Ema prince:

mou snubbed old trashford because of the intensity of chelsea's interest.

meanwhile..the presence and clueless tactic of benitez made this season a torture to me

I know its gonna be an exhilarating 2013/2014 season for the back to back winners..RECORD BREAKERS!!!

Afam4eva: Why do we just like arguing over nothing. No local even is more important or prestigious than an international event. The premiership is a competition for clubs in England while Europa is for clubs in Europe, so common sense should suggest that the one that involves European clubs is more important. Even if there's a third-tier European competition it would still be more important than the premiership. A vice president is more important than a governor. A deputy governor is more important than a local government chairman etc etc.

try69:

I would av been more happy winning a european title bruv

gabito2: A̶̲̥̅я̩̥ε̲̣̣̣̥ Ʊ guys mad? H☺ώ can you compare europa cup to a domestic cup, d money no be d same sef, domestic Ȋ̝̊̅§ domestic, international Ȋ̝̊̅§ international, when man Ʊ wey disgraced last seasoopin to europa, they were further disgraced by basel home and away, just imagine, and chelsea finished basel, stop all d stupid mentality and say d truth, chelsea achieved more dis season

Willgates:

I'l certainly choose d europa ova n over again...reason being dat d EPL aint realy dat tense esp.wen d tournament z approaching itz end n a team z leading d table wit a gud margin as compared to d former. [my thoughts tho]

Afam4eva:
A Nigerian senator earns more than Barack Obama. Are they more than the American president? Put your thinking cap on. The prize money has nothing to do with it.

Willgates:

I'l certainly choose d europa ova n over again...reason being dat d EPL aint realy dat tense esp.wen d tournament z approaching itz end n a team z leading d table wit a gud margin as compared to d former. [my thoughts tho]

kcjazz: Winning the europa is like my son failing his class and been demoted to a lower class and then he takes first position.
It is good for his spirrit but bad for my pocket. Man utd had a better season and financially it pays more to win the league than the europa.

kcjazz: Winning the europa is like my son failing his class and been demoted to a lower class and then he takes first position.
It is good for his spirrit but bad for my pocket. Man utd had a better season and financially it pays more to win the league than the europa.

Rehnoy: Retard! so chesick needed somebody who would go to war anytime he gets beaten by a better team Answer me.

daylae: i don't follow. . . take a long sigh,and come again?

daylae: Then are you saying clubs like barcelona,madrid,juve e.t.c had done well in european competitions than chelsea did? Because chelsea only won the "loser's throphy" while the aforementioned were close to winning the CL? Do you realise chelsea 'll deservely play whoever clinge the CL later? Clubs like man u,barca,and madrid would have love to do that even as europa champion.

obigin43: why is it so difficult for some people to face the reality and say the simple fact for once
Chelsea and Man U played 5 times out of it Man U won just 1 chelsea won 3 and draw one
is this not enough reason for u to know that chelsea is better of Man U for this season
and come to think of it chelsea played more games than any premiership club this season
and for ur info.europa is bigger and more recognize than any domestic cup
for those that calling europa a loser if i may ask hv u ever seen loser with a trophy
cos if u think it is a loser cup remember that man u,madrid and barca have been in loser compution b4
if u can remember chelsea won maldrid 2-i to win their first European cup in 1971
if u re in doubt ask google.

aaronson: For sure I understand man u fans are hating but they all should go sit at old trafford and wait for chelsea to give a finger in the middle,chelseafc won the second most prestigious cup in club football,matter of fact we too ambitious for bigger dreams than settling for a local cup....This simply means man u is famous locally but chelsea is respected globally.

Kunlegzy: so d logistics put in place by the clubs do not need to be refunded by UEFA, oh i forgot the competition is free for the teams participating, lolz. we need to see chelsea doing parade with their prestigious europa cup. hahahhah

Kunlegzy: even with relegating team in the premierleague, the tv right is five times higher than the price money and tv right of europa winner like chelse. check out this link: http://www.financialexpress.com/news/manchester-united-top-table-for-premier-league-tv-earnings/1118680

daylae: bullocks! Man u wanted someone who would't mind reporting to fergie,while he continually be his protege. Jose does not belong to such class!

Rehnoy: let them read it here... Soccer champions Manchester United topped the table
for English Premier League television income in
2012-13, raking in almost 61 million pounds ($93
million) in the final year of the current three-year
contract, the League said on Tuesday.
Relegated Queens Park Rangers, owned by Malaysian
airline boss Tony Fernandes, received almost 40 million
pounds, the lowest figure among the 20 clubs.
Television income will climb further next season after
telecoms company BT entered the British market,
taking a share of live rights alongside pay TV operator
BSkyB. BT has replaced U.S. company ESPN as the
second broadcaster in Britain.i pray they read oooh. u know u can seperate somethings from chelsea fc and there re fans. lolz
The Premier League has also secured enhanced
overseas rights deals and revenue from television is
expected to rise to around 5.5 billion pounds over the
next three years, from around 3 billion pounds.
The differences in payments between clubs reflect
where they finished in the league and also how many
times their matches were screened live in Britain.

hotwax: LOL. Local league is better than International.
Boring referee deciding EPL is better than Champions league. Is this what Manu fans are saying ?