₦airaland Forum

vibratingpenis:
Aren't you one of those emergency wike supporters because of BAT?

Tell me one sensible thing people like you have ever talked about?

Do you really think I have time for banters with you?

Can't you make your point without banter or referring to BAT?

Did I mention BAT in the discourse?

Blessedity:
A political appointee like Wike daring someone that was democratically elected by the people and you say some people are not mentally deranged in this country?

How is he (Wike) dating her(Kingibe)?

vibratingpenis:
See agbadorians and gaslighting

Your response if ridiculous, you have not been able to indicate what Wike has said or done to Madam Irrational again

Obansy112:
Establishing two owned state university with NUC Aggreditation
Building four world class hospitals in
Okene
Ajaokuts
Aiyeng a
Lokoja
LOKOJa ganaja roundabout
Building of GYB standard Model secondary sch. In all the local govt.
Construction of 15km roads in each LGA.
PMB ultar moder civic center
Reconstruction of Lokoja water works

etc

So are all these items that you listed not normally expected of any governor.

The funds he administered are for development of the state so when he does little with the money and mismanage and enrich himself and cronies with the rest, we should praise him and make it look like he has done wonders?

Why are you guys attacking Wike? Did he say anything about Kingibe recently that necessitated this attack from Adeyanju?

Obansy112:
If he's worst as you claimed, he can't be hiding in kogi state and his people didn't snitch on him. Yahaya Bello is far better than all the kogi previous governor's. Truth is bitter, Yahaya Bello is only been whitch hunted by Emilokon boys who feel threaten by his achievements as kogi governor.

What achievements? Tell us about it.

What is your point on this discussion? We are not all lawyers and the article should be summarized for non learned persons comprehension.

Godswill Akpabio and his goons are corrupt and selfish people.

They want the best health care for themselves but care less about the people.

We also know that the contracts for building and equiping the hospital will be inflated and used to extort the government account.

Buccalcavity2:
I'm for an independent Palestinian nation whose goal is not to exterminate her neighbor too. If that minimum is agreed upon, then we are on same page...

My dear, that is my wish too.

I also think that will help the Palestinians to focus on develop themselves and their abilities rather than concentrating on fighting Israel's oppression which would have ended with their independence.

EXPRESSSMAN:
You don't know the history of that region well. You said that Israel were the ones harassing the Palestinians.
The Palestinians occupied that land before the present Israel were resettled there from all over Europe in 1948. The Palestinians resisted the resettlement till this day. They started the war against Israel from the first day the first set of people landed.
The attack of 7 October by Hamas was not a mistake as you claim. it has been happening since 1948 and Israel always reacted they way they are doing now.
The Christians do not think that there will be an end to it or peace between them because the Bible prophecize these their hatred for each other.

How easy do you think it is to yield your land to Israel based on resettlement of Israel back to a land they left for decades?

Those land were owned by Palestinians for decades before Israelites came back based on the effort of some nations to resettle Israelites.

There will be some resistance definitely but they yielded eventually. Israel became a country yet the nations that resettled Israel didn't seem it fit to also allow a Palestine Country. It was either a costly mistake or deliberately done to subject the Palestinians to the Israelites.

However, they are two different people, with different cultures and morals; who may find it difficult to coexist genuinely rather tolerate each other. Now the center can no longer hold, they have to be separated from that unfortunate association which gave Israel control over the Palestinians.

Palestinians desire freedom from the Israelites and they will get it, even if will take 40 or 400 or 4,000 years. The Palestinians must be free.

Buccalcavity2:
You see. This is where we differ. You seem to conclude that it is Israel that made Palestinians Toxic. I beg to remonstrate! That conclusion detaches historical perspective and ongoing sentiment among Palestinians and its partners who believe Israel should not exist (which is still actively pursued). Such argument strengthen the resolve of an "Israeli extremist" that a 2 state solution is a reward for antisemitism,which they resist.
2 state solution is not as difficult as the definition of boundaries and underlying assumption of right of existence of both countries. Those are the underlying sentiments fueling the crisis.

2 state solution will not work eventually even if they both Israel and Palestine choose to revisit the case.

The most realistic solution is independent nations with defined territory.

Let there be Palestine country as we have Israel country.

telleyway:
Apart from sentiment, especially with religious affiliation, no one will point accusing fingers at Israel. If not for their will power and defense mechanism, Israel is the most attracted country in the world. October 7 Hamas attack was targeted at weakening them, thank God for the defense system.
And if you follow history, Jerusalem is Israeli capital, it was war that took them away for Palestinian to encroach.
You should better use your energy to advise the terrorist nations surrounding them to allow them have peace.

History indicates that Jerusalem belongs to both Israelis and Palestinians.

