360degreess:
That's a good development.. Their labour is in vain,that's how the labour of Obituary will be..

Abi, no wonder una misery, hardship, poverty and sorrow now dey end ooo.

garfield1:


A heavy hammer from njc should suffice.they have a point if the complaint is about inec not complying with the electoral act

Tsammani of the Appeal Court used to be his problem, but he has been transferred to Abuja. Ikyegh JCA is now there.

That's why I said let's look at the judgement first....

The questions are..

1. Was INEC invited 21 days before?
2. If I invite INEC and they decided not to come, how is that the Party's problem?

So, unless LP didn't invite INEC @ all, it will be upturned.

garfield1:


What is happening? Is there any new provision that I am unaware of? Yesterday,the apc candidate for yala 2 hon nkasi was sacked due to a pdp petition.the other time,dansuki was sacked as a result of apc petition.the apex court has consistently stated that non aspirants in a party's primaries do not have locus

The position on the screenshot (14c) is where they target.

They don't challenge the Primaries, they challenge INEC's role in it. So far, judgements like Osun and others have been delivered by the FHC. We will know better with the decision of Higher Courts.

Again, the same Judge that ruled on the Yala own is to decide on PDP v Peter Odey this month... And you should really fear for Cross-River APC Guber Candidate. It's a very very tight case.

AFRICANJAMAICA:
Ok

Nigerian politics is from hell

Sani Abacha has resurrected in Rivers State. But he'll die again like a house rat that he is

Later they will way they don't want to give power to igbos.

Even though those that support igbos presidential candidates can't support this style of politics and government at the federal level.

Igbo ronu

Rivers state Judiciary na wa o.

Obi no dey give shishi to appeal that judgment so make the candidates go rest.

ecolime:
Rivers PDP doesn't want any form of opposition next year. Which kain rubbish cases be this na?


Wike wey go still go on exile las las

Don't mind the motherfvcker

politicoNG:


https://www.google.com/amp/s/dailypost.ng/2022/11/04/court-sacks-3-labour-party-candidates-in-rivers/%3famp=1





https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02BAtN86QQf9iviGMkKrBVZatS83ajDq2GsVCiKM64YvH9Hz7GEjQYsoKkjEmHXcrtl&id=101996748550541

With the full backing of Gvnor Agbero Wicked Wike backing

politicoNG:


https://www.google.com/amp/s/dailypost.ng/2022/11/04/court-sacks-3-labour-party-candidates-in-rivers/%3famp=1





https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02BAtN86QQf9iviGMkKrBVZatS83ajDq2GsVCiKM64YvH9Hz7GEjQYsoKkjEmHXcrtl&id=101996748550541

I'm even surprised that the LP could allow a known partisan judge to preside over its case. Steven Daylop Pam is reputed to be under Wike's payroll. Everybody knows this fact in Port Harcourt.

Our judiciary is gradually becoming a threat to our nascent democracy.

fergie001:

The position on the screenshot (14c) is where they target.

They don't challenge the Primaries, they challenge INEC's role in it. So far, judgements like Osun and others have been delivered by the FHC. We will know better with the decision of Higher Courts.

Again, the same Judge that ruled on the Yala own is to decide on PDP v Peter Odey this month... And you should really fear for Cross-River APC Guber Candidate. It's a very very tight case.

Yes,I fear that woman in court 2.I dont know the case pdp has with odey but what I fear concerning otu is that he has dual citizenship.
Why is that section referring to aspirants instead of candidates

Demo crazy at work, wailing wailers will come against judiciary, since the judgement is against Obi-idiots.Demo crazy at work, wailing wailers will come against judiciary, since the judgement is against Obi-idiots....

fergie001:

Tsammani of the Appeal Court used to be his problem, but he has been transferred to Abuja. Ikyegh JCA is now there.

That's why I said let's look at the judgement first....

The questions are..

1. Was INEC invited 21 days before?
2. If I invite INEC and they decided not to come, how is that the Party's problem?

So, unless LP didn't invite INEC @ all, it will be upturned.

True.ikyegh looks tough

garfield1:


Yes,I fear that woman in court 2.I dont know the case pdp has with odey but what I fear concerning otu is that he has dual citizenship.
Why is that section referring to aspirants instead of candidates

Mba Ukweni SAN is leading the Plaintiffs.

I don't know of Prince but know of Odey. Odey has dual citizenship. He voluntarily acquired UK citizenship. And Section 66 is a problem.....

Again and very delicately, Odey was one of the 18 Cross-River House of Assembly members that defected to APC and was sacked by the FHC. In their pleadings, they told the Appeal Court, that they are members of the PDP and did not defect. As at when he was picked as Deputy, his name was not in the APC membership register.

