There were three types of Jews - Pharisees, Essenes and Sadducees. Among them, only Sadducees were followers of Moses. Pharisees and Essenes were basically Buddhist. The difference between them and main stream Buddhists was the mainstream Buddhists also believed in other Gods. Buddha is one of the ten Avatar of Aryan god Vishnu. Right now, the Chinese Buddhism has two types - Semitic and polytheist that involves their local gods. In India, the picture is same but the polytheist version's gods are Hindu.

Ramses was a very popular king. He was worshiped everywhere throughout his empire. Even just a few days ago, another of his idol was found in a slum of Cairo. The followers of Moses started a bad campaign against him involving with their imaginary prophet. It is a business strategy; people get attracted or curious about new things or experiences and the Sadducees were succeeded. More people started to come to their temples and their holy places for pilgrimage. Their business was booming. When Sadducees became more popular, the other two (mainly Essenes) thought that it was time for a new market strategy. The monk life of Christians is as same as the Essenes belief. During Emperor Vikramaditya, Hinduism was preached in Middle East and Southern Europe. Religious rules and incidents change through time and place. The Indian Indra became Zeus in Greece and Odin in Norse. The European version of Krishna died because of the sins of his followers. Sounds familiar?? Actually , Jesus is a combination of Krishna and Aryan god of Sun Suriya. Suriya's birth is exactly as same as Jesus.

Funny thing is that even if Jesus existed, he should have been a Middle Eastern who sought refuge in Jerusalem because god was powerless to keep him safe in his hometown Bethlehem just like it was powerless to keep Moses safe in Goshen and Mohammad in Makka. It means that the early Christians didn't have Easter, Halloween and even Christmas. The early Bible didn't have Norse mythological creatures like Unicorn and dragon. Like every other Semitic religion, Christianity was polytheist. Later, Semitic culture got popular and the original Christians became Satanist. The old Christians used to worship the head of sheep as a symbol of god. Cross was popular among many pagan beliefs in both Asia and Europe. The ancient temples of Mathura and Varanasi still have crosses on their top. The Egyptian god Horus has a cross. The temples of Emperor Serapis which were destroyed by Alexander had the base on a cross - the present Churches follow the same rule. During the reign of Constantine Pogonatus, by the order of The Sixth Ecumenical Council or the Sixth Synod, cross was started to be used to attract Pagans in Christianity.

Jesus didn't exist at all because there is no record and it is very unusual for Romans not to keep a record of something that almost destroyed their empire; they recorded national embarrassments like Nordic invasion, Hannibal and even Spartacus. Just like Moses, the tales of Jesus were made out of nowhere.

The next question would be;
can you provide link to the source?

1. Anacalypsis by Godfrey Higgins >> (link to read the full volume II https://archive.org/stream/anacalypsisanatt014474mbp/anacalypsisanatt014474mbp_djvu.txt)
2. Bible Myths and Their Parallels in Other Religions by Thomas William Doane
3. Aryan Sun-Myths by Charles Morris

where this one come from again

Some people and s.tupidity are

Great theory, too bad no historian buys this shitt...

Richirich713:
Great theory, too bad no historian buys this shitt...

These historians you listed up there were mostly affected by observational bias or expectational bias in that they were mostly Christians.
There has been 3 large scale "expeditions" to prove the existence of Jesus and they all came back with 3 different profiles/result.
The scholars don't even agree on what Jesus did, how long he lived for and things like that.
The only things that they agree on is that Jesus was crucified and he was baptized by John based on the criteria of embarrassment.
Which is a shitty thing to base the existence of someone on.
Josephus, Tacitus and Pliny the young who wrote the records these scholars based their work on wrote it some 30-100 years after Jesus supposedly died meaning that they relied on word of mouth and you know how reliable a word of mouth account is.
Even Josephus' account has been called a fraud by a lot of scholars.