₦airaland Forum

XXXXTENTACION:
Henceforth I Will have to ignore that madman...
What has this thread got to do with Robots and Manequins....

XXXXTENTACION:
What are you even saying...
the post is about logical fallacies and you are talking of A.I and Robots... Did anybody ask you anything on Robots...


workch are you sure this dude is okay...

Dliquidmetal:
Nothing to see here,bucket of turd as usual.

Dtruthspeaker:
Thanks be to The Creator that you have made your own creation "who is after your own image and likeness". What you call A.I Robots and Mannequins.

Do your robots care to know you?
No!

ALL IT CARES FOR IS THAT IT "LIVES" EXACTLY AS YOU ARE TO YOUR OWN CREATOR!

AND JUST LIKE YOU, ITS CREATOR CAN TAKE AWAY ITS LIFE AT YOUR PLEASURE, SO ALSO DOES YOUR CREATOR HAVE THAT RIGHT ALSO! 1 - 1!

XXXXTENTACION:
In order to prove that he is smart he ended up showcasing his stupidity....
How the Bleep do you compare a living thing with a non living thing...

Dtruthspeaker:
Olodo! Is that not what you The Creator of your new A.I Robots and Mannequins wiil say to them?

Like, you the moronic Robot "DOES NOT KNOW THAT! ALL IT CARES FOR IS THAT IT "LIVES" EXACTLY AS YOU THINK!

AND JUST LIKE YOU UNPLUG ITS POWER BATTERY, SO ALSO DOES YOUR CREATOR UNPLUG YOUR POWER BATTERY AND YOU DIE! 1 - 1!

XXXXTENTACION:
Idiot is camry a living thing
is samsung a living thing
comparing a non-living thing versus a living thing is fallacy of false equivalance....
you have just proved the o.p to be correct...

Dtruthspeaker:
This is the case of EPA (creation human) vs. TOYOTA MOTOR COMPANY (another creation, human)

Human vs. Human fight.

Not Corrolla vs. Toyoda fight!

Dtruthspeaker:
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE LAWS OF LOGIC AND FALLS AKA 'FALLACY' ARE MEANT TO DO AND ACHIEVE?

ANSWER= THE PROTECTION AND SAFEGUARDING OF NATURE AND NATURAL TRUTHS.

LOGIC IS THE POLICE/CUSTOMS & IMMIGRATION/NAFDAC/NDLEA/EFCC OF TRUTH

They do not teach that in textbooks in school ONLY PROFESSIONALS LEARN IT.



Fault- Presence of reasonable defect.

Unfaulty Equivalence is NO FALLACY.



NATURE'S, NATURALTRUTH!

EVER SEEN A CREATION OR PRODUCT COMPLAIN OR SUE ITS MANUFACTURER?

Did the Camry sue Mr Toyoda or the laptop, Samsung?

No! Nada! Never! 'Impossibe'. NATURE SAYS!

Dliquidmetal:
Wow!!! It took a lot of sacrifices,that explains why this "Thedishonestspeaker" cant afford to reason beyond his indoctrination.....I would do myself well by not engaging in further exchanges with him henceforth cause it's pointless really because I've been there myself.

Bacteriologist:
You will never catch me responding to him. Him and his type have proven countless times that it is a total waste of effort and time trying to reason with them.

Religion is a mental virus.

Dliquidmetal:
it's a very very lucrative business I tell you with a very super risk to reward ratio but I'm not down to manipulating vulnerable people for my own benefits. Religion doesn't make people morally upright,those gods of men aren't upright but dubious businessmen and I cant join league.

Dliquidmetal:
it's mostly cause of hypocrisy and to me religion is a tool that humans created for their own benefits but majority of present day humans aren't even enlightened enough to see through this grand delusion.
Christian's for examples are very good when it comes to picking different parts of their "unholy book" that's suits/justifies whatever bullshit they did or about to do.
Religion isnt really a scam,its simply a tool in my own perspective,that's why Nigeria is the way it is lol the more religois we we claim to be the more we would be manipulated and oppressed by our leaders cause they know this things to the core. Many of them are closet atheists but outside they feign religious lmao just to keep enriching themselves and continuously basking in the euphoria of being powerful.

Tobedated:
i guess you're right coz there hasn't been a reply from them

Tobedated:
Hey bros let solve dis once and for all theist bring proof dat god exist from outside of your religion that is from the world a good firm proof dat atheist bring proof y you disagree then atheist bring your proof dat god doesn't exist and let the theist oppose it let the debate begin theist first

Nothingserious:
E shock you abi?

Joke was on you. I said “literate”.

