Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,152,692 members, 7,816,825 topics. Date: Friday, 03 May 2024 at 06:02 PM

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (410) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (987991 Views)

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President Trump / Photos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian. / @elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) ... (407) (408) (409) (410) (411) (412) (413) ... (667) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by newafricaken254: 4:50pm On May 05, 2018
China PLAN East Sea Fleet's Y-8Q ASW variant

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by lionel4power(m): 7:55pm On May 05, 2018
newafricaken254:
China PLAN East Sea Fleet's Y-8Q ASW variant
Spot the M.A.D
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by newafricaken254: 7:33am On May 06, 2018
off topic: Osonde Osoba works at the leading edge of artificial intelligence (AI). His recent work explores society's growing reliance on autonomous machines, and what it means for security and the future of work. He also has highlighted concerns that algorithms too often rely on historically biased data, preserving and extending those biases in everything from criminal sentencing to mortgage approvals to credit access. He was introduced as the “engineer of fairness” at a recent TEDx talk. Osoba grew up in Nigeria, earned his Ph.D. in electrical engineering at the University of Southern California, and came to RAND(an American nonprofit global policy think tank) first as a summer associate in 2012 and then as an engineer in 2014.

 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4l_LZ5NcIBI
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by newafricaken254: 3:43pm On May 06, 2018
turkey Aselsan AESA Multi Function Radar

 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWdU9mrELpU
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by newafricaken254: 3:48pm On May 06, 2018
Pakistan Army - Airforce | Joint conventional fire power capability Test in Central Command exercise at Jhelum

 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwwdpqY085I
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by newafricaken254: 3:58pm On May 06, 2018
Test frames of the newest Russian UAV "Korsar"

 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zy4XPT2BD0c

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by newafricaken254: 4:05pm On May 06, 2018
Russia MI-35M attack helicopter

 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipfLEMfTLE8
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidex111: 9:12pm On May 06, 2018
Ouch. An Indian Army Rudra armed copter had a hard landing near Jodhpur on Friday. Brown out impact.

2 Likes

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidex111: 9:28am On May 07, 2018
#Russia Armed Forces Uran-6 and Uran-9 UGV also Katran and Korsar UAV during the night rehearsal for #VictoryDay parade.

2 Likes

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by SternProphet: 12:33pm On May 07, 2018
bidex111:
Ouch. An Indian Army Rudra armed copter had a hard landing near Jodhpur on Friday. Brown out impact.
That's an odd place to mount FLIR
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Patchesagain: 12:47pm On May 07, 2018
Suprised to see this bad-boy hasnt seen more use in the African battle space.

Would be great to outfit a light Cav unit wit - highly mobile formations who's job is to either screen your main force in conventional operations (on the front during an advance, or the flanks during an attack) or form a QRF in the event that any large insurgent groupings are identified.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inVEUV_T8aM

@Frumentus

2 Likes

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 12:07pm On May 11, 2018
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by lionel4power(m): 12:25pm On May 11, 2018
giles14:
http://alert5.com/2018/05/11/video-of-israeli-air-strike-on-syrian-pantsir-s1/
seems like the pantsir is a very potent system
the missile hit the pantsir S1
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 12:43pm On May 11, 2018
lionel4power:
the missile hit the pantsir S1
I believe it was its potency that made the Israeli strike it.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by SternProphet: 12:46pm On May 11, 2018
lionel4power:
the missile hit the pantsir S1

Israel will destroy or render useless any S-300 or S-400 systems delivered to Syria. They don't have to use just one airstrike.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by lionel4power(m): 1:43pm On May 11, 2018
giles14:
I believe it was its potency that made the Israeli strike it.
Israel's continuous attack on Syria have started making me doubt Russia's air defence systems capability
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 1:44pm On May 11, 2018
SternProphet:


Israel will destroy or render useless any S-300 or S-400 systems delivered to Syria. They don't have to use just one airstrike.
it will depend on the relationship BTW them and Russia then Russia and syria
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by lionel4power(m): 1:49pm On May 11, 2018
SternProphet:


Israel will destroy or render useless any S-300 or S-400 systems delivered to Syria. They don't have to use just one airstrike.

the way some of you guys come here and boldly make grand claims makes me wonder if some of you even understand the dynamics and variables involved in today's battlefield.

for every singular action taken.... a wide range of factors is considered.

