Blackfire:
1,416 years ago, the meccans thought they could curtail mohamed and his al majiris madness by been nice, and diplomatic before they could react *bam bam bam * mohamed has taken over, there molested wives,orphan children, looted treasures, headless bodies in the trenches were the price they payed, till today there gory stories ve never been heard.


Yet this European countries ve not learn anything, an average Muslim believe every part of this world belongs to them, if this continue in the next 10 years... It will be nothing but tears, sorrows and blood.

vedaxcool:


Spawn of hitler, I hear. Between me and you who east swine? You are what you eat you know! Dried Coco-brain

APCzombie:


[s]Muslims don't eat porK because that will be cannibalism

Muslim filthy swine[/s]

Annunaki:
What do you expect when their prophet was a serial rapist? Raping is part of the sunnah of their prophet.

vedaxcool:


[b][/b]

pomporiking:
So you're telling me men seeking assylum will risk geting sent back for something so stupidif they did then germany should close their borders

ziccoit:


When the Archibishop Desmond Tutu attended her daughter gay wedding, all Christians were not lawless, stup1d, gays, senseless and Bible didn't teach them to be sodomists?

You see, you hypocritically generalized your condemnations when Islam and Muslims are involved but only attacked the culprit when Christianity and Christians are involved.

vedaxcool:





#leavetrashforlawma

parisbookaddict:

Lol, he dodges the question?? Can u swear u have never taken alcohol before Mr muslim . Holy than thou al tayyia using hypocrite.

APCzombie:


Eating pork is like eating your own child. That is why it is haram in Islam to eat pork.

Deep down, you Muslims love the pig and that is why you revere it and consider eating it to be cannibalism.

vedaxcool:


#leavetrashforlawma

vedaxcool:
[s][/s]

When will you grow a fully matured reasoning faculty? Are your priests that rape boys muslims? Or your pastors that deceive married women looking for fruits of the womb into sleeping with them muslims? Or hitler, anders breviek, all the gun murderers in the states raised by xtian parents muslims? By the grace of God those refugees would not pay Germany kindness with wickedness. Amin.

The sexual misconduct occurred under the influence of alcohol clearly the first indication those attackers are not anywhere near practicing muslims. But trust some uneducated fools to always want to promote their religion by taking rare stories that occur within their religion on a large scale to bring religion into the fray.

If this makes fp, then this 2 threads must be pushed to fp, unless lala has a life long mission of posting crap about muslims;

https://www.nairaland.com/2817247/media-silent-donald-trump-supporter#41411574

https://www.nairaland.com/2815233/kill-us-together-leave-kenyan#41412503

Amberon:
Do you also want me to name thousands and millions of atrocities Muslims have done in drones to promote Islam? did your prophet not rape women?

Have your imams not also done the same? haven't they swindled women of their hard earned money and slept with them in the guise of deliverance?

[b]mention an incident where a thousand christian men stormed the streets raping women in other to promote Christianity saying that Jesus commands it... [/b]don't mention me if you have nothing reasonable to say.

vedaxcool:
[s][/s]
Put on your thinking cap and come up with a better sensible post. How does raping promote Islam or any religion for that matter? Another dumber drunken unstable individual prowling the internet.

APCzombie:


We have seen the videos of these so called refugees who are 90% males of military age.

These are not men fleeing conflict but a Trojan army.

And we know those who need asylum and it is not these Muslim barbarians but the Yazidis , Kurds and Christian women and girls who have been sold into sexual slavery by the caliphate of sin.

vedaxcool:
[s][/s]
Put on your thinking cap and come up with a better sensible post. How does raping promote Islam or any religion for that matter? Another dumber drunken unstable individual prowling the internet.

APCzombie:


The armed robbers that were part of Mohammed's gang raped and sold captured women as sex slaves.

Mohammed even had laws drawn on how to treat captured women and girls.

These same laws and creeds are what ISIS is using to justify selling captured women and girls as sex slaves.

This same evil doctrine is what Shekau used to justify abducting and selling young Christian school girls into sexual slavery.

vedaxcool:


#leavetrashforlawma

pomporiking:


Beyond ridiculous how the genocide against the yazidis went under the radar for so long

vedaxcool:
[s][/s]
Put on your thinking cap and come up with a better sensible post. How does raping promote Islam or any religion for that matter? Another dumber drunken unstable individual prowling the internet.

