The leadership of Intersociety is
worried over the sketchy situation
on the ground pertaining to a
conditional bail purportedly given
yesterday (19th October 2015) to
Citizen Nnamdi Kanu of theRadio
Biafra, which was widely reported in
the print and online media within
and outside Nigeria.


The widely publicized news of
(sketchy) conditional bail, under
reference, is by all intents and
purposes, unreliable, sketchy and
complicated. The legal and media
angles to the said conditional bail
are totally clothed with legal
quackery and media mediocrity.


For example, the following
questions were not answered in the
referenced media report: Was
Nnamdi Kanu arraigned before a
named Chief Magistrate Court or
charged before a named Federal or
FCT High Court? If he was so
arraigned or charged, what charges
were preferred against him? Who
stood as prosecution team, AGF or
DSS legal department? Were the
charges bailable if he was arraigned
before a Magistrate Court? Who was
the presiding authority, Chief
Magistrate or a Judge? Are the
charges against him, if any, known to
the 1999 Constitution or its
subsidiary criminal laws, with their
penalties clearly defined in written
law? What date is the returned or
adjourned date? Was Citizen
Nnamdi Kanu represented by any
legal team and what are the
identities of members of his legal
team, if any?


Apart from the clear absence of the
foregoing ingredients in the said
wide statement of his bail, our
update investigation still indicates
that Citizen Kanu was still in the
custody of the DSS as at 7pm this
evening (20th October 2015).


Pieces of information obtained by
Intersociety this evening from the
top hierarchy of the Indigenous
People of Biafra (IPOB)including
Office of Coordinator of
Coordinators and Directorate of the
State in UK and USA clearly show
that Citizen Nnamdi Kanu is yet to
be set free or released from the DSS
dudgeon. In other words, he is still
in detention as we write.


We advise the media practitioners
and legal team handling and
following the matter under
reference to always cross-check
their facts and do a thorough job
before rushing to the press.


This type of half baked and
contradictory information can have
fatal effects on the detained Biafran
self determination activist. Criminal
and hired elements within State
security organization can perfectly
silence Citizen Kanu following this
sort of confused and contradictory
report and smartly exonerate the
State Security agencies from any
traceable culpability.


As we earlier demanded, Citizen
Nnamdi Kanu must be charged to
court of superior records or
competent jurisdiction strictly
within constitutionally or statutorily
grounded offenses and clearly
defined and written penalties or be
released unconditionally and
immediately.




http://www.thebiafraherald.co/2015/10/radio-biafra-director-nnamdi-kanu-not.html?utm_source=&utm_medium=twitter&m=1

That's where he belongs

Good for him

.






If they need thei country I see no harm in it, but let it be according to the led rules and regulations governing the existance of Nigeria. We are destined to be in one country out of our wish, because we have different backgrounds. If Ibos continue to proof sturbance why not our leaders let them, their contribution is more of negetive impact. I am sorry to say but they succeeded in tarnishing the good image of our dear country through their ambition to make money by all means which resulted in them partaking in any busseness no matter how bad that will make them at the expense of other citizens of our country. I see no reason why they should be kept if they want to go, they have every right, why holding them.












.

. I'm loving this. Way to go DSS. By the time they're through with him and his jobless supporters they will see their father and call him mommy and their mom and call her daddy. Make sure una flog am well well.

Okay

part of the abnormalities in naija, maybe he was tried in a kangaroo court.

They claimed the Igbos are the problem of Nigeria but they fought the civil war to keep their problem (Igbos) with them and yet still fighting to be identified with this their perceived problem (Igbos)..
Does it mean that Nigerian love staying problems

Kanu entered 'one chance' the very day he equated chestbeating to real influence. How could he be that dumb? Is he not suppose to be a leader of 'men' - flattheads but 'men' all the same.

This is Nnamdi kanu's present condition. Quite unstable.