Ihedinobi: Now that's one man that would make a great second daddy for you. He and R. Dumbkins would get along famously.

Logicboy03:
{Gunshot! Muslim's brain is leaking on the floor}

Logicboy03: Stalin was an intelligent man despite being a psychopathic killer. . .&c

F00028:

sigh! I guess a murdering atheist will always be a murdering atheists...even on a good day.

aletheia:
Despite your half-hearted efforts, your post reeks of your admiration for Stalin and his methods. At least he was a more consistent atheist than the pretentious wannabe that you are. . .and on what grounds as an atheist is Stalin "wrong in executing religious people."?

Logicboy03:


lol....is that the highlight of the op?

F00028:

the op is about a Godless man in a position of power. we all know how that turns out

MacDaddy01: Jose Mujica is the president of Uruguay. He lives a humble lifestyle.


-He gives about 90% of his salary to charity keeping only £1,250 out of $12,500

-He drives a volkswagen beetle

-Under Mujica’s stewardship, Uruguay has become known for low levels of corruption. The South American country ranks as the second least corrupt country in Latin America in Transparency International’s global corruption index.

-The president said that the only big item he owns is his VW car, valued at $1,945 dollars. The farmhouse in which he lives in Montevideo is under his wife’s name, Lucía Topolansky, a Senator, who also donates part of her salary


www.nairaland.com/attachments/833669_548451_3750686159197_1787401980_n_jpg9dcba261f6cfb166123b7986d4c75594



[size=18pt]He is an atheist! (doesnt believe in god)[/size]


What have our christian and muslim leaders done?

Logicboy03:


You might want to shake away that ignorance by reading about Uruguay and Asutralia.

Logicboy03:
Why kill people for beliefs? Isnt that what was wrong with religion in the first place?

aletheia:
From logicboy's evolutionary standpoint. . .those killed are those who fell in the race for "survival of the fittest". Those who survived will reproduce and pass on their survival skills to their progeny thus increasing the "survival quotient" of the species. . .why then do you atheist struggle with that? Be consistent to your worldview.

F00028:

only two

"there have been twenty-eight countries in world history that can be confirmed to have been ruled by regimes with avowed atheists at the helm … These twenty-eight historical regimes have been ruled by eighty-nine atheists, of whom more than half have engaged in democidal acts of the sort committed by Stalin and Mao …"

Stalwert: I once showed how a certain atheist mod and his band of cheer leaders behaved like stalin, https://www.nairaland.com/1076080/example-atheist-morality

Logicboy03:
BY the way, survival of the fittest doesnt always translate to the strongest. I could be the smartest, the most adpatable etc

aletheia:
You are typically as dense and the dunce as ever. . .who is talking about "strongest"? The "fittest" according to your religion of evolution are those who survived Stalin and will therefore live to pass on their survival skills to their progeny. So be consistent: from your evolutionary standpoint, it is neither morally good nor morally bad to "kill people for beliefs": it is just one the mechanisms by which "natural selection" ensures that the weaker members of the herd are culled. Be consistent to your atheistic view.

Beretta92: It is preposterous to say that all atheists are amoral like Stalin and Mao.I,as an agnostic still uphold a very high moral standard personally,and everyday I strive to be a better person.I still remain the most trusted in my family.Some religious peeps both christains and muslims especially girls that suspect me to be an atheist,still trust me more than their closest friends.I still don't drink,smoke,or womanize just like when I was a believer,only that I now abstain for better reasons.Infact,by observing me from a distance,you'd think me to be a pastor.You don't need god to be good or moral.If you do,then you might just be an evil person on the inside.

Beretta92: It is preposterous to say that all atheists are amoral like Stalin and Mao.I,as an agnostic still uphold a very high moral standard personally,and everyday I strive to be a better person.I still remain the most trusted in my family.Some religious peeps both christains and muslims especially girls that suspect me to be an atheist,still trust me more than their closest friends.I still don't drink,smoke,or womanize just like when I was a believer,only that I now abstain for better reasons. Infact, by observing me from a distance,you'd think me to be a pastor.You don't need god to be good or moral.If you do,then you might just be an evil person on the inside.

dekung:

Honestly I wonder where these theists get their notion that morality is synonymous with belief in the invisible sky ruler(islam) or sky daddy (christianity). Today I was pondering in my mind the behavior of an average theist and I realised that they only God's people when it comes to debate about the existence of their God, in everyday living their lifestyles are not better than everyone else, sometimes they are even worse. There is this Lady who constantly argues the God thingy with me all the time, she reads her bible every now and then as if its going out of fashion and early in the morning she is the first to wake up and pray. She has completed all the membership classes in her church and when she sings at house fellowship she is like a nightingale. Deep down in my mind, I thought this girl has NEVER seen a naked man in her life but I was shocked when, last week, she told me in passing that the last time she was ill, she teased the guy she is dating she was pregnant! As if that was not enough she said the guy pleaded with her to please do something about the pregnancy because his wife must never find out. My shock knew no bounds. Now the question in my mind is does this define morality?

