purpose. Sometimes proper names are called simply names, but that term is often used more broadly. Words derived from proper names are sometimes called proper adjectives (or proper adverbs, and so on), but not in mainstream linguistic theory. Not every noun or a noun phrase that refers to a unique entity is a proper name. Chastity, for instance, is a common noun, even if chastity is considered a unique abstract entity.
~ Wikipedia

Maynman:
There are many “Bishops”” coming.
There are many “Gods” coming.

Yahweh worshipper, just as we have millions of Bishops, is the same way we have millions of Gods, and your isrealite deity yahweh is just one of them( capital G dey there, cause it seems you are obsessed with capital letters)

Have you researched Yahweh yet?

In the English language, capitalization is used when the word is used as a proper noun, as well as for other names by which a god is known. Consequently, the capitalized form of god is not used for multiple gods or when used to refer to the generic idea of a deity. The English word God and its counterparts in other languages are normally used for any and all conceptions and, in spite of significant differences between religions, the term remains an English translation common to all.
~ Wikipedia