Maynman:


Exactly 😁

So if you say Darwin provided fossil evidence, show me that he did.

Maynman:


You said nothing, Philosopher means lover of wisdow. He was a physicists.

He just woke up one day and made a blank statement, i see.

So show me the evidence Hawking provided for hawking radiation.

I am still waiting

Workch:
So if you say Darwin provided fossil evidence, show me the he did.

Show me that he did not, absence of evidence is not evidence of absent abi

Workch:
So show me the evidence Hawking provided for hawking radiation.

I am still waiting

So, He just woke up one day and made a blank statement, i see.

Maynman:


Show me that he did not, absence of evidence is not evidence of absent abi

does that also apply to God?

Workch:
you see why I said atheist are theists are different sides of same coin?
😂

Atheism is the opposite of theism, you don’t know? Bwahahahah

Maynman:


So, He just woke up one day and made a blank statement, i see.

If that's not the case, then show me evidence of him providing evidence

Workch:
does that also apply to God?

Which of the gods?

Maynman:

Atheism is the opposite of theism, you don’t know? Bwahahahah

of the same coin

Maynman:


Show me that he did not, absence of evidence is not evidence of absent abi

does this also apply to God?

Workch:
If that's not the case, then show me evidence of him providing evidence

If that is the case then show me how he woke up one day and made a blank statement calling it hypothesis.

Workch:
does this also apply to God?

Which of the gods?

Maynman:


Show me that he did not, absence of evidence is not evidence of absent abi

Dude, you shot yourself here 😂😂

Maynman:


Show me that he did not, absence of evidence is not evidence of absent abi

I really cannot believe that an atheist would be force to say this 😂

Workch:
I really cannot believe that an atheist would be force to say this 😂

I’m using your logic, is it only meant for theists?

Maynman:


Which of the gods?

atleast one of these Gods can exist since an absence of evidence is not evidence for absence according to you.
😂😂

Maynman:


I’m using your logic, is it only meant for theists?

Then use your logic to give me evidence that hawking provided evidence for hwaking radiation since you made the claim and he did.

Workch:
atleast one of these Gods can exist since an absence of evidence is not evidence for absence according to you.
😂😂

According to your logic too
You see how amusing the logic is?

Workch:
Then use your logic to give me evidence that hawking provided evidence for hwaking radiation since you made the claim and he did.

The start of this argument is you using that logic, then let’s start afresh, it seems you don’t even believe the logic, you cherrypick it when you need it

Maynman:

According to your logic too
You see how amusing the logic is?

So hawking didn't provide evidence for hwaking radiation.

Good to know that we are on the same page

Workch:
So hawking didn't provide evidence for hwaking radiation.

Good to know that we are on the same page

He did.

Maynman:


The start of this argument is you using that logic, then let’s start afresh, it seems you don’t even believe the logic, you cherrypick it when you need it

So you have no evidence of Darwin using fossils as evidence.

I am right when say that Atheism is not really different from theism. But have no evidence for anything they claim

Workch:
So you have no evidence of Darwin using fossils as evidence.

I am right when say that Atheism is not really different from theism. But have no evidence for anything they claim

So you have no evidence for your “deistic god”?

Agnostics are hypocrite oo

Maynman:

He did.

I have proven to you that both ahtiestd and theists will not provide evidence for their claims when questioned.

It's what you re doing

Workch:
I have proven to you that both ahtiestd and theists will not provide evidence for their claims when questioned.

It's what you re doing

And i have proven to you that agnostics cherry pick when they use their logic.

Maynman:


So you have no evidence for your “deistic god”?

Agnostics are hypocrite oo

this was after Darwin, show me in the original paper, origin of species where darwin presrned fossil evidence.

If you show me, I will believe you

Workch:
this was after Darwin, show me in the original paper, origin of species where darwin presrned fossil evidence.

If you show me, I will believe you

Don’t “believe” me.
Read slowly.

Maynman:


And i have proven to you that agnostics cherry pick when they use their logic.

If you show me evidence of Darwin using fossil to explain evolution in his paper, I will believe you.

Show me

Workch:
If you show me evidence of Darwin using fossil to explain evolution in his paper, I will believe you.

Show me

Don’t believe me.
What year was fossils discovered again?

Maynman:

Don’t “believe” me.
Read slowly.

is that from Darwins paper? On the origin of species?

If you point to anywhere on Darwin paper, where he used fossil evidence to demonstrate evolution, I will believe you.

I'm willing to change.

I can give you a link to download the paper

Maynman:


Don’t believe me.
What year was fossils discovered again?

should I share a link to download Darwins original paper so you can show me?

Workch:
is that from Darwins paper? On the origin of species?

If you point to anywhere on Darwin paper, where he used fossil evidence to demonstrate evolution, I will believe you.

I'm willing to change.

I can give you a link to download the paper

What year was fossils found?