Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,153,537 members, 7,819,921 topics. Date: Tuesday, 07 May 2024 at 06:47 AM

Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? - Politics (2) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? (13662 Views)

"Hope Uzodinma Infected My Wife With HIV-AIDS" - Godwin Ebubeagu Ekenulo / Aisha Buhari Reaches Out To People Living With HIV/AIDS (photos) / What Does BBC News Have Against Black Presenters? (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by cap28: 2:53am On Sep 07, 2009
.And is Obama as US president, now following Kissingers doctrine (evil eye and all) and frantically "depopulating" himself?


i dont think you understand the issues - first of all Obama is a a frontman for a powerful elite who are the real power brokers, therefore he would be expected to follow their agenda which includes depopulation policies, this doesnt mean that he would be "depopulating himself" as you put it, it would simply mean that he would be expected to support and pass through any legislation aimed at promoting depopulation policies. 

Obama's current health care and policy adviser, a Dr Ezekiel Emmanuel is an ardent supporter of depopulation ideology or eugenics, Emmanuel beleives that health care should be rationed and provided to only those who can participate fully in society - which means that if you are elderly and suffering from dementia or young and disabled with learning difficulties you could be denied health care on the grounds that you are not able to fully participate in society.  if you look at the intention behind this you could argue that these are attempts to introduce a gradual depopulation of american society by removing so called undesirables or people who are regarded as burdens on society.
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by Beaf: 3:03am On Sep 07, 2009
When people come up with this sort of far fetched shit, it can be entertaining, but I remember watching some guys called heavens gate and having a laugh with the rest of my folk. They were going to be raptured by flying saucers hanging on the tail of a comet; then a couple of days later, they had all committed mass suicide.
We should be really careful.

http://www.heavensgate.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven's_Gate_(religious_group)
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by Kobojunkie: 3:03am On Sep 07, 2009
OH MY GOSH!!! Roflmao!!! That came from an adult educated mind?? Roflmao!!
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by Beaf: 3:10am On Sep 07, 2009
^na so we see am o! They even ran around the place in some wacky plastic space suits and other toyish stuff. grin

The human mind can be a miracle.
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by SeanT21(f): 3:17am On Sep 07, 2009
Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People??

NOOOOO!!!
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by No2Atheism(m): 3:20am On Sep 07, 2009
Kobojunkie:

OH MY GOSH!!! Roflmao!!! That came from an adult educated mind?? Roflmao!!

Beaf:

When people come up with this sort of far fetched shit, it can be entertaining, but I remember watching some guys called heavens gate and having a laugh with the rest of my folk. They were going to be raptured by flying saucers hanging on the tail of a comet; then a couple of days later, they had all committed mass suicide.
We should be really careful.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven's_Gate_(religious_group)

oyb:

heheheh

wikipedia is not reliable - but an article from a kook [/b]on the internet is?  grin

2005 reports are not reliable, but the 1998 report of dr boyd is reliable  cheesy cheesy

how come he is the only one to have made this discovery?

[b]we all know that you have a weird obseesion with how the whiteman is resposible for holding the blackman down etal
- heck some have said that somewhere in the religion you stated that er your God er spoke to you and[b] told you Jesus is black or some such[/b]. so its no real surprise that you're here again , feeding your neurosis with ever more absurd conspiracy theories - all the while blathering about your - academic research -

you're simply being a black james watson (without the accolades)

 undecided

1. Ignore everything that no2atheism HAS said as concerns the topic - CHECK
2. Go down the route of melodrama - CHECK
3. Pretend to say something of meaningful contribution to the topic. - CHECK
4. Ignore the fact that what Boyd Greaves presents and says are actually fact checkable from the government itself and have been put under scrutiny - CHECK
5. Ignore Historical precedents - CHECK
6. A muslim claiming that the Messiah is White - CHECK
7. Call Boyd Greaves a kook (without evidence) - CHECK
8. Use straw man's argument of linking the issue to Flying Saucers as a means of ridicule - CHECK
9. Use more melodrama and make the loudest noise - CHECK

Hmmm am i missing something else from the responses . . .  grin grin grin

@others

Those that seek to contribute can do so and note that:

- This topic is not a personal opinion about how HIV AIDS is transmitted.

- Instead it is a discussion into the historical origin and purposes of the HIV AIDS virus itself


. . . people should please take time to properly read the topic first, before posting their replies otherwise it makes them look hmm hmm very bad research-wise, . . . it does not bode well for replies that go way off mark as regards to the purpose of the thread.

FURTHER COMPARED AND CONTRASTED POINTS AS REGARDS THE TOPIC ARE WELCOMED . . .


sorry if i am not responding immediately, instead i intend to vet response that i end up responding to, so as not to go off topic.
Those who know me on this forum know that i don't do melodrama (hence i would gladly ignore all irrelevancies  undecided)  while prefering to listen to well thought out responses in relation to the valid points raised by Boyd Graeves.
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by cap28: 3:22am On Sep 07, 2009
When people come up with this sort of far fetched shit, it can be entertaining, but I remember watching some guys called heavens gate and having a laugh with the rest of my folk. They were going to be raptured by flying saucers hanging on the tail of a comet; then a couple of days later, they had all committed mass suicide.
We should be really careful.


what on earth has the above got to do with the possibility of hiv aids being a manufactured disease in order to advance the depopulation of blacks.  

braindead dimwits like you who cant read and dont understand what is going on around them are usually the kind of people who end up in cults and religious sects, i have a feeling you are actually IN one.  

if all of this is way above your intellectual ability why dont you move over to the under fives discussion message board where the topics under discussion will be more in tune with your infantile mental ability its obvious from your responses that your brain is incapable of processing any of this as it is way too complicated for what you are normally used to.

im done trying to reason with a cretin with an IQ of minus 500!!!
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by Beaf: 3:25am On Sep 07, 2009
^Where have I come across this sort of thing before?

http://www.heavensgate.com/
The plonkers really believed in their gods coming to take them away in flying saucers.
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by No2Atheism(m): 3:51am On Sep 07, 2009
I HAVE NOTICED THAT SOME PEOPLE ARE NOT EVEN TAKING THE TIME TO CROSS CHECK THE POINTS RAISED BY BOYD GRAEVES, INSTEAD THERE SEEMS TO BE A KNEE JERK REACTION BASED PURELY ON DOGMA RATHER THAN LOGIC.

