₦airaland Forum

ifenes:
How old are you?

Old enough to learn, unlearn and re-learn.

KingEbukasBlog:
Oh no ... did you just insult winner01 ? The imaginary ancestors of those evolved animals must hear this

I think one of them ape-ancestors have heard and is definately not happy with cloudgoddess

cloudgoddess:
Why are you always calling my name in your threads I'm not interested in whatever pathetic pseudoscientific bs you're spreading these days.

@ bolded, All these names simply cos of a perceived opposition to evolution? . I understand.
Well, if these ones were pseudoscientists, i'd like to know who the 'real' scientists are. Since today's science is no longer based on
knowledge, discovery and truth but majority vote.

cloudgoddess:
The time you're spending posting this crap you could be ordering a biology textbook and studying. Use your time more wisely.

Oh!, Not your advice again!!. Last time you referred me to "science", you shot yourself badly in the leg. You copied links hastily without reading through to see if they totally supported your view or not. And wasted my time.
I think ill pass on this one, "scientist".

frank317:
u never start. Na blood remain to cry out.



e pain u?

Logic bro, simple logic. Dont just shout it, do it. I dont do islam, i ain't in the section, i dont keep late nights in the section and then accuse a muslim of not sleeping.

Be the thinker you wish to be.

frank317:
Any scientist that believes in a magical sky daddy is either deceiving u or himself. Or can u scientifically explain how snake talked eve into eating a fruit that is capable of making a naked woman discover she is naked.
U too cry... I wonder how u behaved as a baby.

I really want to agree with you that those great scientists were deceiving themselves but then my intelligence wont just allow me. And i dont believe in a sky daddy or a cloudgoddess.

This may help you though: https://www.nairaland.com/2917639/much-better-explanation-evolution

frank317:
Lol... U must be feeling tough. If crying means countering a view then I wonder which school u went to. "Ahhh uhhhh buuu gaaa yeee...atheist don't want we Christians to rest, they are here day and night disturbing our peace aghhh my Jesus u must be restless, this people are disturbing u and baba God's peace... Uhhhhh, buuuhhh ahhh," keep on crying.

Wail on dude!!, Wail on !!

frank317:
If u don't want people to react to ur views keep them to urself. You can cry a river, atheists are here to stay.

Seriously i would love to keep 'em to myself, but then i saw a religion section and decided to share my views with religious peeps. Then frankenstein and his likes start to masturbate all over the place.

Emorse has a good advice for you.

emorse:
You can go through my profile. I have little history in this section cos I know how parochial guys in here can be.

Be like emorse, he doesn't do religion, he doesn't spend his life and time on religion.

frank317:
He doesn't know he sound like a kid when he keeps on repeating that gibberish.

Stale!!!.
You dont do religion, this is a religion section, what are you doing here?.

Well, I wouldnt have an answer to that either if i was confronted by a muslim for spending so much time on islams section without believing in islam.

frank317:
The presence of atheists on this forum must be giving him sleepless nights. I wonder why he feels threatened for Jesus.

This is a large forum. Of about 40 sections, you choose to dwell in the religion section. C'mon man, We both know who is having sleepless nights. we both know who is dedicated to attacking religious worldviews on a religion section.

frank317:
I wonder why he feels threatened for Jesus.

Talk is cheap dude. This thread is simply to debunk the absurd contemporary notion that a christian cant be a "real" scientist. Nothing more, nothing less.

So you can wish i was "threatened for Jesus" all you want - lol - whatever that means. If it make ls you feel better .

emorse:
You have your views and they do not ruffle the feathers of the newly hatched chick in my poultry house but you should understand that others have theirs too. Yeah I can tell all these things mean a lot to you. The reason you're getting all emotional. However, emotions never solved any problem for humanity.

I shared my views, it disturbed you and you couldnt but react. I rubbish your reactions and now you cry foul. its understandable.

emorse:
@the bolded makes you appear really desperate. Speaking from both sides of your mouth. Work on your argument skills man, and then find your match. And please don't quote me anymore cos I won't honour you with a response.

You'd wish i was desperate. You should take to your own advices kid. You should never have reacted to this in the first place, go find a place you fit in. Your opinions will be forgotten.

Judas2013:
Religious mind

Does it matter if i reply, you have closed your mind. I just hope you dont run around screaming rationality and logic next time.

Oluwaseytiano:
Pls enlighten your humble student, O Master.