You should not misinform the public by saying the Palestinians encroached into Jerusalem.

Israel is also a terrorist nation and are continuously breeding the terrorist within the Israelites and Palestinians and other nations surrounding Israel that you call terrorists.

When Israel kills all the Hamas, even more deadlier terrorists could rise again against Israelites.

Now is the time for nations to rise up and say no to these system that breeds terrorism that is prevailing in the Middle East and stop playing politics with everything including lives and properties.

Gbogbowa:
have you ever seen any Palestinian conderming what Hamas did but rather it was celebrated.saying Hamas are not part of Palestinian it's like Saying Boko Haram are not part of Hausa Fulani people.As long as Hamas indirectly work for Iran and Palestinian celebrate them they can't be a nation

The Palestinians have been oppressed, harassed, humiliated, despised and discriminated by Israel for long.

The psychology and mentality of the average Palestinians has become toxic and wired against Israel due to the treatment over the years. The Palestinians have made mistakes and attacked a superior power in the person of Israel and they have been decimated. However, the mentality of hatred, anger and elimination towards Israel remains with them and perhaps will be transferred to future and younger generation.

This is not good for peace, league of nations
and international community. Someone or some people has/have to stop this killings and destruction of lives and properties.

The war between Israelites and Palestinians must be stopped with sustainable peace in focus. How?

The solution is an independent Palestinian nation as we have an independent Israel nation. The respect of international laws, ethics and understanding between the both nations in their relationship with themselves and other nations in the world.

Gbogbowa:
I'm a christian and I stand on what she said

I and a lot of people don't care if you are a Christian and align with her opinion.

That opinion is your and her personal opinion. It doesn't change the fact and realities of the situation between Palestine and Israel.

Buccalcavity2:
Sad indeed... But an attack on the government of Israel resulted in civilian casualty just as the attack on the government of Palestine is resulting in civilian casualty. October 7 rocket attacks were meant for exactly who? Why is it ok to rationalize one and condemn the other? Why is it ok to rationalize those who swore to exterminate Israel if they have the power and not ok for Israel to exterminate the possibility of such threat? Esp when this had been done previously and was done in the 21st century (to Yazidis).I think both are doing the same thing, only in varying degrees depending on the power they have.
Can't and won't hold brief for Israel...but I understand their argument.

When two people can't coexist together and their relationship becomes toxic and dangerous.

There must be a dissolution to make peace between them and ultimately for their neighbors and the world.

There must be an independent Palestinian nation with defined territory and opportunity to operate independently within the context of international laws, ethics and understanding.

The senseless killings must stop.

EXPRESSSMAN:
The Palestinians missed it in 1948. At that point, UN proposed the two states solutions and even allocate a larger part of Jerusalem to them. They refused thinking that their Arab brothers would help them to flush out Israel. That did not happen. Israel turned the table against. As of today, they have been completely pushed out of Jerusalem.
They just exist in Gaza and some scattered settlement outside Jerusalem. Is that where they will form the State of Palestine. As far as America retain their veto power , there will be no state for the Palestinians. The Bible prophecize all these some 3000 years ago. Israel are God's people, no nation mess with them.

Decision makers in 1948 are not the decision makers today. Today, the Palestinians want a nation especially since they can no longer tolerate the oppression, apartheid and brutality of Israel.

There shall be a Nation called Palestine, it doesn't matter what America and Israel think about it.

EXPRESSSMAN:
Israel cannot allow Palestinians to be an independent state because they are terrorists. Their sole aim is to exterminate the Jews so get that clear. Your enemy is not your friend.
Now, you're talking of women and children. When Hamas and Hezebolla threw 1000 mlssels overnight to Israel, did they consider women and children?
So why do you want Israel to now consider women and children.
Note that in war every thing is fair and square. Tell Hamas not to start what they cannot finish.

Newsflash, it is not up to Israel to decide the destiny of the Palestinians with respect to becoming a nation in the world.

It is up to the league of nations, the will eventually be a Palestine nation.

Mark my words today.

You and Israelites can fight it but you will not succeed.

Gerhards:
Dude, you are not making any sense on this thread, get some rest and stop making fool of yourself here

Just tell me how I am fooling myself and I want you to make sense since I don't make sense on the thread.

I am waiting to hear you ohhhhhh

Buccalcavity2:
Oh my friend, you got that twisted. Read (even google)!
After different views from both parties from 1937 2-State solution proposals, Israel supports two state solution currently.... The party that disagrees is Hamas (it's stated in her mission statement) hence the rhetoric of "from river to sea".
Hamas is the government of Palestine; now it is ridiculous that you plan to separate the representatives of a people from the people (esp when it's an ideology). Common!
Like I said, I'm sad with the development but what would I have Israel do? Leave Hamas and wait for the next attack?
No emotional attachment to any of both.