HENCE TO HELP PEOPLE SEE THE POINTS MADE BY BOYD GRAEVES . . . BELOW ARE THE POINTS ONCE AGAIN .

THE MORE WORRISOME PARTS OF THE COMMENTS THAT I AM SEEING HERE IS THAT MOST OF THE COMMENTERS FAIL TO REALISE ONE IMPORTANT POINT, BOYD HAS BEEN SUBJECTED TO THE BRUTAL US LEGAL SYSTEM (MEANING THAT HIS STATEMENTS AND PROCLAMATIONS HAVE BEEN FACTED CHECKED IN THE COURT OF LAW) . . .


I am not promoting Boyd Greaves, yet at the same time i find that his points and submission are difficult to disprove hence demand consideration, hence the reason and basis for this thread in case someone has a another referencable argument . . . that can likewise be fact-checked.





http://www.boydgraves.com/timeline/


The History of the Development of AIDS
Chapter Excerpt from “State Origin: The Evidence of the Laboratory Birth of AIDS” by Boyd E. Graves, J.D.


The true history of the origin of AIDS can be traced throughout the 20th Century and back to 1878. On April 29 of that year the United States passed a “FEDERAL QUARANTINE ACT”.

The United States began a significant effort to investigate “causes” of epidemic diseases. In 1887, the effort was enhanced with the mandate of the U.S. “LABORATORY OF HYGIENE”. This lab was run by Dr. Joseph J. Kinyoun, a deep rooted-racist, who served the eugenics movement with dedication.

Two years later, 1889, we were able to identify “mycoplasmas”, a transmissible agent, that is now found at the heart of human diseases, including (AIDS) HIV.

In 1893, we strengthened the Federal Quarantine Act and suddenly there was an explosion of polio.

In 1898, we knew we could use mycoplasma to cause epidemics, because we were able to do so in cattle, and we saw it in tobacco plants.

In 1899, the U.S. Congress began investigating “leprosy in the United States”.

In 1902, We organized a “Station for Experimental Evolution” and we were able to identify diseases of an ethnic nature.

In 1904, we used mycoplasma to cause an epidemic in horses.

In 1910, we used mycoplasma to cause an epidemic in fowl/birds.

In 1917, we formed the “Federation of the American Society for Experimental Biology” (FASEB).

In 1918, the influenza virus killed millions of unsuspecting. It was a flu virus modified with a bird mycoplasma for which human primates had no “acquired immunity”.

In 1921, lead eugenics philosopher, Betrand Russell, publicly supported the “necessity for “organized” plagues” against the Black population.

In 1931, we secretly tested African Americans and we tested AIDS in sheep.

In 1935, we learned we could crystallize the tobacco mycoplasma, and it would remain infectious.

In 1943, we officially began our bio-warfare program. Shortly thereafter, we were finding our way to New Guinea to study mycoplasma in humans.

In 1945, we witnessed the greatest influx of foreign scientists in history into the U.S. biological program. Operation Paperclip will live in infamy as one of the darkest programs of a twisted parallel government fixated on genocide.

In 1946, the United States Navy hired Dr. Earl Traub, a notorious racist biologist.
A May appropriations hearing confirms the existence of a “secret” biological weapon.

In 1948, we know that the United States confirmed the endorsement of “devising a scheme” in which to address the issue of overpopulation in certain racial groups. State Department’s George McKennan’s memo will forever illuminate the eugenics mendacity necessary for genocide of millions of innocent people.

In 1949, Dr. Bjorn Sigurdsson isolates the VISNA virus. Visna is man made and shares some “unique DNA” with HIV. See, Proceedings of the United States, NAS, Vol. 92, pp. 3283 - 7, (April 11, 1995).

In 1951, we now know our government conducted its first virus attack on African Americans. Crates in Pennsylvania were tainted to see how many Negro crate handlers in Virginia would acquire the placebo virus,  They were also experimentally infecting sheep and goats. According to author Eva Snead, they also held their first world conference on an AIDS-like virus.

In 1954, Dr. Bjorn Sigurdsson publishes his first paper on Visna virus and establishes himself as the “Grandfather of the AIDS virus.” He will encounter competition from Dr. Carlton Gajdusek.

In 1955, they were able to artificially assemble the tobacco mosaic virus. Mycoplasmas will forever be at the heart of the U.S. biological warfare program

In 1957, future U.S. president, Rep Gerald Ford and others gave the U.S. Pentagon permission to aggressively deploy offensive biological agents. There are no recorded cases of AIDS prior to the 1957 creation of “Special Operation-X.” (The SOX) program served as the immediate prototype program for the Special Virus program to begin in 1962.

By 1960, Nikita Kruschev had been let in on the biological weapon. His 1960 statement will long reflect the arrogance of the secret blend of communism and democracy. The two countries would go to a November 1972 agreement to cull the Black Population.

In 1961, scientist Haldor Thomar publishes that viruses cause cancer. In 1995, he and Carlton Gajdusek informed the National Academy of Sciences that “the study of visna in sheep would be the best test for candidate anti-HIV drugs.”

In 1962, under the cover of cancer research, the United States charts a path to commit premeditated murder, the “Special Virus” program begins on February 12th. Dr. Len Hayflick sets up a U.S. mycoplasma laboratory at Stanford University. Many believe the “Special Virus” program began in November 1961 with a Phizer contract.

Beginning in 1963 and for every year thereafter, the “Special Virus” program conducted annual progress reviews at Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA. The annual meetings are representative of the aggressive nature in which the United States pursued the development of AIDS.

In 1964, the United States Congress gave full support for the leukemia/lymphoma (AIDS) virus research.

In 1967, the National Academy of Sciences launched a full scale assault on Africa. The CIA (Technical Services Division) acknowledged its secret inoculator program.

In 1969, Fort Detrick told world scientists and the Pentagon asked for more money, they knew they could make AIDS. Nixon’s July 18 secret memo to Congress on “Overpopulation” serves as the start of the paper trail of the AIDS Holocaust.

In 1970, President Nixon signed PL91-213 and John D. Rockefeller, III became the “Population Czar.” Nixon’s August 10 National Security Memo leaves no doubt as to the genocidal nature of depopulation.

