Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,194,948 members, 7,956,576 topics. Date: Monday, 23 September 2024 at 02:26 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Islam for Muslims / What Do The Scholars Say? (27215 Views)
COVID-19: Muslim Organizations, Scholars Move Ramadan Tafsir Online / Ahlu Sunnah Scholars Fatawa On Bida'h / Tell Us Islamic Scholars With Their Sittings (halqo) In Your Community (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) ... (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Nobody: 8:27pm On Apr 21, 2017 |
AbuHammaad: Wa feeka baarak 1 Like |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Nobody: 5:59am On Apr 22, 2017 |
﷽ Every week on Friday we hear the verse: [يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا اتَّقُوا اللَّهَ وَقُولُوا قَوْلًا سَدِيدًا] "O you who believe - exercise taqwa of Allah and say a *qawlan sadeedan* (appropriate word)" [al-Ahzab (33) : 70] But what does *qawlan sadeedan* mean? Sheikh ibn 'Uthaymeen explained: "The *Qawl al-Sadeed* is that which is right for its situation, meaning that which is correct and in conformity with wisdom. So it is neither from the characteristics of *sadaad* (appropriateness) to [always] be gentle in speech nor to [always] be harsh therein - rather it is for your speech to be correct and in keeping with wisdom. So it could be that *al-sadaad* is through harshness of speech and it could be that *al-sadaad* is via gentleness of speech. Look at the Prophet (ﷺ), how sometimes he would intensify his speech and how sometimes he would soften his speech, and all of his speech (ﷺ) was appropriate and all of it was befitting." [Tafsir Surah al-Nisaa' 1/60] Credit: Khalil Phillip Klopfenstein
|
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Nobody: 5:43am On Apr 24, 2017 |
2 Likes
|
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Nobody: 7:44am On Apr 24, 2017 |
QUESTION (440) What is the ruling on raising the finger when saying the shahaadah following wudoo’, and doing it regularly? ANSWER TO THE QUESTION Praise be to Allaah. I do not know of any basis for that, rather what is prescribed for the one who finishes doing wudoo’ is to say: “Ashhadu allaa ilaaha illallaah wah'dahu laa shareeka lah wa Ashhadu anna Muhammadan ‘abduhu wa rasooluhu, Allaahumma-j’alni minat-tawwaabeen waj’alni minal-mutatahhireen. (I bear witness that there is no god except Allah alone with no partner or associate, and I bear witness that Muhammad is His slave and Messenger, O Allaah, make me one of those who repent and make me one of those who purify themselves).” See: Noor ‘Ala Ad-Darb (Fataawa At-Tahaarah, Furood Al-Wudoo’ Wa Sifatuhu). May Almighty Allaah accept our prayer as an act of worship. «Abu Mardiy Kewdirôrun At-thaqoofiy» |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Nobody: 7:45am On Apr 24, 2017 |
QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSION WITH SHAYKH, DR SHAROF GBADEBO ROOJI (HAFIDHOHULLAAH) Questioner: Should we boycott the innovators? Dr Sharof: Yes, it is from the methodology of Islaam. You don't sit with an innovator; you have to boycott him. However, you should boycott him so that he changes his ways. Make him know that you're boycotting him so that he follows the correct teaching of Islaam. This is very important. If you boycott him for sometimes, go back to him and ask him to repent. If he fails to repent, continue boycotting him till he repents. This means that our primary aim is to make him change, not to make him die upon the innovation. That is it. [SOURCE: "QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSION DURING THE EXPLANATION OF MA'AARIJUL QABUUL AT IBADAN"; TIME: "1:14:05 to 1:14:43"] Translated by Aboo Aaishah Al Odeomeey 2 Likes 1 Share |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Nobody: 6:29pm On Apr 24, 2017 |
Question: What is the ruling if a man washes his right foot, then he puts the sock on after that, before he washes his left foot? Answer: All praise is for Allaah alone and may the salaat and the salaam be upon His Messenger and his family and his Companions….. To proceed: there is no masH (wiping) upon the two (feet) for you because you put the first (foot) in before the completion of the purification. And with Allaah is the tawfeeq. And may peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad and his family and his Companions. Permanent Committee for Research and Verdicts 1 Like |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Amoto94(m): 9:55pm On Apr 24, 2017 |
