Genesis 2:9 And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the middle of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.


From the above Bible verse, God by this statement:

"the tree of life also in the middle of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil",

created the sense of MORALITY.

By this sense, man will know what is GOOD (obeying God) and what is EVIL (disobeying God).

But this ridiculous God of theists went forward to issue MORALITY commandment to a man that he didn't give SENSE OF MORALITY to.

Genesis 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, you shall not eat of it: for in the day that you eat thereof you shall surely die.


The question to the theists therefore is this:

Since God didn't CREATE SENSE OF MORALITY IN MAN, how does God INTEND that man, WILL be able to OBEY OR DISOBEY him?

Since the SENSE of OBEDIENCE or DISOBEDIENCE is a FUNCTION of MORALITY sense.

Cc: doctorAlien
Shadeyinka
All theists.

akintom:
Genesis 2:9 And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the middle of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.


From the above Bible verse, God by this statement:

"the tree of life also in the middle of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil",

created the sense of MORALITY.

By this sense, man will know what is GOOD (obeying God) and what is EVIL (disobeying God).

But this ridiculous God of theists went forward to issue MORALITY commandment to a man that he didn't give SENSE OF MORALITY to.

Genesis 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, you shall not eat of it: for in the day that you eat thereof you shall surely die.


The question to the theists therefore is this:

Since God didn't CREATE SENSE OF MORALITY IN MAN, how does God INTEND that man, WILL be able to OBEY OR DISOBEY him?

Since the SENSE of OBEDIENCE or DISOBEDIENCE is a FUNCTION of MORALITY sense.

Cc: doctorAlien
Shadeyinka

Do you in the first place believe that God exists?

Why are you then asking questions about God and God's word? Somebody who doesnt exist to you?

Power of 'choice' is the most powerful gift that he gave man...

felixomor:



Do you in the first place believe that God exists?

Why are you then asking questions about God and God's word? Somebody who doesnt exist to you?

Good to hear from you Felixomor. I hope you wouldn't get ridiculous yourself, along the discuss this time?

The purpose of my writing is to help as many as possible to WAKE UP from the drudgery of religious jokes overdose.

Your God doesn't exist, am simply bursting the claim of you his children, that God exist.

felixomor:



Do you in the first place believe that God exists?

Why are you then asking questions about God and God's word? Somebody who doesnt exist to you?

This guy know how to evade questions he can't answer

talktonase:
Power of 'choice' is the most powerful gift that he gave man...

Read the thread well.

your God didn't give that power. Yet your God wants man to exercise the power, he didn't give.

Isn't that a joke?

akintom:



Good to hear from you Felixomor. I hope you wouldn't get ridiculous yourself, along the discuss this time?

The purpose of my writing is to help as many as possible to WAKE UP from the drudgery of religious jokes overdose.

Your God doesn't exist, am simply bursting the claim of you his children, that God exist.

The bolded statement already shows ur bias behind ur question.
So u dont deserve any answers.
Sorry!
And by the way is this the type of bias "science" taught u?

In other words "why convict them of evil, when by default they have no knowledge of good and evil"?

GRIMMJOE:
This guy know how to evade questions he can't answer

Says the person who just evaded a simple question.
Yeah right

felixomor:


The bolded statement already shows ur bias behind ur question.
So u dont deserve any answers.
Sorry!
And by the way is this the type of bias "science" taught u?

Stop attacking the messenger.
You like 'ad hominems'

talktonase:
Power of 'choice' is the most powerful gift that he gave man...

You gave a baby a knife to play with and said its his choice to cut his self or not.

DeSepiero:


Stop attacking the messenger.
You like 'ad hominems'

Abeg where is the "attack"?

He claims to be a scientist like me and i simply pointed out the bias in his question.

Where is the attack?

GRIMMJOE:
This guy know how to evade questions he can't answer

Can you prove to me that your God exists?

I have over time prove to that your God doesn't exist through the very story book (Bible) or other traditional ideologies, that introduced God to the world of men.

Without bible and traditional religious ideologies, God would not have been known to man.

If i ask you, "do you believe "Fks" exist"?. It doesn't make any sense to you.

But if "Fks" replaces "God", you will believe. That is the childishness in religious beliefs.

GRIMMJOE:
This guy know how to evade questions he can't answer

DeSepiero:

Stop attacking the messenger.
You like 'ad hominems'

that guy's one massive joke

he just attempts to derail threads, any thread by atheists

he would make it a personal thing in his pathetic attempt

there was a thread like that few days back, he kept derailing with his personal attacks, I jumped in and said he's right, we are everything he called us and more; I then told him to address the OP; suddenly he became as useful as his god is in my life; he had to leave the thread

felixomor:


Abeg where is the "attack"?

He claims to be a scientist like me and i simply pointed out the bias in his question.

Where is the attack?

You're appealing to his belief rather than addressing the substance of his argument or refutting his claim.
Now that's Argumentum ad Hominem!

felixomor:


The bolded statement already shows ur bias behind ur question.
So u dont deserve any answers.
Sorry!
And by the way is this the type of bias "science" taught u?

It's either you're a Pseudoscientist or you're no scientist at all. Just as you religious folks claim everything, except ONE rational thing.