In 1971, Progress Report #8 is issued. The flowchart (pg. 61) will forever resolve the true laboratory birth origin of AIDS. Eventually the Special Virus program will issue 15 reports and over 20,000 scientific papers. The flowchart links every scientific paper, medical experiment and U.S. contract. The flowchart would remain “missing” until 1999. World scientists were stunned. The flowchart will gain in significance throughout the 21st Century. It is also clear the experiments conducted under Phase IV-A of the flowchart are our best route to better therapy and treatment for people living with HIV/AIDS. The first sixty pages of progress report #8 of the Special Virus program prove conclusively the specific goal of the program. By June 1977, the Special Virus program had produced 15, 000 gallons of AIDS. The AIDS virus was attached as complement to vaccines sent to Africa and Manhattan. However, because of the thoroughness of authors, like Dr. Robert E. Lee, we also learn the Stanford Mycoplasma Laboratory issues one of the first papers with AIDS in the title. “Viral Infections in Man Associated with Acquired Immunological Deficiency States.” The primary scientist, Dr. Thomas Merigan, was a “consultant” to the Special Virus program.

Progress Report # 8 at 104 - 106 proves Dr. Robert Gallo was secretly working on the development of AIDS with full support of the sector of the U.S. government that seeks to kill its citizens. Dr. Gallo can not explain why he excluded his role as a “project officer” for the Special Virus program from his biographical book. Dr. Gallo’s early work and discoveries will finally be viewed in relation to the flowchart. We now know where every experiment fits into the flowchart. The “research logic” is irrefutable evidence of a federal “Manhattan-style project” to develop a “contagious” cancer that “selectively” kills. Dr. Gallo’s 1971 paper is identical to his 1984 AIDS announcement.

Progress Report #8 at 273 - 286 proves we gave AIDS to monkeys. Since 1962, the United States and Dr. Robert Gallo have been inoculating monkeys and re-releasing them back into the wild. Thus, even government scientists are baffled that both HIV-1 and HIV-II would “suddenly emerge” from two distinct monkey ancestral relatives during the last 100 years. A 1999 Japanese study will ultimately prove the Man to Monkey origin of Monkey AIDS. The monkey experiments summary definitively proves Monkey AIDS is also man-made.

In 1972, the United States and the Soviet Union entered into a biological agreement that would signal the death knell for the Black Population. The 1972 agreement for collaboration and cooperation in the development of offensive biological agents is still U. S. policy.

In 1973, we find that world scientist, Garth Nicolson reports on his project, “Role of the Cell Surface in Escape From Immunological Surveillance.” His report is accompanied by seven published papers. Dr. Nicolson worked in conjunction with the Special Virus program from 1972 until 1978. Dr. Nicolson is considered by some to be Dr. Gallo’s “West Coast” counterpart. It is strongly held that because of Dr. Nicolson, Dr. Robert Gallo and Dr. Luc Montagnier would secretly meet in Southern California to coordinate what they would and would not say about the special virus development program.

In 1974, Furher Henry Kissinger releases his NSSM-200 (U.S. Plan to Address Overpopulation). It is the only issue of discussion at the World Population Conference in Bucharest, Romania.  The men in the shadows had won, the whole world agrees to secretly cull Africa’s population. Today it is Africa and other undesirables. Tomorrow it may be you.

In 1975, President Gerald Ford signs National Security Defense Memorandum #314. The United States implements the Kissinger NSSM-200.

In 1976, the United States issues Progress Report #13 of the Special Virus program. The report proves the United States had various international agreements with the Russians, Germans, British, French, Canadians and Japanese. The plot to kill Black people has wide international support. In March, the Special Virus began production of the AIDS virus, by June 1977, the program will have produced 15,000 gallons of AIDS. President Jimmy Carter allows for the continuation of the secret plan to cull the Black Population.

In 1977, Dr. Robert Gallo and the top Soviet Scientists meet to discuss the proliferation of the 15,000 gallons of AIDS. They attach AIDS as complement to the Small pox vaccine for Africa, and the “experimental” hepatitis B vaccine for Manhattan. According to authors June Goodfield and Alan Cantwell, it is Batch #751 that was administered in New York to thousands of innocent people. This government will never be able to repay the people for the social rape, humiliation and out right prejudice people with HIV/AIDS face on a daily basis. The men in the shadows of the AIDS curtain accurately calculated that you would not care if only Blacks and gays are dying. In fact you don’t care that nearly a half million Gulf War veterans are encumbered with something contagious. Soon there will be no more Black people and a confused military, older White people will start suddenly dying and you still won’t get it. Be here now for us, give us a chance to be there for you.

Suddenly, just as President Nixon had predicted, there was explosive death. On November 4, 1999, the U.S. White House announced,,  “Within a period as short as five years, all new infections of HIV in the United States will be African American, ” At some point our experts must be allowed to begin the interface process of allowing the history of this virus program to count. It is ludicrous and preposterous to fail to review the U.S. virus program in which to elucidate the etiology of AIDS.

More of the history of the secret virus program can be found in the archives of Dr. John B. Moloney. A review of the files under Dr. Moloney’s name would further pinpoint additional dates and records consistent with one of the greatest hunts, capture and proliferation of disease in the history of the human race. We have found the missing link. It is the guts of the research logic of a federal program that seeks to kill. We have found a curtain of AIDS. We can identify some of the people who work in the shadows of the curtain. Dr. Robert Gallo and Dr. Garth Nicolson must lead us in review. In light of the attack mechanisms available in which to inhibit AIDS, it is time that not another person be stricken with this relic, synthetic mycoplasma chimera.

Help those of us who are still here to realize full and contributory lives. We are all one people.

On September 28, 1998 I filed suit against the United States for the “creation”, “production” and “proliferation” of AIDS. On November 7, 2000, the appeals court agreed with the lower court and held AIDS bioengineering as “frivolous.” The world continues to wait for the court to rule on the resubmitted issues. The court can not continue to simply brush aside our experts and the government’s flowchart.

I have been asked to give my perspective with regard to the federal program MK-NAOMI . MK-NAOMI is the code for the development of AIDS. The “MK” portion stands for the two co-authors of the AIDS virus, Robert Manaker and Paul Kotin. The “NAOMI” portion stands for “Negroes are Only Momentary Individuals.” The U.S. government continues to orchestrate silence from the very top echelons of the Congress and military. At present there is no accountability. The good people will ultimately create a tsunami of public outrage. We can not allow the state an autocratic right to govern outside of the Constitution. Our society is structured to hide crimes committed by the state, while punishing citizens for minor indiscretions. Their strategy focuses on the general confusion they can create via manipulation of the media. They are very good at what they do. We must become more focused in our continued presentation of the flowchart. The flowchart is the absolute missing link in proving the existence of a coordinated research program to develop a cancer virus that depletes the immune system. New diseases do not create old illnesses.