You are talking 1937 and I am talking about 2020s. Palestinians want to be a nation that is independent. They want a Palestine country
and they made it clear at the United Nations conference even in 2024.

Israel has always controlled the kind of employment for Palestinians, the goods and products that go into Palestine, the Israelites control the life of Palestinians and want to seize their lands by force and duress.

Why is Israel targeting women, children and civilians in their attacks against Hamas?

Why weaponize basic necessities of life like food, shelter, water, communication and social infrastructures, against the Palestinians?

Why the genocide in Gaza?

Buccalcavity2:
I read historical perspective and can hardly fault the Israelis. The people "we" love to protect do not believe in a 2 state solution either. Ask an Hamas offspring or average Palestinian today, you hear "from the river to the sea". So we protect one to sacrifice another?
That rhetoric is real! It is what first displaced the Israelis (with a lot of casualty) for there to be a need to come back. And if you doubted that, ask the Yazidis what can happen, even in the new millennium!
I do not support killings as long as both parties are agreeable. But if one is saying I want to exterminate you, the other has a right to defend and protect its interest,moreso when they have the power to do so now unlike the old times!
You shouldn't use international community to buy time to strike a deadly blow (an intention you never hid) on a "neighbor".
Hamas should downtool or be open to mutual existence.

It is ridiculous to read your message in defense of Israel.

Are all Palestinians, including the women and children that are being killed, members of Hamas?

Israel has been operating apartheid against Palestinians in Gaza even when Gaza is officially not governed by Israel.

Israel has indicated their unwillingness to allow a Palestinian country. Can you ask Israelis why? Every countries recognizing Palestine as a nation has been criticized, reprimanded and declared enemy by Israel. Why can't Israelis allow Palestinians be a nation on their own? Must Palestinians be subjects of Israelis to be bullied, deprived, despised and oppressed?

Israel is a selfish, arrogant, annoying and tyrannical country that must be checked and bound by international laws. They must respect international laws and fundamental human rights and rules of engagement at war.

HardBishop:
Only presidency... I repeat only presidential election. You could see how the FG targeted MNK cos he want to plunge the whole SE to boycott the process. 🤣🤣🤣And igbos were cooperative....... The whole hausas and Yoruba were in a deep shit lamenting cursing MNK.

Time is just clicking 😆

You can do all since you don't want to be part of Nigeria. Abi, your state government will not be drawing funds from Nigeria or under Nigeria.

If you only boycott presidential election then you are not agitating for Biafra, you want something else that you need to determine and tell us.

When you boycott, I will say well done to you.

Rexymania:
...but a federal high court in Abuja is saying Bayero is the legitimate Emir of Kano Emirate... Sanusi is now playing for sympathy.... recently, the police in Kano state are not taking orders from the governor. With the police? The government is powerless. Bayero is keeping his cards to his chest

federal high court in Abuja has no jurisdiction over chieftancy or kingship issues.

Rexymania:
Sanusi had the support of the APC at that time bcus they wanted to use Sanusi to taunt Jonathan....it was after Jonathan removed him as CBN governor they made him king. Wetin Bayero won talk? Bayero no get mouth those time na, na now him duh gain recognition

Listen, Bayero should just respect himself. Being Emir is just a privilege; an opportunity to serve people; not a right.

If they say leave the throne, just move on. It is not the end of life. That was how Sanusi approached it when he was removed and that is part of the reasons I respect him.

If God's choice is for Sanusi to return as Emir, Bayero should just rest abeg.

HardBishop:
No problem, when the presidential slot is being denied to us SE, it would be a historical mark In Nigeria history when elections are being bypass in the region will be a normal and constant reminder.
As Nigeria complained bitterly against MNK and sit at home, that's how it shall be Tru out media outlets.
Pls let this warning not be overlooked. Northerners ad other really complained and kidnapped MNK. Whatsoever the sidelined region takes, no complain

When you boycott presidential election please ensure that you also boycott the senatorial and house of representatives elections too.

In fact, don't participate in gubernatorial and state assemblies elections too so that we know that you don't want to be part of Nigeria.

Maybe you would have driven your points that you want Biafra nation.

tgmservice:
Hello nairaland Fam need you input on this.

I am a married man going to 3 years now.
I was scrolling on Facebook when a Saw a video of man exercising in a Gym.