I wont. You should allow nature to.
You do not know how you were created yet you demonstrate so much knowledge on what you dont know.

This quote defines you:
"To sustain the belief that there is no God, atheism has to demonstrate infinite knowledge, which is tantamount to saying, "I have infinite knowledge that there is no being in existence with infinite knowledge" --Ravi Zacharias

Once again, be a man and admit it. You do not know what you dont know.

Judas2013:
I am against anyone who ask me to worship a god.

You do worship a god. It might be women, money, alcohol, yourself or any other thing.
You do not need to asked to worship anything, you were born a worshipper. You need to really think deep and see the world for what it is.

Oluwaseytiano:
Am not an atheist. I just don't believe in religion. So am sure the God that created me is not manmade like Yahweh, Allah, Zeus or Buddha.

You do not know what you dont know.

KingEbukasBlog:
Ifeness be like :

Yesterday : Jesus does not exist , he is a fictitious character

Today : Jesus is an alien , an anunnaki . Christians are worshiping Aliens and ancient alien astronauts

Tomorrow : Jesus is The Sun and his disciples(the 12 zodiac signs). Christianity came from Astrology

Your wahala too much

Winner01 , bro , I wonder why his atheist friends turn a blind eye to his delusions . Someone needs to tell this guy that by Next Tomorrow he might find himself deriving a new theory about God at yaba left

ifeness is an atheist yet a cultist. Im yet to see other atheists argue him out of his delusions. They seem to be concerned with christians alone. Well, its not like they arn't deluded.

Ifeness' psyche has been tampered with, you should expect him to give different stories everyday. The first day i argued with ifeness, i came to the obvious conclusion that "many are but few are roaming".
He might even tell you that you are Jesus tomorrow

KingEbukasBlog:
Irrationality is the atheist's middle name .Someone who is open minded is READY to accept possibilities and new information - they LACK these qualities .

To the atheist, science is atheism and therefore is closed to the possibility that the universe was created. Such close-mindedness.

Oluwaseytiano:
perhaps true. BT it still doesn't change the fact that you are mentally enslaved

Another overused line, you still havent explained how religion enslaves one mentally. And I bet those world changers i mentioned up there would disagree with you. You have no valid proof that atheism has not enslaved you mentally, afterall, im at loss on what atheism has contributed to the growth of humanity.

Oluwaseytiano:
Religion is a scam, a fraud and the opium of the masses.

Let me not make the obvious assumption that someone accused me of earlier. But seriously, that line is stale and has been overused. Come up with something new, would ya?

emorse:
Nowhere in my response did I mention atheism but you assumed - like you all do - and that I was trying to attack your religion. Mind you, the definition of faith I stated up there was given by "a very big man of God" but if you say he is wrong, who am I to argue?

Yeah i assumed, like i would assume that you probably haven't eaten if you told me you were hungry. And you wouldnt blame me, nowadays, once some people believe they were not created by a Creator, they start to scream "rational thinking".
What do you mean by " a very big man of God"? I know of the Son of God, the sons of God and children of God. Now we know people that were really indoctrinated simply because they suck up to "big men of God".

emorse:
There you go. Defensive just as I expected. I'm "a great nobody" yet I side with science to " remain relevant"? Snap out of it bro and allow your religion defend itself cos you're doing a really poor job. Note this. I'm not here to attack you. I only stumbled upon this thread and thought to drop my 2kobo. You can go through my profile. I have little history in this section cos I know how parochial guys in here can be.

"Allow your religion to defend itself", what is this? Well, When you read the first paragraph of the article, you will know what this thread is all about. No one is defending religion, its just a simple reminder. You dont make erroneous comments and then scream defence when it is broken down. Its needless to go through your profile, cos its not a measure of your intelligence or open-mindedness. And its only normal for you to have little history in this section unlike some people who crave attention so badly that they keep late nights to proclaim and defend their supposedly "irreligious" worldview on a religion section.

emorse:
Now you side with science? Are you also trying to "remain relevant"? Like I said earlier, you really need to make up your mind. And @ the bolded, that's some great advice. It'll do you a lot of good. Enjoy!

I do not "side" with science, science is what i do. Its why i dont scream science at every little argument. And if i was trying to remain relevant, i would be on an opposing section.
Ive made up my mind, and its why im on a religious section. You should take to your advice of making up your mind. You seem to be agitated cos your past have been reffered to.
Once again, Why not sit back, relax and free yourself from the shackles of close-mindedness.

