nemesis2u:


i dont think so because code is encrypted, almost unbreakable

f22 uses ada because ada is better however for F35 they selected c/c++ because of the lack of ada programmers , ada tools , training and processor support and to keep development costs down.

their first choice was always ada but because of the above reasons they selected c/c++
why do u think f35 is always running into software problems because as i already explained above it is due to the inherent deficiencies long associated with buffer overflows, type errors etc etc.
many of the deficiencies have been managed but still some manage to crop up inadvertently.

also the export F35 will get watered down and most probably "snoop enabled" software versions

china uses which language for its j10 j20 aircrafts

F-35 is a joint project with many US allies ,they must share some code at least partly.

Snoop enable version almost for sure

US has this habit .And most of their allies can't resist no matter how expensive it is.they have no other choice.they can't develop it indenpendently.

J20 has it's own operating system which is classified.

chinese8107:


F-35 is a joint project with many US allies ,they must share some code at least partly.

Snoop enable version almost for sure

US has this habit .And most of their allies can't resist no matter how expensive it is.they have no other choice.they can't develop it indenpendently.

J20 has it's own operating system which is classified.

lol i am asking about programming language

nemesis2u:


lol i am asking about programming language

the most widely used C/C++

off course. but not limited to .

Ka-52 with ASM KG-35U

chinese8107:


the most widely used C/C++

off course. but not limited to .

ru sure ?



anyways let the secrets be secrets

nemesis2u:


ru sure ?



anyways let the secrets be secrets

and then there is ADA which is a more secured language compared to the widely civilian used C++ . The US DOD outsourced the creation of ADA to Bell Tech and it is the language that powers most of the US Mil Apps.

overhypedsteve:
and then there is ADA which is a more secured language compared to the widely civilian uses C++

wrote a biggggg comparision about ada versus c/c++ (for avionics) above a few posts earlier

u missed it completely

feel free to join the party
nobody here is interested in technical stuffs it seems only photos

nemesis2u:


wrote a biggggg comparision about ada versus c/c++ (for avionics) above a few posts earlier

u missed it completely

feel free to join the party
nobody here is interested in technical stuffs it seems only photos

oh. I didn't see your earlier post. Thought you are asking about the various languages used for military applications. Yea we just want to see photos of some bad-ass Military tech. Keep it coming Boss I am Rooting for you straight from my couch control room.

overhypedsteve:
couch control room.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ljvIsTGn1o


HAL's HTT40 in its repainted avatar.

Russian SSO commandos in Syria



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9AUlDFt4m30

INS VIKRANT under construction

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeSQpg2xriE

Russian Spetsnaz in Syria

watch at .20s awesome hit

Hum shikari hein (we are the hunters)
Dushman hai shikaar (enemy is our prey)
Hinsa ke hum maalik hai (we are the owner of violence)
Tum bas kiraidaar (you are just a tenant )

some years back , the place (bunker) where this was scribbled in enemies blood as a warning had all the 22 tenants (enemies) dead to give weight to the warning !

New Video of Tejas Formation Landing from the Cockpit


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3gpW8XUQyY

D4 Fascination

German designed made in Germany or China ,made of composite materials not as expensive as a luxsry car ,even a civilian feels affordable

9.5 hour air endurance.
2200km range
270 kg payload
248km/hour speed

AVIC AC2

Cessna 208b Grand Caravan

US Amphibious plane assembed in China

AVIC HO300
amphibious

Patches689, Mikecza, africaken254


German tanks operated by turks get wrecked in Syria. Amazing time.
The Leo2A4

nemesis2u:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeSQpg2xriE
Russian Spetsnaz in Syria
watch at .20s awesome hit

Awesome!

Nemesis2u and chinese8107

What if your argument on the use of C++ for F-35 have something to do with cuda programming introduced in 2007. Cuda is an extention of C/C++ used for programming GPUs to process complex operations within a very short time.

Cuda is still very recent and only C/C++ can be used for now. Cuda enables parallel processing on the CPU and GPU simultaneously. GPUs have thousands of cores to compared to CPU with just few cores.

patches689:


It hit it on the side of the turret, A4's have weak armor there. This came up when news broke of them in Syria... consensus was they frontally they would be ok, but side on allmost any ATGM made after 1970 would penetrate

Hence the A7 has a huge block of add on armor there, same with the A5.

