Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,154,743 members, 7,824,143 topics. Date: Saturday, 11 May 2024 at 12:25 AM

Mitt Romney Win Means World War 3 - Foreign Affairs - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Mitt Romney Win Means World War 3 (2315 Views)

Mitt Romney President-Elect Transition Website Leaks Online / Mitt Romney's Loss In Pictures / Barack Obama Vs Mitt Romney : Election Night Thread (2) (3) (4)

(1) (Reply) (Go Down)

Mitt Romney Win Means World War 3 by Rossikk(m): 2:02pm On Oct 04, 2012
If Obama is defeated, get ready for INSTANT descent to WW3 (Nuclear War) courtesy of racist warmonger and Netanyahu sidekick, Mitt Romney.

Mitt Romney has made no secret of his desire to ''back Israel'' in any decision by the latter to attack Iran.

A war with Iran will immediately drag in the US, Russia and China, and will almost certainly lead to the deployment/exchange of nuclear weapons.

ANYONE VOTING ROMNEY IS VIRTUALLY COMMITTING SUICIDE. MIGHT AS WELL GET A ROPE AND HANG YOURSELF NOW.
Re: Mitt Romney Win Means World War 3 by whitecat007: 2:57am On Oct 05, 2012
Regardless of who wins the election, there is going to be a showdown in the middle east. Btw you sound more racist than Romney.
Obama will have no choice than to roll over and play dead when Israel attacks Iran, the congress and Obama will not be able to get anything done. Did i hear hostage? or how many veto/executive power can Obama use?
Any failure on the part of Obama to support Israel when China, Russia and the rest of the Middle east are pounding Israel may cause Obama being assassinated.
You might as well be the first to commit suicide, cos Orun wa wo ni, kii se oro enikan.
Re: Mitt Romney Win Means World War 3 by TayoD1(m): 3:09am On Oct 05, 2012
Now that you and you guy Obama have lost in the arena of ideas, the next thing is to embark on a fear campaign. I laugh in swahili.
Re: Mitt Romney Win Means World War 3 by Rossikk(m): 10:21pm On Oct 06, 2012
Tayo-D:
Now that you and you guy Obama have lost in the arena of ideas, the next thing is to embark on a fear campaign. I laugh in swahili.

Use your brain. You seem blissfully unaware of the Republicans' warmongering habits and blind support for Israel and increased 'defence' spending. I wonder why you spend your time being dull instead of thinking. Better realise that Republican warmongering and trigger happiness means death and calamity for you and your family in the long run.
Re: Mitt Romney Win Means World War 3 by violent(m): 6:01pm On Oct 07, 2012
The sky is falling!..the sky is falling!! we are all gonna die!!

These sorts of threads aren't uncommon from people with an overwhelming ignorance of the world's political stage and who believe reality is analogous to nice written Nollywood scripts.

Here's some lessons for you, little boy;

Lesson 1: If for some far fetched reasons, US strikes Iran, Russia and China will only scream and moan, but will not risk putting millions of their own citizen's life at risk to save little Iran! It's simple, they have no reasons to do so. With it's waverider hypersonic program, the US has made so much advancement with technologies that can strike anywhere in the world within an hour. Why will China risk putting it's 1 billion + citizens at risk of annihilation because of Iran? Surely China is more important to the Chinese than Iran, no?

As a matter of fact, under the United State's pressure, Russia has refused to sell military equipments to Iran and China has cut its oil purchases, why then will these two countries deliberately go to war against United States and NATO because Iran is getting creamed out?

Lesson 2: Mitt Romney is NOT stupid. He knows he will not get the support of the United States public if he attacked Iran. He knows oil prices will increase astronomically if he did. He knows the United State's fragile economy will bear the brunt of a rising oil price, so he's more likely to play the Obama game of sanctions than send off troops to Iran. This is even truer given that Iran's economy is beginning to feel the hard pain impact of those sanctions.

Lesson 3: Israel, even if adventurous, is not stvpid enough to attack Iran on it's own. Attacking Iran's nuclear site is the kind of Job that you either get it done completely or you don't touch it at all. Israel does not have the military capacity to execute a clean cut strategy like that on it's own, it needs the United States...and if we all assume that the United States is not in mood for another war, it means the status quo of upping the military threats while applying sanctions will just have to do good enough for Israel.


The World is not going to descend into a nuclear war, Romney's rhetorics are clear; it is to appeal to extreme righters and some hard core Jews. Putin made a whole bunch of anti western noise during his campaign in Russia. You haven't seen him switch his nuclear war heads towards the United States or Great Britain, have you?
Re: Mitt Romney Win Means World War 3 by solbil: 7:25pm On Oct 07, 2012
but why is america so bent on supporting israel unconditionally? Surely there are other races in america that are also in highly placed positions too. Also, the second war is long gone.
Re: Mitt Romney Win Means World War 3 by TayoD1(m): 9:37pm On Oct 07, 2012
@Rossikk,

Use your brain. You seem blissfully unaware of the Republicans' warmongering habits and blind support for Israel and increased 'defence' spending. I wonder why you spend your time being dull instead of thinking. Better realise that Republican warmongering and trigger happiness means death and calamity for you and your family in the long run.
You are a dolt. How many wars has Obama started since he became President? What's the difference between his policies towards Isreal and that of the Republicans? Bush did not invade an African country but Obama devastated one while killing its long time leader. Ode buruku.
Re: Mitt Romney Win Means World War 3 by KayDee4: 3:23am On Oct 08, 2012
It is no news that the repubs are bloody warmongers, that's why Dikkkk Cheney was in bed with different weapons dealers and death merchants when he was VP; Why are the repubs hell-bent on funding the department of defense well beyond what they need even when the defense secretary is saying "we dont need all this money" , the repubs are trying to shove it down their throats. Why are the evil Koch brothers and NRA pumping in so much money into republican campaigns at the house and presidential levels? The war on the streets is a small-scale war caused by their anti gun-control stance.

violent: Lesson 1: If for some far fetched reasons, US strikes Iran, Russia and China will only scream and moan, but will not risk putting millions of their own citizen's life at risk to save little Iran! It's simple, they have no reasons to do so. With it's waverider hypersonic program, the US has made so much advancement with technologies that can strike anywhere in the world within an hour. Why will China risk putting it's 1 billion + citizens at risk of annihilation because of Iran? Surely China is more important to the Chinese than Iran, no?

