₦airaland Forum

TenQ:
Your primary school logic doesnt work on me.
Answer to YOUR claims. On the day I I come online to prove that God exist, take me up and I will answer your objections.

Here are your claims again: please answer to them

God doesn’t exist. Don’t distract me from that. No evidence he does

TenQ:
So sorry it is giving you a headache.
Why not see a doctor for head examination. The sounds might be amplified in your head....a psychiatrist might be of help.

I will be cured if you can provide evidence for your imaginary friends. Thanks for caring

TenQ:
How is it your problem: is it your head?
Prove your claims, you cant!

sometimes it disturbs me, noise pollution. I would sue you guys if we were in U.K.
Christians cannot tell others about bleating, Christian are the super-bleaters.

Worse of all, they bleat a non-existent god

TenQ:
Your post was not asking for evidence. Your post made several claims. I simply asked you to prove them.

I thought you have finally gotten some objective proof of your claims only to find out it was just your sentiments.

If it is not, prove your 10 claims!

God does not exist, don’t shy away from it. Provide evidence

BassReeves:
There is nothing monstrous about God

The gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster disagrees

TenQ:
I asked him for the basis and evidence of his disputes and claims: unfortunately he has NONE!
He just keeps on bleating like a she goat the same claims of his

You people bleat everyday in your churches, conversing with your imaginary friends

Like you have psychological issues

BassReeves:
A man who disputes, a claim that God exist, is a rebel
Removing God from existence, is a great act of rebellion.

Which god?

Flying Spaghetti Monster?

TenQ:
I don't have to do that and I've not done that.
I've only responded to your post that is full of empty claims.

My post is asking for evidence. You are avoiding that part

TenQ:
You will note that I haven't argued anything with you, I have only asked you the basis of your claims.
Unfortunately, there is none.

Then provide evidence that god exist.
He lives only in your deluded head that cannot tolerate the word “provide evidence”

TenQ:
?
As You were the ones making the claims:
Answer the question or forever keep quiet!

No claim here, I’m disputing a claim that god exist.
He doesn’t and that’s why we arguing

TenQ:
If you are going to dispute something at least do it with logical sense and objectivity instead of bleating about like a sheep in distress.

After your post, the logical question to ask you is to present your evidence to the contrary

did you make the claim with logic and reasoning?
No

:stop crying more than the bereaved

Ammishaddai:
I believe he made his convictions public so there is no need sending him private messages. Thank you

So you should also be ready to take others opinion since you are replying him in public

TenQ:
I didn't come to Nairaland to make any claim. I responded to you claim now you claim damage.

Unfortunately, none of your claim have any basis!

It does Because your god doesn’t exist, you didn’t provide evidence. You are just frustrated about anyone trying to dispute it

It’s ok to have cognitive dissonance

Ammishaddai:
[s][/s] The question was never referred to you so why are you pained ? The Op said God does not exist ,and for him to say such means that he has evidence to prove his convictions. Now , kindly let him prove his claims . Thank you

Then send a private message. Your god doesn’t exist until you provide evidence he does

Ammishaddai:
[s][/s] I was not referring to you . Kindly mind your business and let the OP answer the question

Asking someone to that your god doesn’t exist is like asking you to prove that Zeus doesn’t exist.

It’s a stupid question and a straw Man of shifting burden of proof.

You make an extraordinary claim of a supernatural god, you will provide extraordinary evidence or they are just imaginary friends like Spider-Man and Santa Claus

TenQ:
You wrote the original post not me. I am simply responding to your claims.

Unfortunately, you don't have any foundation of logic or reasoning as the basis of your counter-claim.

Too bad!!

You are responding my dispute because you don’t have evidence for your extraordinary claim.

It’s a shame that you believe in Stone Age tales without evidence like you don’t have firing neurons

Your imaginary friend is your onus to proof. No one is going to proof your barbaric claims for you

TenQ:
I do not need to. I only need to hear from your wealth of wisdom in coming to a logical counter-position.

I couldn't be more disappointed!

Why is it so difficult for you just say; god exist, see the evidence and test it?

Your frustrations about me disputing it is not evidence, it should encourage you to find evidence for it.

TenQ:
Its a shame that uneducated people wrote and compiled a book AND one supposedly with education comes up to refute the book and is as backward as stone age people in logic and expression.

To this, I shake my humble head in awe!

Dont abuse people, just provide evidence for your imaginary friend

Insults are not evidence

TenQ:
See one forming enlightenment without an iota of EVIDENCE to back him up.

