Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis - Religion - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis (9149 Views)
Islam Is Not A Benchmark For True Christianity / Roman Catholicism, Mary And Idolatry / Catholicism's SHOCKING Attitude Toward The Bible! (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) ... (11) (Reply) (Go Down)
| Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by Richwallet: 2:16pm On May 25, 2021 |
According to the Gospel of Thomas and Queen Mary Magdalene the early Christianity was void of idols. There were no images of Christ. Instead believers sought gnosis, and prayer and fasting were the chief practices. Observance and obedience to the divine laws was required to keep the body free of demonic interference. These were the first Christians which began in Glastonbury England among the Druids. The cross was not a symbol of Christ cruxifiction yet rather of Alchemy symbolizing the old Swastikas borrowed from Vedic monotheistic Sanskrit and Zoroastrian teachings of the 4 elements produced by the all powerful spirit manifesting into our reality. We were to pray as if our prayers were already answered and use Segulot symbolism to focus our subconscious mind to using emotional energy to propel our desires unto this plane of existence. Early Christians were called Heretics by the pagan orders of North Africa and Roman Empire. The 4th century Orthodox church persecuted the true followers of Christ in favor of Idolatry. The same idolatry present in Rome, Greece, Egypt, Babylon, Canaan, Axum modern Ethiopia and North African groups who sought to conceal the mysteries only for the elect few while enslaving the masses through idolatry. Woe to the priests and pharisees who stand at the gate of heaven yet will not enter. Nor will they allow any other man to enter. They desire to keep the peoples as slaves than teach you the true Christianity. gno·sis (nō′sĭs) n. Intuitive apprehension of spiritual truths, an esoteric form of knowledge sought by the Gnostics. Idolatry is the worship of an idol or cult image, being a physical image, such as a statue, or a person in place of God. In Abrahamic religions, namely Judaism, Christianity and Islam, idolatry connotes the worship of something or someone other than God as if it were God. Once you know the truth it shall set you free.
|
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by Richwallet: 2:18pm On May 25, 2021 |
Christianity was our religion not Rome.
|
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by Richwallet: 2:23pm On May 25, 2021 |
Black people fighting with Black people using White people. This game is over and will never be played again. The Man of Lawlessness reveals himself.
|
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by HarrisAWalcott: 2:45pm On May 25, 2021 |
No White devils without Black devils |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by HarrisAWalcott: 2:51pm On May 25, 2021 |
They have no word for sex because sex is apart of the idolaters religion as in Babylon and Rome. In Vodoun, Ifa, Santeria and Hindu it is the same free open experience of sexuality because it's not culture it's their religion. |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by HarrisAWalcott: 4:15pm On May 25, 2021 |
Idols of wood and stone carved by their hands yet have no power of themselves. So they must imbued the statues and fetishes with their own sexual energy. This is how the gods are entertained then they must be feed either with the blood of an animal or human being. Thus this is the single reason for caste to create a segment of the people doomed to be sacrifices like the OSU among the Igbo who are outcast Isrealites. Idolaters are the root of slavery a need for human sacrifices to feed their gods. All human sacrifice in pictagrams were slaves kidnapped and trafficked people. This was done all over the world even among Native Americans existed idolatry and human sacrifice. Cannibalism is an idolaters belief that by eating another human being they were absorbing their strength. Cannibalism existed in Egypt among the Greek ruled Lower Egypt where Seraptis Cristos believers founded by Ptolemy I. The Greeks who were exiled Egyptians spend time in India and learned of the Krishna story used it as a basis to form Serapis worship. Many do not understand the Watchers myth told within the book of Enoch. I will elaborate and disclose for you the meaning. The pagan idolaters ruling the world today have planted stories of aliens behind human civilization yet this is another of their many lies. Monotheism is civilization and polytheism is religion. Monotheism is the belief in the one Supreme God. This God is invisible and omnipresent throughout creation in the form of energy that is conscious. Through gnosis God revealed to man the sacred letters that unlocked the secrets hidden in their own souls. From this information man was able to create civilization. Yet from time to time during the ups and downs of cosmic cycles this knowledge was loss. So God himself would incarnate among men to restore the faith in the unseen. The physical world is not real it is a matrix of cosmic thought manifested as solids, fire , water, air and earth are the 4 categories. This is the great secret of Alchemy that man through his inner being can transform lead into gold. This is how monotheism was and is civilization. Polytheism is the fall of Man into material worship of the false matrix. Men conjured into existence non physical entities called fallacies or demons as you will. No angels fell from heaven these were men conjuring negative dark energies in order to bypass God's power and authority. The Book of Enoch says the Kings of the Earth created gods with their own hands. This implies there are no physical aliens coming from other worlds. Yet the Fallen are men who have become possessed by demons they created then produced offspring through women that carry the same evil bloodline. The father passess down 60 percent of his DNA to his offspring dividing man into different tribes and castes. There was a study done on subjects using brain scans that showed people who have a strong sense of God have different brain waves than those who do not. They called the VMAT2 v.s the God gene. This gene is in lower qualities in other human beings and I'm assuming these are those whose fathers were idolaters. More on this hot topic. 2 Likes
|
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by ochibuogwu5: 4:25pm On May 25, 2021 |
