₦airaland Forum

Justnation:
Go and remove him,
you hate the truth

ahmedio2017:
Lolzzzzzzzz are you cleared now?
Ignorance is a big tools affecting us in this part of the world, imagine something that has nothing to do with you o, ILORIN is a case study, it is a Yoruba land, there is Muslims and Christians there and infact traditionalist are there too everyone is living independently and there is Sharia court.

11doubledee:
Unfortunately I haven't and I don't know of any until today.
As e be so ,you go need share update o!

Trueprophet91:
Are traditional worshippers in the north?

ahmedio2017:
Sharia law in Nigeria is legal under the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, particularly in the northern states that have adopted it. The key constitutional sections that allow for the implementation of Sharia law include:

1. Section 6(5)(k) – Establishment of Sharia Courts

This section recognizes the existence of Sharia Courts of Appeal at both the state and federal levels, allowing them to adjudicate matters of Islamic personal law.

2. Section 38 – Freedom of Religion

This section guarantees Nigerians the right to practice and manifest their religion, including following Islamic law if they choose to.

This has been used to justify the implementation of Sharia in states where the majority of people are Muslims.


3. Section 275 – Creation of a State Sharia Court of Appeal

This section allows any state with a Muslim majority to establish a Sharia Court of Appeal to handle civil matters involving Islamic personal law (e.g., marriage, inheritance, and family disputes).


4. Section 277 – Jurisdiction of the Sharia Court of Appeal

Defines the limits of Sharia law, restricting it to personal matters involving Muslims (such as marriage, inheritance, waqf, and guardianship).

Criminal matters under Sharia law are controversial because the Nigerian Constitution already defines a common legal framework under secular law.

11doubledee:
Whatever form it may come as,is it not a Nigerian politician that will receive it?
The issue here is all through your life as a Nigerian have you ever received free or subsidized health care or drugs before?
I use both public and private hospitals, and I have never received none.
You will be so surprised that some Nigerians with terminal illnesses may be paying more for the said drugs than American patients.

ahmedio2017:
Yes Sharia is legal and constitutional in Nigeria

ahmedio2017:
Don't get it wrong, Sharia law will be for Muslims and Sharia court will also be for the Muslims, there won't be any form of generalization. Look at ilorin for instance there is Sharia court in ilorin so is Christianity affected in any form in ilorin? Is traditional worshipers affected in ilorin? Everyone will be doing there things according to their religion teachings. I believe you understand better now?

ahmedio2017:
That's is Sharia law na, don't mix it up, Kano is a Muslim state, Yoruba land consist of both Muslims and Christians..

PDJT:
- South East is Biafraland and there are not enough Muslims in the Souh East for a Shariah to be established.

- Tinubu and Prof. Ishaq Akintola as true Muslims supports the idea of Shariah law in the South West.

Ten06:
The sharia being practiced in some states in the north, how have they made the place safe and secure?

PDJT:
- As long as Nigeria exists, Shariah law will be established in all South West states starting with that Ayo Fayose poverty-stricken state.

- All those Yooroba lazy youths venting on socials against Muhammad's righthand man, Sultan, should be very careful with their utterances.

RaySimran:
You recognizes him as the Head of Islamic supreme council...

You waits for his pronouncement before you undertook any religious obligation...


He now feels you're not getting enough..


That you should actually be kept holy and avoid having your issues resolve by "infidels"...


Why are you now attacking him?
Someone who cares for you?

Make it make sense...

LagosOrigin:
The same people insulting the sultan of sokoto will still go back on their kneels to beg him

Na their way

ahmedio2017:
Keep your mouth sh.ut, Sharia law isn't meant for the Christians how is that suppose to be a problem? You this illite.rate, always use your br.ain. we have christians and Muslims in southwest so live and let us live ode.

Xisnin:
Most of the aids are neither money nor received into government account.

Sheuns:


Yet we have some people saying USA should get out. Their masters (politicians) dare not say so because they’re the ones that enjoy these aids the most.

A large sum of these funds if investigated were looted.

CommonSense1967:
It's really pathetic..Muslims need to stand up and stop this nonsense. This is rhe result of having Christian Governors in all SW states. This had to change and change fast.

Gandollar:
This is the more reason why Sharia law is necessary.

Let Yoruba Muslims denounce Islam all together if they don't want sharia.

