₦airaland Forum

lepasharon:
Or Allah

Show me a verse in the koran where Allah claims to love non muslims or have the power to save non muslims.

JackBizzle:
Unlike the monster you are, I am a human being with one brain and one life- I use it wisely.

Yeah, by being stup1d, by spending your life talking about someone that doesnt exist. Try the same for santa claus and see how stup1d you are.

orisa37:
He has just had WISDOM. He has just understood The Light of God in him (The Biology). He is just starting to act, interact and move for good in Faith, Hope, Peace and Love of God in Christ Jesus. The Wisdom of God which passes all understanding be with him for ever. Amen.

Amen.

orisa37:
God bless you child and keep you sane for ever more.

Amen.

Happy easter....

happy easter all

lalasticlala

JackBizzle:
I have thought about it far more than you have.

Then im sorry, your brains are feeble

JackBizzle:
So, your god is a monster? A monstrously powerful being

My God, Your God, Our God exists. And His mere creations cant even begin to fathom the extent of His power.


think about that

JackBizzle:
God exists but you arent sure that he is good?

God exists. And His mere creations cant even begin to fathom the extent of His power.

JackBizzle:
Why must atheists be the bad guys in hollywood movies or tv series?

Do you agree with Lex Luthor in superman v batman!!


If God is all powerful, he cant be good. If God is all good, he cant be all powerful.



cc Reyginus, Joshthefirst, Kingebukasblog, muskeeto, winner01, weigraf

If God exists, how can His creations even begin to fathom His being.

The only fact is : God exists.

JackBizzle:
So my fuel case was supernatural?

Your existence is supernatural.

JackBizzle:
Wait! If I don't carry money maybe a good samaritan can help pay for the fuel.

Silly atheist- you can't win against miracles.

If a good samaritan helps. A diehard atheist will still say something like "Stay in your house, if someone brings fuel to you, ill pick the god for you myself". They will always need an extra detail.

Nothing will serve as evidence of the supernatural for someone who is desperate to live in denial of the obvious.

You are only making a mockery of yourself with this.

And please, nor dey quote me na. Abi dey send you

Logicbwoy:
The uk and usa are secular. The USA is a secular country by constitution (establishment clause). The UK is secular in its policies (despite having an unelected number of Bishops in it govt- which they will soon scrap).

I hope you know that when the UK and USA were founded by your christian principles, they were racist, slavery abiding, misogynist and genocidal. Your so-called christian prinicples involved slavery and all many kinds of wickedness involved in tribalistic thinking.


Today, we find that Secular coutries are more peaceful and prosperous. The America you call is not even one of the top 5 most developed countries in the world. They are- Norway, Australia, Switzerland, Netherlands and Denmark- strongly secular or atheistic countries.

The same christianity that propelled the abolition of those evil practices?

Look, You dont have to side with secularism. None of those countries is an atheist state. You can also call Nigeria an islamic state because she has more number of muslims.

Logicbwoy:
Saudi Arabia is not doing well. Stop being ignorant- one of the worst countries for human rights and women. There is poverty in saudi- dont let the sheiks and princes fool you

China is a communist country. You can be an atheist and still be religious. Communism is an atheistic state religion. Why dont you point out thatSouth Korea is an atheist country? hmm?

Saudi-arabia is not doing well economically? interesting.

If You equate irreligion to atheism or do not know that there is a surge in the number of christians in south korea or do not know that south korea is not an atheist country. Then you aren't even worthy of anyone's attention.

Logicbwoy:
North Korea is a communist country. It follows a state religion.



Nigeria is not a religious nation? Does the bible tell you to lie? Nigeria that ranks as one of the most religious countries in the world?

Ranked by who? The same people that ranked Nigeria as economically progressive? You do not deserve anyone's time.

Weah96:
Are you mad? I addressed a point made by the Kingebukasblog, not you. Go and classify Hitler to him. Wetin dey worry u sef? Go and pray somewhere.

Pain!!! na hn dey worry you.

AgentOfAllah:
"Something arising from nothing"? Not sure what you're on about. But to the best of my knowledge, evolution is silent on the origin of life. If you don't know this, then your knowledge of the subject is severely defective. I suggest you educate yourself on the subject matter instead of debunking the imaginary "flaws" you've fabricated.