No one ever said western tanks are invincible, thats a strawman argument Russiaphiles create.

Pic: A4 on the right, A7 on the left

Fact remains, around 4 Turkish A4 tanks have been destroyed by Tow missiles in Syria. Whereas a single T-72B took two TOW missiles and survived.

T-90s have also performed pretty well in Syria, taking lots of direct hits.

My argument was over the years before the conflicts in Syria and Yemen, you kept on banging about the performance of the T-72 against the Abrams in the Iraqi Gulf war. Despite the fact that all the elements were in favour of the US and her allies in that conflict.

Today we see vehicles you claim to be superior been blow apart all over the conflicts in Syria and Yemen including significantly modernised Patton tanks fielded by Turkey and Saudi-Arabia, while their Russian equivalents in the same battles perform really well.


Even with the Add On armour, it would be the same effect as newer model ATGMs enter the market. Based on the conflict in Syria, any watcher can confidently say that when compared, two tanks from the same generation, Russian and western, properly trained crew, the Tanks from Russia offer better all round capability and are indeed better.

If the battle of Khursk were to repeat itself, this December 2016, i would know were my money is.

iblawi:
Nemesis2u and chinese8107

What if your argument on the use of C++ for F-35 have something to do with cuda programming introduced in 2007. Cuda is an extention of C/C++ used for programming GPUs to process complex operations within a very short time.

Cuda is still very recent and only C/C++ can be used for now. Cuda enables parallel processing on the CPU and GPU simultaneously. GPUs have thousands of cores to compared to CPU with just few cores.

CUDA is a parallel computing platform and application programming interface (API) model created by Nvidia

It allows software developers and software engineers to use a CUDA-enabled graphics processing unit (GPU) for general purpose processing

I v no idea if F-35 uses Nvidia GPU chip in it's build-in computer. but there is possibility.

chinese8107:


CUDA is a parallel computing platform and application programming interface (API) model created by Nvidia

It allows software developers and software engineers to use a CUDA-enabled graphics processing unit (GPU) for general purpose processing

I v no idea if F-35 uses Nvidia GPU chip in it's build-in computer. but there is possibility.

To me this can explain why the program is expensive because they are completely new projects. The technology is currently being extended to other devices.

nemesis2u:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ljvIsTGn1o


HAL's HTT40 in its repainted avatar.

hoe much is it ?comparing with Yak-152 , CJ-7

hongdu CJ-7 (L7) is a joint project with yakovlev with both side have rights to make modification.. it can be equipted with different engines 360hp,500hp,700hp

iblawi:


To me this can explain why the program is expensive because they are completely new projects. The technology is currently being extended to other devices.

CUDA is in use in ISR systems mounted on manned aircraft's uavs etc etc , radars, missiles ( i know of very big missiles )

long story short
advantage:
it decreases the Size, Weight and Power (SWaP) requirements of the onboard compute platform resulting in greater range, greater payload and greater endurance .

disadvantage:
latency of the incoming data steam but it can be mitigated to certain extent.

i dont think F35 per se uses CUDA.
only chances r that its subsystems like the Reconnaissance/targeting pods or EO subsystems (LRUs) might use it . to reduce SWaP parameters, to reduce the aircraft's own processor overload and increase redundancy etc
no way to confirm.
ask the Chinese military to know for sure

german WWII antique MK108 only 58kg weight, but 30mm autocannon

nemesis2u:


CUDA is in use in ISR systems mounted on manned aircraft's uavs etc etc , radars, missiles ( i know of very big missiles )

long story short
advantage:
it decreases the Size, Weight and Power (SWaP) requirements of the onboard compute platform resulting in greater range, greater payload and greater endurance .

disadvantage:
latency of the incoming data steam but it can be mitigated to certain extent.
7
i dont think F35 per se uses CUDA.
only chances r that its subsystems like the Reconnaissance/targeting pods or EO subsystems (LRUs) might use it . to reduce SWaP parameters, to reduce the aircraft's own processor overload and increase redundancy etc
no way to confirm.
ask the Chinese military to know for sure

Nice 1.

chinese8107:
german WWII antique MK108 only 58kg weight, but 30mm autocannon

really like these type of interesting pics / info

just whatever u do
dont ever let a monkey sleep on ur gun