My father does not allow me to study in Madeenah university. Question: I got accepted to the Islamic University – and all praise belongs to Allâh. My father, however, does not allow me to go to Madeenah, because he thinks that studying Sharee`ah is a waste of time – and he told me that he is free from me if I go there. What should I do with a father who does not pray – nor is he interested in religion in general? Answer: Don’t listen to him; go, study and learn – and all praise belongs to Allâh. He ordered you to commit a sin, not to be obedient – and there is no obedience to the creature in disobedience to the Creator. Sheikh Sâlih bin Fawzân al-Fawzân http://salafi.eu/father-does-not-allow-studying-at-the-islamic-university/ 1 Like |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Nobody: 5:15am On Apr 26, 2017 |
1 Like
|
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Amoto94(m): 10:46pm On Apr 27, 2017 |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Nobody: 10:26am On Apr 28, 2017 |
QUESTION AND ANSWER WITH SHAYKH, DR SHAROF GBADEBO ROOJI (HAFIDHOHULLAAH) Questioner: A person asks, ‘A sister who beliefs she is knowledgeable about Islaam because she can recite the Qur’aan married a Christian with the aim of converting him to Islaam…’ Dr Sharof: Cuts in…Ah! We seek refuge with Allaah. Questioner: The questioner said he boycotted the sister because of this act but her mother said it is blameworthy. Dr Sharof: How is it blameworthy? For what reason?! Allaah does not make it permissible for the Muslim women to marry the non-Muslims even if the person is from the people of the book, a Jew or a Christian. It is not permissible. Something of this nature is very common in the Yoruba communities. You may see one Musili married to one Jacob or Solomon. We seek refuge with Allaah from the accursed Shaytoon. There are fathers who even celebrate with them on this evil act. This is absolutely unfortunate yet they still congratulate themselves; they drink alcohol in such unfortunate events. What do you expect to see in such gatherings? Muslim women must not marry the non-Muslims! Muslim women must not marry the non-Muslims!! From the ways of making such sister regret her actions is to boycott her. Don’t give her any attention (until she repents). That is it. [SOURCE: "Q AND A SESSION DURING THE EXPLANATION OF THE CONCEPT OF NIKAAH] Translated by Aboo Aaishah Al Odeomeey 2 Likes |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Nobody: 10:29am On Apr 28, 2017 |
QUESTION AND ANSWER WITH SHAYKH, DR SHAROF GBADEBO ROOJI(HAFIDHOHULLAAH) Questioner: Is it permissible for one to enter the Masjid (mosque) and go straight to the position of the Imaam to observe Tahiyyat al-Masjid (two raka’aat prayer observed to greet the Mosque)? Dr Sharof: Is it permissible or not for one to enter the Masjid (mosque) and go straight to the position of the Imaam to observe Tahiyyat al-Masjid? It is not permissible; it is not appropriate. This is because if you do so, it is possible that the Imaam misinterprets your stance, and the one who enters the Masjid (after you) may also have that misinterpretation. While standing there (at the Imaam’s position), some people may enter the Masjid thinking that the prayer had started and as such they may form a congregation behind you thinking that you are standing at that position because you’re the only one praying the obligatory prayer. If the Imaam comes in and discovers that the congregation has been formed behind you he may become terrified. This can result to mayhem; this is called al-Iftiyaat (treason against the religion). This will cause a great confusion which you may not be able to contain. For this reason, we should stay at the Saff (rows in the mosque) and pray our Nawaafil (supererogatory prayer). That is it. [SOURCE: EXPLANATION OF BAABU SOLAATUL JUMU’AH OF BULUUGHUL MUROOM (TAPE 1); DATE: 2-4-2013; TIME OF THE TRANSCRIBED QUESTION AND ANSWER, 1:10:29] Translated by Aboo Aaishah Al Odeomeey |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Amoto94(m): 11:23am On Apr 28, 2017 |
RESERVING PLACES IN THE MOSQUE.
(Translated by Dawud Burbank)
Shaikh `Abdur-Rahmaan ibn Naasir as-Sa`dee -
rahimahullaah(d.1376 H)was asked: What is
the ruling on reserving places (at-tahjeer) in
the mosque?