"Evolution doesn't account for consciousness, for isn't it the conscience that produced the theory of evolution?" - Terrence Mckenna, American ethnobotanist, mystic, psychonaut, lecturer, and author

https://www.nairaland.com/2917639/much-better-explanation-evolution

KingEbukasBlog:
In our small world ? My brother , my God is EVERYTHING and you are a unit of it observing the birth , growth and demise of ANYTHING

Great Post by winner01 . Lalasticlala come see fantastic educative post

I wonder what goes on in their minds. How can an atheist who denies the reality of the immaterial accuse you of close-mindedness.

emorse:
Funny. You guys really need to make up your minds. One minute you're all for rational thinking and actions. The next, you're all for "faith" - seeing things that are not, as though they are.

I take it thats your own definition of faith. And you need to stop this desperation. Why do you refer to rational thinking and faith as if they oppose each other. Unbelievers also have faith in lots of stuff so What faith are you talking about? And please rational thinking does not include creation without a Creator?? Stop trying to redifine rational thinking.

emorse:
Science has no problems with religion. One man( Schafersman) cannot unilaterally speak on behalf of the science world. Religion on the other hand has always felt threatened by scientific exploits. The fear that science will eventually unravel all your secrets has given you sleepless nights since 0/0/00.

Yeah right, says you. A great nobody. The only reason why you side with science is to remain relevant. No one would listen to you if you didnt have something to cling to.
I sleep well, You on the other hand dont, its why you are on a religion section by this time of the night, ready to attack christians and their beliefs. Get some rest, would ya?

emorse:
Until you all let your guards down and try to reason along the frighteningly unconventional paths, you're going to remain stuck in your small world, admiring from afar, great works by great men. And by great men, I mean scientists - evolutionists and creationists inclusive.

Yeah, another atheist myth: Theists dont reason. You should Wake up from your slumber. Atheism has absolutely nothing to offer humanity, science does. And we know how science was birthed. Why not sit back, relax and free yourselves from the shackles of close-mindedness.

“We must not build on the sands of an uncertain and everchanging science…but upon the rock of inspired Scriptures.” - Sir Ambrose Flemming

For more quotes by great men, you can visit: https://www.nairaland.com/2499498/quotes-famous-men-bible

This article is just to serve as a reminder that science is being hijacked by naturalists and evolutionists. Nowadays you have to disbelief in God to be a "real" scientist. Science is no longer defined today as a branch of study which seeks to observe, discover, and understand the nature and principles that govern our universe, our world, and ourselves, but a branch of study which consistently reaffirms that there is no God. Nowadays, atheists are forcing us to choose between science and the Sovereign Creator of science. But not to worry, we know how desperate they want to be heard. We can always remind them that religion has contributed immensely to the scientific growth of our world. This article focuses on some christian scientists alone. Other discoveries and inventions by scholars and scientists from other religious groups are not mentioned here.



One of the self-serving arguments of modern evolutionists is their rather arrogant claim that creationist scientists are not real scientists. No matter that a large number of creationists have earned authentic Ph.D. degrees in science, hold responsible scientific positions and have published numerous scientific articles and books—if they are creationists, they are not true scientists! In a Letter-to-the-Editor, Steven Schafersman, of Rice University's Department of Geology, says, for example: "I dispute Henry Morris's claim that thousands of scientists are creationists. No scientist today questions the past and present occurrence of evolution in the organic world. Those ‘thousands of creationists' with legitimate post-graduate degrees and other appropriate credentials are not scientists, precisely because they have abandoned the scientific method and the scientific attitude, criteria far more crucial to the definition of scientist than the location or duration of one's training or the identity of one's employer" (Geotimes, August 1981, P. 11).

Thus modern creationists are conveniently excluded as scientists merely by definition! Science does not mean "knowledge" or "truth," or "facts," as we used to think, but "naturalism" or "materialism," according to this new definition. The very possibility of a Creator is prohibited by majority vote of the scientific fraternity, and one who still wishes to believe in God must forfeit his membership.

Well, no matter. At least we creationist scientists can take comfort in the fact that many of the greatest scientists of the past were creationists and for that matter, were also Bible-believing Christians, men who believed in the inspiration and authority of the Bible, as well as in the deity and saving work of Jesus Christ. They believed that God had supernaturally created all things, each with its own complex structure for its own unique purpose. They believed that, as scientists, they were "thinking God's thoughts after Him," learning to understand and control the laws and processes of nature for God's glory and man's good. They believed and practiced science in exactly the same way that modern creationist scientists do.

