Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,157,364 members, 7,833,364 topics. Date: Sunday, 19 May 2024 at 07:32 PM

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (163) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (993743 Views)

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President Trump / Photos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian. / @elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) ... (160) (161) (162) (163) (164) (165) (166) ... (668) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 9:48pm On Apr 27, 2017
tdayof:
grin grin grin grin

Don't mind me.
I still de yarn
by d tym dz asha go enter we grounds en,im induction go b like tourist attraction grin

meanwhile u know abt Chinese ECM pods, kindly share
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by lionel4power(m): 10:53pm On Apr 27, 2017
is it just me or it looks like the F 5 tiger from the right view??

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 4:00am On Apr 28, 2017
Odunayaw:
I still de yarn
by d tym dz asha go enter we grounds en,im induction go b like tourist attraction grin

meanwhile u know abt Chinese ECM pods, kindly share

Chinese ECM no. I don't think I have ever thought about checking or reading about it.

Here's something worth reading.
http://www.c4isrnet.com/articles/breaking-down-chinas-electronic-warfare-tactics
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Adminisher: 6:05am On Apr 28, 2017
jakeporeshenko:

Looks like the Fc 2000 to me
100 per cent correct
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:37am On Apr 28, 2017
Luigi Rizzo (F595) FREMM fregate with Amerigo Vespucci school ship - Itialian navy

3 Likes

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 1:30pm On Apr 28, 2017
You guys are all wrong. grin grin

The JF-17B looks so much like a Mirage-2000D

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 1:35pm On Apr 28, 2017
Henry240:
You guys are all wrong. grin grin

The JF-17B looks so much like a Mirage-2000D

I guess the double seat caused all these. lol
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 1:39pm On Apr 28, 2017
Henry240:
You guys are all wrong. grin grin
The JF-17B looks so much like a Mirage-2000D
grin difference I can spot at once Spine length tail
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 10:59am On Apr 29, 2017
....

2 Likes

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 11:03am On Apr 29, 2017
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:15pm On Apr 29, 2017
Typical ASW mission profiles for choppers

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 7:21pm On Apr 29, 2017
Welcome. grin grin
nemesis2u:
Typical ASW mission profiles for choppers
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:44pm On Apr 29, 2017
satellite pic of INS Arihant india's first SSBN , u can notice the hatches of the missile silos r open (the white patches)

many don't know this that the Arihant was first designed to be a SSN but midway , due to change of strategic power play the SSN design was converted into SSBN design hence the smaller number of missile silos.

its primary purpose was to validate Indian technologies and design competency towards building SSN/SSBN technologies together with integrating and validating SLBM launch from these subs.

its follow through INS Aridhaman will have more silos either 8 or 10 .

there will be another SSBN of Arihant class after which a new design with ability to carry either 20 or 24 SLBMs will be built.

then all the Arihant class SSBNs will be converted into SSGNs.

also construction of india's first SSN is progressing well, the hull has been laid down , but info is restricted on this project.

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:21pm On Apr 29, 2017
tdayof:
Welcome. grin grin

lol

unfortunately that EW post will take some time more

but i got a clue for u , which should get ur lazy ass moving grin

a ship borne ECM jammer can deliver significantly high effective radiated power (ERP) for effective jamming, anywhere in the order of 100 KW upwards.

do u think a aircraft borne jammer can deliver enough power to chew through that ?

grin grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 8:34pm On Apr 29, 2017
nemesis2u:


lol

unfortunately that EW post will take some time more

but i got a clue for u , which should get ur lazy ass moving

a ship borne ECM jammer can radiate more than 40,000 watts of power ( lowest estimate ) do u think a aircraft borne jammer can deliver enough power to chew through that ?

grin

I doubt if an airborne ECM jammer will ever do such. The AN-ALQ99 radiates less than 7000watts.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:36pm On Apr 29, 2017
tdayof:


I doubt if an airborne ECM jammer will ever do such. The AN-ALQ99 radiates less than 7000watts.

edited my first post

40 KW upwards is for smaller ships like frigates etc (not necessarily though)

destroyers etc have more potent ECM
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:40pm On Apr 29, 2017
tdayof:


I doubt if an airborne ECM jammer will ever do such. The AN-ALQ99 radiates less than 7000watts.

did u know that shipborne ECM jammers r used to break target lock of the active seekers of AShMs.

unfortunately much of this is classified
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 8:50pm On Apr 29, 2017
nemesis2u:


edited my post first post

40 KW upwards is for smaller ships like frigates etc (not necessarily though)

Okay then I think the issue here is that a ship can radiate 40k but the same ship can have its radar jammed by an airborne electronic warfare aircraft saturating 3kw of noise power.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 8:51pm On Apr 29, 2017
nemesis2u:


did u know that shipborne ECM jammers r used to break target lock of the active seekers of AShMs.