Answer: You should know -may Allaah have
mercy upon you- that reserving places in the
mosque, and placing a stick; when the person is
delayed in his house, or in the market place,
from attending, is not lawful, and is not
permissible. That is because this is contrary to
the
Legislation; and contrary to what the
Companions, and those who followed them
upon
goodness, were upon. So the Prophet ( ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺳﻠﻢ) encouraged the people to come to
the front in the mosques, and to draw close to
the imaam themselves; and he gave
encouragement with regard to the first row,
and said: << If the people knew what there is in
the call, and in the first row>>, meaning with
regard to tremendous reward, << and then
they
did not find any way to it except to draw lots,
then they would indeed draw lots.>>
And compliance with this, and this tremendous
reward, will not come about except for one
who himself comes to the front and precedes.
As for one who puts his stick or the like down,
and comes later on, then he has acted contrary
to what the bringer of the Legislation
encouraged, and he is not complying with his
command. So whoever claims that he attains
the virtue of coming to the front, and the
virtue of the place of excellence, by reserving a
place
in it, when he actually comes later, then he is a
liar. Rather the person who does this misses
out on the reward, and he acquires sin and
accountability.
So from the evil effects of that, is that he
believes that by reserving a place of virtue at
the
start of the row, or in the place of virtue, that
he can attain the virtue of being at the front.
This
is a false and futile belief, because the virtue
cannot be attained except by one who himself
arrives and precedes. As for one who reserves
a place of virtue, but comes later on, then he
does not attain anything of the virtue; for the
virtue is for the one who comes first, not for
the
one whose stick arrives first.
So if there were any good in that action, then
the people who would have been most eager
upon it would have been the Companions -
radiyallaahu `anhum. However, Allaah kept
them
free of this vile action, just as He kept them
free of every vile action. So if the person who
reserves a space knew that he is sinful, and that
his praying at the back of the mosque would
be better for him, and safer for him, than the
sin, then he would not venture to do it. Rather
he
would keep far away from it; and how could he
attain reward through performing an action
that
is forbidden, and not permissible?!
Also from the evil effects of that is that the
mosques are for Allaah, and the people are on
an
equal footing within them. No one has a right
in them except for the one who comes forward
himself. So if someone else precedes, then he
has more right. So if a person reserves for
himself something which someone else has a
right to, then he will be sinful and disobedient
to
Allaah, and he will be wronging the person
whose right it is; and the right will not just be
for a
single person, rather everyone who arrives
before him will have a right to his place. He
will
therefore have wronged a large number of
people. So if we imagine a person coming, and
the
first row has been reserved by people
wrongfully, so therefore he takes his place in a
row
further back, then he will have greater
excellence than them, and greater reward, and
will be
more secure from sin. So Allaah knows from
his intention that if he had found it empty he
would have prayed in it. So he is the one who
attains its virtue; whereas they attain sin, and
they miss out on the reward.
And from the evils of that is that it invites
stepping over people, and causing harm to
them,
and the bringer of the Legislation has
forbidden that. So he combines reserving
something for
himself, coming late, and stepping over the
people. Therefore he is doing what is forbidden
from a number of aspects.
And from them is that if he places his stick, it
causes him to become lazy, and to delay in
coming. So when he knows that he will find a
place at the front of the mosque, even if he
comes late, then his heart cools, and he
becomes lax about coming forward (early). He
therefore misses out on a great amount of
good, and he acquires a large amount of sin.
And
from the evils is that it provokes rancour,
enmity, and disputation in the houses of Allaah,
which were not built except for the
remembrance of Allaah, and for His worship.
And from the evils is that the Prayer of the
person who reserves a place is deficient,
because
sins, if they do not nullify deeds, then they
render them deficient; and there are from the
scholars those who hold that the Prayer of the
person who wrongfully reserves a place is not
correct; just the same as a person who prays in
a place which he has seized illegally: his
Prayer is not correct because he illegally took
the place, and wronged someone else.
And from the evils of that is that the person
who habitually reserves a place is one who is
persisting upon disobedience to Allaah,
because he is committing it, resolved to keep
on
doing it; and persisting upon sins runs contrary
to Eemaan. He -the Most High- said:
[[Meaning: And they do not persist upon sin
which they have commited whilst they know,
(but
rather they repent.)]][Soorah Aali `Imraan (3)
:135]
And lesser sins become major sins through
persistence upon them. So the amazing thing is
that most of those who do that are people who
have a desire for good; and perhaps the
repugnance of this matter has departed from
them on account of their persistance upon it,
and
the fact that some of them follow others.