And somehow this attitude did not hinder them in their commitment to the "scientific method." In fact one of them, Sir Francis Bacon, is credited with formulating and establishing the scientific method! They seem also to have been able to maintain a proper "scientific attitude," for it was these men (Newton, Pasteur, Linnaeus, Faraday, Pascal, Lord Kelvin, Maxwell, Kepler, etc.) whose researches and analyses led to the very laws and concepts of science which brought about our modern scientific age. The mechanistic scientists of the present are dwarfed in comparison to these intellectual giants of the past. Even the achievements of an Einstein (not to mention Darwin!) are trivial in comparison. The real breakthroughs, the new fields, the most beneficial discoveries of science were certainly not delayed (in fact probably were hastened) by the creationist motivations of these great founders of modern science.

TABLE I

SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES ESTABLISHED BY CREATIONIST SCIENTISTS
DISCIPLINE - SCIENTIST
ANTISEPTIC SURGERY - JOSEPH LISTER (1827-1912)
BACTERIOLOGY - LOUIS PASTEUR (1822-1895)
CALCULUS -ISAAC NEWTON (1642-1727)
CELESTIAL MECHANICS - JOHANN KEPLER (1571-1630)
CHEMISTRY - ROBERT BOYLE (1627-1691)
COMPARATIVE ANATOMY - GEORGES CUVIER (1769-1832)
COMPUTER SCIENCE -CHARLES BABBAGE (1792-1871)
DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS - LORD RAYLEIGH (1842-1919)
DYNAMICS - ISAAC NEWTON (1642-1727)
ELECTRONICS - JOHN AMBROSE FLEMING (1849-1945)
ELECTRODYNAMICS - JAMES CLERK MAXWELL (1831-1879)
ELECTRO-MAGNETICS - MICHAEL FARADAY (1791-1867)
ENERGETICS -LORD KELVIN (1824-1907)
ENTOMOLOGY OF LIVING INSECTS -HENRI FABRE (1823-1915)
FIELD THEORY - MICHAEL FARADAY (1791-1867)
FLUID MECHANICS -GEORGE STOKES (1819-1903)
GALACTIC ASTRONOMY - WILLIAM HERSCHEL (1738-1822)
GAS DYNAMICS - ROBERT BOYLE (1627-1691)
GENETICS - GREGOR MENDEL (1822-1884)
GLACIAL GEOLOGY -LOUIS AGASSIZ (1807-1873)
GYNECOLOGY - JAMES SIMPSON (1811-1870)
HYDRAULICS - LEONARDO DA VINCI (1452-1519)
HYDROGRAPHY - MATTHEW MAURY (1806-1873)
HYDROSTATICS - BLAISE PASCAL (1623-1662)
ICHTHYOLOGY - LOUIS AGASSIZ (1807-1873)
ISOTOPIC CHEMISTRY- WILLIAM RAMSAY (1852-1916)
MODEL ANALYSIS - LORD RAYLEIGH (1842-1919)
NATURAL HISTORY - JOHN RAY (1627-1705)
NON-EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY- BERNHARD RIEMANN (1826- 1866)
OCEANOGRAPHY -MATTHEW MAURY (1806-1873)
OPTICAL MINERALOGY - DAVID BREWSTER (1781-1868)
PALEONTOLOGY - JOHN WOODWARD (1665-1728)
PATHOLOGY - RUDOLPH VIRCHOW (1821-1902)
PHYSICAL ASTRONOMY - JOHANN KEPLER (1571-1630)
REVERSIBLE THERMODYNAMICS -JAMES JOULE (1818-1889)
STATISTICAL THERMODYNAMICS -JAMES CLERK MAXWELL (1831-1879)
STRATIGRAPHY - NICHOLAS STENO (1631-1686)
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY - CAROLUS LINNAEUS (1707-1778)
THERMODYNAMICS - LORD KELVIN (1824-1907)
THERMOKINETICS - HUMPHREY DAVY (1778-1829)
VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY- GEORGES CUVIER (1769-1832)


