Miracle2022:
coming from someone that claps for ipob after killing the military couple.

Provide evidence

fergie001:

The problem with talking before reading. I looked for your trouble my mentioning you to have a broadview of the judgement.

Let me use pidgin, maybe you will understand.

The Appeal Court talk say Section 84(12) dey unconstitutional. Wetin e mean be say why the Umuahia judgement dey nullified, Ministers no suppose to resign until 30 days to the date of the general election.

You don understand am now?

u are saying thesame thing the only difference is he is using primaries and u are using general elections.

reference to same law. lol

While determining the appeal on the merit, the appellate court however held that the provision is unconstitutional because it violates Section 42 (1)(a) of the Constitution and denied a class of Nigerian citizens their right to participate in election.....
With this paragraph,the second 84(12) is invalid. So the minister are in the right direction.there right of participation in an election is been protected by the judgement.

jaxxy:


u are saying thesame thing the only difference is he is using primaries and u are using general elections.

reference to same law. lol

He asked if I were alright?

Symptoms of typing before reading.

Mynd44:

The judgment is not very clear

Ok, clear it!

Yeye judgement. In one breath nullifying the FHC judgement based on locus standi of the plantiff and still justifying the judgment.

fergie001:

The problem with talking before reading. I looked for your trouble my mentioning you to have a broadview of the judgement.

Let me use pidgin, maybe you will understand.

The Appeal Court talk say Section 84(12) dey unconstitutional. Wetin e mean be say why the Umuahia judgement dey nullified, Ministers no suppose to resign (no suppose to resign until 30 days to the date of the general election.)

You don understand am now?

you have not said anything

Malami is the one dragging this thing, there is no fuss affecting anyone

Abeg don't quote me again, may 31st is already here make everyone allow that day decide

Lubumbashi:
This judgement has torpedoed Emefiele, Amechi, Malami, Akpabio, Ngige and other appointees who refused to resign as demanded by the electoral act and APC leadership.

Other aspirants are going to visit the APC chairman but Tinubu is the only candidate the APC chairman went to visit

Tinubu on the road to Aso Rock

Even your father as useless as he is, will be better than Tinubu

Truthisunique2:
you have not said anything. Malami is the one dragging this thing, there is no fuss affecting anyone

Did you see anything concerning Primaries either in the news report or in my comments?

You need some exposition on a few things about this matter.
I cannot do that now...

Funny judgment. Having held that the person who approached the Federal High Court Owerri lacked the locus to initiate the suit, how then did the same Court proceed to agree with him that the said section is unconstitutional.
Cash and carry judiciary

fergie001:

Did you see anything concerning Primaries either in the news report or in my comments?

You need some exposition on a few things about this matter.
I cannot do that now...

may ending you would see who gets the apc ticket

Don't quote me on this shit again, be preparing yourself for convention

And tell your oga to submit his withdrawal form on Friday, if he doesn't sign it he is disqualified as aspirant

Truthisunique2:
may ending you would see who gets the apc ticket

Don't quote me on this shit again, be preparing yourself for convention

And tell your oga to submit his withdrawal form on Friday, if he doesn't sign it he is disqualified as aspirant

jaxxy, you can see he didn't understand a bit about anything here.

Suit yourself.

fergie001:
garfield1 vicdom kahal29 penguin2 indispensable85 ejimatic agberaorogboye AAA593


I believe it is.

The Appeal Court nullified the judgement in Umuahia on technical grounds that Edede had no locus.

The PDP challenged that section hence the Appeal Court ruled that Section 84(12) is unconstitutional wrt to Section 42 of the 1999 CFRN.

It means that Section 84(12) is null and void hence all political appointees can keep their jobs and contest as before.

Yes boss. That's just the summary. The title of the ruling is ridden with obscurity and ambiguity.

Mynd44:

The judgment is not very clear

Don't mind the yeye meth ipob terorists.

They wont read but rush to comment. The Appeal court clearly stated that the section 84 is unconstitutional as it denied citizens there right.

Which means the section can be struck out by another higher court.

I wonder the own goal Malami scored here.

Its obvious the judgement is not clear

vicdom:

Yes boss. That's just the summary. The title of the ruling is ridden with obscurity and ambiguity.

