dometome:
Point of correction, NK was facing not treason but TREASONABLE FELONY! Treasonable felony is NOT treason!

FeloniousFelon:


Treasonable felony is not also the same thing as Terrorism.


Even Buhari is a treasonable felon for overthrowing Shagar

dometome:
I believe that the treasonable felony they are talking about is because NK said that Buhari is a paedophile. Which is true! But overthrowing a DEMOCRATICALLY elected government is treason.

Daplux4:
@ op thank you for this eye opener

FeloniousFelon:
The FG through the office of the AGF went to court not to proscribe IPOB but to get a ruling on who the final authority lies in proscribing a group.

Note: The court did not declare IPOB a terrorist organization. The court only affirmed that the constitutional ruling on the President having the final say on which group to ban.

It is important to state here that the court was approached not to make a ruling on IPOB being a terrorist organization but to weigh in on who has the final say in banning the seccionist movement.

No court can declare IPOB a terrorist organization because none of its members have been convicted or facing terrorist charges in any competent court.

Nnamdi Kanu was facing Treason, Sedition and defamation charges and NOT terrorism charges and so he or IPOB can not be labelled as terrorist.

The inability of the last adminstration to tag Boko Haram a terrorist organization early when the latter began their reign of terror was because Nigerian senate was yet to pass the anti-Terrorism bill .

This legislative loop hole was what made northern senators oppose the tagging of Boko Haram as a terrorist organization.

The Terrorism bill which was passed early in 2011 was copied from that adopted by the United States and it requires congressional approval to also proscribe the group from which the President of the United States will ascent to it.

During the congressional hearing on the activities of Boko Haram, the then SoS of the United states, Hilary Clinton was invited to testify and shed more light on Boko Haram and to give both her honest and professional opinion on Boko Haram. Hilary Clinton refused to categorize Boko Haram as a terrorist organization but claimed the violent Islamic organization was an armed insurgency fighting against wide spread corruption of the Nigerian govt. Barack Obama will reiterate this view afterwards and refused to designate BH until the UN headquarter bombing in Abuja.

A serving senator in the US will later begin investigation on wwhy Hilary Clinton refused to aknowledge BH for what they are - a violent radical Islamic terrorist organization. And so far his findings have indicted both Clinton and Obama's initial hesitation based on their connections to opposition elements in Nigeria and their foreign backers (notably Saudi Arabia) towards effecting a regime change.

The only reason the FG went to court was to make a ruling demanding who had final authority to ban any organization and this was coming after the Senate President faulted the pronouncement of the FG through the Minister of Information banning and categorizing IPOB as a terrorist organization .


However much the current useless jihadist govt wants to manipulate the law, they should be reminded of a pending civil suit initiated by IPOB in the US where Buruntai and other top ranking security officers are being sued for terrorism, torture and extra judicial murder

Once that court rules in favor of the plaintiffs , the likes of Buruntai will effectively be declared a terrorist and will be banned from entering the US or other western nations.

With that proscription, the next stage will be the ICC .

vedaxcool:
[s][/s]

charge and bail analysis is what led a London gay club stripper terrorist to zombiefy so many people. IPob is terrorist and the court's ruling says much.

FeloniousFelon:


Get a copy of the since passed Anti-Terrorism bill before you spew your foolishness here.

And if I may ask ; why did the FG not file Terrorism charges against KANU ?

Why are they yet to file additional terrorism charges on KANU?

vedaxcool:
[s][/s]

In fullness of time they will. They gave cownu the space to show his terrorist tendancy and his urine soaked shoe licking zombies have supplied ample evidence. Keep lying to cownu fartlings giving them false hope like ipork did fooling many of their followers on Trump and Putin.

FeloniousFelon:



The civil case that buruntai is facing in the US will soon determine who the real terrorist are.


One day the hunter will become the hunted

FeloniousFelon:



No. That is defamation of character to which the President can not initiate a criminal or civil case against KANU because the President by virtue of his immunity can not be called to testify or provide evidence.

vedaxcool:


keep on fooling yourself it is allowed.

FeloniousFelon:


The only fool here is you who has not contributed one byte of sense on this thread .

I just pity the moronic idiots who pay you to defend this useless govt. Because it is obvious they are stark illiterates .

vedaxcool:


[s]You are pained no more access to the crumbs poor hardworking igbos donate to feed mazi cownu his family and his team of beggars.[/s]

vedaxcool:


You are pained no more access to the crumbs poor hardworking igbos donate to feed mazi cownu his family and his team of beggars.

GoroTango:
A competent court of law declared IPOB a terrorist organization. Anyone wishing to overturn this verdict must approach the court of appeal. Opening all these useless threads cannot save Kanu from the doom he brought upon himself, and if he knows whats good for him, he should remain in hiding for as long as Buhari is president.

FeloniousFelon:


No court declared IPOB a terrorist organization .

The FG went to court seeking a ruling that gives them the final say in banning IPOB.

Ask yourself why the AGF is yet to amend the charges KANU is standing trial for to include terrorism ?

Think!

GoroTango:
Then what was the court order declaring IPOB a terrorist organization all about?