TABLE II

NOTABLE INVENTIONS, DISCOVERIES OR DEVELOPMENTS BY CREATIONIST SCIENTISTS
CONTRIBUTION - SCIENTIST
ABSOLUTE TEMPERATURE SCALE - LORD KELVIN (1824-1907)
ACTUARIAL TABLES - CHARLES BABBAGE (1792-1871)
BAROMETER - BLAISE PASCAL (1623-1662)
BIOGENESIS LAW -LOUIS PASTEUR (1822-1895)
CALCULATING MACHINE - CHARLES BABBAGE (1792-1871)
CHLOROFORM - JAMES SIMPSON (1811-1870)
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM - CAROLUS LINNAEUS (1707-1778)
DOUBLE STARS - WILLIAM HERSCHEL (1738-1822)
ELECTRIC GENERATOR - MICHAEL FARADAY (1791-1867)
ELECTRIC MOTOR - JOSEPH HENRY (1797-1878)
EPHEMERIS TABLES - JOHANN KEPLER (1571-1630)
FERMENTATION CONTROL - LOUIS PASTEUR (1822-1895)
GALVANOMETER -JOSEPH HENRY (1797-1878)
GLOBAL STAR CATALOG - JOHN HERSCHEL (1792-1871)
INERT GASES - WILLIAM RAMSAY (1852-1916)
KALEIDOSCOPE - DAVID BREWSTER (1781-1868)
LAW OF GRAVITY - ISAAC NEWTON (1642-1727)
MINE SAFETY LAMP - HUMPHREY DAVY (1778-1829)
PASTEURIZATION - LOUIS PASTEUR (1822-1895)
REFLECTING TELESCOPE - ISAAC NEWTON (1642-1727)
SCIENTIFIC METHOD - FRANCIS BACON (1561-1626)
SELF-INDUCTION - JOSEPH HENRY (1797-1878)
TELEGRAPH - SAMUEL F.B. MORSE (1791-1872)
THERMIONIC VALVE - AMBROSE FLEMING (1849-1945)
TRANS-ATLANTIC CABLE - LORD KELVIN (1824-1907)
VACCINATION & IMMUNIZATION - LOUIS PASTEUR (1822-1895)


Nor should anyone suppose that their commitment to theism and creationism was only because they were not yet acquainted with modern philosophies. Many were strong opponents of Darwinism (Agassiz, Pasteur, Lord Kelvin, Maxwell, Dawson, Virchow, Fabre, Fleming, etc.). Even those who lived before Darwin were strong opponents of earlier evolutionary systems, not to mention pantheism, atheism, and other such anti-supernaturalist philosophies, which were every bit as prevalent then as now.

To illustrate the caliber and significance of these great scientists of the past, Tables I and II have been prepared. These tabulations are not complete lists, of course, but at least are representative and they do point up the absurdity of modern assertions that no true scientist can be a creationist and Bible-believing Christian.

Table I lists the creationist "fathers" of many significant branches of modern science. Table II lists the creationist scientists responsible for various vital inventions, discoveries, and other contributions to mankind. These identifications are to some degree oversimplified, of course, for even in the early days of science every new development involved a number of other scientists, before and after. Nevertheless, in each instance, a strong case can be made for attributing the chief responsibility to the creationist scientist indicated. At the very least, his contribution was critically important and thus supports our contention that belief in creation and the Bible helps, rather than hinders, scientific discovery.

In each case, the scientists listed were strict creationists, unreservedly believing in the Bible and the God of the Bible. Some were "progressive creationists," but none were theistic evolutionists, so far as can be determined. They came from a variety of denominational backgrounds and doctrinal persuasions, but all were at least professing Christians, committed to the basic doctrines of Christianity. Additional biographical data concerning both their Christian convictions and their scientific contributions have been compiled recently by the writer for a chapter in a future book and it has been a great personal blessing to share in their lives and studies in this way. The mere listing of their names in these summary Tables may seem impersonal, but even this bare compilation is impressive.

The scientific achievements of modern creationist scientists do not yet measure up to those of these earlier creationists (neither do the attainments of modern evolutionists for that matter), but we at least have the same beliefs, the same motivations and the same spiritual resources. There is a much greater weight of establishment prejudice to overcome today, but the God of Robert Boyle and the God of Clerk Maxwell is still the same "Creator, who is blessed for ever" (Romans 1:25), "Lord, it is nothing with thee to help, whether with many, or with them that have no power: help us, 0 Lord our God: for we rest on thee, and in thy name we go against this multitude. 0 Lord, thou art our God; let not man prevail against thee." (II Chronicles 14:11).


Ref: Dr. Henry M. Morris Ph.D. Founder and President Emeritus of ICR.

dolphinheart:
good, hope not with established pagan customs and unscriptural practices sha.