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by lionel4power(m): 2:24pm On May 11, 2018
Future of Russia's A2D2

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 2:27pm On May 11, 2018
lionel4power:


the way some of you guys come here and boldly make grand claims makes me wonder if some of you even understand the dynamics and variables involved in today's battlefield.

for every singular action taken.... a wide range of factors is considered.
I fear o

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by SternProphet: 2:43pm On May 11, 2018
lionel4power:


the way some of you guys come here and boldly make grand claims makes me wonder if some of you even understand the dynamics and variables involved in today's battlefield.

for every singular action taken.... a wide range of factors is considered.

Yeah. Netanyahu visits Moscow every month pressing Jewish indigeneship buttons on both sides so Israel Russia conflict is remote ..but it will not be a fair fight. They won't allow advanced missiles in Syria or Lebanon. They can't help it if it's deployed in Iran.
I am not in support of Donald Trump btw . I think the man is an idxxt, oversimplistic and insecure amateur politician trying to whip up his base. Europe will render the US irrelevant and powerless in influence within the next few years.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 2:53pm On May 11, 2018
lionel4power:
Israel's continuous attack on Syria have started making me doubt Russia's air defence systems capability
I don't doubt the Russian system only that dey don't want to be drawn into the secondary war.

but I thought the Iranians said they have a system more capable than the Russian S300 sam.just wondering why their are not yet deployed.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by SternProphet: 3:11pm On May 11, 2018
giles14:
I don't doubt the Russian system only that dey don't want to be drawn into the secondary war.

but I thought the Iranians said they have a system more capable than the Russian S300 sam.just wondering why their are not yet deployed.
1. Will S-400 stop F-35s firing cruise missiles? Maybe not.
2. There is a time lag between receiving S-400 missile system and commissioning / operationalize them. Won't Israel most likely take them out before they are installed. They have the intelligence capabilities. They even have people in Russia who will deliver the relevant info the next day they are shipped
3. Dense UAV actions combined with commandos.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by lionel4power(m): 4:22pm On May 11, 2018
Israeli strikes used 28 planes, 70 missiles: Russia

10th May 2018 - 13:45 GMT | by ​Agence France-Presse in Moscow

RSS

Israel's strikes on Syria saw 28 planes take part in raids with a total of around 70 missiles fired, the Russian Ministry of Defence (MoD) said on 10 May.

The MoD said in a statement: ‘28 Israeli F-15 and F-16 aircraft were used in the attack, which released around 60 air-to-ground missiles over various parts of Syria. Israel also fired more than 10 tactical ground-to-ground missiles.’

Russia said Syria's air defence systems shot down more than half of the missiles, while the extent of the damage was still being assessed.

The MoD said: ‘The locations of Iranian armed groups and also the positions of the Syrian army's air defences in the area around Damascus and in the south of Syria were attacked.’

Israel carried out the raids after it said around 20 rockets were fired from Syria at its forces in the occupied Golan Heights overnight.

It blamed the rocket fire on Iran's Al-Quds force, adding that Israel's anti-missile system intercepted four of the projectiles while the rest did not land in its territory.

On 10 May Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Bogdanov called for ‘restraint on all sides’, adding that Moscow was ‘concerned’ at the development.

The strikes came a day after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu held talks in Moscow with Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose country has provided massive military and diplomatic backing to the regime of President Bashar al-Assad in Syria's seven-year civil war.

At the meeting Putin also expressed ‘deep concern’ over US President Donald Trump's decision to withdraw from a key 2015 Iran nuclear deal on 8 May, a decision Netanyahu supported.

On 9 May the Russian leader called the situation in the Middle East ‘unfortunately very acute.’

Netanyahu had told Putin that ‘it is the right of every state, certainly the right of Israel, to take the necessary steps in order to protect itself from (Iranian) aggression),’ his office said in a statement on 9 May, referring to Iran's presence in Syria.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Whyem15: 7:19pm On May 11, 2018
Please note that more than half of the 70 missiles fired were destroyed in flight by the old Syrian air defense systems together with some of the pantsirs
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Whyem15: 7:33pm On May 11, 2018
Come to think of it, Iran is not stupid enough to fire mere rockets at Israel when they have sophisticated ballistic missiles and not stupid enough not to deploy counter measures knowing Israel will surely retaliate, news coming out right now says Iran denies firing rockets at Israeli soldiers. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2018/05/iran-israeli-claims-fabricated-baseless-180511063809142.html
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by SternProphet: 8:20am On May 12, 2018
Whyem15:
Combv to think of it, Iran is not stupid enough to fire mere rockets at Israel when they have sophisticated ballistic missiles and not stupid enough not to deploy counter measures knowing Israel will surely retaliate, news coming out right now says Iran denies firing rockets at Israeli soldiers. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2018/05/iran-israeli-claims-fabricated-baseless-180511063809142.html

Iran is actually denying that their forces were attacked in Syria. This is a reluctance to admit failures. They are only saying that Israel committed aggression against Syria.
The original Israeli statement was clear and specific. They hit all Iranian bases in Syria and destroyed all.