This compilation of court documents and correspondence is the true effort of one man’s achievement in solving the mystery of the origin of AIDS. We have found the origin of AIDS, it is us.


Sign Petition | Audio

Comments | About Boyd "Ed" Graves, J.D.

Video | 1971 Special Virus Flow Chart


Contact | Order

Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by Beaf: 4:18am On Sep 07, 2009
. . .Furher Henry Kissinger. . .
shocked

Your evidence is loaded with bunkum. . . Don't tell me you are an academic who is to puritanical to quote wikipedia; yet you belittle your intellect with such a low quality post.

Is that an insinuation that Kissinger is a Nazi? Damn!

The weird, the wacky and the wonderful!
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by Nobody: 9:52am On Sep 07, 2009
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIDS#History

AIDS was first reported June 5, 1981, when the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recorded a cluster of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (now still classified as PCP but known to be caused by Pneumocystis jirovecii) in[b] five homosexual men in Los Angeles.[/b][138] In the beginning, the CDC did not have an official name for the disease, often referring to it by way of the diseases that were associated with it, for example, lymphadenopathy, the disease after which the discoverers of HIV originally named the virus.[70][71] They also used Kaposi's Sarcoma and Opportunistic Infections, the name by which a task force had been set up in 1981.[139] In the general press, the term GRID, which stood for Gay-related immune deficiency, had been coined.[140] The CDC, in search of a name, and looking at the infected communities coined “the 4H disease,” as it seemed to single out Haitians, homosexuals, hemophiliacs, and heroin users.[141] However, after determining that AIDS was not isolated to the homosexual community,[139] the term GRID became misleading and AIDS was introduced at a meeting in July 1982.[142] By September 1982 the CDC started using the name AIDS, and properly defined the illness.[143]

A more controversial theory known as the OPV AIDS hypothesis suggests that the AIDS epidemic was inadvertently started in the late 1950s in the Belgian Congo by Hilary Koprowski's research into a poliomyelitis vaccine.[144][145] According to scientific consensus, this scenario is not supported by the available evidence.[146][147][148]

A recent study states that HIV probably moved from Africa to Haiti and then entered the United States around 1969.[149]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_AIDS

1955–1957: British printer (possible AIDS death)

The oldest documented possible case of the then-unknown syndrome was thought to have been detected in 1959, when a 25-year-old British printer (usually referred to, mistakenly, as a sailor) who had travelled in the navy between 1955 and 1957 (but apparently not to Africa) sought help at the Royal Infirmary of Manchester, England. He reported to have been suffering from puzzling symptoms, among them purplish skin lesions, for nearly two years. His condition had taken a turn for worse during Christmas 1958, when he started suffering from shortness of breath, extreme fatigue, rapid weight loss, night sweats and high fever. The doctors thought he might be suffering from tuberculosis and, even though they found no evidence of bacterial infection, they treated him for tuberculosis just to be safe, to no avail. The printer continued to weaken and he died shortly after in August 1959. His autopsy revealed evidence of two unusual infections, cytomegalovirus and Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP, later, when redetermined as P. jirovecii, renamed Pneumocystis pneumonia), very rare at the time but now commonly associated with AIDS patients. His case had puzzled his doctors, who preserved tissue samples from him and for years retained some interest in solving the mystery.

Sir Robert Platt, then president of the Royal College of Physicians, wrote in the printer's hospital chart that he wondered "If we are in for a new wave of virus disease now that the bacterial illnesses are so nearly conquered". It was only 31 years later, after the AIDS pandemic had become well-known and widespread, that they decided to perform HIV-tests on the preserved tissues of the printer, which initially turned out a positive result. While the case was reported in the July 7, 1990 issue of the British medical journal The Lancet, their claim was retracted in a letter in the January 20, 1996 issue where they reported that the tissue sample had become contaminated in the laboratory.[16][17][18]

[edit]
1959: Congolese man

One of the earliest documented HIV-1 infections was discovered in a preserved blood sample taken in 1959 from a man from Leopoldville, Belgian Congo (now Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo).[19] However, it is unknown whether this anonymous person ever developed AIDS and died of its complications.[19]

[edit]
1960: Congolese woman

A second early documented HIV-1 infection was discovered in a preserved lymph node biopsy sample taken in 1960 from a woman from Leopoldville, Belgian Congo.[2]

[edit]
1969: Robert R.

In 1969, a 15-year-old African-American male known to medicine as Robert R. died at the St. Louis City Hospital from aggressive Kaposi's sarcoma. AIDS was suspected as early as 1984, and in 1987, researchers at Tulane University School of Medicine confirmed this, finding HIV-1 in his preserved blood and tissues. The doctors who worked on his case at the time suspected he was a prostitute, though the patient did not discuss his sexual history with them in detail.[20][21][22][23][24]

[edit]
1969: Arvid Noe

In 1976, a Norwegian sailor named Arvid Noe, his wife, and his nine-year-old daughter died of AIDS. The sailor had first presented symptoms in 1969, eight years after he first spent time in ports along the West African coastline. A gonorrhea infection during his first African voyage shows he was sexually active at this time. Tissue samples from the sailor and his wife were tested in 1988 and found to contain the HIV-1 virus (Group O).[25][26][27]

[edit]
Spread to the western hemisphere

HIV-1 strains are thought to have arrived in the United States from Haiti in the late 1960s or early 1970s.[28] HIV-1 is believed to have arrived in Haiti from central Africa, possibly through professional contacts with the Democratic Republic of the Congo.[29]

Because of the long incubation period of HIV (up to a decade or longer) before symptoms of AIDS appear, and because of the initially low incidence, AIDS was not noticed at first. By the time the first reported cases of AIDS were found in large United States cities, the prevalence of HIV infection in some communities had passed 5%.[30] Worldwide, HIV infection has spread from urban to rural areas, and has appeared in regions such as China and India.