No oo, except that i eat chicken.

dolphinheart:
Why not kukuma celebrate him everyday!, since he owns all days. why go through the stress of finding just one day for the celebration?, a celebration we where not even commanded to observe, and no precedence set by the disciples to celebrate it!

I celebrate him everyday.

sweetcocoa:
The questions are never really answered(for former christians like us, who were bold enough to ask), they just mumble some mumbo jumbo and expect you to accept it as truth, anyways, typical christians don't even ask important questions, as they are often too scared of offending god or the holy spirit, which we know to be very malicious, so Sunday school is practically useless.

How about those whose questions have been answered? Should they neglect christianity simply because yours werent answered?

How about inquisitive skeptics like me(a christian), who has visited reddit frequently (though im not proud of that and ive stopped) just to find questions or assertions that will shake my faith and pose serious questions to other believers like me but havent found any. Except maybe temper tantrums thrown at God by emotionally affected individuals?

Thirdly, if sunday school teachers dont have answers to some questions. Can you or anybody else claim to have infinite knowledge about all questions?

Lastly, are you sure you have an open mind or is your judgement biased based on a worldview which you think is logical?

Ill appreciate your answers sweetcocoa.

sweetcocoa:
Lmao @ giving room for questions and answers.


Sunday school, just like church and religion in general, makes you all the more stupid and confused.


Say no to religion and regain your sanity.

How does a room for question and answers make you look more stupid and confused?

.

MarieSucre:
My point is not about the wife or her husband. My point is about the man who is toasting the woman. Is he a retar.d? Have women finished in Nigeria? You're excusing the man out of the equation like the burden of responsibility only lands on the woman's shoulder. Is the man a small child that cannot comprehend words. This your logic is what rapists use too.

Im not excusing the man, the lady in question has already excused him. The decision is with her. When godmother starts showering your husband with money and gifts and he keeps it from you, then you will understand that saying no while nodding your head means yes..

Thank God for them

MarieSucre:
"She has not told her husband yet, only if her husband
comes on the street and we fight serious fight. then the
whole street start calling a troublesome woman
because 2 men fought over her in public before I will
really believe her NO"

I posted this in the comment I quoted. You're just making my point for me. Is he a child? That cannot hear NO. I bet you if a woman keeps coming on to you despite your revelation to get that you're in a relationship, you will immediately conclude and I would support you in this conclusion that either she is retard.ed or a Karishika that has come to suck your destiny.

Pls apply this logic too.

Im telling you whats up. You discuss challenges with your husband. How can a toaster send you money and you will keep such from your husband. Thats a yes in disguise.

Men understand No when they see one especially in a country where most relationship and marriages started with the woman saying No.

The lady should keep deceiving herself.

MarieSucre:
I write as if I am tired of some men treating themselves like children.

-"Nooo she did not tell me No well"

"She should have slapped me and pushed me while saying NO so that I know that she means it"

"she should have rented big billboard inscribed with a big NO and stationed it at Oshodi bustop"

"She should have started dressing like Mary Amaka, wearing all those skinny jeans and make up must definitely be for me not for herself hence she is still not telling me NO"

"She should have use car and jam me when she sees me in the road, this one that she is driving slowly by me, she even greeted me politely, heeeeen the babe is still the nigga"

"As far as she has not used Knife to threaten me to leave her alone then I must intensify my efforts".

"She has not told her husband yet, only if her husband comes on the street and we fight serious fight. then the whole street start calling a troublesome woman because 2 men fought over her in public before I will really believe her NO"

My dear it is exhausting.

Then how do you explain women who have confessed that their initial "No" meant "Yes" and that they wanted the man to try harder.

How do you explain a lady who says she will say "No" till the point of sex even when she wants it badly.

How do you explain a lady who is adjusting her pants for a man and still saying No.

Face it. The lady is married, and two have become one. She does not keep situations such as this from her husband. Its enough to cause a disagreement in the family.

Gifts, notes, cash, c'mon. Whats she doing? and For how long?

The husband cant be pleased.

MarieSucre:
Does she need to tell her husband first before the man backs off? Is her NO not enough.

Its natural in the Nigerian culture for a lady to say No at first. Your No is not enough when you dont take needful steps. Your No means yes when a man showers you with gifts and you keep it from your husband. It shows you are keeping the man around just in case. The man also knows this thats why he's still around. Im interested in knowing how happy the husband will be when he eventually knows that another man has been showering his wife with gifts.
If she hasnt told her husband, shes definately enjoying it.