Another high court will affirm it

Those bastards wants to eat their cake and have it, e no hard na, resign and run for the post, not that you will be the perm sec or director or senator, suspend your duties and run for another post so if you lose, you go return to your former post
Na wickedness and evil be that

Lol

Nigerialabalaba:

dis itself can be argued all d way to sc and meanwhile 84 stays. law na ass o no be maths

This is important to the 2023 elections and so will be given priority hearing.

Don't be surprised if the Court of Appeal releases judgment on this by April, and the Supreme court by May.

LasgidyPort:


Of course it will go all the way to the Supreme court where the matter will finally be laid to rest.

We have only 1 Supreme Court

dats why i say pesin wey go carry dis made in unuahia judgement go convention to take contest don enter 1 chance

LasgidyPort:


This is important to the 2023 elections and so will be given priority hearing.

Don't be surprised if the Court of Appeal releases judgment on this by April, and the Supreme court by May.

Hahaha.....may na wen pdp go do primary to select presidential candidate o. who go dey bank on dat kain tin. na only NA fit helep dem fast, no be courts o.

Nice

Maxymilliano:
The section can only be removed by an act of parliamentary amendments and not by judicial pronouncement

This is very false....

Section 140(2) of the Electoral Act 2010 was invalidated by a Federal High Court Judgement that was never appealed.

It has stayed till date. A Court can invalidate or void any Section of any Act, Decree, existing law that is inconsistent or conflicting to the Constitution.

ivolt:

This is not true until the supreme court determines the constitutionality of such law
or absent of appeals.
The law stands.

It takes effect immediately.

It is declaratory.

kahal29:



https://mobile.twitter.com/tvcnewsng/status/1504763909223419907



https://www.channelstv.com/2022/03/18/breaking-court-orders-fg-to-remove-section-8412-from-electoral-act/?utm_source=&utm_medium=twitter

This judge must be drunk on everything but legal and logic.
The rights of those concerned to vote or be voted for has not in any way been infringed upon.
Simple
Step down and contest if you desire so. It's not any violation of any law

Nigerialabalaba:

Hahaha.....may na wen pdp go do primary to select presidential candidate o. who go dey bank on dat kain tin. na only NA fit helep dem fast, no be courts o.

They have a good case. So they will just take their chances and participate.

By the time the case is concluded in their favour, status quo is maintained.

LasgidyPort:


They have a good case. So they will just take their chances and participate.

By the time the case is concluded in their favour, status quo is maintained.

inec no go accept even as e dey so because d electoral act na one let alone wen another high court con give a conflicting judgement. NA is d one dem for lobby. court na dead end.

Yes if you want to contest but if you're not contesting you can be a delegate to convention or Congress that the bill err

Parachoko:
But, the law was so clear, if you want to contest, resign as a Commissioner or minister

I wander why this law is so hard to follow.

Yes if you want to contest but if you're not contesting you can be a delegate to convention or Congress that where the bill err

Parachoko:
But, the law was so clear, if you want to contest, resign as a Commissioner or minister

I wander why this law is so hard to follow.

Justices garfield1 vicdom kahal29 penguin2 indispensable85 ejimatic AAA593 (Bayelsa dept).....food is ready!

kahal29:



https://mobile.twitter.com/tvcnewsng/status/1504763909223419907



https://www.channelstv.com/2022/03/18/breaking-court-orders-fg-to-remove-section-8412-from-electoral-act/?utm_source=&utm_medium=twitter

.

The court has no right to ask the FG to expunge a law as passed by the national assembly.

Chat me up. I will teach you on how to make money online with 3 times daily. Whatz app only . 08097691699

Malami couldn't find any judge in Abuja to do his bidding and had to run to Abia.
BTW, the AGF cannot delete any part of our law as instructed by the illiterate judge. It is beyond his power.

LasgidyPort:


A judicial pronouncement can render a law null and void.

History is replete with such.

This is not true until the supreme court determines the constitutionality of such law
or absent of appeals.
The law stands.

Most of our problem in Nigeria is caused by judiciary
Lawyers have made themselves Demi god

Now the National Assembly should appeal and ask that the status qou should remain pending the determination of the appeal which could take 6 months just like what Malami did to the VAT matter

Nigerialabalaba:

dis itself can be argued all d way to sc and meanwhile 84 stays. law na ass o no be maths

when will Tinubu urchins learn?

Amaechi is yet to pick his ticket

tnerro1:
Now the National Assembly should appeal and ask that the status qou should remain pending the determination of the appeal which could take 6 months just like what Malami did to the VAT matter

Injustice Tanko reports to Buhari and the cabal.Shebi you all were rejoicing Onnoggen was removed and he came on board

ivolt:

This is not true until the supreme court determines the constitutionality of such law
or absent of appeals.
The law stands.

Until this latest judgement is vacated, section 84 is null and void

ivolt:
Malami couldn't find any judge in Abuja to do his bidding and had to run to Abia.
BTW, the AGF cannot delete any part of our law as instructed by the illiterate judge. It is beyond his power.

e go soon do una like film

Laggafin:
Malami has seriously held the judiciary and the entire country at it's jugular and scrotum... I mean what an Artoney General .. first of it's kind ds country has Eva seen

Malami has done nothing.. That section contravene the provisions of the Constitution which gives 30 days to the election for resignation


They are presently tinkering with the constitution, let them just put it directly in the constitution

vicdom:
CC: Fergie001
I was arguing with some neophytes earlier that the section 84 (12) of the new electoral act violated our constitution, positing that any court can easily throw it out.

Yes but a political appointee is a civil servant and civil servants must resign before running for office. Ministers must let this sink into their head.

fergie001:
Justices garfield1 vicdom kahal29 penguin2 indispensable85 ejimatic AAA593 (Bayelsa dept).....food is ready!

What a counter attack from malami

Themandator:



Malami has done nothing.. That section contravene the provisions of the Constitution which gives 30 days to the election for resignation


They are presently tinkering with the constitution, let them just put it directly in the constitution

Ok we see how it goes

cktheluckyman:

when will Tinubu urchins learn?

Amaechi is yet to pick his ticket

amaechi don collect ticket from magnus.

as u be learner,i just dey tell u say people wey 84 support go go high court market go buy dia own judgement too, no be only umuahia dey sell judgement and no be only ngige and obiano dem get pliant judges.
u see as obiano court order no epp am yesterday night. everyone get hin own court order. ngige, malami, obiano ,amaechi, dem na learner

ivolt:
Malami couldn't find any judge in Abuja to do his bidding and had to run to Abia.
BTW, the AGF cannot delete any part of our law as instructed by the illiterate judge. It is beyond his power.

It is worrying. When people like you begin to posture and position as learned.. Very worrying

Courts have always declared laws illegal when it infringes on the supreme laws of the land


Go to Google and type... Can court declare laws illegal