[edit]
Canadian flight attendant theory

A Canadian airline steward named Gaëtan Dugas was referred to as "Patient 0" in an early AIDS study by Dr. William Darrow of the Centers for Disease Control. Many people consider Dugas to be responsible for bringing HIV to North America. This is considered inaccurate, as HIV had spread long before Dugas began his career. This rumor may have started with Randy Shilts' 1987 book And the Band Played On (and the movie based on it, in which Dugas is referred to as AIDS' Patient Zero), but neither the book nor the movie state him to have been the first to bring the virus to North America. He was called "Patient Zero" because at least 40 of the 248 people known to be infected by AIDS in 1983 had had sexual intercourse with him, or with someone who had sexual intercourse with him.

The current consensus is that HIV was introduced to North America by a Haitian immigrant who contracted it while working in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in the late 1960s, or from another person who worked there during that time.[31]

[edit]
1981–2: From GRID to AIDS

The AIDS epidemic officially began on June 5, 1981, when the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in its Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report newsletter reported unusual clusters of Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) caused by a form of Pneumocystis carinii (now recognized as a distinct species Pneumocystis jirovecii) in five homosexual men in Los Angeles.[32]

Over the next 18 months, more PCP clusters were discovered among otherwise healthy men in cities throughout the country, along with other opportunistic diseases (such as Kaposi's sarcoma[33] and persistent, generalized lymphadenopathy[34]), common in immunosuppressed patients.

In June 1982, a report of a group of cases amongst gay men in Southern California suggested that a sexually transmitted infectious agent might be the etiological agent,[35] and the syndrome was initially termed "GRID", or gay-related immune deficiency.[36]

Health authorities soon realized that nearly half of the people identified with the syndrome were not homosexual men. The same opportunistic infections were also reported among hemophiliacs,[37] heterosexual intravenous drug users, and Haitian immigrants.[38]

By August 1982, the disease was being referred to by its new CDC-coined name: Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS).[39]



contrast this timeline with boyd graves timeline

http://www.gene.ch/gentech/2001/Feb/msg00017.html


Beginning in 1963 and for every year thereafter, the "Special Virus" program conducted annual progress reviews at Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA. The annual meetings are representative of the aggressive nature in which the United States pursued the development of AIDS.

In 1964, the United States Congress gave full support for the leukemia/lymphoma (AIDS) virus research.

In 1967, the National Academy of Sciences launched a full scale assault on Africa. The CIA (Technical Services Division) acknowledged its secret inoculator program.

In 1969, Fort Detrick told world scientists and the Pentagon asked for more money, they knew they could make AIDS. Nixon’s July 18 secret memo to Congress on "Overpopulation" serves as the start of the paper trail of the AIDS Holocaust.

In 1970, President Nixon signed PL91-213 and John D. Rockefeller, III became the "Population Czar." Nixon’s August 10 National Security Memo leaves no doubt as to the genocidal nature of depopulation.

some of the greater absurdities in the good dr boyd's report


In 1972, the United States and the Soviet Union entered into a biological agreement that would signal the death knell for the Black Population. The 1972 agreement for collaboration and cooperation in the development of offensive biological agents is still U. S. policy.


In 1974, Furher Henry Kissinger releases his NSSM-200 (U.S. Plan to Address Overpopulation). It is the only issue of discussion at the World Population Conference in Bucharest, Romania. • The men in the shadows had won, the whole world agrees to secretly cull Africa’s population. Today it is Africa and other undesirables. Tomorrow it may be you.

http://www.population-security.org/28-APP2.html. the full NSSM-200

just one excerpt from a very big document - wonder why the good doctor failed to provide actual excerpts from the fuhrer's plan grin

e U.S. should encourage heightened international interest in and commitment of resources to developing delivery mechanisms for providing integrated health and family planning services to neglected populations at costs which host countries can support within a reasonable period of time. Efforts would include:

1. Encouraging the World Bank and other international funding mechanisms, through the U.S. representatives on the boards of these organizations, to take a broader initiative in the development of inexpensive service delivery mechanisms in countries wishing to expand such systems.

2. Indicating U.S. willingness (as the U.S. did at the World Population Conference) to join with other donors and organizations to encourage and support further action by LDC governments and other institutions in the low-cost delivery systems area.

A. As offered at Bucharest, the U.S. should join donor countries, WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF and the World Bank to create a consortium to offer assistance to the more needy developing countries to establish their own low-cost preventive and curative public health systems reaching into all areas of their countries and capable of national support within a reasonable period. Such systems would include family planning services as an ordinary part of their overall services.

B. The WHO should be asked to take the leadership in such an arrangement and is ready to do so. Apparently at least half of the potential donor countries and the EEC's technical assistance program are favorably inclined. So is the UNFPA and UNICEF. The U.S., through its representation on the World Bank Board, should encourage a broader World Bank initiative in this field, particularly to assist in the development of inexpensive, basic health service infrastructures in countries wishing to undertake the development of such systems.

In 1976, the United States issues Progress Report #13 of the Special Virus program. The report proves the United States had various international agreements with the Russians, Germans, British, French, Canadians and Japanese. The plot to kill Black people has wide international support. In March, the Special Virus began production of the AIDS virus, by June 1977, the program will have produced 15,000 gallons of AIDS. President Jimmy Carter allows for the continuation of the secret plan to cull the Black Population.

In 1977, Dr. Robert Gallo and the top Soviet Scientists meet to discuss the proliferation of the 15,000 gallons of AIDS. They attach AIDS as complement to the Small pox vaccine for Africa, and the "experimental" hepatitis B vaccine for Manhattan. According to authors June Goodfield and Alan Cantwell, it is Batch #751 that was administered in New York to thousands of innocent people. This government will never be able to repay the people for the social rape, humiliation and out right prejudice people with HIV/AIDS face on a daily basis. The men in the shadows of the AIDS curtain accurately calculated that you would not care if only Blacks and gays are dying. In fact you don’t care that nearly a half million Gulf War veterans are encumbered with something contagious. Soon there will be no more Black people and a confused military, older White people will start suddenly dying and you still won’t get it. Be here now for us, give us a chance to be there for you.

so what was the fate of those thousands?


note that there are NO documents corroborating all these highlighted claims.
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by Pataki: 10:28am On Sep 07, 2009
Oyb and his wikipedia citations. How did he survive intellectually before the commencement of wiki? grin
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by zmurda(m): 10:46am On Sep 07, 2009
No2Atheism:


In 1974, Furher Henry Kissinger,

Henry Kissinger was of Jewish descent and fleed the Nazi Germany

cap28:



Obama's current health care and policy adviser, a Dr Ezekiel Emmanuel is an ardent supporter of depopulation ideology or eugenics, Emmanuel beleives that health care should be rationed and provided to only those who can participate fully in society - which means that if you are elderly and suffering from dementia or young and disabled with learning difficulties you could be denied health care on the grounds that you are not able to fully participate in society.  if you look at the intention behind this you could argue that these are attempts to introduce a gradual depopulation of american society by removing so called undesirables or people who are regarded as burdens on society.