This notion of missiles intercepts by Pantisir system belongs to the era of non smart, inertial guidance only missiles , the missiles that we saw in action evaded all intercepts and they had video cameras showing their homing towards objectives till destruction of targets were achieved.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Whyem15: 8:57am On May 12, 2018
Any proof to show that Iranian targets were destroyed? The only proof of the attack was the video showing the attack on the Syrian pantsir. The same Russia that accurately reported that 28 F15s and F16s fired 60 air to surface missiles and land based systems fired 10 missiles are also the ones to claim more than half of the missiles were intercepted.


'It was either disabled or out of ammo': How Israelis hit the Syrian SA-22 air defense system
Published time: 11 May, 2018 23:18
Edited time: 12 May, 2018 04:39
A Pantsir-S1 (NATO reporting name SA-22 Greyhound) air defense system © Evgeny Biyatov
A functional SA-22 would never let a missile reach it, a former deputy head of the Russian Air Force told RT. The Russian-made system filmed getting hit by an Israeli missile in Syria was either turned off or out of ammo.
Following a massive airstrike on what it called Iranian targets in Syria on Thursday, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have released footage taken aboard a Spike NLOS cruise missile, which is seen hitting what appears to be a Pantsir-S1 (NATO reporting name SA-22 Greyhound) air defense system.
There can be only two possible explanations for a successful strike against a Pantsir-S1: "One is that it had already used up its ammunition reserve. The other is that it was simply turned off; it wasn't battle ready," Aytech Bizhev, a former Russian Air Force Deputy Commander-in-Chief, said.
"There can be no third option as it wouldn't have let itself to be destroyed… When it's battle-ready it performs constant surveillance of enemy aircraft and has a very fast reaction time. It would've brought down those cruise missiles with either its cannons or own missiles," he explained.
The Israeli footage shows none of the Syrian Pantsir's weapons were even pointing at the incoming missile. The three human figures standing outside the vehicle in the video, likely the crew, also suggest that it wasn't operational at the time of the attack.
According to Bizhev, the Israeli Air Force used its geographical advantage to catch the Syrian military off guard on Thursday.
"No matter how well-trained your personnel is and how good your hardware is, you know that the fly-in time between Israel and Syria is zero [as the countries have a common border]. Furthermore, the Israeli F15 and F16 fighters carried out the airstrikes without entering the [Syrian] air defense area."
"They approached at low altitudes then bounced from behind the Golan Heights, carried out the attack and left," he added.
According to the expert, the Pantsir-S1 "requires between three to five minutes to go operational." Keeping the systems on full alert at all times is impossible, mainly because it's going to be absolutely exhausting for the crew.
READ MORE: Israeli strikes on Syria raise threat of military confrontation with Tehran – Russian MP
A military observer for the Gazeta.ru website, retired Colonel Mikhail Khodorenok, also pointed out that the Russian-made system wasn't in any way camouflaged or placed in a specially prepared position at the time of the airstrike. "This indicates that the Pantsir- S1 wasn't ready for engagement."
Khodorenok said that incident in Syria doesn't give a reason "to question the high combat capabilities" of the Pantsir-S1 system.
https://www.rt.com/news/426520-syria-israel-pantsir-russia/

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidex111: 2:21pm On May 14, 2018
Colourful infographics on military potential of #CentralAsia based on Global Firepower assessments

#Turkmenistan seems to have a lot of armour - rusty junk inherited from the then USSR

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by SternProphet: 10:28am On May 15, 2018
bidex111:
Ouch. An Indian Army Rudra armed copter had a hard landing near Jodhpur on Friday. Brown out impact.

This is a properly designed chopper. Good aerostructure design

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:56pm On May 19, 2018
X

(1) (2) (3) ... (407) (408) (409) (410) (411) (412) (413) ... (667) (Reply)

American Politics Thread - 2024 Elections — Biden’s Presidency! / Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . / Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa?

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 55
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.