This man wore a short nicker and you could see the shape of his joystick dangling. His thing was really big
The issue is that when I scrolled down the comment section I saw a comment from my wife since we are friends on FB and this is exactly what she said in verbatim (guess she is not so smart I would see her comments)

" I love to eat this kind of Food" yea including the smiley face

From her profile pic you can clearly see she is a married woman even other people responded to her comment calling her all sort of names like Olosho and the rest, one even said I pity your Husband.


I saw this when I was in the Office and it clearly spoilt my day I could not concentrate at work anymore.
When I got home I challenged her regarding this comment and she said its nothing that its just a joke comment.

I have been angry as she seriously disrespected me and I am considering a divorce from the marriage.



Edited: File photo used for illustration

I don't think you should make it a big deal. It is a silly comment from her and perhaps not well thought or articulated.

Unfortunately for her, you saw it and she got insults from several people on the comments section.

Let her know you feel embarrassed by the comment she made on the guy's di.ck. Hopefully, she would apologize.

Work on improving the size of your di.ck - there are some solutions you can apply.

It is not enough reason to divorce her especially if she is apologetic after realizing that she hurt you feelings.

Rexymania:
Bayero the last Emir was kidnapped and killed by terrorist which prompted Sanusi to become king.

No be murder be that?

That throne duh get error before....Sanusi should allow the murdered Emir's son to rule in peace, after his death, then Sanusi if he's still alive should rule or his son.

Case closed.

Since you feel the son of the late Bayero should be allowed to rule: Why was Sanusi chosen by the kingmakers to be king ahead of Bayero in the first place?

Why didn't Bayero go to court or challenge the kingmakers when they chose Sanusi? He was Okay with that choice then and never questioned Sanusi's rule until Ganduje dethroned Sanusi and made Bayero the Emir.

Biodun556:
Federal high has jurisdiction if the complainants sue for human rights violations

Federal high Court has jurisdiction over human right issues

Adolphus Karibi-White, a former justice of the supreme court, said in the case of Olaniyi V. Aroyehum (1991) 5 NWLR (Pt. 194) 652 at 660 that “the right to be a traditional ruler is not a fundamental right that can be enforced under the provisions of the Nigerian Constitution”.

“… chieftaincy is not a matter of fundamental rights and cannot be enforced under the provisions of Section 31 of the Constitution. It cannot be seriously argued that there is a fundamental right to be a ‘Chief’. It is not a human right, even though it is a privilege claimed by human beings in an organised society to bring order to their mutual relationships. It is not such a right which the law can enforce by virtue merely of the claimant being a human being,”

The Apex court has said that the right to be an Emir is not a fundamental right under chapter four of the constitution, the federal high court sitting in Kano ought to have declined jurisdiction to continue to entertain the dispute over the chieftaincy matter in Kano.



Falana said a traditional ruler who was deposed by a governor without a fair hearing can approach the state high court for legal redress.

“But in challenging deposition or removal from the throne, the appropriate court to seek redress is the state high court,” he said.

“In Chief Joseph Odetoye Oyeyemi v Commissioner For Local Govt., Kwara State & Ors. (1992)2 SCNJ 266, the appellant sued the defendant at the Kwara state high court where he challenged the withdrawal of his recognition as the Bale of Oro without affording him the right to make a representation. He won at the high court and lost at the court of appeal.”

He said the decision of the appellate court was later overturned by the supreme court.

“The summary of the existing judicial authorities is that the federal high court lacks the jurisdictional competence to entertain any matter pertaining to the deposition of a traditional ruler unless the complaint is limited to his banishment or detention,” Falana said.

“In conclusion, judges and lawyers should realise that disputes arising from chieftaincy and other local matters are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the high court of each state of the federation, notwithstanding that the country is operating a distorted federal arrangement.”

Hmm. Excellent speech - no doubt.

Is this the justification for the apartheid (against Palestinians), brutality and genocide that Israel has been executing against the Palestinians?

Israel can't deceive us with their choice of words, they can keep trying to make "black look like white" but we know what it is.

Israel has committed the same crime that we crucified Hitler for conducting a genocide against the Israelites several years ago. The world came to Israelites rescue and called the spade what it is in case of Hitler.

Why does Israel want us to excuse it's act of genocide in this case against the Palestinians?

The speaker tried to guilt trip the Christians by bringing the words of the Bible to justify Israel's genocide and brutality but I want to ask - What is the population of Christians in Israel? About 2%

I am almost certain that the speaker is a Jew so why coerce the conscience of Christians?

There are no moral, religious or fundamental human rights justification for what Israelis are doing to the ordinary people of Palestine.

Biodun556:
The judiciary can nullify act of parliament through the power of judicial review

I believe that the jurisdiction of such annulment of the act of parliament is with the state high court not federal high court in respect of kingship titles.

What is the position of the state high court on the matter?

Akpabio is just a clown