vivacious vivi:

Er...u guys do. And before u reply, I was born catholic so I do know what I'm talking abt.

@Topic: as a work of art, its beautiful I guess.

rudolph-bosco:
........i prat it doesnt get too late before you realize you are heading for hell.

frosbel: When will the Catholics cease from their idolatry !!

promkingzz: Matt. 16:18, "And I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades shall not overpower it."

I am proud to be a Roman Catholic and a member of the church which St Peter himself founded! I'm sure the Bible all u Catholic critics use contains the verse above. The scriptures never in any page says that Oyedepo or Oritsejafor or whoever will find a church, not even by prophesy! and you critics still have the guts to come on NL and accuse the catholics of idolatory?

Anyway sha, na una get una mouth so mk una dey talk. no time for timaya sef e com be una. Mtcheww

sylve11: Protestant hating catholic, catholic hating protestant; is this what christianity is all about?

kinguwem: 'Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image ....' (Exo 20:4).

Catch_fire:

Or any calendar of Adeboye

Catch_fire:

Or any calendar of Adeboye

belabela:

History has it that Peter never visited Rome. Peter couldnt have founded the church of Rome. Besides a deep reflection on the name ROMAN catholic church should immediately suggests to you that this is not the catholic (universal ) church rather the roman catholic church.
From the creation of the office of the pope to the doctrine of purgatory to to replacement of bread with flesh to mass. You have alot to contend with the true catholic church of Jesus Christ. There are two significant Peters in the bible and it is obvious that Peter the disciple of Jesus has nothing to do with the roman catholic church. Very likely it's the other Peter ( Bar Jesus)

jim jones: i'm trying real hard to give a fark here.......





wow! i haven't read anything this retar*ded since the bible.

first off, the shroud of jesus turin is a known hoax.

second, what records do you speak of with respect to peter? there is no firsthand historical or even biblical record that puts peter anywhere, at any point in rome!

near 45 a.d.(around the time your catholic wankers claim peter was in rome), we find peter being cast into prison in jerusalem (acts 12:3, 4). in 49 a.d., he was still in jerusalem, this time attending the jerusalem council. about 51 a.d., he was in antioch of syria where he got into differences with paul because he wouldn’t sit or eat with gentiles. strange that the "bishop of rome" would have nothing to do with Gentiles in 51 a.d.! later in about 66 a.d., we find him in the city of Babylon among the jews (I pet. 5:13). remember that peter was the apostle to the CIRCUMCISED. Why was he in babylon? because history shows that there were as many jews in the mesopotamian areas in christ’s time as there were in palestine. it is no wonder we find him in the east.

in all of paul's writings about his dealings in rome, at no point did he mention peter. now let's get something straight, i aint no advocate for neither of these wankers, but hombre, get your history together. there's a huge disparity between the roman catholic account of history and actual history itself.

jim jones: i'm trying real hard to give a fark here.......





wow! i haven't read anything this retar*ded since the bible.

first off, the shroud of jesus turin is a known hoax.

second, what records do you speak of with respect to peter? there is no firsthand historical or even biblical record that puts peter anywhere, at any point in rome!

near 45 a.d.(around the time your catholic wankers claim peter was in rome), we find peter being cast into prison in jerusalem (acts 12:3, 4). in 49 a.d., he was still in jerusalem, this time attending the jerusalem council. about 51 a.d., he was in antioch of syria where he got into differences with paul because he wouldn’t sit or eat with gentiles. strange that the "bishop of rome" would have nothing to do with Gentiles in 51 a.d.! later in about 66 a.d., we find him in the city of Babylon among the jews (I pet. 5:13). remember that peter was the apostle to the CIRCUMCISED. Why was he in babylon? because history shows that there were as many jews in the mesopotamian areas in christ’s time as there were in palestine. it is no wonder we find him in the east.

in all of paul's writings about his dealings in rome, at no point did he mention peter. now let's get something straight, i aint no advocate for neither of these wankers, but hombre, get your history together. there's a huge disparity between the roman catholic account of history and actual history itself.

akthedream: You christains must be dumb to refer it as a statue of your so called god,.Come to think of it,it might be that of a Gay.But,definately not that of Jesus...Apart from doing all u can to buy PRIVATE JET,what else do u christains do with ur brain if there is even any?

ijaw citizen:

ALWAYS DISPLAYING AND PARADING THEIR IGNORANCE EVEN TO THE HIGHEST HEAVENS....HMMMM, TYPICAL NIGERIAN!!

BALABALA OR WHATEVER YOU CALL YOURSELF, ABEG WHICH HISTORY BOOK DID YOU READ? IT WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER IF YOU SAID YOU READ THOSE CRAP SOMEWHERE BUT YOU'RE NOT SURE OF ITS ACCURARY, AND THE ENLIGHTENED AND WELL READ PEOPLE HERE WILL TEACH YOU ONE OR TWO THINGS ABOUT CHURCH HISTORY.

PHEEEWW! I KNOWN HE IS GOING TO ATTACK ME LIKE HE IS PROGRAMMED TO. TYPICAL NIGERIAN ROBOT (95% OF NIGERIANS ARE ROBOTS, THEY DONT THINK BEFORE ACTING)

abubello:
But you also worship ghost as part of your trinity. Is that not idolatory?

jehovahnoni: 99.89% of ur family and generation are robots,,,dey cant even act,,,,,METAL-HEAD

ijaw citizen:

WOW!
ANOTHER ROBOT DISPLAYING ITS TALENT
1. OF EVERYONE ON THIS THREAD, HE WAS THE ONLY ONE WHO PICKED OFFENCE
2. I WASN'T EVEN REFERING TO HIM NOT TO TALK OF HIS FAMILY
3. HE GLADLY ACCEPTED TO BE PART OF THE 95% DUMB NIGERIANS

WHAT MORE CAN I SAY?