Come and Surrender your life to the Lordship of Jesus Christ Crucified : "Jesus answered and said unto him, “Verily, verily I say unto thee, unless a man be born again, he cannot see the Kingdom of God.” 4 Nicodemus said unto Him, “How can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter a second time into his mother’s womb and be born?” 5 Jesus answered, “Verily, verily I say unto thee, unless a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God. 6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit." (John 3:3-6 ) Are you born-again in Christ Jesus Crucified ? What does it mean to be born-again in Christ Jesus Crucified ? 1. Hear and understand the gospel of Jesus Christ Crucified, Resurrected and Glorified. 2. Become convicted as a sinner because you inherited sin's nature(the flesh) from Adam and your own personal sins by the Holy Spirit through the gospel that you heard. 3. Repentance from sin's nature and sinful lifestyle. 4. Believe in Jesus Christ death and resurrection as your own remission/atonement for sin's nature and sinful lifestyle. 5. Decide to live only in obedience to Jesus Christ teachings by praying for the release of God's mercy and grace from His throne of Grace each day and moments of your life even as you engage in personal daily bible studies and fellowship with the Holy Spirit. 6. Submit to water baptism by immersion(In the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit; Matthew 28:18-20, Romans 6:3-4) if you have not been baptized according as Jesus was baptized before now as an outward sign of the new creation life that you have received in Christ. ARE YOU READY TO RECEIVE JESUS CHRIST CRUCIFIED NOW ? Repent from your sin inside your heart now, accept that you are a sinner in the eyes of God, ask JESUS CHRIST to wash you with His Precious Blood shed on the Cross of Calvary and ask Him to receive you into His kingdom and fill you with His Holy Spirit through the name of Jesus. This can be done by saying this prayer and declarative words of salvation thus "Father, I come to you now recognizing that I am a sinner, I ask you to save my soul by the effects of Jesus death on the Cross and His resurrection, receive me as your SON and fill me with your Holy Spirit Power to sustain me till the end in your holiness in Jesus name. Amen". Then you can join any fellowship that preaches CHRIST AND HIM CRUCIFIED ALONE close to your neighborhood so that you will ask them to baptize you with water and join them to grow your NEW LIFE/FAITH in JESUS CHRIST CRUCIFIED daily through daily personal bible studies and quiet-time with the Holy Spirit. On your own, you can get a holy bible then start reading it so that you will have more revelational knowledge about JESUS CHRIST CRUCIFIED who is now YOUR NEW LIFE especially from the New testament, you can start from the Gospel according to St. Matthew, few verses each day like Matthew 1:1-17 for the first day, 2nd day Matthew 1:18-25; OR John 1:1-5, John 1:6-10, John 1:11-18 e.t.c. Each time before you open the holy bible to study; ask the Holy Spirit to reveal JESUS CHRIST CRUCIFIED FRESH INTO YOUR HEART thus "Father, fill me with your Holy Spirit baptism of Power and Fire new/fresh and mix your written word with faith in my heart even as I study each word and sentence now and any other time I remember it in my heart in Jesus name. Amen". If you have more questions then you can inbox me or ask any Christian around your neighborhood. Great Grace Brethren!!! 1 Like |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by HarrisAWalcott: 5:04pm On May 25, 2021 |
Ochibuogwu5 Why ruin the post with that gibberish copy and paste scripture with no jewels contained? There is no Jesus Christ for that's an idol. |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by jamesid29(m): 5:41pm On May 25, 2021 |
It is well... Walks away |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by sonmvayina(m): 5:46pm On May 25, 2021 |
There was nothing like chridtianity prior to nicea.. .it is all paganism and idolatry.. |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by Richwallet: 6:11pm On May 25, 2021 |
sonmvayina: Black people in Rome created Catholicism which is paganism and idolatry. 1 Like |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by Richwallet: 6:14pm On May 25, 2021 |
richie44: |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by Richwallet: 6:16pm On May 25, 2021 |
HarrisAWalcott: |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by Richwallet: 6:18pm On May 25, 2021 |
DoctorAlien: Catholicism is not Christianity its African Vodou and Indian Hindu religion. |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by peggywebbs(f): 6:45pm On May 25, 2021 |
Good day ladies and gentlemen of nairaland. I am Catholic and proudly one. First of all Catholicism has been one controversial sect from time immemorial. The truth is it is one of the early churches and one church that has kept its tradition. On the issue of idol worshipping, I will say that the Catholic church is being misunderstood. People need to understand what devotion and reverence means as opposed to worship. It is true that some people go the extra mile to worship this images but that doesn't mean it is meant to be so. However, I am of the belief that God is neither Catholic or Christian. We are all connected because of our relationship to our creator God and he sees all as his children. The bible in the new testament is very clear on one thing. You should not be fooled by religion, pastors or false prophets. He gave us the Holy Spirit, the spirit of truth to know and identify the truth. I think we should focus on the truth and not denominations. If you want to be a redeem member, mfm, etc it is fine so far they believe that Christ was born by immaculate conception, he was crucified, died on the cross, buried, raised the third day and will come again to judge both the living and the dead. Anything other than this is irrelevant. Anyway I come in peace. |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by Richwallet: 7:00pm On May 25, 2021 |
peggywebbs: We are not misunderstanding the evil history only just understanding evil Black people are at the root of it. White people are merely the face and it is really Black people behind the idol beliefs. All traditional religions from Africa to India throughout the world are majority Blacks. And the Hebrew Blacks have suffered persecution at the hands of White mercenaries backed up by Blacks who are the real Romans. The Knights Templar were Hebrews destroyed by Catholic Blacks in France. The French kings didn't become White until the 15th century after the Moors using dirty tactics pushed Judah off the thrones of Europe then handed power to Whites. I know about the vow of silence your leaders take. We Judah founded Christianity not Romans and we built Europe. I will not cease exposing the lies of Black Catholics who know the truth. Catholicism is not Christianity its African Vodou and Indian Hindu religion.