So desire for good cannot be realized through
seeking closeness to Allaah by doing
something forbidden. Rather the person who
desires good should be the farthest of the
people
away from acts of disobedience to Allaah; and
from wronging the people with regard to their
rights. So nothing draws a person closer to
Allaah except obedience to Him. So worse than
this is that the person reserves something for
himself, or for someone else, and (in doing so)
combines a number of sins.
So how can a Believer, who is rightly guided,
who has life in his heart, be pleased to commit
a
matter which has these evils and harmful
effects?! So what is obligatory upon everyone
who
does that is that he should repent to Allaah,
and resolve that he will not return to it; since a
person who knows that this is not permissible,
but then persists upon this sin, is one who is
taking Allaah?s prohibitions lightly; bold upon
acts of disobedience to Allaah. It is to be feared
that he is from those who love to be praised
for what they have not done: for show and
repute;
he loves to be praised for his praying in the
first row, and for the place of virtue; whereas
he is
actually a sinner who is wronging the people of
the mosque, and he does not attain the virtue.
Yet he persists upon this blameworthy and
despicable characteristic.
So we believe that the Believer, who is earnest
about his Religion, when he knows that this is
forbidden, and he knows the evils and harms
contained in it, and how it reduces his Prayer
or
nullifies it, he will not undertake it and he will
not do it; because there is no benefit for him in
that, neither in his Religion nor in his worldly
life. Rather it is entirely harmful for him. So
the
person who is granted success should seek the
aid of Allaah upon abandoning it, and upon
being resolved not to return to it; and he
should seek Allaah?s forgiveness from what has
emanated from him, because Allaah forgives
extensively and is Merciful. He -the Most High-
said:
[[Meaning: And I am indeed forgiving to those
who repent, truly believe and worship Allaah
alone, perform righteous deeds, and remain
constant upon right guidance.]][Soorah TaaHaa
(20):82]
And we ask Allaah to preserve us and our
brothers the Muslims from acts of
disobedience to
Him, and that He pardons us and them what
has occurred from us previously from them.
Indeed He is Beneficent, Generous. As for a
person who comes to the mosque, and his
intention is to wait for the Prayer; but then
something occurs: for example he needs to
perform
wudoo, or the like, and then he returns, then
there is no harm for him; and he has more
right
to his place, and no blame is attached to him.
Likewise a person who is in the mosque, and he
places his stick or the like, so that he can pray
or recite Quraan in another place in the
mosque. Then there is no harm; with the
condition that he does not step over people,
and
does not harm them.And Allaah knows best,
and may Allaah extol Muhammad, and grant
him
peace and security.
[Ref.: al-Fataawas-Sa`diyyah, pp.182-186:
Maktabatul-Ma`aarif, 2nd edn., 1402 H].
Source:salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=10&Topic=11454 |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Nobody: 3:30pm On May 02, 2017 |
Imam Daar Al-hijrah Maalik ibn Anas said: Verily this knowledge is your flesh and your blood, through it you'll be asked (questions) on the day of resurrection, so look(carefully) who you take your knowledge from.
