a bad job at photoshopping! one's shadow is supposed to fall away from the person not standing right next to the person as is seen in the case of the girl pictured.

Ur own no get shadow...

socialmediaman:
The Image manipulation was poorly done. Here is another manipulation that makes girl headless also. Graphic designers will be laughing at the poor job

cc: austinereds, Davash222, CACAWA, hooged, LaClicKLaBenDin, LaClicKLaBenDin, Earth2Metahuman, rottable, iSlayer2, VictorCreator, akinszz, Babalegba, KwoiZabo, MrPolitics, falcon01, Tallesty1, DaFlash, Bahddo, Omudia11, loomer

socialmediaman:
The Image manipulation was poorly done. Here is another manipulation that makes girl headless also. Graphic designers will be laughing at the poor job

cc: austinereds, Davash222, CACAWA, hooged, LaClicKLaBenDin, LaClicKLaBenDin, Earth2Metahuman, rottable, iSlayer2, VictorCreator, akinszz, Babalegba, KwoiZabo, MrPolitics, falcon01, Tallesty1, DaFlash, Bahddo, Omudia11, loomer

Good work! So, I think it's safe to say that the two pictures were not originally there, but were imposed, right?

akinszz:
Ur own no get shadow...

There won't be shadow where there's no head now, abi the headeless guy get head shadow?

LaClicKLaBenDin:


Good work! So, I think it's safe to say that the two pictures were not originally there, but were imposed, right?

It's possible they were both there, but the guy's head was cut off with software. It's also possible they were imposed on the photo

Can't you a little dark shade by the right of the collar? That's his head. His head was bent downward looking at something. Secondly, the altitude of the camera was low .

Leebeedo:
[b]Can't you a little dark shade by the right of the collar? That's his head. [/b]His head was bent downward looking at something. Secondly, the altitude of the camera was low .

The shadow looks like that of his collar, not his head. Meanwhile try what you're proposing physically; Bending your head like that would also require a good amount of your back bent as well

LaClicKLaBenDin:
[b]Now let's consider something else, check the design on upper wall in the picture, I mean the pink design. Now if the head of the man was edited, the design wouldn't be continuous, because the position of the head of the man would have covered part of the wall and the ceiling too from appearing on the picture at all, and when edited and the head removed, it's not possible for the design to still be where the head was, because, the head would have prevented the camera from grabbing that design, but that is not case. Now take a good look at the girl's head the way it covers part of the ceiling and the pink design on the upper wall, you could see the shadow of her head running through the ceiling and the upper wall. This would have been the same effect the headless man's head would have had on the picture, and this could have made editing hard and obvious. But from the picture, it looks more like there was never a head there, because every detail that could have been hidden by the head and its accompanying shadow, are all neatly there.
[/b]

you are very correct

Omudia11:
LaClickLa

You are very correct. The thing is that most are actually daft but they think they're smart. There is no way one can bend while standing filly erect without the their neck showing at the very least.

There is no shadow of the man's head on the wall whereas the shadow of the girl's head is even visible to the blind.

The design on the wall is continuous.. If it was Photoshop that wouldn't have been possible.

you are making sense