Exactly....... Na The Nation nah

I was telling indispensable85 one day that this Section 84(12) get wahala. I know the Ministers and co will be the most elated to hear this news.

fergie001:


jaxxy, you can see he didn't understand a bit about anything here.

Suit yourself.

Lol I can see he's gone off on a tangent without understanding what u wrote. or do u guys have scores to settle from another thread.

CyberWolf:
Resign where? Abi you no read where the judge ruled that the said section 81(12) is unconstitutional.

Let's wait for the full verdict,the judgement sounds contradictory.

Very poor reporting. Why not mention what the voided section says?

Nigerialabalaba:
Wow!!Malami don score home goal. NJC suppose drag dat Judge sef

How market Ngige, Amaechi, Nwajuiba and Emefiele

Read the judgement again. These Tinubu urchins dey too quick

jaxxy:
Lol I can see he's gone off on a tangent without understanding what u wrote. or do u guys have scores to settle from another thread.

Not at all. I don't even mention him, just knows he supports Amaechi and it will be a relief for him, that's all. He didn't even understand a sh!t what he just read.

Truthisunique2:
you have not said anything

Malami is the one dragging this thing, there is no fuss affecting anyone

Abeg don't quote me again, may 31st is already here make everyone allow that day decide

Why are you fighting him? He is saying Malami and others do not even need to resign according to the court of appeal

objobj:


So you don't understand the judgment?
The section should be null and void because it contradict the constitution.

You no fit read sef.

It's not true. PDP prayers where that the Court strike down the judgement of Umuahia Court.

The legal opinion of Federal Appeal Court judge doesn't count here because it wasn't one of PDP prayers.

ityP:


Why are you fighting him? He is saying Malami and others do not even need to resign according to the court of appeal

my guy my head dn full jare

I associate his moniker to tilumbu zombies before even replying him

Anyway enough of this court talk, may is already here and everyone would see who becomes flagbearer

So I don't like all this inconsequential talk

drlateef:




What are we going to do about these wailers. Rain fall ,they wail, rain didn’t fall, they wail. What do they want

Don't be a daft perpetually. Is it that you don't know the provisions in that document this inglorious legal merchants that called themselves judges just set aside?
Are you not worried that democracy is in the gutters with this kind of attack on law and conscience?
The lawmakers for the first time in this Major General's regime that they stood their ground to bring some sanity to our political atmosphere by asking the political appointees to step aside if they have political ambition.
ONLY FOR THESE REPULSIVE JUDGES TO THROW THAT TO THE GUTTERS.
No wonder all of the Ministers refused to resign all along. Even the shameless CBN midget of a governor to also sit on top our national treasury, election sensitive materials and still want to contest. Soon INEC chairman will follow suit.
Yet, you see no wrong in all these and still defend your dullardino-in-chief.
I tuale 4 u

Mynd44:

The judgment is not very clear

Those that are affected by that section of that act will have go back to high court to file another case. Because according to the judgement even though that section Is unconstitutional, the man Is file the case Is not the right person to do so.

That controversial section of the electoral act still remain null and void, therefore PDP and NASS lost it. Case closed.

Nonpartisan1:

https://thenationonlineng.net/breaking-appeal-court-sets-aside-judgment-voiding-section-8412-of-electoral-act-2022/

MikoB:


Let's wait for the full verdict,the judgement sounds contradictory.

It's clear

ityP:


Why are you fighting him? He is saying Malami and others do not even need to resign according to the court of appeal

On whose prayers or appeal? The court strike out the judgment of the lower court. The legal opinion of the Judge can't be part of the judgment because it wasn't part of the appeal.

If you want to get the judgment the Judge opined, a party with locus stand has to approach the Court for that .

Truthisunique2:
my guy my head dn full jare

I associate his moniker to tilumbu zombies before even replying him

Anyway enough of this court talk, may is already here and everyone would see who becomes flagbearer

So I don't like all this inconsequential talk

Lol. I also used to think the dude is a Tinubu fan o. He may be or may not be, but one thing is sure, he argues politics without sentiments. I don dey notice am for long

Gozac:

It's not working against them, the section says no appointee should vote or voted for in a primary election without resignation. They still have time to resign because there is no time frame for resignation

the act says 30 days Before the primary