|
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Nobody: 5:51pm On May 03, 2017 |
Some scholars hold very firm positions in the rulings that they derive. Others may hold opposite opinions. However holding onto a strong and firm ijtihaadee position of an 'aalim based upon his understanding of the texts does not necessitate that those who hold another opinion based upon their ijtihaad are therefore deviants, hizbees or sinners,unless that position is something that the Salaf did not allow differing regarding. -Ustaz Abu khadeejah hafidhahullaah 1 Like |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Nobody: 9:02am On May 04, 2017 |
Is it Permissible for a Woman to Pray Without Socks or With a Short Garment? Answered by Shaikh Albani Questioner: Our teacher, many women go to the masjid for prayer without socks, they perform their prayer without socks. Shaikh Al-Albani: Whether they go or not (to the masjid) their prayer in their houses without socks is an invalid prayer. Questioner: Even in the house? Shaikh Al-Albani: Even in the house, so how about the masjid? Questioner: May Allah reward you. Shaikh Al-Albani: And you also. Another Questioner: Even if she completely covers her feet? Shaikh Al-Albani: How do you imagine that she covers her feet? In the present day there are no women who drag their garments (because of it being long), but if you can picture this case then the prayer is correct, and the issue is that her feet are uncovered, however if her feet are covered, for example: her dress is loose and long where it covers her feet, then this is what is wanted from the women when she prays in her home or in the masjid, but sadly today women don’t have long clothing. Questioner: Ok, do the socks cover, O teacher? Shaikh Al-Albani: The socks cover and don’t cover. They cover the color of the skin, but they don’t cover the shape of the foot, therefore from the conditions of the garment that covers the private parts for men – aside from women – is that it is not transparent where the color of the skin is visible, and it is not tight where it defines the body part. So the garment is not permissible unless it contains these two characteristics, it’s not transparent and not tight. Questioner: Ok, do the socks define the body part? Shaikh Al-Albani: Absolutely, they define. Questioner: Ok, how do they cover in prayer? Shaikh Al-Albani: With time they cover; they cover and don’t cover. And I explained to you in detail how they cover and don’t cover. Questioner: Meaning, the woman must wear socks in prayer? Shaikh Al-Albani: I said, and I am still saying – she must cover her feet with a loose and wide garment, as for the socks they cover and they don’t cover, my words are clear. Questioner: Is it better to wear socks? Shaikh Al-Albani: If her garment is long […] if her garment is long where it covers her feet whether she wears socks or not, what is meant is a covering that is not tight or transparent. Socks without a garment over them define the body part, but they cover the skin color and this is not enough, so it is necessary for the garment to cover the color and the shape. Questioner: Our teacher, in regards to nullification of the prayer, but they don’t have knowledge of these things. Shaikh Al-Albani: Yes, they don’t have knowledge but they can learn, so if they learn and remain lenient then their prayer is invalid. Tape 4 of “Silsilat al Huda wan Noor” |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by FriendNG: 8:41pm On May 04, 2017 |
I have never read something as beautifully written as this. It is an amazing advice by the great scholar, Ibn Al-Qayyim...please read: ❝A friend will not (literally) share your struggles, an a loved one cannot physically take away your pain, and a close one will not stay up the night on your behalf...so look after yourself, protect it, nurture it...and don't give life's events more than what they are really worth...Be certain that when you break no one will heal you except you, and when you are defeated no one will give you victory except your determination...your ability to stand up again and carry on is your responsibility...Do not look for your self worth in the eyes of people; look for your worth from within your conscious...if your conscious is at peace then you will ascend high...and if you truly know yourself then what is said about you won't harm you. Do not carry the worries of this life... because this is for Allah...and do not carry the worries of sustenance because it is from Allah...and do not carry the anxiety for the future because it is in the Hands of Allah... Carry one thing: How to Please #Allah. Because if you please Him, He Pleases you, fulfills you and enriches you. Do not weep from a life that made your heart weep...just say "oh Allah...compensate me with good in this life and the hereafter". Sadness departs with a sajdah...happiness comes with a sincere du'a...Allah Does Not forget the good you do...nor Doe He Forget the good you did to others and the pain you relieved them from...Nor Will He Forget the eye which was about to cry but you made it laugh... Live your life with this principle: Be good even if you don't receive good...not because of other's sake but because Allah Loves the good doers.❞ #SubhanAllah 2 Likes 2 Shares |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Mofpearl: 3:36pm On May 05, 2017 |
