felixomor:


Go and read about the snails that were found to be 27,000 years old using carbon dating.
It was a very Popular story.
Because it seems you are not aware of such.
You are just busy appealing to authority up and down.


Not only is Carbon dating flawed.
It can be nonsense.
Also read about the story of "the london hammer"
......
Educate yourself man.

buffalowings:


seriously
I hate lies

check this link
https://bible.org/seriespage/4-elisha-and-two-bears-2-kings-223-25?_e_pi_=7%2CPAGE_ID10%2C2146432488

it is inconceivable that in that link, the writer is trying to justify the maulings

just to show you how sick this writer is, he was trying to refute the claim they were kids but young men

then I begin to wonder, does it matter if they weren't kids

a life is a life.. a child's life is not worth more than an adult or a youth



there are some portions in the Bible that doesn't sit well with me








2 Kings 2:23–2423 He went up from there to Bethel, and while he was going up on the way, some small boys came out of the city and jeered at him, saying, “Go up, you baldhead! Go up, you baldhead!”24 And he turned around, and when he saw them,che cursed them in the name of theLord. And two she-bears came out of the woods and tore forty-two of the boys.

CatfishBilly:

Shey you see?
Stop reading your news from Christian apologist websites.
Here you go, you can thank me later
http://paleo.cc/paluxy/hammer.htm

felixomor:

Fallacy of appeal to authority....

felixomor:


I pity you.
"London hammer" is even on wikipedia.
Go and learn.

Junia:

You tell your son to buy you sonething.

He didn't go.

You punished Him

Whats wrong with that ?

CatfishBilly:

Shey you see where they write for there say na Christian creationist that bought the hammer?
He has refused to release it for independent verification by different groups of scientists. The age being quoted is the age of the rock it was found in because he refused to release it for verifications.
Don't be biased bro.

cooncudee:


Lol, was that the bone of contention?
Let me remind you

Did god forcefully interfered with peoples lifes in the bible? regardly if they are its 'offsprings/creations' or not?

felixomor:


Guy, your descent is complete.
Your argument is very dead.
I thought ur argument was on "Christian website only"

Please show some integrity for yourself.

What about the 27,000 year old snails nko?
I pirry u

CatfishBilly:

Okay then, we have settled the hammer issue
I'll get back to you on the snails.

felixomor:


Sorry.
The London Hammer is in a Museum as we speak.
It has been analysed by many scientists.
You lied BiGLY

CatfishBilly:

It's in a museum so that creationists like your self can masturbateeeee yourselves into a coma while viewing it and at the same time shielding it from the scientific community who will render his claims invalid.
As for your snails.
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD011_3.html
http://evolutionwiki.org/wiki/Living_snails_were_C14_dated_at_2,300_and_27,000_years_old
Read up bro, that's what doctors do.

Junia:

No .. He just called His children to do things for Him.

felixomor:

Firstly, many intelligent scientists are creationists.
But your brain thinks that once you are a creationist, it means you are not scientific. Wrong

You have been dragged massively to the extent that your logic is failing you.
I thought u just said the man who bought it failed to release it for verification.

You Lied Again.....
Wikipedia even has the names of at least 2 scientists who analyzed it.....

Again I pirry u.
The funniest part is after you are exposed, u start saying "doctor this, doctor that"...
Mschewww.....

However, for years Baugh refused to allow the hammer to be C14 dated. In an exchange of letters between creationist Walter Brown and Jim Lippard in Creation/Evolution, Brown (1989) suggested that the hammer handle has not been dated because Baugh had three "understandable" conditions for dating it: that it be done with mass spectrometry, that Baugh be present during the dating, and that someone else pay for it. However, Lippard countered that no one has objected to the first two conditions, and that Baugh had no right to expect the third, since he's the one making the claims, and thus the one obligated to back them up. Even so, even after others offered to pay for the dating, Baugh declined to have it done. As Day (1991) wrote in a follow up letter: "Far from being 'understandable,' Baugh's stipulations seem to be little short of evasive tactics... If four years have gone by and nothing has happened, I think it is safe to conclude that Baugh has no interest whatsoever in determining the truth about his marvelous hammer."

realmindz:


of course you are right...it is easy to scream fuuuuls fuuuls most especially when you are out of ideas and incapable to think

CatfishBilly:

You and who is dragging? I've been posting links here that you've not done anything to refute.