A military confrontation with Iran may not necessarily degenerate into a full-scale world war where China and Russia will get involved. If the US strikes, it will probably be an Iraq-style war of strike and invade or they let Israel throw the first punch and give them full backing. However it comes, it will totally destabilise the middle east and devastate the fragile world economy; everyone will be affected somehow someway. The world doesn't need this right now.

violent: Lesson 2: Mitt Romney is NOT stupid. He knows he will not get the support of the United States public if he attacked Iran. He knows oil prices will increase astronomically if he did. He knows the United State's fragile economy will bear the brunt of a rising oil price, so he's more likely to play the Obama game of sanctions than send off troops to Iran. This is even truer given that Iran's economy is beginning to feel the hard pain impact of those sanctions.

A lot of people would have said the same about Bush before he invaded Iraq but Dickkk Cheeney deceived him to deceive the nation in turn and proceed with the senseless war. They didn't get full support from the public but went ahead.
Mitt doesn't care about oil prices going up, he wouldn't be interested in oil from the middle east anyway since he plans to carry on with "drill baby drill" and the keystone pipeline deal.
Is Iran really feeling the impact of the sanctions ? , I doubt it. China, India and Russia have been doing business with Iran and most recently Switzerland; Geneva-based Vitol has been helping Iran sell their oil. This is foreign policy red meat for the repubs to criticize Obama's approach of sanctions and diplomacy and push their own campaign for a military option.

violent: Lesson 3: Israel, even if adventurous, is not stvpid enough to attack Iran on it's own. Attacking Iran's nuclear site is the kind of Job that you either get it done completely or you don't touch it at all. Israel does not have the military capacity to execute a clean cut strategy like that on it's own, it needs the United States...and if we all assume that the United States is not in mood for another war, it means the status quo of upping the military threats while applying sanctions will just have to do good enough for Israel.

Yeah, all they need is assurance from the US, that they will get back-up.

Romney's rantings about striking Iran has reached the level where you say something over and over again to the point that you believe it is the right thing. He is very much for military action and the consequences will be dire.
Re: Mitt Romney Win Means World War 3 by Rossikk(m): 11:50pm On Oct 08, 2012
violent:
The sky is falling!..the sky is falling!! we are all gonna die!!

These sorts of threads aren't uncommon from people with an overwhelming ignorance of the world's political stage and who believe reality is analogous to nice written Nollywood scripts.

Here's some lessons for you, little boy;

Lesson 1: If for some far fetched reasons, US strikes Iran, Russia and China will only scream and moan, but will not risk putting millions of their own citizen's life at risk to save little Iran! It's simple, they have no reasons to do so. With it's waverider hypersonic program, the US has made so much advancement with technologies that can strike anywhere in the world within an hour. Why will China risk putting it's 1 billion + citizens at risk of annihilation because of Iran? Surely China is more important to the Chinese than Iran, no?

As a matter of fact, under the United State's pressure, Russia has refused to sell military equipments to Iran and China has cut its oil purchases, why then will these two countries deliberately go to war against United States and NATO because Iran is getting creamed out?

Lesson 2: Mitt Romney is NOT stupid. He knows he will not get the support of the United States public if he attacked Iran. He knows oil prices will increase astronomically if he did. He knows the United State's fragile economy will bear the brunt of a rising oil price, so he's more likely to play the Obama game of sanctions than send off troops to Iran. This is even truer given that Iran's economy is beginning to feel the hard pain impact of those sanctions.

Lesson 3: Israel, even if adventurous, is not stvpid enough to attack Iran on it's own. Attacking Iran's nuclear site is the kind of Job that you either get it done completely or you don't touch it at all. Israel does not have the military capacity to execute a clean cut strategy like that on it's own, it needs the United States...and if we all assume that the United States is not in mood for another war, it means the status quo of upping the military threats while applying sanctions will just have to do good enough for Israel.


The World is not going to descend into a nuclear war, Romney's rhetorics are clear; it is to appeal to extreme righters and some hard core Jews. Putin made a whole bunch of anti western noise during his campaign in Russia. You haven't seen him switch his nuclear war heads towards the United States or Great Britain, have you?

You're very naive and complacent. Have you heard of the Project For The New American Century? It's a neo-con WAR AGENDA that's been published for over 12 years now. Mitt Romey is a neo-con backed war-monger. Just yesterday he called for the US to arm the Syrian rebels! Better wake up!

''Madeleine Albright, a Secretary of State to Mr Clinton, said Mr Romney was "shallow" and had surrounded himself with "a division of neoconservatives" responsible for the Bush administration's reckless foreign adventurism.''


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-election/9594730/Mitt-Romney-calls-for-Syrian-rebels-to-be-armed.html
Re: Mitt Romney Win Means World War 3 by IncomeTutor: 11:20am On Feb 02, 2013
Politics of intrigues

(1) (Reply)

African American Killed Fighting For Isis, White House Confirms / IDF Shares Proof Of Hamas Concealing Launchers In Mosques (pics) / Happy Independence Day Ghana!

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 58
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.