Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,162,650 members, 7,851,219 topics. Date: Wednesday, 05 June 2024 at 03:15 PM

N134bn Ogoni Judgment Debt: Shell Loses Appeal At Supreme Court - Politics (2) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / N134bn Ogoni Judgment Debt: Shell Loses Appeal At Supreme Court (10421 Views)

The Outcome Of Atiku's Appeal At The Supreme Court Is Predictable - Jafar Jafar / Tribunal Judgement: Peter Obi Files 51 Grounds Of Appeal At Supreme Court / Atiku, PDP Loses Appeal At Supreme Court (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: N134bn Ogoni Judgment Debt: Shell Loses Appeal At Supreme Court by Jackpat(m): 7:12am On Jan 13, 2019
I smell trouble over the money
Re: N134bn Ogoni Judgment Debt: Shell Loses Appeal At Supreme Court by otokx(m): 7:15am On Jan 13, 2019
The names of the beneficiaries sound like Eleme not Ogoni people.
Re: N134bn Ogoni Judgment Debt: Shell Loses Appeal At Supreme Court by chloride6: 7:39am On Jan 13, 2019
Omo make shell pay up abeg...

Shell has had it rough in court for a while...

First the $80 million case in the US..

Then Malabu and now this,
Re: N134bn Ogoni Judgment Debt: Shell Loses Appeal At Supreme Court by Hushteddy(m): 7:52am On Jan 13, 2019
actiondrilling:
The Supreme Court has dismissed the appeal filed by Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC), which prevented First Bank of Nigeria Limited from paying the plaintiffs community a judgment debt now totaling N134 billion to the plaintiff community represented by 10 Ogoni Chief of Ejama Ebubu community of Ogoni in Rivers State.

In a ruling on Friday, Justice Kumai Bayang Akaahs said the notice of appeal filed by the oil giant was incompetent and struck out based on Order 8 Rule 7 of the court’s rules.


Justice Akaahs also said motion filed by Shell on July 16, 2018 had no leg to stand on it ought not to have been filed.

The Supreme Court consequently awarded N500,000 against Shell for filing an incompetent appeal in the court.

Citing authorities to back up his submission, the apex court held that since the notice of appeal filed by Shell sought to be amended was incompetent, no valid amendment could be effected because issues of fact or mix law and fact were raised in the original notice of appeal with leave of court.

He agreed with the submission of the lead counsel to Shell, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN) that an appellant who has a valid and subsisting appeal can seek the leave of court to do so, adding that in the instant case, there is no such valid notice of appeal that could be amended.

“Where the grounds of appeal are based on mixed law and facts and the leave of either the Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court is not sought and granted, the appeal is incompetent and neither the Court of Appeal nor the Supreme Court will have any jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

“As the notice of appeal sought to be amended was incompetent, no valid amendment could be effected even though issues of jurisdiction were raised in the proposed notice of appeal.

“Learned senior counsel for the appellants stated that correct legal position that the appellant who has a valid and subsisting appeal can seek the leave of court to do so but in the instant case, there is no such valid notice of appeal that can be amended, Justice Akaahs held.

The suit was first commenced in 1991 before a Rivers State High Court sitting at Nchia Division, when the Ejama community represented by Isaac Osaro Ogbara, Victor Obari, John Oguru, Joseph Ogusu, G. O. Nnah, George Osaro, and Adanta Obelle, had sued Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Netherlands, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, United Kingdom, and SPDC over alleged oil spills in 1970 that occurred when Shell operated in the community. Judgment was entered for the sum of N6Billion in favour of the community by the Nchia High court. That judgment was conceded on appeal because the Supreme Court had in a sister case decided that States High Court have no jurisdiction in oil related matters. The Plaintiffs in 2001 refiled the suit at the federal High Court, Port Harcourt.