PPAngel:
[size=18pt]Cleric: 'Real Islam' is About Abducting Women and Destroying Churches...[/size]



During a recent televised interview with Grand Ayatollah Ahmad al-Baghdadi, the leading Shia cleric of Iraq made clear why Islam and the rest of the world can never peacefully coexist.

First he spent some time discussing “defensive jihad,” saying that all capable Muslims are obligated to fight for the “liberation” of “occupied” territory, for instance, Israel .

He then explained “offensive jihad,” Islam’s primary bloodline, which forged what we now call the “Muslim world” over the centuries.

According to the ayatollah, when they can—when circumstance permits it, when they are strong enough—Muslims are obligated to go on the offensive and conquer non-Muslims (a fact to be kept in mind as millions of Muslim “refugees” flood the West).

The Muslim cleric repeatedly yelled at the secularized host who kept interrupting him and protesting that Islam cannot teach such intolerance. At one point, he burst out: “I am the scholar of Islam [al-faqih]. You are just a journalist. Listen to me!”

Expounded Al-Baghdadi:

If they are people of the book [Jews and Christians] we demand of them the jizya—and if they refuse, then we fight them. That is if he is Christian. He has three choices: either convert to Islam, or, if he refuses and wishes to remain Christian, then pay the jizya [and live according to dhimmi rules].

But if they still refuse—then we fight them, and we abduct their women, and destroy their churches—this is Islam!... Come on, learn what Islam is, are you even a Muslim?!

As for the polytheists [Hindus, Buddhists, etc.] we allow them to choose between Islam and war! This is not the opinion of Ahmad al-Husseini al-Baghdadi, but the opinion of all five schools of jurisprudence [four Sunni and one Shia].

Towards the end of the interview, because the clean-shaven, suit-and-tie-wearing host kept protesting that this cannot be Islam, the ayatollah burst out, pointing at him with contempt and saying, “Who are you? You’re going to tell me what to believe? This is the word of Allah!”

Indeed. Not only is it the word of Islam’s deity, but it is the fundamental, insurmountable obstacle for peace between Muslims and non-Muslims. Al-Baghdadi—and the countless other Muslim clerics, Sunni and Shia, that hold these views—are not “radicals.” For offensive jihad is no less codified than, say, Islam’s Five Pillars, which no Muslim rejects.

The Encyclopaedia of Islam’s entry for “jihad” states that the “spread of Islam by arms is a religious duty upon Muslims in general … Jihad must continue to be done until the whole world is under the rule of Islam … Islam must completely be made over before the doctrine of jihad can be eliminated.”

Islam has yet to “completely be made over.”

Renowned Muslim historian and philosopher Ibn Khaldun (d. 1406) explained jihad as follows:

In the Muslim community, jihad is a religious duty because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and the obligation to convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force. The other religious groups did not have a universal mission, and the jihad was not a religious duty for them, save only for purposes of defense. But Islam is under obligation to gain power over other nations.

Here it’s worth noting that even the most offensive jihad is seen as an “altruistic” endeavor, not unlike the “white man’s burden” of the 19th century. After all, the ancient argument that “we must reform your ways, with our ways, for your own good” has been one of the most cited justifications for offensive jihad since the 7th century.

Indeed, soon after the death of Islam’s prophet Muhammad (634), when his jihadis burst out of the Arabian peninsula, a soon-to-be conquered Persian commander asked the invading Muslims what they wanted. They reportedly replied as follows:

Allah has sent us and brought us here so that we may free those who desire from servitude to earthly rulers and make them servants of Allah, that we may change their poverty into wealth and free them from the tyranny and chaos of [false] religions and bring them to the justice of Islam. He has sent us to bring his religion to all his creatures and call them to Islam. Whoever accepts it from us will be safe, and we shall leave him alone; but whoever refuses, we shall fight until we fulfill the promise of Allah.

Fourteen hundred years later, in March 2009, Saudi legal expert Basem Alem publicly echoed this view:

As a member of the true religion [Islam], I have a greater right to invade [others] in order to impose a certain way of life [according to Sharia], which history has proven to be the best and most just of all civilizations. This is the true meaning of offensive jihad. When we wage jihad, it is not in order to convert people to Islam, but in order to liberate them from the dark slavery in which they live.

Even al-Qaeda partially justified its jihad against America for being “a nation that exploits women like consumer products”; for not rejecting the “immoral acts of fornication, homosexuality, intoxicants, gambling, and usury.”

If the “white man’s burden” was/is to “civilize” Muslims, by bringing them “democracy,” “human rights,” and “secularism,” the “Muslim man’s burden”—captured by Allah’s word to Muslims, “Jihad is ordained for you, though you dislike it” (Koran 2:216)—has long been to “civilize” Westerners by bringing them under the umbrella of Sharia.

