You score 80 marks in an examination, the Examiner deducts 50 marks and awards 30 marks to you. The University Senate returns your 50 marks. This is the Imo Case.

You score 80 marks in an examination, the Examiner says you're not even a student in the first place and shouldn't have sat for the exam, your 80 marks don't count. The University Senate agrees with the Examiner. This is the Zamfara case.

Very simple explanations, now it's clear.

Very simple example, Hahahhaa PDP rogue members will soon interpret it in their own suitable way.

You sneaky APC e-thugs are being clever by half! Your analogy is biased ab-initio as you've craftily and sneakily taken sides by assuming the examiner had no reason to deduct 50 marks to begin with! What of if you were caught cheating in the exam with a 'bullet' that would have helped you answer part of the exam that's worth 50 marks?

A better analogy would be: the Senate swallowing your lie hook-line-and-sinker, that you deserved and worked for the 50 marks, without even caring to listen to the examiner or ask him why he deducted the marks in the first place!

Always wants to make point but it's senseless , arguing upside down

Examiner can't deduct your mark , if you carried bullet you are going straight to senate / panel

XANDERBOY85:
You sneaky APC e-thugs are being clever by half! Your analogy is biased ab-initio as you've craftily and sneakily taken sides by assuming the examiner had no reason to deduct 50 marks to begin with! What of if you were caught cheating in the exam with a 'bullet' that would have helped you answer part of the exam that's worth 50 marks?

A better analogy would be: the Senate swallowing your lie hook-line-and-sinker, that you deserved and worked for the 50 marks, without even caring to listen to the examiner or ask him why he deducted the marks in the first place!

What you are saying in essence is that removing votes from 300+ wards / PU is justified but the defense lawyer couldn't cite one single incident of ballot snatching , vote buying , voter coercion , voter intimidation or any of such malpractices before the court, even INEC couldn't cite a reason why the votes were deducted


Are you sure you are ok upstairs ?


Osun elections as a case study , the votes in ikirun had to be recast because of violence , people moving from environs to go and vote PDP outside their polling unit , there was even viral video of girl with hijab claiming police and APC didn't allow them to vote in Ikirun whereas most of them were from Ede town where adeleke was born

That vote was recast ,


my point is if the PDP lawyer or INEC couldn't prove anything was wrong hence why the votes were REMOVED (NOT EVEN CANCELED) and you still think PDP was cheated , then you definitely have zero matter upstairs

balo2rule:
You score 80 marks in an examination, the Examiner deducts 50 marks and awards 30 marks to you. The University Senate returns your 50 marks. This is the Imo Case.

You score 80 marks in an examination, the Examiner says you're not even a student in the first place and shouldn't have sat for the exam, your 80 marks don't count. The University Senate agrees with the Examiner. This is the Zamfara case.

And while they returned your 50 Mark's you scored 120 above maximum total exam score of 100...

Does that make any sense to you?.. would the school even make such announcement seeing such?..

balo2rule:
You score 80 marks in an examination, the Examiner deducts 50 marks and awards 30 marks to you. The University Senate returns your 50 marks. This is the Imo Case.

You score 80 marks in an examination, the Examiner says you're not even a student in the first place and shouldn't have sat for the exam, your 80 marks don't count. The University Senate agrees with the Examiner. This is the Zamfara case.

Lie! Examiner removed marks from all the students that took the exam including the person that took the first position. The 4th position went to the senate to complain and the senate awarded all the marks deducted to him making him to score above the 100 mark just because he was the only one that complained that his mark was deducted. The supreme court would have asked inec to award each and every candidates their portion of the votes from the 388 PUs(whether it was hope that brought the case or not), that would have taken the wishes of the electorates into consideration

balo2rule:
You score 80 marks in an examination, the Examiner deducts 50 marks and awards 30 marks to you. The University Senate returns your 50 marks. This is the Imo Case.

You score 80 marks in an examination, the Examiner says you're not even a student in the first place and shouldn't have sat for the exam, your 80 marks don't count. The University Senate agrees with the Examiner. This is the Zamfara case.

university senate even adds extra 25 marks making it 105

Op which school you go. I want see your lecturers and VC make i ask them if them go award mark above the percentage 100.

180/100. Na BP them they measure?

DaBullIT:
Always wants to make point but it's senseless , arguing upside down

Examiner can't deduct your mark , if you carried bullet you are going straight to senate / panel

What you are saying in essence is that removing votes from 300+ wards / PU is justified but the defense lawyer couldn't cite one single incident of ballot snatching , vote buying , voter coercion , voter intimidation or any of such malpractices before the court, even INEC couldn't cite a reason why the votes were deducted


Are you sure you are ok upstairs ?


Osun elections as a case study , the votes in ikirun had to be recast because of violence , people moving from environs to go and vote PDP outside their polling unit , there was even viral video of girl with hijab claiming police and APC didn't allow them to vote in Ikirun whereas most of them were from Ede town where adeleke was born

That vote was recast ,


my point is if the PDP lawyer or INEC couldn't prove anything was wrong hence why the votes were REMOVED (NOT EVEN CANCELED) and you still think PDP was cheated , then you definitely have zero matter upstairs

I'm just going along with the OPs analogy you fool!

YES! I'm saying removing those votes WERE JUSTIFIED! If INEC that's supposed to be the umpire doesn't act when faced with brazen, in-your-face rigging then who would? We're yet to hear the reasons why the Supreme Court gave the ruling it gave (a ruling which ended up making the tally of final votes cast more than that of accredited voters) so we're not privy to the facts of the hearing to say one way or the other what the defence teams cited or didn't cite!

In any case, you have to wonder why the useless Supreme Court believed the position of that crook Uzodinma and not that of INEC.....that it cancelled votes from those units due to rigging! After listening to the facts of the case, two lower courts saw reason with INECs position.....TWO! Then your APC Supreme Court came along and, with one stroke of the pen, overrulled the lower courts well-considered judgements and went ahead to deliver a ridiculous ruling that ended up making total of final votes cast more than that of accredited voters! Let's see how they'll wriggle out of this one!

I guess it's "IMPs" day today , no news , journal or post on any website or media has come out to say the results of 388 polling units omitted ( NOT CANCELED ) was due to rigging , but you had to add that to make your claim legit


Any case supreme court decision is final , if you do not like it , go and furrrck yourself

XANDERBOY85:


I'm just going along with the OPs analogy you fool!

YES! I'm saying removing those votes WERE JUSTIFIED! If INEC that's supposed to be the umpire doesn't act when faced with brazen, in-your-face rigging then who would? We're yet to hear the reasons why the Supreme Court gave the ruling it gave (a ruling which ended up making the tally of final votes cast more than that of accredited voters) so we're not privy to the facts of the hearing to say one way or the other what the defence teams cited or didn't cite!

In any case, you have to wonder why the useless Supreme Court believed the position of that crook Uzodinma and not that of INEC.....that it cancelled votes from those units due to rigging! After listening to the facts of the case, two lower courts saw reason with INECs position.....TWO! Then your APC Supreme Court came along and, with one stroke of the pen, overrulled the lower courts well-considered judgements and went ahead to deliver a ridiculous ruling that ended up making total of final votes cast more than that of accredited voters! Let's see how they'll wriggle out of this one!