|
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by Richwallet: 7:23pm On May 25, 2021 |
.... |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by HarrisAWalcott: 8:19pm On May 25, 2021 |
Rome is the devil's church |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by HarrisAWalcott: 8:59pm On May 25, 2021 |
....... |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by sonmvayina(m): 9:08pm On May 25, 2021 |
HarrisAWalcott: Christianity in general has always been about inanna(lucifer) and Tamuz... |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by HarrisAWalcott: 9:15pm On May 25, 2021 |
sonmvayina: You don't know what you are talking about. Pagans upsurp the Abrahamic faiths and Rome is pagan. Christianity started in Europe not Rome. That history is not told that's why you associated Christianity with Luciferian practicing Romans. |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by HarrisAWalcott: 11:20pm On May 25, 2021 |
Lucifer is just another name for Venus in spring when it's called the Morning Star. Fertility rites start in spring, pan sexual rituals and sacrifices which are the Devil's religion. So anywhere they are endorsing homosexuality along with idol worship they are serving Lucifer. |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by HarrisAWalcott: 12:00am On May 26, 2021 |
... |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by HarrisAWalcott: 2:16am On May 26, 2021 |
Catholicism is not Christianity |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by sonmvayina(m): 9:52am On May 26, 2021 |
HarrisAWalcott: Christianity started in Nicea, which is in present day Turkey. In a way you are right. But they got most of their belief from Babylon.. |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by sonmvayina(m): 9:55am On May 26, 2021 |
HarrisAWalcott: Yea...just like Tinubu is not a Nigerian...I hear you. 3 Likes |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by HarrisAWalcott: 11:35am On May 26, 2021 |
sonmvayina: No Catholicism has been about Lucifer since day one.. The Romans who are Blacks blended their pagan religion which is luciferianism with the true Christianity. There is European Celtic Christianity that was replaced by Emperor Charlemagne of the Holy Roman Empire. I mean Charlemagne was a Frank. He was from father's tribe of Franks.. We are Germanic Blacks written out of history due to White Jewish stealing our identity but it all started with Charlemagne who was one of us. Whole they were showing the world the phony holocaust of White Jews by Hitler the Nazis were killing my people the Black Frankish Jews . After losing power many Black Franks lived in Ghettoes yet some were affluent because we were the true European nobility. We lost power because of infighting and some of us betray the faith of Christ. Charlemagne built Roman Catholic cathedrals right on top of the Celtic churches. He forced people to convert to Catholicism and expanded his Empire from Germany all the way to Switzerland. Once you understand this hidden history you will forget about Antioch because Christianity started in Europe. What ethnicity was Charlemagne? Charlemagne (c. 742-814), also known as Karl and Charles the Great, was a medieval emperor who ruled much of Western Europe from 768 to 814. In 771, Charlemagne became king of the Franks, a Germanic tribe in present-day Belgium, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and western Germany.Jun 6, 2019 Some idiot Black Americans who desire to be Africans call us Moors when they see these images of Black European Nobility but we are not Moors. Our tribe is called France. We are the real Franks to whom France is named after. Our tribe is thousands of years old since the time of Moses. Our ancestors were the Hebrews who left Egypt before Moses. We founded the kingdom of Troy that was destroyed by the Black Greeks known as the Trojan War. The sons of Hectar who was the crowned Prince and son of King Priam migrated to Gaul living as tribal groups of Franks along the Rhine River. After we built France the capital was named after Paris the brother of Hectar. The Merovingian dynasty is a special bloodline of Franks whom married the royal family of Judah continuing the royal bloodline of Christ. Yes the ruling family of the Franks were Merovingian the sons of Yesuah Ben Yossef and Queen Mary Magdalene.