unfortunately much of this is classified

Yes, I have read it somewhere. I have a declassified PDF of the DOD on ECM.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Adminisher: 1:04am On Apr 30, 2017
Odunayaw:
the only explainable reason for getting block 1s would be demonic interference

Refuel tankers?? not even a gossip grin
but I think the combat range of the Jf17 is pretty okay + I don't see us dropping bombs in any where outsyd our borders in d foreseeable future

but i'd like me some Tankers tho


My calculations and I might be very wrong is we are getting 3 nos JF17B first which is JF 17 Block 2 fighter + trainer
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 1:18am On Apr 30, 2017
Adminisher:



My calculations and I might be very wrong is we are getting 3 nos JF17B first which is JF 17 Block 2 fighter + trainer
If the JF17B is block 2 then why no refueling probe ?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:22am On Apr 30, 2017
tdayof:


Okay then I think the issue here is that a ship can radiate 40k but the same ship can have its radar jammed by an airborne electronic warfare aircraft saturating 3kw of noise power.



its like u have been tasked to destroy a tank , but in terms of fire power u have been given a considerably less potent weapon ie RPG.

so what i will do is settle for a mobility kill , the best a RPG can do for u in a best case scenario.


same for a ships radar , head to head i cannot utilize my jammers to directly take it on , so what i will try to do is confuse / distract etc the radar / radar operator.

u must understand airborne jammers r used as a prelude to near simultaneous attack runs by airborne assets using missiles/bombs etc.

the objective of the airborne jammers is to decoy/confuse/overload the defensive/offensive EM spectrum capabilities of a ship for a bare minimum time at the least in order to facilitate a successful attack and nothing more.

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:28am On Apr 30, 2017
Nemesis2u, do you have any technical details on the pod used by Egypt's Mig-29m?

Is it Russian or Western?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:35am On Apr 30, 2017
Henry240:
Nemesis2u, do you have any technical details on the pod used by Egypt's Mig-29m?

Is it Russian or Western?

no idea

but methinks it should be Russians

the Egyptians seems to keep their western and eastern block weaponry isolated as a hedge against any possible western sanctions

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:58am On Apr 30, 2017
nemesis2u:


no idea

but methinks it should be Russians

the Egyptians seems to keep their western and eastern block weaponry isolated as a hedge against any possible western sanctions

It's the targeting pod which i find more interesting. I have never seen it before. There is also no information available online, or at least in english available . It is called a PPK or PKK pod, something like that.

It is smart that way, just in case of sanctions.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:06am On Apr 30, 2017
Henry240:


It's the targeting pod which i find more interesting. I have never seen it before. There is also no information available online, or at least in english available . It is called a PPK or PKK pod, something like that.

It is smart that way, just in case of sanctions.

post the pic
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:32am On Apr 30, 2017
nemesis2u:


post the pic

I can't find a pic of it. However here is what i found.

Egypt will be equipped with the PPK targeting pod comprising thermal imager/TV systems and laser rangefinders allowing the employment of not only precision-guided munitions (PGM), e.g. bombs and missiles carrying TV or laser homing heads, but also ‘dumb’ munitions with a circular error probable (CEP) of tens of centimeters.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 12:58pm On Apr 30, 2017
JF17B

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 1:07pm On Apr 30, 2017
tdayof:
JF17B

Any pictures of the HUD and MFD available?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu2: 1:18pm On Apr 30, 2017
We don't pay attention to the[b] real causes of war.[/b] What makes people take up arms in the first place? Why do we invest in weapons systems and armies? Once you look deeper at wars and those who fight them the truth is astonishing.

The Black Confederates of the US Civil War

We were told Lincoln declared war to fight the slave owning states and free the slaves-REEAAALLLLYYYY??

Once you look at the Confederate leaders and their soldiers the narrative falls to pieces. Confederate leader Jefferson Davis and wife,Vanna Howells.

"When you eliminate the black Confederate soldier, you've eliminated the history of the South." quoted from General Robert E. Lee, in 1864.

I was in every battle General Forrest fought after leaving Columbia...I was mustered out at Gainesville (Alabama,May 1865)
[url]The Forgotten Confederates[/url]

Obviously,many blacks fought for the South,and they weren't slaves,in fact many owned slaves;even white slaves!

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 1:27pm On Apr 30, 2017
Henry240:


Any pictures of the HUD and MFD available?
No, but once I see, I will post.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 1:27pm On Apr 30, 2017
...
tdayof:
No, but once I see, I will post.

1 Like

(1) (2) (3) ... (160) (161) (162) (163) (164) (165) (166) ... (668) (Reply)

American Politics Thread - 2024 Elections — Biden’s Presidency! / Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . / Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa?

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 37
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.