Sharia is a way of life for Muslims.

3ice9ce:
Do you know that if Sharia is allowed in the SW, it means the Sultan will be making laws for Yorubas.

Can the Ooni make laws for traditional worshippers in the North?

Aawizdom:
The events of Hijab and Shariah arbitration have exposed the level of intolerance of Yoruba Christians to their Muslim folks. When you objectively analyse the events, it's a pure hatred mix with sheer ignorance shown by Southern Christian.

MasterJayJay:
https://x.com/NSCIAng/status/1884589162214408592?t=oW33Ol_6p_RRWsTdzwaxNg&s=19[/quote]The sponsors of the move to install Sharia courts and system of government in the Southwest is manifesting now.

The Sultan of Sokoto and the Supreme Council of Islamic Affairs is part of the plot. That plot will fail. Sharia is unwanted in the Southwest. There are courts in the southWest that can handle civil and criminal offences hence there is no place for the primitive Sharia rules and punishment.

Any body in the Southwest that is not comfortable can go to the North where Sharia is practiced to stay and reside.

mariovito:
Yoruba don enter one chance.

Very smart game being played here,

Use an igbo Muslim to write your letters and communique to make it seem democratic where as same igbo Muslim lawyer can't lead them pray.

NothingDoMe:
Staying there to constitute civil disobedience at the office is absurd. Sending mails to all the employees that the President didn't follow protocol to fire her so she won't leave.

She is daft. Period.

Ojuntana:
Oga all heads of agencies are political appointees regardless of whether they are career people or not. Trump fired James Comey who was a career FBI agent and now installing Kash Patel who has never worked in the FBI. Are you saying that is illegal?

Even in the Nigerian case, Hameed Ali was confirmed as Comptroller General of Customs. Stop typing rubbish abeg

There's nothing in your website that says IG's are not political appointees

Ojuntana:
Oga all heads of agencies are political appointees regardless of whether they are career people or not. Trump fired James Comey who was a career FBI agent and now installing Kash Patel who has never worked in the FBI. Are you saying that is illegal?

Even in the Nigerian case, Hameed Ali was confirmed as Comptroller General of Customs. Stop typing rubbish abeg

There's nothing in your website that says IG's are not political appointees

Ojuntana:
You are just copying and pasting blindly

How does all these negate the fact the IG is a political appointee

iwaeda:
https://punchng.com/lagos-butchers-lament-as-cow-prices-soar-to-n1-7m/

Ojuntana:
You are writing rubbish bro

Is there any appointment made with regard to political affiliation? Even the AG is expected to be made without regard to political affiliation. What that means is that it is not required that the appointee be a member of a political party or movement before he can be appointed.

It is obvious you misconstrue political appointment to mean an appointment based on political affiliation? No sir. Political appointment simply means an appointment made by a political office holder.

Below is the official definition of a political appointee according to the US government: According to the United States Office of Government Ethics, a political appointee is "any employee who is appointed by the President, the Vice President, or agency head".

Now check and see if the IG's office falls into that category or not

Ojuntana:
You are writing rubbish bro

Is there any appointment made with regard to political affiliation? Even the AG is expected to be made without regard to political affiliation. What that means is that it is not required that the appointee be a member of a political party or movement before he can be appointed.

It is obvious you misconstrue political appointment to mean an appointment based on political affiliation? No sir. Political appointment simply means an appointment made by a political office holder.

Below is the official definition of a political appointee according to the US government: According to the United States Office of Government Ethics, a political appointee is "any employee who is appointed by the President, the Vice President, or agency head".

Now check and see if the IG's office falls into that category or not

MadamExcellency:
Why was James Comey not reinstated? The precedence isn't there and as such what she should advocate is her settlement not disregarding presidential order.

Ojuntana:
Your position is wrong. The position of Inspector General in the US is a political appointment not a career appointment. There's nothing in the 1978 laws establishing it that says they must be career civil servants. Go and do your research and stop painting your bias as facts.

The Nigerian system is modelled after the US system and the US has only one AG who is also a political appointee. What exactly is the job of the Minister of Justice different from the Attorney General of the Federation? It is neither here nor there and splitting the offices will ultimately lead to conflict. Besides, if split, will the AGF still be a cabinet position or it will become autonomous? If so, how then will he be able to represent the interests of the government in court when he's not on the cabinet?