Chelseafan1:
Rumdeuter needed someone to argue with and you just obliged him... Smh

raumdeuter:


What is Mourinhos record vs this same Newcastle? Just this season they played 2-2 vs this same Newcastle.

Under Mourinho how did they fare

raumdeuter:
Traore 5-0
Thats how Chelsea should be handling lesser sides with authority not the fidgety Chelsea under Mourinho even when playing Bournemouth

GBR1:


Even based on previous seasons, Mourinho has had a terrible record against newcastle, that's a fact. But Newcastle aren't the only lesser team he has faced in the epl, and you it'll be treasonous to judge him based on his worst season ever. But again, maybe i'm expecting too much of reasoning from you, which obviously you might be incapable of.

CFCman:
PSG are in trouble on Tuesday!

raumdeuter:

Lets see who is the clown now
Who was Chelsea coach on December 5 2015 when Chelsea lost to Bournemouth
http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/34951749

GBR1:

Now you are sounding like a clown. Mourinho was consistent with beating these lower teams without having to park the bus, check his goals record in the epl. It's mostly the big games he sets up defensively and those are the games most people remember.

FFS Chelsea never played Bournemouth in the EPL with Mourinho in charge.

kokaneprodigy:

if Mourinho wasn't in charge against Bournemouth then who was? Since Hidink is yet to lose a game since he became the manager and Chelsea lost against Bournemouth.
Get ur facts right.

GBR1:

Look at the post you quoted . i said ''ever''. You cannot hold that against me. Even with my errors, i'm still far ahead of you, think about that for now.

kokaneprodigy:

if Mourinho wasn't in charge against Bournemouth then who was? Since Hidink is yet to lose a game since he became the manager and Chelsea lost against Bournemouth.
Get ur facts right.

raumdeuter:
Traore 5-0

Thats how Chelsea should be handling lesser sides with authority not the fidgety Chelsea under Mourinho even when playing Bournemouth

bigkesh:


You mean like 6-0 against Arsenal??

GBR1:

Show me where i said that, if you can read properly.

raumdeuter:


See his defence below and help me laugh



How can you make basic factual errors and claim to be ahead of anyone. Instead of apologising for the lie/error and going back to where you crawled out from you keep disgracing yourself further

kokaneprodigy:

When I quoted u it was never You then changed it to ever later, check what I quoted.
To you does "ever" even make sense there? ur denial is appalling dude. You goofed accept and we'll forgive u.

raumdeuter:


I mean the way Chelsea was struggling vs smaller sides this season

GBR1:

It would have been a factual error if i said "never" but i didn't, so now i could claim i meant otherwise so why should i apologize for an error that didn't even occur. You saw and read what you wanted to see. I didn't even have to edit the post, you quoted it.Obviously i was wrong, but you don't admit errors with raumdeter. I have followed the league for a long and can't ever remember Bournemouth playing in the EPL until this season, but i forgot Chelsea had already faced them earlier this season with Mourinho in charge.

nonsoroyalty:
dude u edited ur post it was never when i saw it just accept ur error and lets move on

raumdeuter:
Traore 5-0

Thats how Chelsea should be handling lesser sides with authority not the fidgety Chelsea under Mourinho even when playing Bournemouth

GBR1:

It would have been a factual error if i said "never" but i didn't, so now i could claim i meant otherwise so why should i apologize for an error that didn't even occur. You saw and read what you wanted to see. I didn't even have to edit the post, you quoted it.Obviously i was wrong, but you don't admit errors with raumdeter and he quoted a different post. I have followed the league for a very long time and can't ever remember Bournemouth playing in the EPL until this season, but i forgot Chelsea had already faced them earlier this season with Mourinho in charge.

GBR1:

and raumdeter quoted the wrong post

raumdeuter:


So what does that mean? Does that mean you didnt post "never"?

Or why was I the one who posted a link to correct you?

Instead of admitting you dont really know much about football or have forgotten a lot. you keep disgracing yourself

Tell us what "ever" in the sentence mean?

hensben:
I always concur with you on this issue. This you said was my main reason I want mou out.

raumdeuter:


Against top teams you can be conservative but vs small teams you enter them fully

GBR1:

This is what you should have asked initially before quoting the wrong post.

GBR1:
Obviously i was wrong, but you don't admit errors with raumdeter and he quoted a different post. I have followed the league for a very long time and can't ever remember Bournemouth playing in the EPL until this season, but i forgot Chelsea had already faced them earlier this season with Mourinho in charge.

GBR1:

Can you post stats to support this claim of yours?

raumdeuter:


I know say na you like his post. Without confirming what he wrote

Tell us in Public. Did Mourinho ever play Bournemouth? SHey na so Archi students dey jump go like posts without confirming

bigkesh:
Fabregas can find Adam Johnson a girl over 16

Chestar5:
.... We should have just reserve some goals for psg

raumdeuter:
Former England midfielder Jamie Redknapp has suggested that the Chelsea winger's below-par campaign means that he would not fetch a significant fee in the transfer market

Former Tottenham and Liverpool midfielder Jamie Redknapp believes that Eden Hazard's disappointing 2015-16 campaign means clubs wouldn't even be willing to pay £15 million for him.

"This year you think 'you probably wouldn't pay £15m-£20m for him'. That's how quickly things can change. He is a top-class player but we want to see it out on the pitch."

See Ikedia life