However, this 2001 case, presided over by Justice Ibrahim Buba claiming N17billion and interest thereon went through full trial. Justice Buba, after listening to the submissions of the parties in the suit, in his judgment in 2010, awarded N17 billion to the representatives of the Ogoni people.

The court equally granted the Ogoni chiefs 25 per cent interest charge on the principal sum of about N17 billion.

SPDC then appealed against the judgment and applied for a stay of execution of the judgment pending the appeal.

As a condition for granting the stay of execution, the court required Shell’s bankers, FirstBank, to provide a guarantee of the judgment sum plus interest.

This condition was complied with. But Shell’s appeal failed on merit because Shell failed to file a brief of argument in support of their appeal but instead claimed that they were granted leave to file an amended brief of argument, which the Court of Appeal found not to be correct.

Against that judgment, Shell proceeded to the Supreme Court where its lawyer, Olanipekun, SAN now leading Olawale Akanni (SAN) who was the company’s lawyer at the Court of Appeal when that appeal was dismissed, filed a fresh application asking for leave to amend the original notice of the appeal filed by Akoni in the Port Harcourt court of appeal registry in order for him to argue fresh points not raised at the court below and in order for him to argue 36 additional grounds of appeal.

Upon the new application at the apex court, the respondents’ lawyer, led by Lucius Nwosu, SAN, filed a preliminary objection. It must be noted that the appellants against whom judgment was entered at the court of appeal are Shell companies – Shell International DV of the Netherlands, Shell International of UK, and Shell Development Company of Nigeria Ltd.

Nwosu, assisted by Lawal Rabana, SAN and others, argued that the findings of the Court of Appeal dismissing their appeal were based on facts, adding that the law is that an appeal must arise out of the decision complained against.

He stated that if the decision complained against was based on findings of fact, the constitution requires that you cannot appeal them except you first seek leave of the Court of Appeal.

The respondents’ lawyer contended that since that notice of appeal at the Court of Appeal was filed without leave, it meant that, that notice was incompetent and cannot be amended because it would mean putting something on nothing and expecting it to stand.

However, in December 2017, the judgment creditors (Ogoni chiefs) commenced garnishee proceedings at the Federal High Court in Owerri presided over by Justice Lewis Allagoa.

They urged the CBN to pay them N122.53 billion out of FirstBank’s account in its custody.

THISDAY gathered that they calculated the principal sum of N17 billion and the accrued 25 per cent interest charge per annum to arrive at the sum of N122,533,403,392.

In January 2018, Justice Allagoa granted them a temporary order (garnishee nisi) ordering the CBN to pay them the sum from FirstBank’s account with it.

But the CBN asked the court not to make absolute the temporary garnishee order it granted six chiefs representing the Ogoni community, compelling it to pay the sum of N122.53 billion on behalf of FirstBank.

CBN’s lead counsel, Professor Fabian Ajogwu (SAN) while responding to the garnishee proceeding, stated that making the order absolute and compelling the CBN to pay out the huge sum would be against the interest of justice because the matter was still pending at the Supreme Court.

He also argued that compelling the CBN to pay the N122.53 billion from FirstBank’s funds domiciled with it could have far-reaching consequences for Nigeria’s oldest and biggest lender by assets and deposits, and a systemic impact on the rest of the financial system and wider economy.

With the dismissal of the Shell’s appeal last Friday, it is not clear if the application filed by the Ogoni chiefs seeking garnishee absolute against FirstBank and reserved for ruling by Justice Ibrahim Buba of the Federal High Court in Lagos would not be granted.

Reacting to the Supreme Court judgment yesterday, Nwosu said: “With this decision, therefore, all arguments of FirstBank that Shell was on a further appeal at the Supreme Court for which they were renging from honouring their obligation that was due by virtue of their guarantee has completely collapsed and as of today, the guarantee is standing at N134 billion, contingent liability of First Bank’s assets. And that there is a garnishee order nisi attaching First Bank’s money at the CBN which since had been served on the Central Bank.