Yes, I encourage people to read the papers themselves, which is why I have included links at any given opportunity.

I'm not sure I understand your challenge, but if your reference to "distinct species" is about the biological taxonomic rank, then your statement makes you out to be utterly ignorant about the subject you so ferociously disdain. I want you to ask yourself what you mean by species, then spend some time pondering upon the product of crossing a panthera Leo and a panthera Tigris, which are clearly "distinct species".

Listen, you seem confused about the basics of this subject, and to be sure, ignorance is not necessarily a bad thing though. I'm also ignorant about a lot of things. It only becomes dangerous when it is mixed with arrogance, in which case you're in danger of promoting fallacies with confidence. I recommend you take a breather and actually do some reading, so that even when you disagree, it'll not be on silly fabricated assumptions that a high school biology student shouldn't make.

Exactly, the expected reaction.
Just cut the crap and provide examples of one distinct specie changing to another. 40,000 generations was not even enough to DELIBERATELY/CONSCIOUSLY change one specie of bacteria to another distinct specie. It becomes funny how you then try to downplay the impossibility of BLIND/UNGUIDED process to change one specie into another under the guise of time.

What has been OBSERVED in reality are the coelacanth, the horseshoe crab, the caddisflies, the trilobite and other embarrassments to evolution which have each lived for not less than 200 millions years and have been thought to be extint millions of years ago until re-discovered. Normally, they have retained their wonderful features and have disgraced evolutionists.

There is no point wasting anyones time, when evolutionists actually OBSERVE one specie changing into another distinct specie and not rely on blind faith that macro-evolution must be true, then you can continue with your pro-evolution epistles.

AgentOfAllah:
If you had a big die with 100 faces, the chances of you landing on face 20 after a throw is 1%. It is highly improbable that even after 100 throws, you will have recorded 20 once. However, if you throw the die 1,000 times you will be closer to the mean expected value of 1% than after the first hundred throws. 10,000 throws will even get you closer to 1% and so on. Ultimately, given enough throws (or time), and this is the crucial bit of information, you will definitely regress to the mean 1%.

Sorry dude, this die is not even 1,000,000,000,000 faces for the simplest of cells. Dont try to downplay the impossibility of something arising from nothing.

AgentOfAllah:
You mentioned R. Lenski's ongoing experiment. Clearly, you are out of touch if you think the E. colis haven't changed appearances {N. Philippe et al.}. One particular species has even changed its metabolism process too!! Check their WEBSITE. Please, actually read about this experiment in the links I shared before you make factually defective statements such as the one you made above. Thanks

Changed appearances huh? People can read those papers and see for themselves.

Ill just repost my challenge to you. What has NEVER been observed is the change from one distinct SPECIES to another. Observation is key in science. Don't redefine science. Good luck again.

Weah96:
Belt buckle issued to the Nazi Army during WWII with

GOTT MIT UNS inscribed on it.

1. I classified Hitler's crimes as religious and still it does not meet up to 2% of the terror metted out to humans.
2. I gave Hitler's atheistic opinion on God and religion and no one has been able to disprove that.
3. Someone who had the balls to murder over 12,000,000 people can painlessly make a cheap trick that will make people think he believes in God.
4. You should shut up if you cant rationalize the crimes committed in the name of atheism.

USA and UK were built by christian founders on christian principles, we all know where they are today even though their children are going against the ways of their fathers. China has an ever increasing population of christians even though it suppresses religion and we all know how her econony is doing. Saudi arabia is religious and are doing well as far as sharia and islam are concerned. North Korea is an official atheist state ruled by an atheist psycho in what is presently the worlds most oppressive dictatorship, that executes religious people indiscriminately and has thousands of them in concentration camps where they are indoctrinated daily with atheism, and also has most of its citizens battling with malnutrition.

So to say religion impedes development is not only unfounded but laughable. Nigeria for example is a terribly superstituous and hypocritic nation and not a religious nation. She has at the helm of her affairs thugs who revere neither God nor human life and will steal in billions even if millions of lives will be lost as a result. An average Nigerian has been so affected by hardship that it has affected his/her mentality, compassion, love etc. Many of them even look for the next person they can dupe.

The same way there are many churches in Nigeria is the same way there is much money in Nigeria(but hoarded by a few thieves). This does not necessarily mean that Nigerians are truthfully religious neither does it mean that most Nigerians are enjoying the money in circulation.

