This accident took place in the car park of my office so I don't know what speed it happened at but the Honda was parked and the Benz rammed into it.

Here's the Benz.

Here's the Honda

Both of them

Table Leg :

Understand now?

sexkillz: Lol. Considering they are of the same model year range.

Both sad and funny seeing as the Honda was parked. The Benz was not even a staff member's car and the Honda had just been repaired for this same type of accident.

Am I seeing things?
You mean that Benz jammed that Honda?

A moving object rammed into a stationary object. Which would be more damaged?science must have explained this in detail.

Lord_Reed: This accident took place in the car park of my office so I don't know what speed it happened at but the Honda was parked and the Benz rammed into it.

Here's the Benz.

the stationary object would be more damaged - that's physics......
if they collided with the same speed, then the smaller object would take more damage. it's about the mass and the velocity.

D difference is clear! German machines all d way!

Lols na there you go know say cornflakes no be garri. but I doubt if both were in motion.

coogar:

the stationary object would be more damaged - that's physics......
if they collided with the same speed, then the smaller object would take more damage. it's about the mass and the velocity.

Thanks for coming to their rescue cos I already know why the poster posted this. Expect the gullible to fall for it though!

Paper vs iron.

Honda no get weight compared to Benz na.

Abeg make we bone physics joor, this is practical.... The materials used to make a german machine are more durable, stronger and even more appealing to the eyes than those japanese toys

are u now trying to tell me that if it rammed into a trailer, na the trailer go first spoil baa?

Abeg make una no vex me for here ooo

Chai!

[size=29pt]IT IS SIMPLY
BUFFALO VS. RAM[/size]

Lagusta: Abeg make we bone physics joor, this is practical.... The materials used to make a german machine are more durable, stronger and even more appealing to the eyes than those japanese toys

are u now trying to tell me that if it rammed into a trailer, na the trailer go first spoil baa?

Abeg make una no vex me for here ooo

park a benz(G-wagon) and let a toyota landcruiser at 90 km/hr ram into it. let's put the durable german materials into test.

lol

otokx: Honda no get weight compared to Benz na.

didn't you read in the OP's post that the Honda was stationary and the benz in motion? Please be sensible.

why not look at the two pictures and step by step look at the impact. i don't agree with the benz impact, it's too sound at the front and besides the front bomber of the benz is not made of steel.

coogar:

the stationary object would be more damaged - that's physics......
if they collided with the same speed, then the smaller object would take more damage. it's about the mass and the velocity.

Am not so sure about this. Theoretically, this would be an elastic collision where mass and energy will be conserved, even though we know there'll still be some loss to environment.

Because one body was stationary, it had zero velocity; it'll be set in motion by the other body of roughly equal mass. The theory says nothing about the stationary body getting more damaged than the moving body. Apparently, its potential energy was insufficient to take the full force of the moving Mercedes. As a result, it had to give way.

sublimes: didn't you read in the OP's post that the Honda was stationary and the benz in motion? Please be sensible.

you can easily tell apart the people that skipped physics classes in high school to chase grass-cutters in the bush.

sauer:
Am not so sure about this. Theoretically, this would be an elastic collision where mass and energy will be conserved, even though we know there'll still be some loss to environment.


Because one body was stationary, it had zero velocity; it'll be set in motion by the other body of roughly equal mass. The theory says nothing about the stationary body getting more damaged than the moving body. Apparently, its potential energy was insufficient to take the full force of the moving Mercedes. As a result, it had to give way.

the momentum of the moving object would cause extensive damage to the stationary object. it would set it in motion and the force that sets in motion would damage the stationary object. that law applies to any collusion.

me vs seun collision. coming soon. viewer discretion adviced

coogar:

park a benz(G-wagon) and let a toyota landcruiser at 90 km/hr ram into it. let's put the durable german materials into test.

but seroiusly, german machines are stronger than those jap stuff...

Oh, and the bulletproof Gwagon go still stand kakaraka like zuma rock, while the landcruiser...... Well, i hope the engine will be spared shaa