“With this judgment now, the central bank is under an obligation to set aside that amount of money with interest still running from First Bank’s account to satisfy that judgment debt based on what the law says under garnishee orders.”

https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2019/01/13/n134bn-ogoni-judgment-debt-shell-loses-appeal-at-supreme-court/?amp


Please OP, there lots of mistakes on this trend.

change the “ogoni” to Ejama community in Ebubu, Eleme.

Thank God, finally my community is liberated from this evil SHell.
Re: N134bn Ogoni Judgment Debt: Shell Loses Appeal At Supreme Court by IamAlexander: 7:56am On Jan 13, 2019
This is victory for Ken Saro Wiwa... Thief Shell should just go and pay their debt.. It's just $437.9M only... grin
Re: N134bn Ogoni Judgment Debt: Shell Loses Appeal At Supreme Court by Nobody: 7:58am On Jan 13, 2019
Hushteddy:



Please OP, there lots of mistakes on this trend.

change the “ogoni” to Ejama community in Ebubu, Eleme.

Thank God, finally my community is liberated from this evil SHell.
Go tell that to thisdaylive not the op.
Re: N134bn Ogoni Judgment Debt: Shell Loses Appeal At Supreme Court by StFrankeinstein(m): 8:04am On Jan 13, 2019
Nice Development. But this shouldn't result chaos. The money should be used for the development of the Ogoni land because they have suffered a lot.
Re: N134bn Ogoni Judgment Debt: Shell Loses Appeal At Supreme Court by kayusely70(m): 8:31am On Jan 13, 2019
Justice at last for ogoni people, saro wiwa has been vindicated, God rest his soul. Ogoni leaders should use the money for their communal development.
Re: N134bn Ogoni Judgment Debt: Shell Loses Appeal At Supreme Court by CanineOfJackal: 8:43am On Jan 13, 2019
This judgement for the people is one of the reasons Buhari wants to remove the CJN because Downing street has told him to make the judgement go away so that the British government can look the other way in his plan interference in election rigging
Re: N134bn Ogoni Judgment Debt: Shell Loses Appeal At Supreme Court by dragonsfly: 9:04am On Jan 13, 2019
numen:
Interesting to see the effect of that sum being set aside from FBN's asset.

It is Shell money that will be paid from First Bank coffers and depositors money is recorded on the books as liability not assets.
Re: N134bn Ogoni Judgment Debt: Shell Loses Appeal At Supreme Court by Nobody: 9:29am On Jan 13, 2019
This money will make a difference if well utilized.
Re: N134bn Ogoni Judgment Debt: Shell Loses Appeal At Supreme Court by Sonoyom(m): 11:01am On Jan 13, 2019
I just pray that there should be peace ooo, we know how it gets down here in Eleme/Ogoni when sharing of money is involved
Re: N134bn Ogoni Judgment Debt: Shell Loses Appeal At Supreme Court by Sonoyom(m): 11:03am On Jan 13, 2019
otokx:
The names of the beneficiaries sound like Eleme not Ogoni people.
Ejama Ebubu is actually Eleme.
Re: N134bn Ogoni Judgment Debt: Shell Loses Appeal At Supreme Court by ArcFresky(m): 11:37am On Jan 13, 2019
All i saw was in "billions"

As lil kesh said. "Gbese re o"
Re: N134bn Ogoni Judgment Debt: Shell Loses Appeal At Supreme Court by Cantonese: 12:48pm On Jan 13, 2019
actiondrilling:
The Supreme Court has dismissed the appeal filed by Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC), which prevented First Bank of Nigeria Limited from paying the plaintiffs community a judgment debt now totaling N134 billion to the plaintiff community represented by 10 Ogoni Chief of Ejama Ebubu community of Ogoni in Rivers State.

In a ruling on Friday, Justice Kumai Bayang Akaahs said the notice of appeal filed by the oil giant was incompetent and struck out based on Order 8 Rule 7 of the court’s rules.