Ezekiel Emmanuel opposes euthanasia, which does not seem to conform with your arguments. Betsy McCaughey deliberately misrepresented the truth in this case. Such baseless arguments should not be put in place to malign people or to support arguments
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by Nobody: 10:49am On Sep 07, 2009
Pataki:

Oyb and his wikipedia citations. How did he survive intellectually before the commencement of wiki? grin

see who is talking - how would u survive without the Internet which enabled you to plagiarize negro and ibime's counter disses wink

na because of the same internet some people can come and blow opata theories about how the white race engaged in a conspiracy to decimate blacks cheesy cheesy
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by No2Atheism(m): 12:20pm On Sep 07, 2009
oyb:


contrast this timeline with boyd graves timeline

http://www.gene.ch/gentech/2001/Feb/msg00017.html
some of the greater absurdities in the good dr boyd's report



1. Finally oyb is starting to use his thinking faculty and not a jihadic dogmatic mentality  grin grin grin.

2. A Few Good Questions . . . to which i have no answer, because I am not here to defend Boyd Greaves instead i want sound academic presentation as to how he could have been wrong . . . @oyb please remember i said academic argument not[b] wikitainment[/b].




note that there are NO documents corroborating all these highlighted claims. 

Haba again u are starting to go off the bend . . . they are events wit date i.e. things that happened in time off which common sense says u can check with the Library of Congress as to whether or not those things actually happened geez do i have to do your thinking for you dooh  undecided undecided


http://www.population-security.org/28-APP2.html. the full  NSSM-200

just one excerpt from a very big document - wonder why the good doctor failed to provide actual excerpts from the fuhrer's plan  grin

so what was the fate of those thousands?
.

1. More melodrama
2. Its an open secret that Kissinger does not hide his intentions . . . never knew you had become a PR for him.
3. " . . .  wonder why the good doctor failed to provide actual excerpts from the fuhrer's plan  grin . . . '' cough cough hmmm hmmm hmmm cough cough  grin grin grin. . . you just answered your own question here '' . . . just one excerpt from a very big document - . . .''
4. Hmm Hmm PR Oyb have you read the document that you are referring to  grin or did you just wikisearch it to find counter arguments  cheesy grin


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIDS#History


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_AIDS

Please nooooooooooooooooooooooo  shocked shocked shocked shocked  not more quoting of wikipedia . . .  cry cry cry cry cry pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee  grin grin grin grin grin

shocked shocked shocked shocked coming from a guy who believes in allah and the quran , hmm i am not suprised. I would suggest you also include Microsoft Encarta while you are at it.

I was about to hail you , then gbam u did it again and I started losing respect for your statements the moment you started using Wikipedia again  shocked shocked shocked.

For goodness sake oyb how many times does it have to smack you in the head i.e. Wikipedia is not a reliable source to be quoted in matters of academic and historical accuracy.

For goodness sake excercise this brain and find better sources.

You are accusing Boyd of being a  kook yet here you are quoting from an unreliable source as if its the reliable quran  cool cool cool grin grin grin (pun intendedgrin grin grin  cool cool cool
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by No2Atheism(m): 12:22pm On Sep 07, 2009
z-murda:

Henry Kissinger was of Jewish descent and fleed the Nazi Germany


Ezekiel Emmanuel opposes euthanasia, which does not seem to conform with your arguments. Betsy McCaughey deliberately misrepresented the truth in this case. Such baseless arguments should not be put in place to malign people or to support arguments

Nice points, i welcome good arguments like these and not the melodrama that i have been seeing . . .

Betsy McCaughey deliberately misrepresented the truth in this case

Please can u expanciate more on the so called deliberate misrepresentation of the truth.

1. Which truth was misrepresented.
2. How was it misrepresented.
3. When was it misrepresented.
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by No2Atheism(m): 12:31pm On Sep 07, 2009
@others

1. Please i would be glad if this thread is not derailed.

2. Other people posting irrelevancy without really bringing anything to the table in terms of sound academic arguments, i would suggest you use other areas of nairaland to increase your post count instead of this thread.
Please i beg you, let this thread remain as a sound expose of how Boyd can be right or wrong.

Thank you
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by Nobody: 12:49pm On Sep 07, 2009
i trust our resident spammer tongue

we all know that he actually believes that oyinbos 'created ' hiv. was he not the one going on about tuskgee airmen and biological warfare? when called out he retreats to the skirts of 'academic argument ' you should be ashamed of yourself - did you even read through the drivel you originally posted? if you did you would not have posted the embarrassing article in the first place.
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by Nobody: 12:55pm On Sep 07, 2009
1. Please i would be glad if this thread is not derailed.

stop being a hypocrite - you have repeatedly tried to derail this thread with your snide references to Islam. why are you even bothering us? shebi your god spoke to you and told you jesus is black - ask him , instead of spamming the politics board with conspiracy theories that belong in the back page of the sun tongue
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by cap28: 1:29pm On Sep 07, 2009
Ezekiel Emmanuel opposes euthanasia, which does not seem to conform with your arguments. Betsy McCaughey deliberately misrepresented the truth in this case. Such baseless arguments should not be put in place to malign people or to support arguments

Ezekiel Emmanuel wrote an article in  1996 setting out how medical care should be rationed, favouring an approach which guaranteed medical care to people who were active and denying care to the elderly he used the example of an elderly person with dementia and stated that such a person would not be guaranteed to receive health care, yes he hasnt openly stated that he supports euthanasia but if you state that you will not guarantee treatment to a person over a certain age who is suffering from certain types of illnessess are you not implicitly favouring euthanasia?  also emmanuel favours the use of "living wills" where (elderly) patients are counselled on making decisions that center around shortening their lives in order to save on govt expenditure.   in january this year emmanuel went on the record to back a policy which favours giving priority to younger (active) people who are ill rather than older people, therefore to call that a baseless argument shows just how removed from reality people like you are - please at least do the research before you get on your high horse about things you know nothing about.