No one has evidence for people with imaginary friends in the sky

TenQ:
In other words, you are just ranting with a less superior argument. SMH!

In other words god doesn’t exist and you don’t have evidence it does.

You are living in delusion

TenQ:
You disputed some claims by making counter-claims!

Prove your own claims!

Only claims made with evidence can be disputed with evidence.
You don’t make claims without evidence and expect people to dispute it with evidence sir.

Show me evidence for god, I will dispute it with evidence or accept it to be true

TenQ:
You didn't!!! ? ?
SMH!!


Claims are assertions made about subjects. I guess, you don't even know you have made claims

I didn’t make any claim, I am disputing the claim “god exist” by Christians which there no reliable evidence to verify it.

TenQ:
How come you cannot recognise any claim you made?

Thats because I didn’t make any claim?
Only ask that people who claim that god exist should provide evidence for it else I don’t believe he does.

TenQ:
If you didn't make any claims within your post, then you probably don't have any comprehension of your writeup.

How come it’s difficult for you to identify the claim I made?

TenQ:
I quoted your original post.
What are your evidences for your claims in the post?

what claim have I made?

BassReeves:
Well thats, a 'I can live with that' or 'I can let that fly', starting point, if 'so JESUS was born by magic' is how you want to understand it to be.

Thats was it seem to be if it’s not by mammalian parthenogenesis

TenQ:
What are the evidences of your claims in this post?

As I can see, none! Only sentiments!!

What claim?

BassReeves:
John 10:1
'I assure you and most solemnly say to you, he who does not enter by the door into the sheepfold,
but climbs up from some other place [on the stone wall], that one is a thief and a robber.'

Let the head scratching begin as you go trying to figure this out

so JESUS was born by magic

hupernikao:
You must ensure you read my comments patiently to avoid asking questions already answered.

Read again

The evidence you have is your restlessness to arguing on something you never believe in, and spending your precious time on such course.


Only two things can cause the above.

1. The person get no job and not busy or not serious with his/her life.

2. The person has a continuous doubt on what he/she holds as believe and truth, hence restless to find out the reality of other options.

I am convinced, your case is the second one. Because I know you aren't someone who has free time to waste.

But the trouble with you is that you don't know what to hold and in your wisdom, you feel arguing about everything is the solution.

To me, that attitude is enough evidence for you because I know "it's not ordinary eye, for a person to keep pursuing arguments on what he doesn't believe in". Except he is under an influence.

Kìńse ojú lásán nah.

do I need to educate you on the definition of evidence?

BassReeves:

---

---

I never said according to me, JESUS was born via parthenogenesis.

You sure do enjoy doing cherry picking, dont you? You repeatedly are found guilty of selective attention fallacy

so how was JESUS born?

ivolt:

@Workch, I understand your confusion.
The fact is NO country operates democracy!
How come?

Well, democracy is an umbrella for some systems of government which emphasises wider participation of the populace and is unique to each country or jurisdiction.

Just as nobody studies a degree, they study medicine, engineering, management and so on.

Now to the "shit shows".
First, you didn't define what you mean by "shit show".
Either you did this deliberately to avoid scrutiny or you don't know what you are talking about.
Giving the examples of "shit show" you gave, I suppose your non-shitshow country
would be were there are no practical opposition or free dissenting voices.
This will include countries such as China,Russia, Iran, Saudi, and modern Venezuela.

I imagine you want a situation where a strong man seizes power, condemn and destroy all opposition and concentrate all powers to himself and cronies as the ideal form of government.
What if you end up among the "perfect" government's condemned by association, ethnicity or even geography?
How will you escape your fate?

Meritocracy seem to be working better than democracy. You seem not be able to differentiate meritocracy from dictatorship

Democracy is delusional and full of gimmickry. The more you look, the less you see. No long term Value.

Meritocracy is not autocracy

emae009:
You're the one in delusion when you're so close minded...
China has been around for thousands of years why ask about only the last 40years. When the so called West with rotten democracy was developing at rapid rate, where was China with the best form of governance??
You really believe that China system of government would work in a dynamic country like Nigeria.
Who would head of this government, which region will the leader come from? Maybe if you start from there you'd know about the complexity of the problem.
Qatar, UAE have been developing rapidly and they don't practice China's system of government, does that make it bad?

Democracy is very recent too.
Political meritocracy practiced by China is more recent than democracy.

It seem to be working better, countries like Singapore, Japan and France all practice meritocracy, they seem to be doing better on the average than democratic governments in all scope of life.