Salam alaykum Is there a difference of opinion on the covering of awrah for prayer? What I understood was that socks can be worn to pray and even go out as long as it is thick. |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Amoto94(m): 4:16pm On May 05, 2017 |
Q 5: In some families the brothers’ wives uncover their faces in the presence of their brothers-in-law. When I advise them, they say they are brothers and do not want to be separated from each other. What is your opinion in this regard? A: It is not permissible for women to uncover their faces in the presence of their brothers-in-law because they are not Mahrams for them; they are in-laws. The Prophet (peace be upon him) was asked about Al-Hamu (the in-laws of the wife – the brothers of her husband or his nephews etc.). The Prophet (peace be upon him) replied: Al-Hamu is death itself. That is, the bad consequences of uncovering their faces in the presence of them are more harmful because it is treated leniently. May Allah grant us success! May peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad, his family, and Companions! Permanent Committee for Scholarly Research and Ifta’ Member Member Member Member Deputy Chairman Chairman Bakr Abu Zayd `Abdul-`Aziz Al Al-Shaykh Salih Al-Fawzan `Abdullah ibn Ghudayyan `Abdul-Razzaq `Afify `Abdul-`Aziz ibn `Abdullah ibn Baz Fatwas of Permanent Committee |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Nobody: 5:13am On May 06, 2017 |
Shaykh Ibn Taymiyyah [رحمه الله] said: ❝A man should not give a Mahr that exceeds what he can afford without hardship.❞ (Majmoo’ al-Fatāwā, (32/194) | Translated By Abū Ruqayyah 'Abd us-Samad) |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Nobody: 5:37am On May 06, 2017 |
Mofpearl: OK, I just saw this..... Difference of opinion I don't know......What I understood from shaykh Al-Albaani's words is the socks shouldn't be transparent and tight such that the legs are defined....but does a loose socks exists? *I'm actually asking........cuz I don't really wear socks that much* I think this might help a bit https://islamqa.info/en/153367 Although with what I've understood before, if your jilbaab goes beyond your ankles up to your heels, then wearing a thick and loose socks is OK.... 1 Like |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Mofpearl: 6:25am On May 06, 2017 |
AbdelKabir: I understood that the prayer is invalid with socks becuse it doesn't fully cover from his statement (may Allah have mercy on him). Thats why I was asking if there was a difference of opinion concerning it * I am concerned about the validity of the prayer*. I dont know about loose socks because they all cling to the body. However, it is possible to have thick socks. I also remwber Abu Mussab saying that woman can wear thick socks out if her clothes don't cover her feet. But it's much better to wear long clothing and socks as well because when you walk your feet can get exposed*he didn't say that but I am saying it*. |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Nobody: 6:43am On May 06, 2017 |
Mofpearl: If the socks cling, at least the shoes can be free, right? Abu Mussab is obviously following what ibn uthaymeen said about socks......But if your jilbaab reaches your heels and you wear socks(if you can't find a loose one) covered by loose shoes, then my understanding is, its OK.....and I hope its actually OK.... |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Mofpearl: 6:55am On May 06, 2017 |
AbdelKabir: I am sorry I am lil lost. I am concerned about validity of the prayer with socks when the clothes aren't long enough to cover the feet. When u say heel do you mean dragging? I was talking about dragging the abaya not regular length clothes. I meant even though one wears long clothes that drags, its better to wear socks as well because your feel might get exposed when u walk. Abu Mussab said that it was okay to wear thick socks. Basically the point I was trying to make was do the scholars differ on wearing socks ( is it sufficient to wear socks to pray and go out). I read on islamqa that prayer with socks and even jeans is valid. |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Nobody: 7:02am On May 06, 2017 |
Mofpearl: Perhaps you read them wrong, jeans covered by jilbaab to increase the thickness of covering is what they intended *most likely* And yes I meant dragging, when you say "thick socks is ok" where exactly does the cloth gets to? |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Mofpearl: 7:09am On May 06, 2017 |
AbdelKabir: Islamqa. Info/en/46529 It was talking about men but the feet is also considered awrah as well. And yes I meant dragging, when you say "thick socks is ok" where exactly does the cloth gets to?Ankles. Its not compulsary to wear sock if the jilbab is long enough to cover the feet (drags). So wearing socks is an extra thing, be it loose or tight. |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Nobody: 7:23am On May 06, 2017 |