If you were scientist, you would have pointed out my bias, and do a disprove Scientifically.

Rather than taking your usual and familiar road to escape into your religious coven.

akintom:


It's either you're a Pseudoscientist or you're no scientist at all. Just as you religious folks claim everything, except ONE rational thing.

If you were scientist, you would have pointed out my bias, and do a disprove Scientifically.

Rather than taking your usual and familiar road to escape into your religious coven.

Of course, i dont expect u to see ur bias.
U r asking a question, yet ur conclusion is already boldly written.
"Scientific" indeed.

Dis/obedience can exist outside morality. For example, Laws and instructions. Most of them provide provide procedures and instructions.

The two had instructions. Do not eat of it.... to help them survive. The same way you buy your phone or t.v with instructions.

I believe that God exists and he is the creator of the whole universe based on faith.

keep disturbing ya brains arguing what is beyond your intelligence.

DeSepiero:


You're appealing to his belief rather than addressing the substance of his argument or refutting his claim.
Now that's Argumentum ad Hominem!

Sorry, u r wrong.
Scientists ask questions and investigate before arriving at conclusions.
He already has a conclusion before his question.
That in itself is a bias.
And thats the point.

felixomor:


Of course, i dont expect u to see ur bias.
U r asking a question, yet ur conclusion is already boldly written.
"Scientific" indeed.

If you can't debate the thread, you will do better to stop filling the page with your irrelevant gist.

Conclusion can be rubbished with superior evidence. Just as i am rubbishing the conclusions of Bible and its believers.

This is what you can't attempt. Your limitations are blindly seeable.

felixomor:


Sorry, u r wrong.
Scientists ask questions and investigate before arriving at conclusions.
He already has a conclusion before his question.
That in itself is a bias.
And thats the point.

Wait! What am I wrong about? You think I'm wrong by saying that you committed argumentum ad hominem? Did you not appeal to his belief rather than tackle the subject of his discuss?

hopefulLandlord:





that guy's one massive joke

he just attempts to derail threads, any thread by atheists

he would make it a personal thing in his pathetic attempt

,......,...............

Says the person who is on virtually every religious thread seeking miracle for amputee growing limbs

Yeah right!

DeSepiero:


Wait! What am I wrong about? You think I'm wrong by saying that you committed argumentum ad hominem? Did you not appeal to his belief rather than tackle the subject of his discuss?

U dont still get it.
His subject is not valid.
Simpu

Another militant atheist on the lose

akintom:


If you can't debate the thread, you will do better to stop filling the page with your irrelevant gist.

Conclusion can be rubbished with superior evidence. Just as i am rubbishing the conclusions of Bible and its believers.

This is what you can't attempt. Your limitations are blindly seeable.

Of course, No reasonable person debates an invalid proposition.

akintom:
Genesis 2:9 And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the middle of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.


From the above Bible verse, God by this statement:

"the tree of life also in the middle of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil",

created the sense of MORALITY.

By this sense, man will know what is GOOD (obeying God) and what is EVIL (disobeying God).

But this ridiculous God of theists went forward to issue MORALITY commandment to a man that he didn't give SENSE OF MORALITY to.

Genesis 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, you shall not eat of it: for in the day that you eat thereof you shall surely die.


The question to the theists therefore is this:

Since God didn't CREATE SENSE OF MORALITY IN MAN, how does God INTEND that man, WILL be able to OBEY OR DISOBEY him?

Since the SENSE of OBEDIENCE or DISOBEDIENCE is a FUNCTION of MORALITY sense.

Cc: doctorAlien
Shadeyinka
All theists.

Can you do us a favour and stop opening threads and spewing thrash ?

felixomor:


U dont still get it.
His subject is not valid.
Simpu

So do you have an answer as to why Adam and Eve were blamed for doing something 'bad' when they have no prior knowledge of good and evil?

felixomor:


Sorry, u r wrong.
Scientists ask questions and investigate before arriving at conclusions.
He already has a conclusion before his question.
That in itself is a bias.
And thats the point.

Now i know for sure that you are a confirmed Pseudoscientist.

Let me educate you and your likes on this platform.

Scientists don't ask questions in vacuum, questions arise from existing conclusions or assumed conclusions.

Eg

Christians gave me an "assumed conclusion" that God exists.


I took that conclusion to both virtual laboratory of BIBLE and LOGIC, in both labs, the conclusion failed the test of VERACITY.

In my thread, without introducing my research question, there's no way my readers will understand my conclusion.

Do you now understand? Felixomor.

DeSepiero:


So do you have an answer as to why Adam and Eve were blamed for doing something 'bad' when they have no prior knowledge of good and evil?

Thanks for helping felixomor limitations.

This is what i expect him and his likes to disprove with superior logical conclusions.

They can't, that i know for sure.

akintom:


Now i know for sure that you are a confirmed Pseudoscientist.

Let me educate you and your likes on this platform.

Scientists don't ask questions in vacuum, questions arise from existing conclusions or assumed conclusions.

Eg

.......................,.

Wrong again.
Science never does that. Sorry.
In short, thats what science is against.

felixomor:

Wrong again. Science never does that. Sorry. In short, thats what science is against.

Let's have what your type do then.