Skeptics can keep making themselves happy by preaching that Nigeria is religious. I have no problems with that if it makes them sleep well.

enoch273:
cause the person is a scammer

sorry mehn, i dont know who starhitz or justin is.

enoch273:
are you starhitz?

No sir. why?

cloudgoddess:
Setting aside the biological components that play a role, I agree with this, in fact I have argued for this exact point in a different thread.

However the bible happens to be one of the worst sources of values that a society can be based off of. It's why countries that have seperated church from state & created secular governments are thriving, and ones still trying to involve holy texts in their lawmaking systems, are struggling. Functioning modern countries, with the help of cumulative human knowledge, compassion, and their brains, have moved far passed the level of moral standards presented in the bible, thankfully.

I may be missing something. But Is there any moral or value that surpasses the love for fellow humans as commanded by Jesus Christ?
We know North Korea is a certified atheist state, ruled by a psycho and has its citizens battling with malnutrition, China we know to have an ever increasing population of christians and a booming economy. Can we have the certified atheist states you are referring to. Not atheist states by population but by declaration. Just as Nigeria has not been declared an islamic state despite the population of muslims.

Saudi arabia has the sharia law and is doing well as far as islam is concerned. U.S.A and U.k were built on christian principles and we know where they are today. The struggling countries you are referring to. e. g. Nigeria is a highly superstitious and hypocritic country and hence cannot witness the change it needs till she has reasonable leaders and not thugs that do not revere God or human life and will loot in billions even if millions of people will suffer for it.

So i ask again, What moral standards supersedes love? Homosexuality?, Suicide?

cloudgoddess:
Perhaps yours doesn't.

Some of us still have functioning mental faculties that haven't been overtaken by religious indoctrination. Not everyone's brain is in the same cage you so willfully keep yours in.

A child learns morals and values from his/her society. If you grew up in a place where cannibalism was normal, it wouldn't mean much to you since it even agrees with your pseudo-scientific belief that we are higher animals... You learn't your morals from religion and society, not from yourself. Religious brains is why we are not wild animals like your mentors, the tyrants in the Op.

cloudgoddess:
The Lord will afflict your knees and legs with painful boils that cannot be cured, spreading from the soles of your feet to the top of your head. Deuteronomy 28:30-31,35
Giving boils to people is so loving!

Yawns!!!, All warnings. Blessings on obedience, curses on disobedience. Can you give us examples of humans afflicted with this curses. Thanks.

cloudgoddess:
When a woman has a discharge, if her discharge in her body is blood, she shall continue in her menstrual impurity for seven days; and whoever touches her shall be unclean until evening. Everything also on which she lies during her menstrual impurity shall be unclean, and everything on which she sits shall be unclean. Leviticus 15: 19-20
Yep, women are so filthy and impure for their natural reproductive cycles that god himself supposedly gave them. How very loving god is for alienating women like pariahs for natural biological functions.

Mosaic laws!!!. I see you clearly avoided the verses that spoke about discharge from men also . People can read up leviticus chapter 15.

cloudgoddess:
Early in the morning, as Jesus was on his way back to the city, he was hungry. Seeing a fig tree by the road, he went up to it but found nothing on it except leaves. Then he said to it, “May you never bear fruit again!” Immediately the tree withered. Matthew 21:18-22 NIV
Wow, who knew jesus was such a crybaby. Why didn't he just ask god to put more fruit in the tree rather than killing it? He must really love nature if he's willing to kill anything that doesn't serve him instantly.

He creates, He takes. Cry all you want. He can take all He created if He wills, except maybe you have the power to stop Him. .
You can also try to stop Him when its time to submit your life, maybe then you will realize you dont own sh*t.

cloudgoddess:
Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man intimately. But all the girls who have not known man intimately, spare for yourselves. Numbers 31:17-18
Yay, rape and killing! Such an expression of overflowing love!


If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property. Exodus 21
Slavery is a great way to express love.

The bible is riddled with much more hateful barbaric nonsense than it is loving or wise messages (which by the way were ALREADY overflowing in Hindu and Buddhist books far before Christianity. For example the "golden rule" originated in Buddhist texts, the bible is NOT unique in it's "wisdom" at all.) So not only was your diety late in the game, but he is obviously bipolar to the max. As expected from such a confused diety, belief in him seems to trigger both hatred and "love" (more like condescending pretend love) from its followers.