|
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by Richwallet: 1:51pm On May 26, 2021 |
We know from the Gospel chronology that the Bethany secondmarriage anointing of Jesus by Mary Magdalene was in the week before the Crucifixion. And we know that at that stage Mary was three-months pregnant and therefore should have given birth in the following September. So, what do the Gospels tell us about events in September AD 33? In fact, the Gospels tell us nothing, but the story is taken up in The Acts of the Apostles which detail for September the event which we have come to know as "the Ascension". The one thing that the Acts do not do, however, is call the event "the Ascension". This was a name given to the ritual when the Roman Church doctrines were established over three centuries later. What the text actually says is: "And when he had spoken these things...he was taken up, and a cloud received him out of their sight." It then continues that "a man in white" said to the disciples: "Why stand ye gazing up into heaven? This same Jesus...shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go." Then, a little later in the Acts, it says that "heaven" must receive Jesus until "the time of restitution". Given that this was the very month in which Mary Magdalene's child was due, is there perhaps some connection between Mary's confinement and the so-called Ascension? There certainly is, and the connection is made by virtue of the time of restitution. Not only were there rules to govern the marriage ceremony of a Messianic heir, but so too were there rules to govern the marriage itself. The rules of dynastic wedlock were quite unlike the Jewish family norm, and Messianic parents were formally separated at the birth of a child. Even prior to this, intimacy between a dynastic husband and wife was only allowed in December, so that births of heirs would always fall in the month of September-the month of Atonement, the holiest month of the Jewish calendar. Indeed, it was this very rule which Jesus's own parents (Joseph and Mary) had themselves broken. And this was the reason why the Jews were split in opinion as to whether Jesus was, in fact, their true Messiah. When a dynastic child was conceived at the wrong time of year, the mother was generally placed in monastic custody for the birth so as to avoid public embarrassment. This was called being "put away privily", and Matthew states quite plainly that when Mary's pregnancy was discovered, "Joseph, her husband, being a just man and not willing to make her a public example, was minded to put her away privily". In this instance, special dispensation for the birth was granted by the archangel Simeon who at that time held the distinction of "Gabriel", being the angelic priest in charge. Both the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Book of Enoch (which was excluded from the Old Testament) detail that the "archangels" (or chief ambassadors) were the senior priests at Qumran, retaining the traditional titles of "Michael", "Gabriel", "Raphael", "Sariel", etc. In the case of Jesus and Mary Magdalene, however, the rules of wedlock had been obeyed to the letter, and their first child was properly conceived in December AD 32, to be born in September AD 33. From the moment of a dynastic birth, the parents were physically separated-for six years if the child was a boy, and for three years if the child was a girl. Their marriage would only be recommenced at the designated time of restitution. Meanwhile, the mother and child would enter the equivalent of a convent, and the father would enter "the Kingdom of Heaven". This Kingdom of Heaven was actually the Essene High Monastery at Mird, by the Dead Sea, and the ceremony of entry was conducted by the angelic priests under the supervision of the appointed Leader of the Pilgrims. In the Old Testament book of Exodus, the Israelite pilgrims were led into the Holy Land by a "cloud"-and in accordance with this continued Exodus imagery, the priestly Leader of the Pilgrims was designated with the title "Cloud". So, if we now read the Acts verses as they were intended to be understood, we see that Jesus was taken up by the Cloud (the Leader of the Pilgrims) to the Kingdom of Heaven (the High Monastery). And the man in white (an angelic priest) said that Jesus would return at the time of restitution (when his Earthly marriage was restored). If we now look at St Paul's Epistle to the Hebrews we discover that he explains the said Ascension event in some greater detail, for Paul tells of how Jesus was admitted to the Priesthood of Heaven when he actually had no entitlement to such a sacred office. He explains that Jesus was born (through his father Joseph) into the Davidic line of Judah-a line which held the right of kingship but had no right to priesthood, for this was the sole prerogative of the line of Aaron and Levi. But, says Paul, a special dispensation was granted, and he tells that "for the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law". As a result of this express "change of the law", it is explained that Jesus was enabled to enter the Kingdom of Heaven in the priestly Order of Melchizedek. So, in September AD 33, the first child of Jesus and Mary Magdalene was born, and Jesus duly entered the Kingdom of Heaven. There is no reference to this child being a son (as there is for the two subsequent births), and given that Jesus returned three years later, in AD 36, we know that Mary must have had a daughter. By following the chronology of the Acts, we see that in September AD 37 a second child was born; and then another in AD 44. The period between these two births to the second restitution in AD 43 was "six years", which denotes that the AD 37 child was a son. This fact is also conveyed by the use of cryptic wording-the same cryptic wording afforded to the AD 44 child-so we know that this third child was also a son. In accordance with the scribal codes detailed in the Dead Sea Scrolls, everything cryptic within the New Testament is set up beforehand by some other entry which explains that the inherent message is "for those with ears to hear". Once these codes and allegories are understood, they never ever vary. They mean the same thing every time they are used, and they are used every time that same meaning is required. For