rowland545:
I see no wrong doing here.....some of this land owners are dubious as fvck....after fixing the house for you. You now want to evict..

The case will drag on while d hotel Lady will keep on making money.....I think I should do this to my land Lady

that is why people like you will never own a property of their own and even if you do, you will see sheggae in the hands of your tenants.

First to do no dey pain

PrimadonnaO:
I don’t see how someone would have rented two apartments at almost the same time and the landlady couldn’t have been in the know of what was going to happen.

Oddly, the tenant’s side of the story makes more sense.

It would make sense to you until you become a property owner. Then the fact that you were agreeable to this kind of behaviour will make you paranoid towards people who want to make use of your property.

PrimadonnaO:
I don’t see how someone would have rented two apartments at almost the same time and the landlady couldn’t have been in the know of what was going to happen.

Oddly, the tenant’s side of the story makes more sense.

there's no way the side of the tenant will make more sense... I suffer use my sweat build house... I give u for rent.. . you tear down part of my house.... Renovate am to hotel? I go juss kill you

make the old woman organise boys wey go deal with the bastard..

Jephz:
there's no way the side of the tenant will make more sense... I suffer use my sweat build house... I give u for rent.. . you tear down part of my house.... Renovate am to hotel? I go juss kill you

Yeah. I think that’s where the problem is emanating from. They didn’t define the contract properly. The landlady should have stated clearly that no part of her property should be restructured. Vague terms of contract cause a lot of issues in the long run.

But I still believe that they surely had some prior discussion about what the property was going to be used for.

This is what you see when there's no unity in d family. Should dis happen to my mother who is united wit us, d man will quit d house in 2weeks time. Trust me, a full time Aba boy, we no dey carry last but let nobody reveal to what i will do to ASHLEY

Dotng:


It would make sense to you until you become a property owner. Then the fact that you were agreeable to this kind of behaviour will make you paranoid towards people who want to make use of your property.

I’m not saying the situation is okay.

I’m simply saying that it’s difficult to believe that one person rented two apartments and went right ahead to start demolishing and reconstructing without any form of consent whatsoever with the property owner.

That’s just too much guts and madness.

PrimadonnaO:


Yeah. I think that’s where the problem is emanating from. They didn’t define the contract properly. The landlady should have stated clearly that no part of her property should be restructured. Vague terms of contract cause a lot of issues in the long run.

But I still believe that they surely had some prior discussion about what the property was going to be used for.

sigh. Here in edo state...... The tenant should not even think of it.... Dem nor need to write am for agreement say nor renovate my house to hotel... Onlybthe tenant go use him brain knw that

Roadtoyesterday:

There is a big difrences btw wickedness and wrong doing. This is wrong doing, not wickedness as you claimed. In Estate management, they call it change of use

change of use by the lord? wrong doing is not wickedness? Nawao

Oliver said in his album do not plant flower in a rented apartment because when you plant finish the owner of house will chase you out. Is better reserve your beautiful flower for your own house.

He is a developer...lol a sophisticated one


That is why it isn't good to generalise....crime knows no tribe or race

safarigirl:
that is why people like you will never own a property of their own and even if you do, you will see sheggae in the hands of your tenants.

First to do no dey pain

this is why tenants will do worst than this to people like u...because u don't have sense to draft agreement before collecting money ...all you care about is money no sense of reasoning

ridbell01:
1.3m for a flat.. Is it 10 bedroom flat?

3 bedroom flat at Alausa goes at that range, even 1.5m

This is all shades of wrong, you don't convert another person's property without their consent no matter what the agreement says. The landlady should not only evict him but make him pay for damages

GogobiriLalas:
The weird thing is despite the obvious defect in the Law, the contri does nothing to address it

Ignorance is a killer

adedehinbo:
lemme just say u re joking,if not,with attitudes like this u might go out one day and never returns nd no one will have the idea of your last destination

lemme also pretend I did not also here you threaten me with kidnapping on a faceless forum ....

