Vieira:

JustMoi, the point were your argument falls down is the fact than Mankind's past has followed the example of the hens moreso than your examples.

Look at the history of humans and you'll see that polygamous behaviour among the men in the past is well established as oppossed to polygamous behaviour among the women.

New technologies, such as DNA testing, have given us insight into female sexual behavior in the wild that was once only guessed about, and guessed about quite incorrectly ,  And we see that being the alpha male may not be what it's cracked up to be,

", four of the males in the chimp community were dominant during the study period, but two of them fathered no offspring (within the group) while dominant. So much for the notion that dominance is necessarily coupled with high reproductive output, " 3

And we see that sexual loyalty to a mate is no more natural in females than in males:

"In fact, fidelity is a phenomenon that seems to occur only when males can impose it on females, either directly through their greater social power or brute force, or indirectly through controlling the resources that females and their offspring require. In sexually egalitarian societies like those of bonobos and marquis, females have both less fear from males and more equal access to resources than do most other female primates.[color=#006600][/color] The fact that the most liberal attitudes toward human sexuality are found in societies where women have similarly independent social status and economic means is entirely consistent with the broader patterns across primates" 2

Vieira:

another point:

why are so many women answering this question on behalf of men?

No ladies should pretend to know what a man feels or is capable of.

Mystique:

I was in love wit a guy once,

***Coupla years back***

k what happened, did the scales fall off his eyes??

manakins:

This thread is amusing with the amount of
response and most people defining love in their
own ways.
I wish to say there is no definition for Love.It all depends on individuals perspective as
in how you want it although the society has made it look live LOVE is a sacred thing like
SEX use to be.

How many of us really understand LOVE?
How many people can actually LOVE in totality?
I conclude the word love is to big so don't even contemplate it because
LOVE = HATE
which is not suppose to be
While
FREINDSHIP = PARTNERS
b/because there is room to figth and make up.
So i conclusievely say that a man can love a woman and still cheat on her while if she finds out that love should see them through which in most cases it tunrs to hate while in friendship there is a better understanding and most likehood to make peace.
PLEASE EDUCATE THEM MORE I HAD TO LEAVE THE FORUM WHEN I FOUND OUT THEY WERE NOT REASONING LIKE I DO , YOU CANNOT BE PAROCHIAL IN YOUR VIEW OF LOVE , LOVE IS ONE THANG THAT HASN'T GOT ONE DEFINITION AND LOVE IS NOT SEX! SO STOP USING SEX TO DEFINE LOVE , IS LIKE SAYING CAN A MAN LOVE A WOMAN AND STILL SHOUT AT HER,YELL AT HER , BEAT HER, QUARREL ETC