Oh poor boy!
Cry me a river.
Come back here next time to boast about your science profile and see me tear you to shreds.

Nothingserious:
You wanted to type literate right? Lol

I don’t like bragging. I hate that you had bragged from day one. Not good enough.

I didn’t stop at the Sec school. I was also taught materials science, strength, thermo, analysis, structures, fluid. Maybe you had thought I was a pastor.

Just focus on issues at discuss when we talk okay. Drop your science profiles by the side.

Nothingserious:
When I was reading Holderness and Lambert, Nelkon, Okeke and Anyakoha, Ababio, Stones, you were probably still running around naked.

Shut up and stop all the emotional tantrums foolish boy.

Nothingserious:
Kingsamx is reasonable and does better Job than you despite our varying worldviews.

You? I just use you to catch cruise.
Silly little boy.
The butterfly thinks himself a bird~(The Gods are not to blame)

Nothingserious:
Did I abuse you?
Maybe I needed to remind you one of those motion ( Newtonian laws) that talks about action and reaction being equal and opposite.
I present back to you what you push to me.
That shouldn’t bother you.

That said, I was thinking you would be smart enough to read the quote and mirror your position in there. It’s a shame you don’t understand it.

That about summarizes you and your position.
Cheers

Nothingserious:
I am disappointed in you.
I gave you a quote from a respected intellectual who happens to share same worldview with you. In your characteristic self, you assumed a pastor wrote it. Lol

Abeg go and rest. That quote summarizes your struggle. I will allow you secretly check it out in the next few days, read it, regurgitate it , assimilate it, internalize it and then respond from a point of knowledge.

See you next time.

johnw47:
ha ha, like blasphemer janosky all you have is your repeated gibberish
such a dum dum

budaatum:
Well, I guess you can pity me as I go sit on the bridges I built with my "how it works", and not with stupid beliefs.

budaatum:
That's the thing with you. You claim to know about the scientific method but probably only apply it in your profession.

Please stop insulting buda by claiming buda believes! Only stupid people believe what they can't bother to do the work to check if their beliefs are true or not. And if they did check, or observe as you'd say, or apply the scientific method to their ignorant belief, they'd stop believing and instead actually know!

P.s. Do know that I am not responding only because of you. Just that you've provided a board for me to write what I'm certain others would read too.

johnw47:
you repeat that again, do you really think i or other christians care about the hate from a antichrist
tell lost blasphemer janosky, he agrees with a antichristian/antichrist like you, and considers him a brother , of course

budaatum:
I agree.

If I make a prediction and do not then go and check if my prediction is true or false and I believe either way, I, buda, is very very stupid and dumb and ignorant!

Hope that's clear enough.

budaatum:
Why do you keep doing this workch? You keep saying "you guys", as if you can't see the individual! Perhaps you don't see or something, or how can I repeatedly be referring to believing Adam as an ignorant stupid slave, and then claim one must believe instead of actually opening ones own eyes and other senses to check and see for for oneself? Is open your eyes and senses not the very first step in science? Can one do science without opening one's eyes to actually look and see? Can you not apply your 13 years of science instead of stupidly believing without actually checking your hypothesis? Do I need to post links of posts of mine where I claim believing without checking or observing, as you'd say, is ignorant and stupid?

The imaginary Adam we read about believed without testing if his beliefs were true or not, and that's why he remained stupid and ignorant and enslaved in the Garden of Eden. Eve, on the other hand, did science to check the hypothesis that states: "on the day that you eat you shall surely die". We shall consider what she discovered on testing once we get over your "you guys" hypothesis!

A hypothesis is not a belief. A belief is an untested hypothesis however. It's like hypothesising that [i]I. If we find the edge of earth, then it means that earth is flat (independent variable)[/i], and then not II. The higher the altitude we travel, the likely that we see that earth is flat (dependent variable), but instead believing the earth is flat. If buda does that with anything, and I mean anything at all, including ignorantly assuming anything about you without first checking, please command buda to shoot buda dead, because that buda does not deserve to live!

Please know that if I build a bridge on a belief that it would stand and span where I'm building it, I would not now be retired and enjoying what I got paid for building bridges! No one would have paid me to build an ordinary foot path on some stupid ignorant untested belief or an untested hypothesis!

Below is my response to a person who thinks one should believe physics. It might help you understand better. And I've added a link explaining how and why I think believing almost anything without bothering to ask and seek and knock is just dumb!

Do let know me please if you can see, though I can bet my very last pound that the fact I've written it in religionese would likely blind you!

https://www.nairaland.com/5123700/disbelieve-know