Mosaic laws, old convenants, an eye for an eye laws. I need not explain any more to you cos this wont be the first time.

"The prophets said, But Now I say". That's God Himself talking girl. "Ye have heard that it hath been said, ‘Thou shalt love thy neighbor, and hate thine enemy. But I say unto you, Love your enemies…" (Matt. 5). Jesus came to show man how to live.

You wish the Bible was not unique in its wisdom , You will be against the hindu and islamic texts if they were half as true as the Bible. Jesus came to show us how to live in Love.

And is this the best justification you can come up with for the madness performed in the name of atheism? Pathetic!!!

cloudgoddess:
As expected from such a confused diety, belief in him seems to trigger both hatred (especially of non-believers) and "love" (more like condescending pretend love) from its followers. I've found far more genuinely caring, selfless, and accepting people amongst non-Christians. A large amount of christians everywhere are actually markedly UNloving in their interactions and behaviors with anyone they don't approve of.

Yes, but atheists are caring and loving everywhere, the tyrants in the Op inclusive. Your atheist friend said there are bad people irrespective of their beliefs, you might need to think about that.

cloudgoddess:
I'd rather use my brain, which reliably tells me that treating others kindly feels good & has positive consequences, and treating others badly feels bad & has negative consequences. See? Simple. No bipolar sky daddies needed.

Your brains don't tell you jack. You learnt your morals and values from religion and society. Had you been brought up in china during mao's reign, you'll support the extermination of religious people. Send my regards to your husband, sky daddy, and your son rain bobo. .

AgentOfAllah:
Existing species are the anomaly, and they only exist because every now and then, however improbable, beneficial mutations do happen, and when they happen, they do what they do best: allow the living thing that should naturally not exist another go at survival. But make no mistake, we are only among the lucky 0.1%.

" bolded, Several improbabilities happened and we got lucky right? . You see, this is exactly why i wont waste my time with you.

AgentOfAllah:
Now, back to your 'almost' question. Are there observable examples of beneficial mutations? Most Definitely! One such example is the increasing resistance of bacteria to antibiotics as a result of reproduction by lucky bacteria species whose random mutations allowed them to become resistant to current antimicrobial formulas {Center for Disease Control and Prevention}. These mutation, while providing no benefit to human populations, is obviously beneficial to the bacteria species that acquired them. For obvious reasons, mutations are a lot easier to spot in unicellular organisms that in multicellular ones, which explains why many lab experiments are able to demonstrate evolution more effectively on such small scales.

Adaptation!!!. Just like bacterial populations grown for thousands of generations in a lab became more and more genetically adapted to their environment each generation (experiment done by Dr. Richard E. Lenski, Michigan State University).

Despite all your wishful thinking, all offspring of the tested Unicellular organisms no matter how long or how many generations, have always resembled their parents. What has never been observed is the change from one distinct species to another. Observation is key in science. Don't redefine science. Good luck.

joseph1832:
Of course you're blind and as a result, you can never see what's in front you. You're a drug addict, know the definition of era so you can saved from the well of ignorance you find yourself.

dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/era

LOL. keep making a fool of yourself. You mentioned events not eras. How willfully ignorant you are.

joseph1832:
On the contrary, the Spanish Inquisition is way different from the Inquisition that span across europe during the 12th to 16th century, killing millions in the name of religion.

I don't need to give you figures... I already told you the books to read, so go and read them.

You know why you cant give figures like i did, cos those figures are nothing compared to atheist murder figures. Give numbers and save yourself from shame.

joseph1832:
You didn't prove anything bro. You only provided an opinion as to what they did. Did you bother to ask yourself why they so hated and murdered religious folks?

Let I said, to see the facts, read the books I mentioned, then you'll see Hitler and Mao were no different from those who murder just because one didn't believe in what they believed.

I provided an opinion by giving Adolf Hitlers quotes? Who else is seeing how dumb this dude is? . I dont need to ask why they hated God and religion, maybe you can tell us why you hate God and religion.