Mofpearl: Feet is awrah for women? Yes, men? No.... Ok, since the awrah(feet in this case) is covered, then the prayer is valid even the socks are tight *according to them*....that's what I understood from the page.... Ankles. Its not compulsary to wear sock if the jilbab is long enough to cover the feet (drags). So wearing socks is an extra thing, be it loose or tight. If it gets to the ankles(or a little bit below the ankles) then wearing a free shoe should suffice... |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Mofpearl: 7:27am On May 06, 2017 |
AbdelKabir: Yes. If it gets to the ankles(or a little bit below the ankles) then wearing a free shoe should suffice...There are shoes that don't cover the feet fully. Anyways jazakallahu khyran. |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Demmzy15(m): 8:38am On May 07, 2017 |
Shaykh Yahya At-Talibi said: The khawarij of this time are worse than than the khawarij of old. For the khawarij of old killed muslims, but these khawarij today kill the muslims and they kill themselves along with them. [From Bulugh al-Maram class in the book of funerals | Translated by: Raha Battas] 1 Like |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Amoto94(m): 11:35am On May 08, 2017 |
Shaykh Rabee’ al-Madkhalee was asked: Question: ❝Which Bida’ is it by which a person is counted as being outside the circle of Ahl-ul-Sunnah wal-Jamma’?❞ The Answer: ❝The Bida’ such as of al-Qadr [Those who reject pre-destination], Bida’ of al-Irjaa [Those who do not accept that Eemaan increases and decreases], Bida’ of ar-Rafd [The Shia, those who rejected the Sunnah and the Companions], Bida’ of Kharooj [Rebelling against the Muslim leader], and the Soofeeyah Bida’ such as the Mawlid [Celebrating the Prophet’s birthday] which has Shirk and any other types of Mawlid. Making journeys to graves and other types of Bida’ which are similar to this – may Allaah bless you. In having loyalty to the Ahl-ul-Bida’ a person becomes from amongst them, and likewise if he aids them and defends them. It was said to Ahmad bin Hanbal: ‘Indeed some people sit with the people of Bida’.’ Ahmad bin Hanbal said: ‘Advise him.’ The person said: ‘But he rejected the advice.’ Ahmad said: ‘Count him from amongst them.’ So, the one who sits with the Ahl-ul-Bida’ and associates himself with them then conclude from him that he is sick and that he is in agreement with these people, and regarding this point there are evidences, from them the saying of the Messenger: ‘The souls are enlisted soldiers, those who become familiar with each other, associate with one another, and those who oppose each other, differ.’ So this person who associates himself and becomes familiar with Ahl-ul-Bida’ then it is evident that there is an agreement and similarity between the matters, the two people and the two groups. To clarify, what we have mentioned is concerning the one who leaves the circle of Ahl-ul-Sunnah wal-Jamma’.❞ [Fatawa Fadeelata Shaykh Rabee’ al-Madkhalee, (14/153) | Translated By Abbas Abu Yahya Miraath al-Anbiyya] |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Amoto94(m): 5:27pm On May 09, 2017 |
We see some people specifying the 15th of Sha'baan with particular supplications and reciting the Qur.aan and performing naafilah prayers. So what is the correct position concerning this, and may Allaah reward you with good? Response: That which is correct is that fasting the 15th of Sha'baan or specifying it with reciting (the Qur.aan) or making (particular) supplications has no basis. So the day of the 15th of Sha'baan is like any other 15th day of other months. So from that which is known is that it has been legislated for a person to fast the 13th, 14th and 15th of every month, however, Sha'baan is characterised unlike the other months in that (except for Ramadhaan) the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) used to fast more in Sha'baan than any other month . So he used to either fast all of Sha'baan or just a little. Therefore, as long as it does not cause difficulty for a person, it is befitting to increase in fasting during Sha'baan in adherence to the example of the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam). Shaykh Ibn 'Uthaymeen al-Bid'u wal-Muhdathaat wa maa laa Asla lahu - Page 612 Fataawa Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Saalih al-'Uthaymeen - Volume 1, Page 190 Standing the night of the 15th of Sha'baan in prayer and fasting during it's day Question: Is standing the night of the 15th of Sha'baan in prayer and fasting during it's day legislated? Response: Nothing firm and reliable has been established on the authority of the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) that he stood in prayer in the night and fasted during the day of the 15th of Sha'baan. So the night of the 15th of Sha'baan is like any other night, and if someone is a regular worshipper during other nights, then he may stand the night in prayer on this night without assuming anything special (because of it being the night of the 15th of Sha'baan). This is because specifying a time for any act of worship requires a authentic proof, so if there is no authentic proof then the act is regarded as an innovation and all innovations are misguidance. Likewsie, regarding specifically fasting during the 15th day of Sha'baan, then no (authentic) proof has