OLAADEGBU:


Selective reading. Let me spell it out for you since you choose not to see it. "Science vol. 224, 1984, pp., code > 58-61." And that's if you are interested in finding out because I know your mind is already made up.

OK. Looked it up and it doesn't say what you say it says.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/1692887

OLAADEGBU:


Do you know the difference between the make and model of a car?



The Maker is the Infinite uncreated Creator.

What’s the make of a car?
Also the model of car?

Your maker is small boy yahweh, a mere israelite god? Bwahahahah

LordReed:


Someone won $2 billion in a lottery recently, that's more than N1trillion therefore it is impossible that the person won it by chance. That's the kind of argument this is, nonsensical.

Lottery is a game of chance and God does not play dice.

OLAADEGBU:


Lottery is a game of chance and God does not play dice.

But that's the argue you made: it can't be chance because the odds are very low yet we see low chance odds happening.

LordReed:


OK. Looked it up and it doesn't say what you say it says.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/1692887

Selective reading at play again. If you look closely under the heading "Major Carbon-14 Deficiency In Modern Snail Shells From Nevada Springs." You can't miss it unless you look with eyes closed.

LordReed:


But that's the argue you made: it can't be chance because the odds are very low yet we see low chance odds happening.

What are the odds of a boeing 747 plane being assembled after a bomb explosion?

OLAADEGBU:


Selective reading at play again. If you look closely under the heading "Major Carbon-14 Deficiency In Modern Snail Shells From Nevada Springs." You can't miss it unless you look with eyes closed.

So? How does it prove that the earth is not millions of years old?

LordReed:


LMAO! So they found a fish they thought was extinct how does that prove evolution didn't happen? The theory doesn't say that a species must go extinct so finding a species thought to be extinct in no way disproves the theory.

Why has the living fossil not evolved since it's existence "400 millions" of years ago? It remains the same today. I wonder what happened to your so called evolution.

Maynman:


Science vol. 224, 1984, pp., code > 58-61

Bwahahahahahahah

At least Lordreed made the effort to look up the facts I spoon fed him with but you are just here to troll.

LordReed:


So? How does it prove that the earth is not millions of years old?

It disproves the lie that the snail shell is 27,000 years old, which you all swallowed up hook, line and stinker.

OLAADEGBU:


At least Lordreed made the effort to look up the facts I spoon fed him with but you are just here to troll.

Facts by quoting a book?
The same way you quote a book to defend your Israelite god.

You are yet to make sense of anything, just desperation.

OLAADEGBU:


Why has the living fossil not evolved since it's existence "400 millions" of years ago? It remains the same today. I wonder what happened to your so called evolution.

LoLz! Where does the theory say that living organisms must change into something sleep and no longer exist? I am sure you know what a strawman is, because this your argument is full of it.

OLAADEGBU:


It disproves the lie that the snail shell is 27,000 years old, which you all swallowed up hook, line and stinker.

LoLz. Why don't you go conduct your own test and tell us what age the shells are.

OLAADEGBU:


What are the odds of a boeing 747 plane being assembled after a bomb explosion?

LoLz! Ask a mathematician or physicist to calculate it for you.

Maynman:


Facts by quoting a book?
The same way you quote a book to defend your Israelite god.

You are yet to make sense of anything, just desperation.

Since you cannot and will not quote a "book" where do you get your facts from, the thin air?

OLAADEGBU:


Since you cannot and will not quote a "book" where do you get your facts from, the thin air?

What do you understand by “facts”? By quoting a “book”?
Why you not an allah worshipper, they have a “book” too.

LordReed:


LoLz! Where does the theory say that living organisms must change into something sleep and no longer exist? I am sure you know what a strawman is, because this your argument is full of it.

When it is a living fossil it means it is not extinct and since your so called evolution theory insists that all living things evolve by adding information to its gene, why has the "400 million" year fish not evolved?

LordReed:


LoLz. Why don't you go conduct your own test and tell us what age the shells are.

Have you now conceded that the shell is not 27,000 years old?

OLAADEGBU:


When it is a living fossil it means it is not extinct and since your so called evolution theory insists that all living things evolve by adding information to its gene, why has the "400 million" year fish not evolved?

Again were in the theory does it say all biological organisms must change into something else? Can you quote any evolutionary text that says so?

LordReed:


LoLz! Ask a mathematician or physicist to calculate it for you.

I know that in your weird and bizarre thinking you will say that given enough time that is a possibility.

OLAADEGBU:


Have you now conceded that the shell is not 27,000 years old?

You are the one saying the earth is not millions of years old it's up to you to show that this shell proves you right.

LordReed:


Again were in the theory does it say all biological organisms must change into something else? Can you quote any evolutionary text that says so?

And what biological organism is excluded from your mythological evolutionary change?

OLAADEGBU:


And what biological organism is excluded from your mythological evolutionary change?

I asked a question first.

OLAADEGBU:


I know that in your weird and bizarre thinking you will say that given enough time that is a possibility.

Quote where I said that or have you started lying again? I thought you had repented from lying? LMAO!

LordReed:


You are the one saying the earth is not millions of years old it's up to you to show that this shell proves you right.

We are talking about the age of the shell of the snail which your evolutionary "science textbook" teaches that it has been carbon dated to be 27,000 years old. Don't change the topic.

OLAADEGBU:


We are talking about the age of the shell of the snail which your evolutionary "science textbook" teaches that it has been carbon dated to be 27,000 years old. Don't change the topic.

Unless you have conducted your own test and able to prove it wrong and tell us the correct date, you are yet to make sense bwahahahah

LordReed:


Quote where I said that or have you started lying again? I thought you had repented from lying? LMAO!

Quote where I said you "said" or forever hold your peace. I was only referring to your crooked way of thinking.

OLAADEGBU:


Quote where I said you "said" or forever hold your peace. I was only referring to your crooked way of thinking.

Oh you read minds now, still a lie since you have no way of knowing my mind if I don't express it. Stop lying.

OLAADEGBU:


We are talking about the age of the shell of the snail which your evolutionary "science textbook" teaches that it has been carbon dated to be 27,000 years old. Don't change the topic.

No we are talking about the age of the earth which was what your post was about.

LordReed:


Oh you read minds now, still a lie since you have no way of knowing my mind if I don't express it. Stop lying.

Who said I cannot read atheists' minds? It is plain for all to see.

LordReed:


No we are talking about the age of the earth which was what your post was about.

You can't think crooked and walk straight.

OLAADEGBU:


Who said I cannot read atheists' minds? It is plain for all to see.

OLAADEGBU:


You can't think crooked and walk straight.

Stop lying.