example, the Gospels explain that Jesus was called "the Word of God": "And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us...full of grace and truth." John goes to great lengths to explain the relevance of this definition, and subsequent entries give details such as "the Word of God stood by the lake" and "the Word of God was in Samaria". Messages conveying information about fertility and new life are established in the Parable of the Sower whose seed "bore fruit and increased". Thus, when it is said that "the Word of God increased", "those with ears to hear" would recognise at once that "Jesus increased"-that is to say, he had a son. There are two such entries in the Acts, and they fall precisely on cue in AD 37 and AD 44. Probably the most misrepresented book of the New Testament is The Book of The Revelation of St John the Divine-misrepresented by the Church, that is; not by the book itself. This book is quite unlike any other in the Bible. It is dubbed with terrible supernatural overtones, and its straightforward imagery has been savagely corrupted by the Church to present the text as some form of foreboding or prophecy of warning! But the book is not called "The Prophecy" or "The Warning". It is called "The Revelation". So, what does the book reveal? Chronologically, its story follows The Acts of the Apostles, and the Book of The Revelation is, in fact, the continuing story of Jesus, Mary Magdalene and their sons, particularly the elder son, Jesus Justus. It follows his life and details his marriage, along with the birth of his own son. This much-misunderstood New Testament book is not a foreboding or a warning as the fearful Church would have us believe. It is precisely what it says it is: a revelation. As we saw earlier, ordained priests of the era were called "fishers"; their helpers were called "fishermen", and baptismal candidates were called "fishes". Jesus became an ordained fisher when he entered the Kingdom of Heaven, but until that time (as explained by St Paul) he held no priestly office. In the rite of ordination, the officiating Levite priests of the Sanctuary would administer five loaves of bread and two fishes to the candidates, but the law was very firm in that such candidates had to be circumcised Jews. Gentiles and uncircumcised Samaritans were on no account afforded any such privilege. Indeed, it was this particular ministerial ritual which Jesus had flouted at the so-called "feeding of the five-thousand", because he presumed the right to grant access to his own new liberal ministry by offering the loaves and fishes to an unsanctified gathering. Apart from eventually becoming a fisher, Jesus was also referred to as "the Christ"-a Greek definition which meant "the King". In saying the name "Jesus Christ", we are actually saying "King Jesus", and his kingly heritage was of the Royal House of Judah (the House of David), as mentioned numerous times in the Gospels and in the Epistles of St Paul. From AD 33, therefore, Jesus emerged with the dual status of a "Priest Christ" or, as is more commonly cited, a "Fisher King". This definition, as we shall see, was to become an hereditary and dynastic office of Jesus' heirs, and the succeeding "Fisher Kings" were paramount in the history of the Grail bloodline. Prior to the birth of her second son in AD 44, Mary Magdalene was exiled from Judaea following a political uprising in which she was implicated. Along with Philip, Lazarus and a few retainers, she travelled (by arrangement with King Herod-Agrippa II) to live at the Herodian estate near Lyon, in Gaul (which later became France). From the earliest times, through the mediaeval era, to the great Renaissance, Mary's flight was portrayed in illuminated manuscripts and great artworks alike. Her life and work in France, especially in Provence and the Languedoc, appeared not only in works of European history but also in the Roman Church liturgy-until her story was suppressed by the Vatican. Mary Magdalene's exile is told in The Book of The Revelation which describes that she was pregnant at the time. It tells also of how the Roman authorities subsequently persecuted Mary, her son and his heirs: "And she, being with child, cried...and pained to be delivered...and behold, a great red dragon, having seven heads...and seven crowns...stood before the woman...for to devour her child... And she brought forth a man-child...and the woman fled into the wilderness... And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war forever with the remnant of her seed...which...have the testimony of Jesus Christ." It was to Gaul that Mary was said to have carried the Sangréal (the Blood Royal, the Holy Grail); and it was in Gaul that the famous line of Jesus and Mary's immediate descendant heirs, the Fisher Kings, flourished for 300 years. The eternal motto of the Fisher Kings was "In Strength"-inspired by the name of their ancestor, Boaz (the great-grandfather of King David), whose name similarly meant "In Strength". When translated into Latin, this became "In Fortis", which was subsequently corrupted to "Anfortas", the name of the Fisher King in Grail romance. We can now return to the Grail's traditional symbolism as a chalice containing the blood of Jesus. We can also consider graphic designs dating back well beyond the Dark Ages to about 3,500 BC. And in doing this, we discover that a chalice or a cup was the longest-standing symbol of the female. Its representation was that of the Sacred Vessel-the vas uterus, the womb. And so, when fleeing into France, Mary Magdalene carried the Sangréal in the Sacred Chalice of her womb-just as the Book of The Revelation explains. And the name of this second son was Joseph. The equivalent traditional symbol of the male was a blade or a horn, usually represented by a sword or a unicorn. In the Old Testament's Song of Solomon and in the Psalms of David, the fertile unicorn is associated with the kingly line of Judah; and it was for this very reason that the Cathars of Provence used the mystical beast to symbolise the Grail bloodline. Mary Magdalene died in Provence in AD 63. In that very year, Joseph of Arimathea built the famous chapel at Glastonbury in England as a memorial to the Messianic Queen. This was the first 'above-ground' Christian church in the world, and in the following