brainwashed
When a crowd adopts a point of view en masse, all critical thinking stops.
—William Powers

When it comes to women in modern era, progress is the operative word. According to the Free Online Dictionary, progress means “steady improvement, as of a society or civilization.” It’s a relative term—how to improve something is entirely subjective. Yet when we talk about women, in 21st century progress is never defined, debated, or qualified. The topic is misleading right out of the gate.

For the past several decades, it has been widely accepted that women in usually, if not always, get the short end of the stick. According to feminists, women, like blacks, have been oppressed for centuries. We’re told not enough progress has been made and that society still hasn’t leveled the playing field. This philosophy is so embedded in our culture that we don’t question it. We don’t even label it “feminist” to think this way; it’s just commonplace to believe women suffer discrimination. Turn on the television, flip through a magazine, or search the airwaves, and you’ll be deluged with stories about women who wonder how their needs can best be met, how they can balance their lives better, or how they can deal with the myriad of problems and dangers they face. Women’s grievances dominate the conversation.



But grievances are like crabgrass: the more heat they get, the more it spreads. And that is precisely what has happened with modern women. Feminist organizations even promote the growth of grievances by consciousness-raising sessions, where feminists exchange tales of how badly some man treated them and what government’s role should be as compensation. On the meantime, buried beneath the surface lies the truth. The 21st century women are the most fortunate set of women who have ever lived. No one has it better. No one.
This is a new twist to an old debate, one that elicits shock. It even sounds wrong on a piece of paper or rolling off the tongue. That’s because the world have been conditioned to believe otherwise. Millions of women think progress requires women’s liberation—from men, from children, from society’s constructs, from just about anything that makes women feel morally obligated to someone or something other than themselves.

The saddest part of this misguided view of human nature is that it hasn’t made women any happier. In fact, it has done just the opposite. According to a 2007 report from the National Bureau of Economic Research, “As women have gained more freedom, more education, and more power, they have become less happy.”1

The authors of this report, Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers, suggest that “the salience of the women’s movement fueled elation in the 1970s that has dissipated in the ensuing years.”2 That isn’t surprising. Most women in America are a right-of-center bunch and don’t want what women on the left want. The majority of women in this country are traditionalists and don’t want to change America.

Feminists do. They’ve spent decades trying to convince women that the world n needs to accommodate them so women can be unshackled, free, and presumably happy. It has been an alluring concept. Certainly women like the idea of being free from their responsibilities from time to time; they may like the thought of being liberated from husbands and children occasionally. Who wouldn’t? Marriage and motherhood require a lot of work and sacrifice. But women don’t want to be “free” if being free means being single, dependent on the government, or even being a big-shot powerhouse with no time for family. Most women in America want what any reasonable person wants: a family to love and—yes—even depend on.

The female left wants something else. “As we approach a new century—and a new millennium—it’s the men who have to break through to a new way of thinking about themselves and society,” wrote Betty Friedan in the 2001 edition of her 1963landmark book, The Feminine Mystique. “Too bad women can’t do it for them, or go much further without them. Because it’s awesome to consider how women have changed the possibili- ties of our lives since we broke through the feminine mystique only two generations ago.”3

Those powerful words helped to shape a generation of American women. Implicit in Friedan’s worldview—the worldview so many women have been raised to accept—is the notion that women are oppressed, and that men are the ones who need to change. Friedan believed the odds are severely stacked against women. The only way to eliminate female oppression, she said, is to change men and society—to create a different America, one that’s more fair and just to women.

Those who are tempted to write off Betty Friedan as a has- been shouldn’t. Her words live on in the minds of influential female leftists whose goals are no different from Friedan’s. In November 2009, Maria Shriver, along with the left-wing think
tank Center for American Progress, produced an exhaustive, four-hundred-page document titled The Shriver Report: A Woman’s Nation Changes Everything. Its fundamental argument is that government policies and laws “continue to rely on an outdated model of the American family.”4

Shriver and company—which includes Oprah Winfrey—seek to remedy this supposed problem by proving we are no longer living in a “man’s world” but are now living in a “woman’s world.” They consider the traditional family a thing of the past, which is fine with them because what feminists really want is a matriarchy. And now they’ve admitted it. The Shriver Report boasted, “As we move into this phase we’re calling a woman’s nation, women can turn their pivotal role as wage-earners, as consumers, as bosses, as opinion-shapers, as co-equal partners in whatever we do into a potent force for change. Emergent economic power gives women a new seat at the table.

http://radioboston.wbur.org/2011/03/18/suzanne-venker

how many copies of this thread are there?

Who's counting.

How many times una go post dis tin self

IamLEGEND1:
how many copies of this thread are there?

female?

@op start ur own blog.

We need that revolution whereby women would be respected equally like men. Women are not respected by the society today. Women are at the back of the line.

Even in some nations there is no franchise. Women are not allowed to vote. A guy does something nasty..it's OK. .a girl does same thing. It's a taboo

qGOOD LUCK WITH THE UNHAPPINESS YOU BITTER OLD WOMEN

the thing about feminists is that most of them are closed minded and insincere to themselves. if they had their way they would reverse things, probably would have created eve first and wont create adam at all, cos they know better than God


maybe its time to really get the equality you clamour for. start by picking up guns and go in place of the soldiers and fight bokoharam.

start in numbers: driving trucks, mining coals, collecting garbage,roofing,firefighting, mechanics,heating,fabrication, vulcaniser, oil drilling, gate manning. .......... then we ll all know you mean business.

feminists can see in black and white that men—not women—are doing the unglamorous, hazardous jobs that are required to maintain our comfy way of life.

but when they talk of inequality, they only talk of government positions and office jobs and not the ones above.

.

Vinshu:
We need that revolution whereby women would be respected equally like men. Women are not respected by the society today. Women are at the back of the line.

Even in some nations there is no franchise. Women are not allowed to vote. A guy does something nasty..it's OK. .a girl does same thing. It's a taboo

I dont see you women crying for equall numbers of women to be deployed to the north to fight the growing insurgency. All you know is office equality.
This is why you can never be equal to men.

Jollyjoy:
female?

Dazryt