Another one of my friends who I will call 'D' was telling me about a friend of his who was dating a 19 yr old girl and wants to break the relation ship because he felt the girl is too young, that his friend is 37yrs and married. 'D' said he told his friend to get on with the relationship that there is nothing wrong, mind you 'D' is a member of deeper life and he is always very upset with me when I come up with atheist arguments and 'D' himself has two kids yet he sleeps with everything in skirts that has hole in front of it.

These are just two out of many experiences that I have everyday with these Bible/Quran thumping God believers. The question that then comes to heart is why do these people delude themselves in to thinking they have a special relationship with their invisible sky daddy. Theists cheat, lie, defraud, steal, womanise, even kill in their everyday lives. Therefore, morality has nothing to do with your belief in God or otherwise, it is about what you feel is right ad what you feel is wrong

Logicboy03:
Atheism = evolution?

Atheism = social darwinism?

Evolution is a religion?

aletheia:
. . .from your evolutionary standpoint, it is neither morally good nor morally bad to "kill people for beliefs": it is just one the mechanisms by which "natural selection" ensures that the weaker members of the herd are culled. Be consistent to your atheistic view.

dekung:
There is this Lady who constantly argues the God thingy with me all the time, she reads her bible every now and then as if its going out of fashion and early in the morning she is the first to wake up and pray. She has completed all the membership classes in her church and when she sings at house fellowship she is like a nightingale. Deep down in my mind, I thought this girl has NEVER seen a naked man in her life but I was shocked when, last week, she told me in passing that the last time she was ill, she teased the guy she is dating she was pregnant! As if that was not enough she said the guy pleaded with her to please do something about the pregnancy because his wife must never find out &c.

aletheia:
The cowardice of atheism is deep-rooted. . .especially as demonstrated by logicboy.

You say there is no God.

You say that life on earth came to be and proceeds by evolution

. . .but your cowardice keeps shying away from the necessary conclusion your Godless worldview demands.


"Morality" is the shredded fig leaves that you atheists hold on to to cover your nakȇdnȇss and excuse your foolishness: evidence that you have well consumed fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. The Grundnorm for "morality" is God therefore ipso facto it cannot originate from within man.

Which is why attempts at using examples of hypocrites and those who have fallen short of God's standard as an example that atheists are "moral" is indeed a pathetic attempt at special pleading.

aletheia:
The cowardice of atheism is deep-rooted. . .especially as demonstrated by logicboy.

You say there is no God.

You say that life on earth came to be and proceeds by evolution

. . .but your cowardice keeps shying away from the necessary conclusion your Godless worldview demands.


"Morality" is the shredded fig leaves that you atheists hold on to to cover your nakȇdnȇss and excuse your foolishness: evidence that you have well consumed fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. The Grundnorm for "morality" is God therefore ipso facto it cannot originate from within man.

Which is why attempts at using examples of hypocrites and those who have fallen short of God's standard as an example that atheists are "moral" is indeed a pathetic attempt at special pleading.

tchaik:

Pls which one is God's standard again? . Do you know how many people God killed in the Torah? Is that His Standard?
Unna no go kill person for here one day! Choiiii!

(Atleats 'our moral standard' is far better than God's.)

oiseworld: Soo how do you intend to hunt down and kill God? You ungrateful creation.
Haven't you read from the bible that ...the more they afflicted them the stronger they grew. Dat was to the children of Israel.

stop wasting your time bro!!!.

aletheia:


Which is why attempts at using examples of hypocrites and those who have fallen short of God's standard as an example that atheists are "moral" is indeed a pathetic attempt at special pleading.

dekung:
Guy you do not have a point. Morality is personal and it has nothing to do with wether you believe in God or not.

Logicboy03:
Wow.


I never knew that you could be persistently dumb. I think you need to read up on some philosophy and morality and evolution. You are ignorant but I'm here to educate you.

Logicboy03:
Another example would be survival. Naturally, our survival is our basic animalistic instinct. We avoid predators and haards that would kill us. Instinctively, a dog would recoil at the sight of fire or a mouse would recoil at the sight of a predator. We also kill other to survive. We kill agressors and predators or we kill prey to eat &c

aletheia:
From logicboy's evolutionary standpoint. . .those killed are those who fell in the race for "survival of the fittest". Those who survived will reproduce and pass on their survival skills to their progeny thus increasing the "survival quotient" of the species. . .why then do you atheist struggle with that? Be consistent to your worldview.

aletheia:
You are typically as dense and the dunce as ever. . .who is talking about "strongest"? The "fittest" according to your religion of evolution are those who survived Stalin and will therefore live to pass on their survival skills to their progeny. So be consistent: from your evolutionary standpoint, it is neither morally good nor morally bad to "kill people for beliefs": it is just one the mechanisms by which "natural selection" ensures that the weaker members of the herd are culled. Be consistent to your atheistic view.

musKeeto: They say we choose to disbelieve God because of the moral obligations He places on us...

I say they choose to believe in Yahweh because of Allah's moral obligations...

You can't eat your God, and have it..