So, two questions:
Does PDP have the locus to institute the case?
Can a Party pick someone who is not a member of the Party as a Candidate?

fergie001:

Mba Ukweni SAN is leading the Plaintiffs.

I don't know of Prince but know of Odey. Odey has dual citizenship. He voluntarily acquired UK citizenship. And Section 66 is a problem.....

Again and very delicately, Odey was one of the 18 Cross-River House of Assembly members that defected to APC and was sacked by the FHC. In their pleadings, they told the Appeal Court, that they are members of the PDP and did not defect. As at when he was picked as Deputy, his name was not in the APC membership register.

So, two questions:
Does PDP have the locus to institute the case?
Can a Party pick someone who is not a member of the Party as an Aspirant?

Very delicate indeed.but section 84 of the electoral act has taken away locus from pdp...of course,apc can pick anybody they like as a candidate.it is their internal affairs.the court won't touch this

garfield1:


Very delicate indeed.but section 84 of the electoral act has taken away locus from pdp...of course,apc can pick anybody they like as a candidate.it is their internal affairs.the court won't touch this

APC lawyers argued this on preliminary objection and also said membership concerns the Party and not some 'meddlesome interlopers.'

PDP said the Constitution is more superior than S84.

fergie001:

APC lawyers argued this on preliminary objection and also said membership concerns the Party and not some 'meddlesome interlopers.'

PDP said the Constitution is more superior than S84.

Which part of the constitution supercedes section 84?

ifihearam:
THought zombiedients said WIKE is codedly OBIDIENT
Gullible senile people living in delusion and denial.

garfield1:


Which part of the constitution supercedes section 84?

S84 talks about Primaries... They are attacking 285(14)c.

Where can one find refuge in this country? You go to police, you get roped and victimised, you go to court, uppercut awaits you there, you go to politicians, they turned you to slave, you go to church, you are held by the throat while they ransack your puckets, you go to your landlord/lady, they blast you with increased rent just because you baff and rub cream. Would there ever be peace?

politicoNG:


https://www.google.com/amp/s/dailypost.ng/2022/11/04/court-sacks-3-labour-party-candidates-in-rivers/%3famp=1





https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02BAtN86QQf9iviGMkKrBVZatS83ajDq2GsVCiKM64YvH9Hz7GEjQYsoKkjEmHXcrtl&id=101996748550541

because it affect LP Now Wike is now an emperor? Same Wike you clowns were hailing to deal with Atiku and PDP. When PETER OBI Was visiting him here and there, Wike was a nice guy abi? Na hypocrisy go k!ll una. Carry go Wike.

Remain Peter Obi.

politicoNG:


https://www.google.com/amp/s/dailypost.ng/2022/11/04/court-sacks-3-labour-party-candidates-in-rivers/%3famp=1





https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02BAtN86QQf9iviGMkKrBVZatS83ajDq2GsVCiKM64YvH9Hz7GEjQYsoKkjEmHXcrtl&id=101996748550541

The hand of wike

I see a wicked monkey hand inside soup....court no dey sack PDP too?

fergie001:

S84 talks about Primaries... They are attacking 285(14)c.

285 talks about candidates and parties against inec.no where does it allow parties to question the party membership of another party.section 84 is not about primaries but false information.

garfield1:
285 talks about candidates and parties against inec.no where does it allow parties to question the party membership of another party.section 84 is not about primaries but false information.

What if the Candidate's name is in your own Party membership register?

fergie001:

What if the Candidate's name is in your own Party membership register?

Section 285 refers to inec register of voters not party register.how a party conducts its primary is its business except where it involves inec report

garfield1:
Section 285 refers to inec register of voters not party register.how a party conducts its primary is its business except where it involves inec report

The plank of this case has nothing to do with Primaries but nomination of the Candidate. Odey didn't contest.

They are not even questioning his membership but his averments in a live appeal in March.

fergie001:

The plank of this case has nothing to do with Primaries but nomination of the Candidate. Odey didn't contest.

They are not even questioning his membership but his averments in a live appeal in March.

You said they questioned his dual citizenship and I said section 285 prohibits outsiders.how can you now say they question his claim of being in pdp in averments and not his membership? You can't blow hot and cold at the same time.is that a disqualifying criteria.

garfield1:


You said they questioned his dual citizenship and I said section 285 prohibits outsiders.how can you now say they question his claim of being in pdp in averments and not his membership? You can't blow hot and cold at the same time.is that a disqualifying criteria.

Section 285 refers to inec register of voters not party register.how a party conducts its primary is its business except where it involves inec report
This is what I quoted.. where did you add dual citizenship?
Please help me find it.
So, where is the hot and cold, help me understand.


They are 6 issues for determination in all. Tell me what you don't understand....


Is Dual Citizenship a disqualification criteria? Yes. See S182
Does PDP have the locus to challenge same? The Court will determine that.