year Mary's son Jesus Justus dedicated it to his mother. Jesus the Younger had in fact been to England with Joseph before, at the age of twelve, in AD 49. It was this event which inspired William Blake's famous song, Jerusalem: "And did those feet in ancient time, walk upon England's mountains green." But who was Joseph of Arimathea, the man who assumed full control of affairs at the Crucifixion? And why was it that Jesus' mother, his wife and the rest of the family accepted Joseph's intervention without question? As late as the year 900, the Church of Rome decided to announce that Joseph of Arimathea was the uncle of Jesus' mother Mary. And from that time, portrayals of Joseph have shown him as being rather elderly at the Crucifixion, when Mother Mary was herself in her fifties. Prior to the Roman announcement, however, the historical records of Joseph depicted a much younger man. He was recorded to have died at the age of 80 on 27 July AD 82, and thus would have been aged 32 at the time of the Crucifixion. In fact, Joseph of Arimathea was none other than Jesus Christ's own brother, James, and his title had nothing whatever to with a place name. Arimathea never existed. It therefore comes as no surprise that Joseph negotiated with Pilate to place Jesus in his own family tomb. The hereditary "Arimathea" title was an English corruption of the Graeco-Hebrew style ha-Rama-Theo, meaning "of the Divine Highness", or "of the Royal Highness" as we'd define it today. Since Jesus was the senior Messianic heir-the Christ, Khristos or King-then his younger brother was the Crown Prince-the Royal Highness, Rama-Theo. In the Nazarene hierarchy, the Crown Prince always held the patriarchal title of "Joseph"-just as Jesus was a titular "David" and his wife was a "Mary". In the early fifth century, Jesus and Mary's descendent Fisher Kings became united by marriage to the Sicambrian Franks, and from them emerged a whole new 'reigning' dynasty. They were the noted Merovingian Kings who founded the French monarchy and introduced the well-known fleur-de-lys (the ancient Jewish symbol of circumcision) as the royal emblem of France. From the Merovingian succession, another strain of the family established a wholly independent Jewish kingdom in southern France: the Kingdom of Septi-mania, which we now know as the Languedoc. And the early princes of Toulouse, Aquitaine and Provence were all descended in the Messianic bloodline of the Holy Grail. Septimania was granted to the Royal House of David in 768, and Prince Bernard of Septimania later married a daughter of Emperor Charlemagne. Also from the Fisher Kings came another important parallel line of succession in Gaul. Whereas the Merovingian Kings continued the patrimonial 'male' heritage of Jesus, this other line perpetuated the matriarchal heritage of Mary Magdalene in a 'female' line. They were the dynastic Queens of Avallon in Burgundy, the House del Acqsmeaning "of the waters", a style granted to Mary Magdalene in the early days when she voyaged on the sea to Provence. Those familiar with Arthurian and Grail lore will by now have recognised the ultimate significance of this Messianic family of the Fisher Kings, the Queens of Avallon and the House del Acqs (corrupted in Arthurian romance to "du Lac"  . The descendant heirs of Jesus posed an enormous threat to the Roman High Church because they were the dynastic leaders of the true Nazarene Church. In real terms, the Roman Church should never have existed at all, for it was no more than a 'hybrid' movement comprised of various pagan doctrines attached to a fundamentally Jewish base. Jesus was born in 7 BC and his birthday was on the equivalent of 1 March, with an 'official' royal birthday on 15 September to comply with dynastic regulation. But, when establishing the Roman High Church in the fourth century, Emperor Constantine ignored both of these dates and supplemented 25 December as the new Christ's Mass Day-to coincide with the pagan Sun Festival. Later, at the Synod of Whitby in 664, the bishops expropriated the Celtic festival of Easter (Eostre), the Goddess of Spring and Fertility, and attached a wholly new Christian significance. In so doing, they changed the date of the Celtic festival to sever its traditional association with the Jewish Passover. Christianity, as we know it, has evolved as a 'composite religion' quite unlike any other. If Jesus was its living catalyst, then Christianity should rightly be based on the teachings of Jesus himself-the moral and social codes of a fair-minded, tolerant ministry, with the people as its benefactors. But orthodox Christianity is not based on the teachings of Jesus: it is based on the teachings of the Roman Church, which are entirely different. There are a number of reasons for this, the foremost of which is that Jesus was deliberately sidestepped in favour of the alternative teachings of Peter and Paul-teachings which were thoroughly denounced by the Nazarene Church of Jesus and his brother James. Only by removing Jesus from the frontline could the Popes and cardinals reign supreme. When formally instituting Christianity as the state religion of Rome, Constantine declared that "he alone" was the true "Saviour Messiah", not Jesus! As for the Bishops of Rome (the Popes), they were granted an apostolic descent from St Peter-not a legitimate Desposynic descent from Jesus and his brothers, as was retained within the Nazarene Church.Donnie
|
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by Richwallet: 1:56pm On May 26, 2021 |
