I have a similar post about this issue, I included several facts concerning this topic. See for yourself.

I am a very curious person and I ask alot of question and research alot of topic. One day I found myself researching the effects of circumcision of the joystick. The reason most people including the majority of Nigerian men get circumcised is because of these health benefits:
decreased risk of urinary tract infections.

A reduced risk of some sexually transmitted diseases in men. (including HIV) 

Protection against penile cancer and a reduced risk of cervical cancer in female sex partners.

Prevention of balanitis (inflammation of the glans) and balanoposthitis (inflammation of the glans and foreskin).

Prevention of phimosis (the inability to retract the foreskin) and paraphimosis (the inability to return the foreskin to its original location).

And easier to clean. 

However as I continued my research I learned that that foreskin which was removed also IMPROVES SEXUAL EXPERIENCE in men. It also helps women who are dry in that area by having extra skin to glide. The foreskin contains thousands of nerve endings which are very sensitive to touch and stretch stimulants. The foreskin glides over the glans during intercourse which is another stimulation. The foreskin also covers the glands which are originally meant to be extremely sensitive, every developing fetus whether male or female develops a clit0ris in the early stages of development. When male hormones develop in the fetus that clitoris continues to grow and develops into the head of the joystick, which is meant to be covered by the foreskin. However the removal of that skin causes the glans( head of penis) to rub over all clothing and causes it to dry out and DEKERTINIZE. This means a thick layer of "tough" skin forms over the glans to deal with the constant irritation it receives. When uncircumcised men remove foreskin and the glans ( head of the joystick) touch anything they find it extremely uncomfortable and unpleasant. 
It is true that the uncircumcised joystick can smell or become dirty if NOT TAKEN CARE Of but this is equally true with the female genital, the armpit, the mouth, or the niash. If you don't wash yourself you will smell, you will be dirty and bacteria will live in those places. When my child comes and their armpit smell why will I cut off his armpit instead of just teaching them how to bath everyday and to wash it, the same goes for the uncircumcised joystick.
I also want to discuss some of these health benefits everyone is talking about if you have sex with somebody who has HIV you will probably get HIV circumcision doesn't make you immune to ANY disease. 
Penile cancer is mostly found in gay men who use their joysticks in ways not intended for its purpose. If you clean yourself the way you are meant to you will not get urinary tract infection.
All these reasons changed my mind about male circumsicon it greatly reduces sexual experience for the man. When I have a son I don't think I'm going to circumcise him. There are traditions that we looked back at them and realised that we need to stop them killing of twins in igboland ( I am igbo) female circumcision all over Nigeria holding slaves etc etc. I think male circumcision needs to be stopped as well.

I want YOU to RESEARCH these things as well to come to a conclusion for yourself. (If you check out real stories of men who got circumcised at old age and compare the sensation afterwards most of them say they don't like it. Keep in mind that most adults who get circumcised had phimosis and had painful erections and intercourse. You need to find a story where the person says he had a normal joystick with no medical conditions to have a fair comparison.)

Emmytes:
It's clear that nobody is intelligent enough to understand and answer my questions.

to rephrase the question, Why is there circumcision at all? If it's bad for the females, it should also be the same for the male. Why arent they left the way they are from the beginning ?

If you say circumcision is bad for females and should be stopped, why do you do it to the males?

And please don't bring in religion into this, I don't indulge in fables and fairy tales.

I completely and totally agree with you Emmytes. I don't care what anyone may say, whether they are making a religious argument or otherwise, circumcision of both sexes is, in my eyes, wrong, inhumane and pointless. Do not destroy something which is already perfect and designed to perform a function and a roll for someone. I believe God (not the Abrahamic one) made everyone perfect, that the body is one of the most amazing and beautiful things to ever come to be, and that destroying the body, destroying something so wonderful and sacred is one of the worst things one can do to another or themselves. I am against circumcision in all forms and for each gender. Period!

As for why it's ok to circumcise a male and not a female, I think it all comes down to religious and cultural superstitions and ignorance, really, that's how I see it. All of these folks propagating bullshit about how removing the foreskin is beneficial, protective, and healthy for a male child refuse to look at actual facts presented about male circumcision--again, the foreskin has a roll to play, it keeps the penis protected from many things as some people have mentioned on this thread. Furthermore, it's like a hood to protect one from the cold or a case ;to keep a delicate musical instrument safe from harm, and as we know the Instruments of each gender are delicate organs. Many also say that it's aesthetically unappealing for men to have foreskins, to that I say "who cares"? I'm blind, number one, so to me whether someone who I may have sex with in the future is circumcised or not would be the last thing I'd worry over. Secondly, this whole concept about "pretty joystick, ugly joystick" is a societal construct, and in my head that's an automatic dismissal of the issue right there.

Anyway, those are my reasons as to why it's ok to cut the foreskin of a male but to leave a female in tact.

Also why does NL change the word for the male Instruments to "joystick"? Are we really that offended? LOL

FeelDeMusic:

I completely and totally agree with you Emmytes. I don't care what anyone may say, whether they are making a religious argument or otherwise, circumcision of both sexes is, in my eyes, wrong, inhumane and pointless. Do not destroy something which is already perfect and designed to perform a function and a roll for someone. I believe God (not the Abrahamic one) made everyone perfect, that the body is one of the most amazing and beautiful things to ever come to be, and that destroying the body, destroying something so wonderful and sacred is one of the worst things one can do to another or themselves. I am against circumcision in all forms and for each gender. Period!

As for why it's ok to circumcise a male and not a female, I think it all comes down to religious and cultural superstitions and ignorance, really, that's how I see it. All of this bullshit propagated by so many folks about how removing the foreskin is benifitial, protective, and healthy for a male child refuse to look at actual facts presented about male circumcision--again, the foreskin has a roll to play, it keeps the penis protected from many things, it's like a hood to protect one from the cold. Many also say that it's aesthetically unappealing, to that I say "who cares"? I'm blind, number one, so to me whether someone who I may have sex with in the future is circumcised or not would be the last thing I'd worry over. Secondly, this whole concept a societal construct, and in my head that's an automatic dismissal of the issue right there.

Anyway, those are my reasons as to why it's ok to cut the foreskin of a male but to leave a female in tact.

Well said bro, well said.

Emmytes:


Well said bro, well said.

Thank you!

Also do you know why some words get censored on here, spicifically those dealing with private parts? Maybe this is some kind of sensorship law or something that I'm unfamiliar with in Nigeria.... I live in America. Or, as I said, are we really that offended with the word p e n i s? haha

Well most Europeans esp eastern Europe don't engage in male circumcision at all.
The whole concept of that stuff is strictly religion based.

Emmytes:
It's clear that nobody is intelligent enough to understand and answer my questions.

to rephrase the question, Why is there circumcision at all? If it's bad for the females, it should also be the same for the male. Why arent they left the way they are from the beginning ?

If you say circumcision is bad for females and should be stopped, why do you do it to the males?

And please don't bring in religion into this, I don't indulge in fables and fairy tales.