Justice Akaahs also said motion filed by Shell on July 16, 2018 had no leg to stand on it ought not to have been filed.

The Supreme Court consequently awarded N500,000 against Shell for filing an incompetent appeal in the court.

Citing authorities to back up his submission, the apex court held that since the notice of appeal filed by Shell sought to be amended was incompetent, no valid amendment could be effected because issues of fact or mix law and fact were raised in the original notice of appeal with leave of court.

He agreed with the submission of the lead counsel to Shell, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN) that an appellant who has a valid and subsisting appeal can seek the leave of court to do so, adding that in the instant case, there is no such valid notice of appeal that could be amended.

“Where the grounds of appeal are based on mixed law and facts and the leave of either the Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court is not sought and granted, the appeal is incompetent and neither the Court of Appeal nor the Supreme Court will have any jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

“As the notice of appeal sought to be amended was incompetent, no valid amendment could be effected even though issues of jurisdiction were raised in the proposed notice of appeal.

“Learned senior counsel for the appellants stated that correct legal position that the appellant who has a valid and subsisting appeal can seek the leave of court to do so but in the instant case, there is no such valid notice of appeal that can be amended, Justice Akaahs held.

The suit was first commenced in 1991 before a Rivers State High Court sitting at Nchia Division, when the Ejama community represented by Isaac Osaro Ogbara, Victor Obari, John Oguru, Joseph Ogusu, G. O. Nnah, George Osaro, and Adanta Obelle, had sued Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Netherlands, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, United Kingdom, and SPDC over alleged oil spills in 1970 that occurred when Shell operated in the community. Judgment was entered for the sum of N6Billion in favour of the community by the Nchia High court. That judgment was conceded on appeal because the Supreme Court had in a sister case decided that States High Court have no jurisdiction in oil related matters. The Plaintiffs in 2001 refiled the suit at the federal High Court, Port Harcourt.

However, this 2001 case, presided over by Justice Ibrahim Buba claiming N17billion and interest thereon went through full trial. Justice Buba, after listening to the submissions of the parties in the suit, in his judgment in 2010, awarded N17 billion to the representatives of the Ogoni people.

The court equally granted the Ogoni chiefs 25 per cent interest charge on the principal sum of about N17 billion.

SPDC then appealed against the judgment and applied for a stay of execution of the judgment pending the appeal.

As a condition for granting the stay of execution, the court required Shell’s bankers, FirstBank, to provide a guarantee of the judgment sum plus interest.

This condition was complied with. But Shell’s appeal failed on merit because Shell failed to file a brief of argument in support of their appeal but instead claimed that they were granted leave to file an amended brief of argument, which the Court of Appeal found not to be correct.

Against that judgment, Shell proceeded to the Supreme Court where its lawyer, Olanipekun, SAN now leading Olawale Akanni (SAN) who was the company’s lawyer at the Court of Appeal when that appeal was dismissed, filed a fresh application asking for leave to amend the original notice of the appeal filed by Akoni in the Port Harcourt court of appeal registry in order for him to argue fresh points not raised at the court below and in order for him to argue 36 additional grounds of appeal.

Upon the new application at the apex court, the respondents’ lawyer, led by Lucius Nwosu, SAN, filed a preliminary objection. It must be noted that the appellants against whom judgment was entered at the court of appeal are Shell companies – Shell International DV of the Netherlands, Shell International of UK, and Shell Development Company of Nigeria Ltd.

Nwosu, assisted by Lawal Rabana, SAN and others, argued that the findings of the Court of Appeal dismissing their appeal were based on facts, adding that the law is that an appeal must arise out of the decision complained against.

He stated that if the decision complained against was based on findings of fact, the constitution requires that you cannot appeal them except you first seek leave of the Court of Appeal.

The respondents’ lawyer contended that since that notice of appeal at the Court of Appeal was filed without leave, it meant that, that notice was incompetent and cannot be amended because it would mean putting something on nothing and expecting it to stand.