And lemme also advice you and other slowpoke never threaten a person u don't know ....it might get u in trouble....u need wisdom in your life

BBBmall25:
This Isn't News Nah, Na Normal Tin For Lasgidi

You you for real?
Turning someone's residential apartment into hotel.

frugal:

It's not a hotel. It's a short let apartment or AirBNB - a major cash cow these days.

According to the news , it says it’s a hotel.
Even if its a short let apartment, it still falls under the hospitality sub sector. So it requires approval.

Skyfornia:
If he is paying his rents...why is the woman bothered? Abi she is enemy of progress?? Some landlords/landladies are wicked, a tenant will move into your dilapidated apartment and renovate it to his taste, when they see that the apartment is looking better, they will either look for a way to eject the tenant or increase his rent.

who sent them message to renovate on another person's property? Nonsense

GisterBlogger:


https://punchng.com/landlady-weeps-as-tenant-converts-flats-to-hotel/amp/

1.3m rent annually for a flat?.
landlady,you are a mean.
what do you expect����

After dem go say lagos landlords no dey gree rent house to some particular people. Why would they? When ya'll always have dubious intentions.

If they should leave , How many People will be Jobless ....... more than 20 People , Let’s think of there family too

Londonboy123:


1.3m rent annually for a flat?.
landlady,you are a mean.
what do you expect����

In Ikeja that is not expensive.

I am sure that man dont have the License to run an Hotel in the first place.

The woman should just go the ALAUSA, the man will be evicted immediate and arrested .

wont happen to me. I will apply jungle justice on the tenant. You will be packed out by force while we do the court thing.

She should secretly organise men of the underworld to go pull the roof out so the bastard will move while they wrestle in court. You cant stay in my house to fight me, never!

zz

RichDad1:
The guys actually took advantage of the woman greediness and naivety.

I'm still trying to understand the greedy part!

Skyfornia:


Omo forget what you heard, a lot happened inside the unheard stories. The matter is in court, why the woman still come dey shout?? Allow the law to take measures.

Make she keep quiet and die in silence after she might have realised that the evil tenant and the trial judge had played ludo on top her head.

A Tenant From Hell

PrimadonnaO:


Yeah. I think that’s where the problem is emanating from. They didn’t define the contract properly. The landlady should have stated clearly that no part of her property should be restructured. Vague terms of contract cause a lot of issues in the long run.

But I still believe that they surely had some prior discussion about what the property was going to be used for.

Are you a Nigerian? Do you live in this country?


A landlord should have a written agreement with you on how not to convert his or her property into whatever you deem fit


Meanwhile, you rented the apartment o.

PrimadonnaO:
I don’t see how someone would have rented two apartments at almost the same time and the landlady couldn’t have been in the know of what was going to happen.

Oddly, the tenant’s side of the story is more coherent.

Oh, you missed the part below or didn't read through.

“I later travelled abroad and while away, I got a call that one of my tenants was moving out to his newly-built house.

My agent again called to inform me that Ashley was interested in the vacant apartment for his brother, who was abroad;

I was reluctant initially, because I didn’t want to give two flats to the same tenant, but he promised to abide by the agreement he had earlier signed when he rented the first flat.

“I didn’t know that he was collaborating with the agent,

PrimadonnaO:


Yeah. I think that’s where the problem is emanating from. They didn’t define the contract properly. The landlady should have stated clearly that no part of her property should be restructured. Vague terms of contract cause a lot of issues in the long run.

Mehn, as a tenant, do you need to be told? It's an offense to modify someone's building because the agreement didn't say that you can't.

But I still believe that they surely had some prior discussion about what the property was going to be used for.

Wrong belief. Even the tenant didn't anything about that. But the agent told the old lady this:

My agent again called to inform me that Ashley was interested in the vacant apartment for his brother, who was abroad;