I dont need your books, I gave my figures, give yours. Dont refer me to a book you saw on a site and have probably never read.
Religious peeps did not submit to their dangerous atheistic ideologies and they exterminated them. And why are you only mentioning Hitler and mao, when we have over 50 other atheist murders.

joseph1832:
I'll have you know they promoted their own ideologies. Hitler promoted Nascism, Mao promoted Maoism, Even Musolini promoted Fascism.

Funny Can you give the basics of maoism or nascism and let people see them.
Yeah, Kim of North Korea is also an atheist promoting kilmungsuism(the god-like worship of oneself and the state). He is an atheist, the state is an atheist state. He does not need to start press conferences by stating that : "I'm an atheist".

Atheists are their own god, you may become the president of Nigeria today (God forbid) and attempt to forcefully introduce your own form of foolishness, Josephism. And then later dolts will say you weren't propagating atheism but josephism.

I call it: The "Anything but God" syndrome

joseph1832:
They never promoted atheism, never for once. As a political scientist, not once was it mentioned that these men promoted atheism. All what they promoted were what I mentioned. And they saw religion and an enemy so they chose to wipe out its adherents. The same thing done by the early church.

If your wishes makes you sleep well, knock yourself out.

The Republic of China under Mao was officially an atheist state, and atheism was endorsed and promoted by the ruling Chinese Communist Party. When the People's Republic of China was established, militant atheist functionaries compelled the Party to impose control on and limit religious suppliers.
During the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, a new form of militant atheism made great efforts to eradicate religion completely. Under this militant atheism espoused by Mao, houses of worship were shut down; Buddhist pagodas, Daoist temples, Christian churches, and Muslim mosques were destroyed; artifacts were smashed; and sacred texts were burnt. It was a criminal offence to even possess a religious artifact or sacred text. The death toll in 20th Cenutry China attributable to Mao Tse-Tsung's "Great Leap Forward" is estimated to be as over 40,000,000." However, following the death of Mao Zedong in 1976, many former policies towards religious freedom returned although they are limited and tenuous, as religion is closely regulated by the government. It was the death of Mao that saw China move away from militant atheism to a more scientific, objective and consequently more balanced approach to religion.


Harold J. Berman, a Harvard specialist in Soviet law says, "militant atheism was the official religion, one might say, of the Soviet Union and the Communist Party was the established church." The militant atheism of the Bolsheviks which owed its origins to the "standard Marxist feeling that religion was the opium of the masses." The goal of the Soviet Union was the liquidation of religion and the means to achieve this goal included the destruction of churches, mosques, synagogues, mandirs, madrasahs, religious monuments, as well the mass deportation to Siberia of believers of different religions. Under the Soviet doctrine of separation of church and state, detailed in the Constitution of the Soviet Union, churches in the Soviet Union were forbidden to give to the poor or carry on educational activities. Moreover, not only was religion banned from the school and university system, but pupils were to be indoctrinated with atheism and antireligious teachings. Schoolchildren were asked to convert family members to atheism and memorize antireligious rhymes, songs, and catechisms, while university students who declined to propagate atheism lost their scholarships and were expelled from universities. Before the Russian Revolution, there were more than fifty thousand Russian Orthodox clergymen, by 1939, there were no more than three to four hundred left.

In the year 1922 alone, under the militant atheistic system, 2691 secular priests, 1962 monks and 3447 nuns were martyred for their faith. In total, the number of Christians who were martyred for their faith under the militant atheism of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics is 12 million. In his book, Islam and the Contemporary World, Golam Wahed Choudhury writes that the atheistic régime, "killed thousands, even millions of Muslims in 1917: they displaced millions in 1921. More than two million were martyred in 1926 when the communists confiscated their livestock according to communist principles: they died of starvation." He goes on further to state that "Stalin's oppression and suppression of the Muslim populations of the Soviet Union can only be compared to Hitler's persecution of the Jews."

Ref: conservapedia.com


You keep mentioning Hitler even after i gave proof of his motivations. In a hurry to quickly escape this, you didn't notice that I classified Hitler's crimes as religious and even at that, the percentage of religious killings did not make 3%. Be gone, you have no point.

Teempakguy:
nope, not nothing. but rather a big dense ball of energy.
comedian.

Stop trying to redefine what nothing means. A big dense ball of energy is something. Where did it come from?