However, in December 2017, the judgment creditors (Ogoni chiefs) commenced garnishee proceedings at the Federal High Court in Owerri presided over by Justice Lewis Allagoa.

They urged the CBN to pay them N122.53 billion out of FirstBank’s account in its custody.

THISDAY gathered that they calculated the principal sum of N17 billion and the accrued 25 per cent interest charge per annum to arrive at the sum of N122,533,403,392.

In January 2018, Justice Allagoa granted them a temporary order (garnishee nisi) ordering the CBN to pay them the sum from FirstBank’s account with it.

But the CBN asked the court not to make absolute the temporary garnishee order it granted six chiefs representing the Ogoni community, compelling it to pay the sum of N122.53 billion on behalf of FirstBank.

CBN’s lead counsel, Professor Fabian Ajogwu (SAN) while responding to the garnishee proceeding, stated that making the order absolute and compelling the CBN to pay out the huge sum would be against the interest of justice because the matter was still pending at the Supreme Court.

He also argued that compelling the CBN to pay the N122.53 billion from FirstBank’s funds domiciled with it could have far-reaching consequences for Nigeria’s oldest and biggest lender by assets and deposits, and a systemic impact on the rest of the financial system and wider economy.

With the dismissal of the Shell’s appeal last Friday, it is not clear if the application filed by the Ogoni chiefs seeking garnishee absolute against FirstBank and reserved for ruling by Justice Ibrahim Buba of the Federal High Court in Lagos would not be granted.

Reacting to the Supreme Court judgment yesterday, Nwosu said: “With this decision, therefore, all arguments of FirstBank that Shell was on a further appeal at the Supreme Court for which they were renging from honouring their obligation that was due by virtue of their guarantee has completely collapsed and as of today, the guarantee is standing at N134 billion, contingent liability of First Bank’s assets. And that there is a garnishee order nisi attaching First Bank’s money at the CBN which since had been served on the Central Bank.

“With this judgment now, the central bank is under an obligation to set aside that amount of money with interest still running from First Bank’s account to satisfy that judgment debt based on what the law says under garnishee orders.”

https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2019/01/13/n134bn-ogoni-judgment-debt-shell-loses-appeal-at-supreme-court/?amp

Penny wise, pound foolish. Greed, wickedness and procrastination. If they paid 6 billion since or argued to lower the amount, it would have been much easier. Now having to pay close to 500 million dollars makes life difficult for FBN, Shell and CBN.
Re: N134bn Ogoni Judgment Debt: Shell Loses Appeal At Supreme Court by don4real18(m): 1:09pm On Jan 13, 2019
Bsideboi:
Shell and First Bank pay up please and the Ogoni chiefs this money is for development of the community not for sharing.
Do you know how greedy people from that region is when it comes to money?
Just try living there for like 2 weeks and come back and tell me if the money won't be shared. In fact sef, there will be a big fight over it
Re: N134bn Ogoni Judgment Debt: Shell Loses Appeal At Supreme Court by gideonvalor98(m): 3:45pm On Jan 13, 2019
Judiciary.... The hope of the common man.it is high time the WORLD take us serious. We say no to CORRUPTION in Nigeria and by God's grace we gonna achieve zero of that. Congratulations to the ogoni people, they have bear the pains for longer time. It is time to smile.
PS: Make una use the money for what it's meant for o. Your comrades both dead and living have fought a good fight and won. Be proud of them..ken saro wiwa comes to mind
PSS: Abeg do first bank jejely o..my savings still dey there

(1) (2) (Reply)

Tinubu Will Fix Nigeria’s Power Sector – Tolu Bankole (APC Chieftain) / Garba Shehu: Cartel, NIPOST Staff Colluded To Embezzle Stamp Duty / Shocking Predictions By Primate Elijah Ayodele For 2012/2013...

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 56
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.