Maczeelly:
Opposition everywhere......Una no dey tire niii

soe:
The efcc case was withdrawn by GEJ and not Buhari.
Read the proceedings, the directive came from the AGF. Buhari is even yet to appoint an AGF.

I think GEJ made that last move so as to create peace for himself in bayelsa especially as the case was borne out of vendatta in the first place.

sheddybest:
One dangerous adventure to undertake as a man of "integrity" is delve into Nigerian politics. While you are there, especially if you don't have that "power" as it were, you will have to dance to the tune of those that play your political drum of relevance. It is therefore, highly discouraging, dehumanizing as well as disheartening for a person of Prof Osinbajo to lay claims without proper verification, even as a professor of law.
Earlier today (Monday) when I read a threat on Nairaland concerning the discharge and dismissal of the case of Timipre Sylva, the former Governor of the oil-rich Bayelsa state, by the EFCC, over a corrupt case of over N2 Billion, I hurriedly remembered what our dear VP said about the Jonathan administration in 2014 over shielding (housing) corrupt persons.
According to the presidential running mate of Maj.Gen. Muhammadu Buhari (retd.), "it is saddening that under Jonathan’s government, there is no consequence for corruption.”
http://www.punchng.com/news/jonathan-politicising-boko-haram-menace-osinbajo/

My questions now are:
1. If there is a consequence for corruption under Buhari, why did Buhari make the same Sylva head of his transition committee?
http://www.thisdaylive.com/articles/timipre-sylva-in-the-emerging-political-scenario/208359/

2. If according to the VP, there was no consequence for corruption under GEJ, what is therefore the consequence of corruption for the magical release of Sylva just less than 3 days into office by the anti-corruption crusaders?
http://www.360nobs.com/2015/05/buhari-allegedly-instructs-keyamo-to-withdraw-from-prosecuting-timipre-sylva/

3. Just a couple of days ago, Buhari said he will not spare any corrupt leader. What is now the justification for Buhari's mingling with the very people (corrupt leaders) he 'intends' to fight?
http://pulse.ng/politics/muhammadu-buhari-immunity-or-not-youll-face-the-law-president-speaks-on-corrupt-leaders-id3813764.html
In conclusion, since the VP kept mute on the appointment of Sylva (with a known corrupts case) to head their transition committee, and also on the premature dismissal of Sylva's case by the EFCC, it therefore means that he has totally contradicted what Buhari 'stands' for - the anti-curroption crusader!

Lalasticlala, Ishilove, Mogidi, Barcanista, et al.

Maczeelly:
Opposition everywhere......Una no dey tire niii

BabaO2:

Too dry and irrelevant write up

basty:
What you guys don't know is, when did Jonathan charged Sylva for corruption? When Jonathan could no longer use Sylva for his shady second term agenda, that was when and why he charged Sylva for corruption.

soe:
The efcc case was withdrawn by GEJ and not Buhari.
Read the proceedings, the directive came from the AGF. Buhari is even yet to appoint an AGF.

I think GEJ made that last move so as to create peace for himself in bayelsa especially as the case was borne out of vendatta in the first place.

Maczeelly:
Opposition everywhere......Una no dey tire niii

shortgun:
I have always said that this Government is a fraud and dats how I will continue to see them, they promised to move away from the old ways of doing things in this country yet they keep changing the goal post as the day go by.

They should have allowed the the case to go on trial and if the man is innocent he will go home a free man.
Buhari is a brainless Dullard who was used by questionable characters to deceive the gullible.

Imortal001:
Tanoid are learners, they dont know hw to play the opposition role. yes, must of your criticism are baseless.
Therefore, i am refering you guys to goto lai muhammed for lectures.

Rawani:
1.

You have no proof of any corruption conviction on Sylva so PMB is in order by appointing him, anything else would be prejudice and pre-empting the courts.