Teempakguy:
eventually, this points to a failure of the God you are trying to sell to me. he has been shown by you to be an incompetent asshole who is only capable of creating disgusting humans. humans who will kill in his name or otherwise. you point to an idiot who is supposed to be the holy and all good being. who will watch as people who do not believe in him slaughter millions of people who did believe in him when all he needed to do was reveal himself. he was content with doing so with Saul. but he couldn't do it to Hitler because . . . reasons. no, he was content to watch the Atheists decimate his "beloved " and you have the gut to come and tell me that atheism is supposed to be evil. oh, shut up.

No one is trying to sell a god to you. This article is simply about the madness of atheism and nothing more. How on earth do you call a "non-existent being" names? I want to imagine myself calling santa claus (a non-existent being) an asshole, maybe ill just be as confused as you are. Its obvious you are living in hatred. Even if you call your father an asshole, it does not change the fact that he's your father.
Ask reasonably sincere questions, you'll get your answers.

Teempakguy:
eventually, you are describing a god who has no regard for human life. which in itself, isn't very bad. until you advertise to me that he's supposed to be the good guy. no thanks, i don't lie to myself. i can see clearly that he is a figment of your collective imaginations. anyone who massmurders is a criminal. be it Hitler, Stalin, dark age Christians, or the god they worshipped. it is only in fiction that the source of evil gets to be the all Good guy. and the fact that you desperately wish him to be real is pathtic and disgusting.

A God who created human life defininately has regards for His creations. You can wish all you want, when you become open-minded, you'll learn to see life for what it really is. Your defences are as weak as your intelligence. Not one reasonable justification for the madness committed in the name of atheism.

joseph1832:
Spoken like a typical christian. When one refute their opinionated belief, they go into a frenzy and splatter insults... I already gave you the eras, but you refuse to see them but rather chose to rant.

Which eras did you mention. Do you even know the meaning of Era. Tell someone to mention one Era that you stated so you can see how empty you are.

joseph1832:
If you want facts, if you want to see proof, please go and read The Inquisition and The Brother's Karamasov. You'll get your facts and figures from those books. Particularly The Inquisition.

Seems the spanish inquisition is the only defence you have, i mentioned that in my table. The total killings in both books were less than 800,000. In the spanish inquisition for example, the total killings were 350,000. It still pales in comparison to just one atheist, stalin, who killed tens of millions.

You know this cant be compared to the madness of atheism, thats why you cant give us exact figures.

joseph1832:
I already gave your names, I named Adolf Hitler, Chairman Mao, but you chose not to see them. Kindly tell me if there ever was a time, Hitler or Mao, ever referred to themselves as atheist. You can even add Idi Amin Dada to the list also.

I proved adolf hitler and mao had an atheistic ideology in the article, can you prove otherwise and stop wailing. We dont need your opinions, we need facts and proof. Idi amin did not promote an ideology neither did he exterminate religious people. Find another escape route.

joseph1832:
So anybody who proclaim his hatred for the christian God is now an atheism as proclaimed by you? Very illuminating I must say.

They did not proclaim hatred for the christian God. The proclaimed their hatred for God and religion and they were motivated to annihilate religious people. Stop running around.

joseph1832:
I suppose Charles Darwin who came with the survivor of the fittest mentality was an atheist right?

Your ranting will do you no good my good man. Religious people weren't the only ones you faced the wrath of Mao and Hitler, others did too, so stop hammering on it like they're the ones who were scarred.

Stop trying to evade the issue. Give an alternate ideology to what those murderers were promoting and stop looking for ways to escape. And yes, Darwin was a weak atheist/agnostic.

joseph1832:
Yea you too. Live and stop attacking people for doing what they do, especially because they don't follow your beliefs...

Please tell us how this article attacks people.. If anything, this article is to help people out of bondage. Stop being desperate to remain relevant. Your opinions are irrelevant.

joseph1832:
How do you know what I need my simple man? Unlike you, I'm not afraid of death, every living thing must die. Its just the plain truth.

Death comes to us all whether we like it or not.

Yeah. So live and quit asking me questions.

joseph1832:
Dude, I asked you a simple question that requires, a yes, or a no. Why the abstracts eh, are you a pastor? lol.

You dont need an answer. You have an answer in your mind already.
Why not just be patient till you die eh.