Henry Kissinger was of Jewish descent and fleed the Nazi Germany

so?? i dont understand the significance of this statement - yes he fled persecution from nazi germany but he played an active part in rehabilitating thousands of nazi scientists in the US who were responsible for the genocide of jews - please read about the role he played in operation paperclip after the second world war - Kissinger is an ardent advocate of the genocide of non white people as set out in his memo NSSM 200 written in 1974 whilst he was national security adviser during the Nixon administration.
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by No2Atheism(m): 4:44pm On Sep 07, 2009
oyb:

stop being a hypocrite - you have repeatedly tried to derail this thread with your snide references to Islam. why are you even bothering us? shebi your god spoke to you and told you jesus is black - ask him , instead of spamming the politics board with conspiracy theories that belong in the back page of the sun  tongue

oyb:

i trust our resident spammer  tongue

we all know that he actually believes that oyinbos 'created ' hiv. was he not the one going on about tuskgee airmen and biological warfare? when called out he retreats to the skirts of 'academic argument ' you should be ashamed of yourself - did you even read through the drivel you originally posted? if you did you would not have posted the embarrassing article in the first place.




Okay u have been heard now hop along . . .  grin grin grin or do i have to sprinkle you with islamic holy water  grin


-----------------------------------------------------------

. . . . . One truly has to weep for Africa if family men like[b] oyb [/b]exhibit this level of historical ignorance and geo-political naivety . . . . . .  sad sad sad

For the record, in case other people want to know where i stand on this topic.


1. Yes i find what Boyd to be[b] very very very plausible [/b]going by historical precedents, current geo-politics and evidences presented by Boyd.

2. Yes i am guilty of prefering academic references and non-wikipedia references for the simple reason that its on record that organisations like the CIA have been caught red-handed editing Wikipedia information (probably for propanganda purpose). Hence if disinformation through wikipedia was not important, then CIA would not be doing it . . . as reported here . Hence common sense tells everyone that it means for matters of strict accuracy, wikipedia simply cannot be trusted (unless u are called oyb  grin grin grin grin).

Before you claim you don't believe that CIA was caught editing wikipedia, the following are pages reporting that same . . . knock yourself out.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6579

http://www.wired.com/politics/onlinerights/news/2007/08/wiki_tracker

[url]http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2007/08/14/the-cia-really-is-editing-wikipedia/[/url]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6947532.stm

http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN1642896020070816



3. However if u take time to actually study the topic before responding, you would notice that it was presented in the form of a question (meaning that even though i find it plausible, nevertheless I am still a sceptic hence open to contrary opinions that can invalidate what Boyd said). Yes off course i understand that its your personal goal to oppose no2atheism since no2atheism does not believe in the crap of allah the moon god and mohammed the peadophile.


4. Yes the Messiah is Black deal with it . . . (ooops sorry that would mean islam cannot link the Bible to catholic idolatory since most of islams so called gripe is with catholism . . . my bad now i understand your gripe  grin grin grin) -  The Bible says so in black and white, i don't do dogmas i deal with historical and biblical facts. Anyone (and I seriously mean anyone) that says the Messiah is white can kindly show me the verse or verses of the bible that says so ( grin grin grin grin oops my bad there is none  grin grin grin grin).


5. Oyb heya sorry yes i know u want to strangle me or deal with me for being very blunt with islam, oops sorry no can do . . .

was he not the one going on about tuskgee airmen and biological warfare?
shocked shocked shocked shocked


6. I think u better break your fast earlier today, cus it seems hunger is making you confuse me with someone else 


7. Yes i don't completely support Boyd for the simple reason that i am not dogmatic, hence i am open to arguments that accurately show where and how he is wrong (THIS MEANS THAT I AM NOT DOGMATICALLY BELIEVING EVERYTHING HE HAS PRESENTED INSTEAD I AM WILLING AND ABLE TO CHANGE MY OWN PERSONAL CONCLUSION BASED ON CONTRARY EVIDENCE). Yet till now i am yet to see one from our esteemed wikitourist (oyb)  grin grin grin and others that seem to term as conspiracy, everything that shakes up their worldview.

FURTHER CONTRIBUTION TO THE THREAD IS WELCOMED . . .
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by Pataki: 5:08pm On Sep 07, 2009
oyb:

see who is talking - how would u survive without the Internet which enabled you to plagiarize negro and ibime's counter disses wink
Are you on hallucination pills? Do you just want to make do with words to depict you can also type in English language? Plagiarize negro and Ibime's counter disses? Where? Cheap lies to make sound as what? undecided

oyb:
na because of the same internet some people can come and blow opata theories about how the white race engaged in a conspiracy to decimate blacks cheesy cheesy
And wikipedia has the best answer for you intellectually, to refute these opata theories? Carry on!
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by No2Atheism(m): 5:20pm On Sep 07, 2009
In academics, you deal with your eyes, ears and logic. In this case what Boyd is saying sounds very very plausbile as far as academic logic is concerned. Nevertheless academic logic requires there to be a review process of what is being said, so as to remove all possibilities of doubt.

They say pictures are worth a thousand words, hence below are pictures showing part of the reason why i find what Dr. Boyd is saying to be plausible . . .

Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by No2Atheism(m): 5:21pm On Sep 07, 2009
Additional pictures showing part of the reason why i find what Dr. Boyd is saying to be plausible . . .

Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by No2Atheism(m): 5:22pm On Sep 07, 2009
Additional pictures showing part of the reason why i find what Dr. Boyd is saying to be plausible . . .

Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by No2Atheism(m): 5:30pm On Sep 07, 2009

Is it possible for Boyd to be wrong - Yes absolutely.
Has anyone shown that Boyd is wrong so far - Not Yet.


In as much as Boyd can be wrong in certain cases , nevertheless i find it astounding that oyb and others are displaying a disgusting level of academic and legal naivety, because common sense tells anyone that since Boyd has already taking his case to court, it means most (if not all) of is deposition as concern this case would have been strictly scrutinised within the US Legal system (which people know to be litigious and unfriendly).