That's from the link I posted. A research article.

Oya debunk my snail story.

CatfishBilly:

Shey you see?
Stop reading your news from Christian apologist websites.
Here you go, you can thank me later
http://paleo.cc/paluxy/hammer.htm

felixomor:


What is your problem with appealing to authority that you are always doing?

Do you know how many people who studied that Hammer before it was bought by Baugh?
Guy just leave,
You know nothing about carbon dating.
Admit.

CatfishBilly:

Refute it naa, bros. That's all I ask of you.
Stop with the ad hominem and pointing out fallacies, just refute them.

adepeter26:
Two NL peeps I don't ve much conversation with are
1) Jù.nia
2) Felix

felixomor:


What is to be refuted?

That u failed to admit that a hammer was found, dated, analyzed by a scientific work, and even the scientists were even mentioned on Wikipedia...
Because the fact doesnt sit with your agenda, u started argument here and there.

At first, u said it was only on Christian website
Then you switched lanes
Now you are telling me to refute your points....

Mscheeeewwww.
The funny part is you never even knew about these things before coming to this thread.
Abeg move jor.

J.R. Cole states: "The stone is real, and it looks impressive to someone unfamiliar with geological processes. How could a modern artifact be stuck in Ordovician rock? The answer is that the concretion itself is not Ordovician. Minerals in solution can harden around an intrusive object dropped in a crack or simply left on the ground if the source rock (in this case, reportedly Ordovician) is chemically soluble."

CatfishBilly:

Shey you see?
Stop reading your news from Christian apologist websites.
Here you go, you can thank me later
http://paleo.cc/paluxy/hammer.htm

Junia:

I don't know whats wrong with you.
We have adressed this topic.
We didnt say the earth is 6000 years old.

Can science proof the first day of the earth with evidence.

Can science proof the formation of fussel fuel with evidence.

Who was the first first scientist to see how fussel fuel came about.

You think you have done something. You just raise topics you can't even tackle yourself

CatfishBilly:

Which scientists I've asked you again.
This is a quote from a scientist in the article and THE ONLY scientist quote.

Make I no add poor reading comprehension to your list of problems.



I don't have to know about them. You lied and I debunked them easily.

felixomor:


Go and read about the snails that were found to be 27,000 years old using carbon dating.
It was a very Popular story.
Because it seems you are not aware of such.
You are just busy appealing to authority up and down.


Not only is Carbon dating flawed.
It can be nonsense.
Also read about the story of "the london hammer"
......
Educate yourself man.

felixomor:


I guess you didnt see "the stone is real"

Or its pretence on your part as usual.

Its now even obvious that u dont even understand the story.
U dont even know why the hammer is a mystery.
Just leave here mehn.
This is a big goof

CatfishBilly:

Sure, stone is real, hammer is real, did you read about how the hammer got into the rock in the same quote or you have selective blindness?

CatfishBilly:

Sure, stone is real, hammer is real, did you read about how the hammer got into the rock in the same quote or you have selective blindness?

felixomor:


Keep quiet please. Stop insulting your ignorance
Thats just one of the ways they thought it happened.
But its a scientific impossibility.

Because the age of the carbon dating of the rock automatically makes it impossible.

And even if it is correct, it means carbon dating is flawed because that rock is younger than the estimated age of the hammer.

You see that You have just been fooling yourself.
You thought it was the carbon dating of the hammer that was the secret.

CatfishBilly:

Nigga how many times am I going to tell you that what was dated was the rock, Baugh refused to release the hammer to anybody that would verify his claims.
He stored it in his own museum where he wankssss to it 5 times daily.
Do you know that his fellow creationists like Answer in Genesis hate him because of that?
They say he has muddled the water for everybody and made creationism a joke.
Read, man