The only way for the Roman High Church to restrain the heirs of Mary Magdalene was to discredit Mary herself and to deny her bridal relationship with Jesus. But what of Jesus' brother James? He, too, had heirs, as did their other brothers, Simon, Joses and Jude. The Church could not escape the Gospels which state that Jesus was the Blessed Mother Mary's "first-born son", and so Mary's own motherhood also had to be repressed. As a result, the Church portrayed Mother Mary as a virgin, and Mary Magdalene as a LovePeddler-neither of which description was mentioned in any original Gospel. Then, just to cement Mother Mary's position outside the natural domain, her own mother, Anna, was eventually said to have borne her by way of "Immaculate Conception"! Over the course of time, these contrived doctrines have had widespread effect. But, in the early days, it took rather more to cement the ideas because the original women of the Nazarene mission had a significant following in the Celtic Church-women such as Mary Magdalene, Martha, Mary Jacob-Cleophas and Helena-Salome who had run schools and social missions throughout the Mediterranean world. These women had all been disciples of Jesus, and close friends of his mother, Mary, accompanying her to the Crucifixion, as confirmed in the Gospels. The Church's only salvation was to deny women altogether; to deny them not only rights to ecclesiastical office, but to deny them rights to any status in society. Hence, the Church declared that women were all heretics and sorceresses! In this, the bishops were aided by the words of Peter and Paul, and on the basis of their teachings the Roman High Church was enabled to become wholly sexist. In his Epistle to Timothy, Paul wrote: "I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp any authority over the man, but to be in silence." In the Gospel of Philip, Peter is even quoted as saying that "Women are not worthy of life". The bishops even quoted the words of Genesis, wherein God spoke to Eve about Adam, saying "He shall rule over thee". The Church Father Tertullian summed up the whole Roman attitude when writing about the emergent disciples of Mary Magdalene: "These heretical woman! How dare they! They are brazen enough to teach, to engage in argument, to baptise... It is not permitted for a woman to speak in church...nor to claim...a share in any masculine function-least of all in priestly office." Then, to cap it all, came the Roman Church's most amazing document, The Apostolic Order. This was compiled as an 'imaginary' conversation between the apostles after the Last Supper. Contrary to the Gospels, it supposed that Mary Magdalene had been present at the Supper, and it was agreed that the reason why Jesus had not passed any wine to Mary at the table was because he had seen her laughing! On the basis of this extraordinary, fictitious document, the bishops ruled that, even though Mary might have been a companion of Jesus, women were not to be afforded any place within the Church because they were not serious! This sexist attitude has persisted within the Church to the present day. Why? Because Mary Magdalene had to be discredited and removed from the reckoning so that her heirs could be ignored. But things are now changing, and, in the Anglican Church at least, women are being restored to the priestly station. Notwithstanding the avid sexist movement, the Messianic heirs retained their social positions outside the Roman Church establishment. They progressed their own Nazarene and Celtic Church movements and founded Desposynic kingdoms in Britain and Europe. They were a constant threat to the Roman High Church and to the figurehead monarchs and governments empowered by that Church. They were the very reason for the implementation of the brutal Inquisition because they upheld a moral and social code which was contrary to High Church requirement. This was especially apparent during the Age of Chivalry, which embraced a respect for womanhood, as exemplified by the Knights Templars whose constitutional oath supported a veneration of "the Grail Mother", Queen Mary Magdalene. Prior to the Middle Ages, the individual stories of this family were historically well-known. But when the Church began its reign of fanatical persecution (the great Inquisition), the whole Nazarene and Desposynic heritage was forced underground. But why the vengeful onset of the Inquisition? Because the Knights Templars had not only returned from the Holy Land with documents that undermined the Church's teachings, but they also established their own Cistercian churches in opposition to Rome. These were not just any churches; they were the greatest religious monuments ever to grace the skylines of the western world: the Notre Dame cathedrals of France. Despite their present-day image, these impressive Gothic cathedrals had nothing whatever to do with the established Christian Church. They were funded and built by the Knights Templars, and they were dedicated to Mary Magdalene-Notre Dame, Our Lady-whom they called "the Grail of the world". This, of course, defeated every dogma that the High Church had encouraged, and the bishops retaliated by re-dedicating numerous other churches to Mary, the mother of Jesus. But, in so doing, they made a strict decree that all artistic portrayals of Mother Mary, the Madonna, must henceforth show her dressed in "blue and white only"so as not to grant her any rights to ecclesiastical office in the maleonly priesthood. Mary Magdalene, on the other hand, was being portrayed (by the world's greatest artists) wearing the red mantle of cardinal status or the black robe of a Nazarite High Priestess-and there was nothing the Church could do about it. The bishops' only option was to proclaim the practice sinful and heretical-because, in having previously elected to ignore Mary Magdalene and her heirs, she was outside their jurisdiction. It was at that time that Grail lore was itself denounced as a heresy by the Vatican. The sixth-century writings of Merlin were expressly banned by the Ecumenical Council, and the original Nazarene Church of Jesus became an "underground stream", aided by such notable sponsors as Leonardo da Vinci and Sandro Botticelli. In those days, the Church policed and controlled most literature in the public domain; and so, in order to avoid outright censorship, the Grail tradition became allegorical and its message was communicated by way of secret watermarks, esoteric writings, Tarot cards and symbolic artwork. But why should Grail lore and the writings of Merlin have posed such a problem for the High Church? Because, within the context of their adventurous texts, they told the descendant story of the Grail bloodline-a bloodline which had been ousted from its dynastic position by the Popes and Bishops of Rome who had elected to reign supreme by way of a contrived "apostolic succession". This apostolic succession was said to have been handed down from the first bishop, St Peter (and, indeed, this is still the promoted view). But one only has to study the Church's own Apostolic Constitutions