toba:

i've answered/explained it already. Marriage is a legal institution in the eyes of the law hence this issue of raaappe in marriage hasnt been clearly prohibited or outlawed. but any kind of forceful penetration without the consent of one of the parties in a relationship which is not backed by law attracts a punishment. I think the jail term for rrrappe in Nigeria is not less than 11 years behind the bar. Im yet to see a married man jailed in Nigeria for rrraape

toba:

hmm u are enlarging the scope of the discourse by importing morality into it. Morality will lead us into asking many questions. Is it morally right for a wife to deny her husband $ex? will it be morally right for the husband to go look outside cos the wife had denied him his right unjustly?

[size=14pt]Good! Very clever to sidetrack the other Questions and Picked out Morality! Kudos!

Now Your questions are simple! It's wrong for a wife to deny her husband sex! And it is wrong for the husband to go look outside cos the wife has denied him sex!. . . Did i answer you?

Now, Back to topic! A woman is normally not in the mood all the time, Right or Wrong?
Should you as her husband understand why she is not in the mood or not?
Now can you justify rape, on the premise that a woman said she is not in the mood?
Now, after violating her, and she is in pains, do you hump her again, because you are in the mood?
You raped her last night, she is in tears, and obviously in serious pain, and ofcourse she is still your wife and should not deny you sex, right? Now again you demand to hump her in the morning and she says no, "i'm in pain" you violate her, cos she is you wife? SMH! And for the 10^th time. . . F[b]u[/b]ck the Law!
Is it every time a man is in the mood?
Can the woman also go outside for sex, if the man is not in the mood, or tired, at that particular point in time?
Is it Morally right, for a man who came back tired from work to DENY his wife sex? DUH! You didnt think it thoroughly then i see!

Pls answer my questions, i'm so loving this! [/size]

toba:

i've answered/explained it already. Marriage is a legal institution in the eyes of the law hence this issue of raaappe in marriage hasnt been clearly prohibited or outlawed. but any kind of forceful penetration without the consent of one of the parties in a relationship which is not backed by law attracts a punishment. I think the jail term for rrrappe in Nigeria is not less than 11 years behind the bar. Im yet to see a married man jailed in Nigeria for rrraape

sexsinners:

how can an ugly man like you get such a pretty girl

toba:

i've answered/explained it already. Marriage is a legal institution in the eyes of the law hence this issue of raaappe in marriage hasnt been clearly prohibited or outlawed. but any kind of forceful penetration without the consent of one of the parties in a relationship which is not backed by law attracts a punishment. I think the jail term for rrrappe in Nigeria is not less than 11 years behind the bar. Im yet to see a married man jailed in Nigeria for rrraape

[size=14pt]Hmm! Because it has not been clearly prohibited or outlawed, makes it right to [b]r[/b]ape a woman? And now, the law is forcibly against violence against women, but supports violation pertaining to sex? Why is the law contradictory? Now which is worse, hitting your wife's face or forcibly ra[b]p[/b]ing her? For the 11^th time, F[b]u[/b]ck the Law!

Hehehe! Married man jailed for violation? Hmm! Me sef neva see, and again, i'm yet to see a lot of men Jailed for Jailable offenses! Is the law ok at all? [/size]

Inked_Nerd:


Thank you! I really don't undersdtand why peopel are so daft when it comes to matters of sex and marriage.

No, it it not the same reason! You and many other men are the reason why this persists!

Thank you!!! Well said!

Who said anything about punishtment? Stop thinking with your pënis.


Where is this law that you all keep talking about?!?! Show it since apparently you all want to use the law as a means of justifying such a heinous act!!!

claremont:

Yes, a man can be guilty of r-aping his wife. I wonder why a man would go as far as r-aping his wife, when there are other women outside who are very willing to help him massage his loins; doesn't make any modicum of sense to me.

Progreen:

seeex in marriage can never be a violation or force.

ronkebp:

As long as the woman says NO!!!!!!!! foR whatever reason, and the man; carries her, removes her wrapper/ skirt/shorts by force and by fire, with the WOMAN still resisting, and the man forces her legs open and forces his thing into her,and restains her, pinning her to the ground or bed with all his might, then that is R.APE, whether MARRIED OR NOT.

Progreen:

seeex in marriage can never be a violation or force.

Progreen:

seeex in marriage can never be a violation or force.

claremont:

Yes, a man can be guilty of r-aping his wife. I wonder why a man would go as far as r-aping his wife, when there are other women outside who are very willing to help him massage his loins; doesn't make any modicum of sense to me.

Princek12:

A man can violation his wife if he forcibly penetrates her. My advice, however, is that every married man whose wife denies him sex should have a mistress. That way, once his wife says no to sex, rather than risk a charge of violation, that man should go and Be Intimate with his mistress. The woman will not claim violation, and the man will be happy. Shikenah!

Princek12:

A man can violation his wife if he forcibly penetrates her. My advice, however, is that every married man whose wife denies him sex should have a mistress. That way, once his wife says no to sex, rather than risk a charge of violation, that man should go and Be Intimate with his mistress. The woman will not claim violation, and the man will be happy. Shikenah!

[size=14pt]. . .Therefore, any woman whose husband denies her sex, with the "excuse" that he had a hectic day or he's tired or not in the mood, should also go outside and get satisfied. . . Hmm! Quite a helpful solution to the problem, and this in the long run would bring marital happiness!. . .





Rubbish!. . . [/size]

Spyker:

There is no violation in marriage in as much as the law is concern. Technically, it's like saying a man was violated by a woman even though it is possible, the law is silent on this issue. Lawyers in the house, hope i'm right?

Section 357 of The Criminal Code act (Nigerian laws Cap 38), applicable in the south of Nigeria, defines violation as: "Any person who has unlawful carnal knowledge of a woman or girl, without her consent, or with her consent, if the consent is obtained by force or by means of threats or intimidation of any kind, or by fear of harm, or by means of false and fraudulent representation as to the nature of the act, or in the case of a married woman, by personating her husband, is guilty of an offence which is called violation.

"unlawful carnal knowledge" means carnal connection which takes place otherwise than between husband and wife

Boyloaf:

hey! U small boi! U neva still grow up? Straffkills!

[size=14pt]SMH! Rantings of a M[b]A[/b]D Niger Delta Man!. . .

Next time you see matured minds, trying to have a discussion, or an exchange of ideas and you have nothing constructive or meaningful to contribute to the issue at hand, i suggest you keep your dirty trap of a mouth, SHUT! Hard as it may seem, but try so hard, to sit on your itchy fingers or betterstill, cut 'em off, to avoid you typing balderdash and hitting on the reply button! This is not your village beer Palour!. . .  [/size]