This means this attempt by oyb and in some cases Beaf to ridicule the deposition of Dr. Boyd by trying to tie him to kookoo conspiracy theorist is nothing short of distasteful.

Hence once again i say, that anyone that does not have anything constructive and academically intelligent to say would do well to watch and study the responses of others before making a contribution to the thread . . .

Its better wen people keep quiet and let people think they are smart, rather than speak and confirm the opposite.
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by cap28: 6:01pm On Sep 07, 2009
In 1969, Fort Detrick told world scientists and the Pentagon asked for more money, they knew they could make AIDS. Nixon’s July 18 secret memo to Congress on “Overpopulation” serves as the start of the paper trail of the AIDS Holocaust.

this seems to tally up with the following:  

1969: On June 9, 1969, Dr. D.M. McArtor, then Deputy Director of Research and Technology for the Department of Defense, appeared before the House Subcommittee on Appropriations to request funding for a project to produce a synthetic biological agent for which humans have not yet acquired a natural immunity. Dr. McArtor asked for $10 million dollars to produce this agent over the next 5-10 years. The Congressional Record reveals that according to the plan for the development of this germ agent, the most important characteristic of the new disease would be "that it might be refractory [resistant] to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease". AIDS first appeared as a public health risk ten years later, appearing first in a population of gay men who had been subjects in a test of a new Hepatitas vaccine. In 1989, work by Alan Cantwell Jr., M.D. linking AIDS to the hepatitis B viral vaccine experiments was suppressed at the 1989 AIDS International Conference by officials of the World Health Organization.


and see this:

1970: Funding for the synthetic biological agent is obtained under H.R. 15090. The project, under the supervision of the CIA, is carried out by the Special Operations Division at Fort Detrick, the army's top secret biological weapons facility. Speculation is raised that molecular biology techniques are used to produce AIDS-like retroviruses.

1970: United States intensifies its development of "ethnic weapons" (Military Review, Nov., 1970), designed to selectively target and eliminate specific ethnic groups who are susceptible due to genetic differences and variations in DNA.
1972: President Nixon announced a ban on the production and use of biological (but not chemical) warfare agents. However, as the Army's own experts reveal, this ban is meaningless because the studies required to protect against biological warfare weapons are generally indistinguishable from those to develop the actual chemical weapons. Research on offensive bio-war continued under the justification that such research was a necessary pre-cursor to defensive bio-war.

1974: Less publicized was National Security Study memorandum 200. This document declared that overpopulation of the world posed a grave threat to the nation and urged the imposition of population control measures wherever possible. While the media have reported the forced sterilizations in China, Canada, and Sweden, the abuses of the sterilization programs here in the United States remain concealed from public view. A class action suit in Los Angeles revealed that Chicano women were being sterilized immediatly after giving birth. The non-English speaking women had been given sterilization consent forms in English and were told the operation was to deal with the after-affects of the pregnancy. Similar abuses were reported on reservations, with estimates of coerced or covert sterilization running as high as one woman out of every four. Yet another lawsuit in New York and a scandal in Puerto Rico led to the passage of laws requiring a standardized consent form printed in multiple languages in 1979.

More can be found in,  Michael Parenti. [book] "Democracy for the Few" (St. Martin's Press 1995)
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by spikedcylinder: 6:02pm On Sep 07, 2009
A little off topic but Dr. Boyd's suit is just wrong. cheesy
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by zmurda(m): 6:03pm On Sep 07, 2009
No2Atheism:


Is it possible for Boyd to be wrong - Yes absolutely.
Has anyone shown that Boyd is wrong so far - Not Yet.



Its better wen people keep quiet and let people think they are smart, rather than speak and confirm the opposite.

It is quite possible for you to be very wrong in the same vein. Is there anything in HIV/AIDS that makes it affect only the black people? I mean does it selectively target the black person's blood? Do you have any proof of this?

Was HIV introduced into Africa by the Oyinbos? What is you proof?

If you tell me the black people have been  systematically repressed and because of these repressions they have become ignorant and hence engage in activities that puts them in danger of HIV/AIDS I will be more convinced

But no Oyinbo man/Illuminati is forcing us to have unprotected sex, use unsterilized stuffs and other what nots that can put us in the danger of HIV. Do you think Thabo Mbeki who didn't believe in HIV and Zuma who engaged in unprotected sex with someone with HIV are agents of those who want to use HIV/AIDS as a biological weapon against the black populace? Or even myself when I have unprotected sex outside marriage!

I don't think so, I think its easy to blame others when the simple thing to do is change our lifestyle

Peace
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by texazzpete(m): 6:21pm On Sep 07, 2009
It amuses me when i see people dissing Wikipedia all in a bid to appear smart.
As an online Encyclopaedia, wikipedia is an extremely valuable resource. While some cases of vandalism exist, it's reliability in most cases speaks for itself.
Funny how it's only on Nairaland i see people sneering when someone refers to Wikipedia.

As far as the topic is concerned, why would any right-thinking adult imagine HIV-Aids would be a biological weapon against black people when it's a disease that

1. Readily infects whites also
2. Is impossible to effectively quarantine.
3. Has no known cure

Seems a clear case of misfiring cerebral neurons, if you ask me.
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by ekeroyal(m): 6:34pm On Sep 07, 2009
When will Nigerians and blacks as a race wake from their slumber. Truly in the words of a former african leader "the black colour is beclouding our brains". May God almighty deliver us.

When we suffer for our mistakes and stubbornness we blame people. How many whites will engage in illicit sex unprotected the way a black man would do?

How many white men will be sick and refuse medical attention?

How many blacks will accept it when they are diagnosed of HIV/AIDS and not say it's a demonic attack?

The Black race have failed because we refuse to leave up to expectation even though science started with us. If only we shall wake up!
Re: Is Hiv Aids A Biological Weapon Against Black People ? by Beaf: 7:50pm On Sep 07, 2009
spikedcylinder:

A little off topic but Dr. Boyd's suit is just wrong. cheesy

That is usually a measure of wackiness. Wacky fashion = wacky mind. cool

(1) (2) (3) (Reply)

Gunmen Invade Idps Camp In Benue, Kill 7 / Nnamdi Kanu’s Family May Sue UK Govt Over "Illegal Rendition" Of IPOB Leader / Why Do Countries Evacuate Citizens In War Countries

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 166
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.