to discover that this is simply not true. Peter was never a Bishop of Romenor of anywhere else, for that matter! The Vatican's Constitutions record that the first Bishop of Rome was Prince Linus of Britain, the son of Caractacus the Pendragon. He was installed by St Paul in AD 58, during Peter's own lifetime. From the 1100s, the powerful Knights Templars and their cathedrals posed an enormous threat to the 'male-only' Church by bringing the heritage of Jesus and Mary Magdalene to the fore in the public domain. The cardinals knew that their whole establishment would tumble if the Messianic descendants gained the upper hand. They had to be crushed! And so the brutal Inquisition was implemented-a hideous persecution of all who dissented from the rule of the bishops. It all began in 1208, when Pope Innocent III sent 30,000 soldiers into the Languedoc region of southern France. This was the home of the Cathars ("the Pure Ones" who were said to be the guardians of a great and sacred treasure-a mysterious secret which could overturn orthodox Christianity. The Pope's so-called Albigensian Crusade lasted for 36 years-during which time, tens of thousands of innocent people were slaughtered-but the treasure was never found. The main thrust of the Inquisition (or "Holy Office" was instituted by Pope Gregory IX during the course of this massacre, in 1231, and it was set against anyone who supported "the Grail heresy". By 1252, the torture of victims was formally authorised, along with execution by burning. "Heresy" was a wonderful charge to level against captives, because only the Church could define it. The victims were tortured until they confessed, and having confessed they were executed. If they did not confess, then the torture continued until they died anyway. One recorded form of torture was to spread the victim, little by little, with fat (beginning with his feet), and then to roast him alive in sections, limb by limb, over an open fire. These savage persecutions and punishments were openly waged for more than 400 years, and were also extended against Jews, Muslims and Protestant dissenters. But the Inquisition was never formally terminated. As recently as 1965 it was renamed "the Sacred Congregation", and its powers are theoretically still in force today. Undaunted by the Inquisition, the Nazarene movement pursued its own course, and the story of the bloodline was perpetuated in literature such as the Grand Saint Grail and the High History of the Holy Grail. These writings were largely sponsored by the Grail courts of France (the courts of Champagne, Anjou and others), and also by the Knights Templars and the Desposyni; and, at that stage, Arthurian Romance became a popular vehicle for the Grail tradition. In the light of this, the Templars became a specific target of the Inquisition in 1307 when the henchmen of Pope Clement V and King Philip IV of France were set in their direction. The papal armies scoured Europe for the Templar documents and treasure-but, like the Cathar inheritance, nothing was found. However, many Knights were tortured and executed in the process, and their companions escaped to countries outside the papal domain. But the Templar hoard was not lost, and while the Vatican emissaries were searching, the treasure and documents were locked away in the Chapter House Treasury vaults of Paris. They were under the protection of the Templar Grand Knights of St Anthony-"the Guardian Princes of the Royal Secret"-who loaded the hoard one night onto 18 galleys of the Templar fleet at La Rochelle. By daybreak, the fleet had sailed for Scotland, and on arrival they were welcomed by King Robert the Bruce who, along with the whole Scottish nation, had been excommunicated by the Pope for challenging the Catholic King Edward of England. In Scotland, the Templars and their treasure remained, and the Knights fought with Bruce at Bannockburn in 1314 to regain Scotland's independence from Plantagenet England. Subsequent to the Battle of Bannockburn, Bruce and the St Anthony Templars founded the new Order of the Elder Brothers of the Rosy Cross in 1317-from which time the Kings of Scots became hereditary Grand Masters, with each successive Stewart King holding the honoured Grand Priory title of "Prince Saint Germain". So, why was it that King Arthur, a Celtic commander of the sixth century, was so important to the Knights Templars and the Grail courts of Europe? Quite simply, because Arthur had been unique, with a 'dual' heritage in the Messianic line. King Arthur was by no means mythical, as many have supposed. Far from it. But he has generally been looked for in the wrong places. Researchers, misguided by the fictional locations of the romances, have searched in vain through the chronicles of Brittany, Wales and the west of England. But the details of Arthur are to be found in the Scots' and Irish annals. He was indeed "the High King of the Celtic Isle", and he was the sovereign commander of the British troops in the late sixth century. Arthur was born in 559, and he died in battle in 603. His mother was Ygerna del Acqs, the daughter of Queen Viviane of Avallon, in descent from Jesus and Mary Magdalene. His father was High King Aedàn of Dalriada (the Western Highlands of Scotland, now called Argyll)-and Aedàn was the British Pendragon ("Head Dragon" or "King of Kings" in descent from Jesus' brother James. It is for this reason that the stories of Arthur and Joseph of Arimathea are so closely entwined in the Grail romances. Indeed, the coronation records of Scotland's King Kenneth MacAlpin (a descendant of Aedàn the Pendragon) specifically refer to his own descent from the dynastic Queens of Avallon.Donnie |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by HarrisAWalcott: 2:42pm On May 26, 2021 |
A lot of online haters blocking the light. The unlucky 9 satanic cursed bloodlines of Isrealites. |
| Re: Roman Catholicism Is Idolatry And True Christianity Is Gnosis by HarrisAWalcott: 5:08pm On May 26, 2021 |
. |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) ... (11) (Reply)
Entering A Terrible Convenant With Satan By Singing Dorobucci / Fastidious Christian ! Why Is Prophet Hud And Shuaib Absent In The Bible / The Egg (read This With An Open Mind)
(Go Up)
| Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 186 |