been established on the authority of the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) to indicate the legislation of fasting on that particular day. As for that which is mentioned from the ahaadeeth regarding this subject, then all of it is weak as the people of knowledge have indicated. However, whoever has the habit of fasting the 13th, 14th and 15th (of every month), then he can continue and fast during Sha'baan as he fasts during the other months, without assuming anything special about the 15th of Sha'baan. Also, the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) used to increase in fasting during this month (Sha'baan), however, he did not particularise the 15th day, rather proceeded as per norm. Shaykh Ibn Fowzaan al-Bid'u wal-Muhdathaat wa maa laa asla lahu - Page 614 Noorun alad-Darb Fataawa Shaykh Saalih Ibn Fowzaan - Volume 1, Page 87 Giving sadaqah specifically on the night of 15th of Sha'baan Question: When my father was alive, he entrusted me to give sadaqah (charity) according to my means on the 15th of Sha'baan every year, and likewise I have been doing this ever since. However, some people have admonished me for doing so saying it is not permissible. So is giving sadaqah on the night of the 15th of Sha'baan permissible according to the willment of my father or not? Kindly advise us and may Allaah reward you with good. Response: To specify the giving of sadaqah on the night of the 15th of Sha'baan every year is an innovation, and despite your father having entrusted you with that, it is not permissible. It is befitting you give this sadaqah without specifying the night of the 15th of Sha'baan, rather do so every year and in whichever month, but without particularising any one month (on a consistent basis). However, it is permissible to do so in the month of Ramadhaan (for the evidence which indicates so). And with Allaah lies all success and may Allaah send prayers and salutations upon our Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) and his family and his companions. The Permanent Committee for Islaamic Research and Fataawa al-Bid'u wal-Muhdathaat wa maa laa Asla lahu - Page 611 Fataawa al-Lajnah ad-Daa.imah lil-Buhooth al-'Ilmiyyah wal-Iftaa. - Fatwa No. 9760 |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Mofpearl: 4:24pm On May 10, 2017 |
Is it permissible for a mahram escort a woman to the airport and another mahram pick her up at their destination whilst she travels alone? No. It isn't this is because it is still considered traveeling without a mahram and the prophet (peace and blessing be upon him) said: It is not permissible for a woman who believes in Allaah and the Last Day to travel the distance of one day, except with a mahram.” (Muslim 1339). Additionally, a group of women cannot suffice for a mahram. For every Muslim woman in a group travelling needs a mahram with her. Gotten from Shayk Salalih bin Fawzaan's transcribed lecture- Advice to the Muslim woman. One can also read more on- https://islamqa.info/en/102494 |
Re: What Do The Scholars Say? by Mofpearl: 7:00pm On May 10, 2017 |
Can one combine intention when doing acts of worship? Q: I like to fast in the winter because the days are short. Of course I hope for the reward of Allah, but I also hope to lose a little weight. Is it permissible for me to combine two intentions? Praise be to Allah Firstly: There is nothing wrong with combining the intention of seeking reward for fasting and the intention of losing weight, although it is preferable for a person to intend his fasting for the purpose of attaining reward only. Losing weight will inevitably happen when one fasts, whether one intends that or not. As-Suyooti (may Allah have mercy on him) said in al-Ashbaah wa’n-Nazaa’ir (pp. 21-22): Combined intentions (and motives) are of many types. Firstly, a person may have, alongside the intention of worship, a motive that is not worship but will not invalidate it. One example of that is if a person intends to do wudoo’ or ghusl, and also to cool himself. There are some views which suggest that it is not valid because of that combined intention, but the more correct view is that it is valid, because cooling oneself is something that will inevitably happen, regardless of whether or not that was part of the motive for doing wudoo’ or ghusl. So he did not plan to have a combined intention, and he did not intend to undermine his sincerity; rather his intention was to do an act of worship in a manner or at a time that is prescribed, because one of its inevitable outcomes is cooling oneself. The same applies if a person has the intention to fast, and also has another motive, namely the desire to avoid certain foods for reasons of health. But there is still some difference of opinion concerning that. End quote. I did NOT know that some scholars were of the opinion that combining intentions is not permissible. https://islamqa.info/en/220996 |
(1) (2) (3) ... (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (Reply)
Any Near Death Experiences For Islam? / Saudi Crane Crash: Deceased And Victims Families To Receive 60 Million Each / Being A Full Hijabite Plus A Footballer, Outter The Fold Of Islam?
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 116 |