LordAdam:


I did not say she should not charge him to court. I am only saying that she should also prove that those allegations are false. It is easy to do. After that, she can charge the guy to court for being used as a agent of discord, libel and to assassinate the character of a law-abiding citizen.

-Lord

Dude...it does not work like that..........let the blogger prove his claim in court.....so that Laurette can be disgraced in the open.....isn't that why he made the comment in the 1st palce .........Laurette abeg go to court and sue his black a$$

Reptyle:


I see the point you are trying to make...but I beg to differ sir.

It would not be easier for her to prove that the allegations are false...and in all honesty, you and I know a rebuttal would be futile in this situation.

This is Nigeria where any allegation against someone is taken as truth and the person is tried, convicted and sentenced in the media even before the "accused" gets a chance to be heard.

Case in point is this very thread we are on. Go back and read the comments from people that have already condemned the woman based on the OP.

I suspect very few of them even know the woman beyond the fact that she is a member of the APC and supported President Buhari 's campaign.

A rebuttal is in my opinion, only effective or useful where people are open and fair minded and willing to hear from both sides before reaching a conclusion.

CltrAltDel:


Dude...it does not work like that..........let the blogger prove his claim in court.....so that Laurette can be disgraced in the open.....isn't that why he made the comment in the 1st palce .........Laurette abeg go to court and sue his black a$$