[s]

naso2:
the electricity situation in Ghana is very pathetic at the moment, talking from experience.

[/s] and how does it compare with the electricity situation in your paradise zoo?

CSTR:
A mere 700MW?
Gullible nation governed by idiotts.
I doubt such project would see the light of day.
Nigeria already had IAEA approval since the OBJ govt.
I just hope they don't finally get to build the damn thing one day.
I don't want anything nuclear around me.

it's a very good idea. I wish Nigeria can go nuclear. It will improve the electricity generation very much if we do.

iamord:
which kind rubbish talk be this?? Preposterous!! I need not waste a muscle to tell u further than this

=you have no proof

EVarn:
=you have no proof

I don't need to prove that to you cause you have shown in your statements that you are permisist, I brought up points that are meant to be researched to know if its genuine, the best you can do as an educated person is to find out.. That's what someone that wants to know is supposed to do. But like I said earlier. You are permisist. U need to work on the way u think.

iamord:
I don't need to prove that to you cause you have shown in your statements that you are permisist, I brought up points that are meant to be researched to know if its genuine, the best you can do as an educated person is to find out.. That's what someone that wants to know is supposed to do. But like I said earlier. You are permisist. U need to work on the way u think.

but m'boy,you fail to understand that on a public forum{like nairaland},when you make claims,you need to back them up with digestible proof.how else do you expect intellectual people to believe you?,how do you expect to silence opinion critics?.you cant just throw me a piece of your opinion and tell me to research it myself!.you{as the poster} should have researched your claims to the extent of being able to produce multiple links/citations when remotely doubted.

EVarn:
but m'boy,you fail to understand that on a public forum{like nairaland},when you make claims,you need to back them up with digestible proof.how else do you expect intellectual people to believe you?,how do you expect to silence opinion critics?.you cant just throw me a piece of your opinion and tell me to research it myself!.you{as the poster} should have researched your claims to the extent of being able to produce multiple links/citations when remotely doubted.

pls don't tag yourself among the intellectuals cos your statements from the beginning of this post show you as a permisist and ignorant. If u express yourself as such I have nothing to prove to u! But if u can't research. Don't disturb me

iamord:
pls don't tag yourself among the intellectuals cos your statements from the beginning of this post show you as a permisist and ignorant. If u express yourself as such I have nothing to prove to u! But if u can't research. Don't disturb me

then we are at an impasse m'boy,the net worth of intelligence is the measurement of reasonable ideology{and opinions}.lets just accept that you cant support your claims with tangible proof.lets just move on and forget about this controversy.

EVarn:
then we are at an impasse m'boy,the net worth of intelligence is the measurement of reasonable ideology{and opinions}.lets just accept that you cant support your claims with tangible proof.lets just move on and forget about this controversy.

I have moved on long before cos you are not good at holding a discussion and a waste of time.