This positive interpretation of jihad ensures that, no matter how violent and ostensibly unjust a jihad is, it will always be vindicated in Muslim eyes: the ugly means will be justified by the “altruistic” ends.

Finally, as Grand Ayatollah Ahmad al-Baghdadi pointed out, the need for Muslims to wage offensive jihad “is not the opinion of Ahmad al-Husseini al-Baghdadi… This is the word of Allah!”

Nor is it the “opinion” of ISIS Caliph Abu Bakr, al-Qaeda leader Ayman Zawahiri, Boko Haram leader Abubakar Shekau, or any of the other countless past and present jihadis. No, jihad to conquer and bring Sharia to non-Muslims is the command of Allah.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/260452/iraqi-ayatollah-abducting-women-and-destroying-raymond-ibrahim

Amberon:
When have we ever witness a time when Christian men came out in hundreds or a thousand to rape and molest women because of their religion??

If you lack something reasonable to say, don't jump into my mentions.

ziccoit:


Where was it stated in that article those people were sexually assaulted because of their religion? You read but allowed your hatred laden heart to misinterpret the information to suite your primordial wrong and crooked ideology. You generalized the action of some Arabians on the entire Muslim worlds even cursing them.

If you really understood the meaning of reasonability you would know who is being unreasonable here.

Amberon:
if you didn't see the part where it had to do with their religion then maybe you should re-read.

when did I curse them? by calling them what they are? You need to re-define what curse means.

Its not a coincidence that they were all Muslims. nb: it wasn't 2 or 3 or 10 or 30 or 50 people, but about 1000 come on... whether you like it or not this is Islam at work; like it or leave it.

parisbookaddict:


Mr muslim, your insults won't stop me from exposing you and ur lies for allah in form of al taqqia. U call me Mrs kitman and forget that kitman is a cousin to al tayyia both invented by mohammed the deceiver.

U say u have warned me not to quote u, then please don't comment and lie in the topics I create.

No run along Mr muslim and go play with ur child bride.

ziccoit:

Ok, let's play game.

Since majority of Christian priests, cleric and pastors are seen endorsing gay marriage even conducting the wedding, Christianity too is all about gay and sodomy. Remember those crimes are weightier than rape.

Blackfire:



though am a little angry with u, but this your reply make me laugh . I ve forgiven u

Annunaki:


Just wondering, are you a former muslim?

parisbookaddict:


Which glue have u been sniffing.

Which majority of Christian priests endorse gay marriage.

Christians don't believe in killing gays Like muslims believe. That does not mean we support it.

Catholics make up 1.2 billion of the earths population and they reject gay marriage in its totality but welcome and call gays to repentance same with coptics, oriental /eastern and Greek orthodox Christian churches etc.

Only a very tiny minority of the 800million protestants have come to accept gays. The Anglican church in the UK, and some tiny insignificant new age churches in America, France, Spain , UK and south Africa. How does that support ur claim that majority of Christian clergy support gays.

Again how is homosexuality a wealthier sin than rape.

So 2 people of the same sex consent to have sex is a bigger crime than a man aggressively forcing himself on a defenseless woman. Are u insane??

U are indeed a deluded lair.

Blackfire:


ooh don't misunderstand my quote, when parisbookaddict after a long time comeback , i welcomed her, which she ignored, that was why i was a little angry, but hey is all good now.

So to your question, why do u say so?

ziccoit:


800millions are not majority before you to vilify the whole body of Christians, yet you were jumping up and down cursing the whole Muslims and calling them names based on wrong doings of handful some? You just exposed yourself for who you really are- an hatred laden individual who always judge on preconceived lies passed onto him by gullible ones. You people are hypocrites.

I knew you would fall for the trap.

This is my verdict on you;

1. You are not a Christian. A Christian doesn't curse and allow hatred to becloud his sense of pure reasoning. Your replies to my comments were riddle with curse, abuse etc. That was unchristian.

2. If you were,though a poor one, you understand nothing about Christianity and Bible you are carrying about.

Stop vilifying a whole group anywhere any place based on hatred and handful of some wrongdoers. I advise you to always seek knowledge of what you don't know before passing judgement. That is what is expected of brilliant and pure mind.

I think am done. Have a nice day.

800millions are not majority before you to vilify the whole body of Christians,

Blackfire:



So to your question, why do u say so?